Abstract
The rapid urbanization growth has not only improved the living standards of people but also raised concerns for environmental sustainability over the globe. In this regard, the issue of excessive urban concentration or over-agglomeration in metropolitan areas is nowadays the prime concern for urban planning and building energy-efficient and eco-friendly infrastructures. In response to rising interest in the dynamic linkage between urban concentration and environment, the current research empirically examines the crucial nexus between urban agglomerations and environmental degradation in top ten urban agglomerated countries in the world from 1960Q1 to 2014Q4. The current research is the pioneer empirical work in the area of urbanization by applying recently developed and innovative methods of quantile-on-quantile (QQ) approach and quantile Granger causality in relatively less explored area of urban agglomeration at the cross-country level. Our mainstream findings indicate that urban agglomeration has a strong positive effect on CO2 emissions in most of our sample countries, and this effect is more pronounced in higher quantiles of respective variables. These results imply that excessive levels of urban concentration in big cities cause environmental degradation, which could be attributed to extreme population density, overcrowding, traffic congestion and extensive demand for energy consumption. However, some countries such as Israel, Paraguay and Columbia exhibit overall declining and negative trends about the relationship between urban agglomerations and CO2 emissions. Moreover, quantile Granger causality results confirm the previous findings of QQ regression and verify the existence of bidirectional causal nexus between urban agglomerations and CO2 emissions in the majority of the lower, middle and upper quantiles in our selected top ten countries except for Kuwait. However, the unidirectional causal relationship also exists for several countries for extreme lower, middle and extremely higher quantiles. Our findings extend the previous work on agglomeration-environment nexus by determining the asymmetric magnitude of linkage between these two variables demanding cautious and individual-focused policies for urban planning and environmental sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in (Open Science Framework) repository, (https://osf.io/bp37n/quickfiles).
Notes
References
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Ali S (2019) Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis air quality. Atmosphere Health 12:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00711-x
Ali R, Bakhsh K, Yasin MA (2019) Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economy: evidence from Pakistan. Sustain Cities Soc 48:101553
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79:621–644
Arain H, Han L, Sharif A, Meo MS (2019) Investigating the effect of inbound tourism on FDI: the importance of quantile estimations. Tour Econ. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816619859695
Arvin MB, Pradhan RP, Norman NR (2015) Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries. Util Policy 35:50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.07.003
Bai Y, Deng X, Gibson J, Zhao Z, Xu H (2019) How does urbanization affect residential CO2 emissions? An analysis on urban agglomerations of China. J Clean Prod 209:876–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.248
Behera SR, Dash DP (2017) The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.201
Bekhet HA, Othman NS (2017) Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: evidence from the dynamic relationship. J Clean Prod 154:374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.174
Bekhet HA, Othman NS, Yasmin T (2020) Interaction between environmental kuznet curve and urban environment transition hypotheses in Malaysia Int J Energy Econ Policy 10:384–402
Bibri SE (2019) Toward the integration of the data-driven city, the eco-city and the compact city: constructing a future vision of the smart sustainable city. In: Big data science and analytics for smart sustainable urbanism. Springer, pp. 315–337
Burton E, Jenks M, Williams K (2003) The compact city: a sustainable urban form? Routledge,
Calderón S, Alvarez AC, Loboguerrero AM, Arango S, Calvin K, Kober T, Daenzer K, Fisher-vanden K (2016) Achieving CO2 reductions in Colombia: effects of carbon taxes and abatement targets. Energy Econ 56:575–586
Chang BH, Sharif A, Aman A, Suki NM, Salman A, Khan SAR (2020) The asymmetric effects of oil price on sectoral Islamic stocks: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach Res Policy 65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101571, 65
Chen S, Jin H, Lu Y (2019) Impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions and energy consumption structure: a panel data analysis for Chinese prefecture-level cities. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 49:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.009
Deshpande A, Mishra P (2007) Urbanization, air pollution and human health. J Environ Res Dev:1
Dieleman F, Wegener M (2004) Compact city and urban sprawl. Built Environ 30:308–323
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213
Du WC, Xia XH (2018) How does urbanization affect GHG emissions? A cross-country panel threshold data analysis. Applied Energy 229:872–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.050
Ewing JA (2017) Hollow ecology: ecological modernization theory and the death of nature. J World-Syst Res 23:126–155. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2017.611
Galadima MD, Aminu AW (2019) Nonlinear unit root and nonlinear causality in natural gas-economic growth nexus: evidence from Nigeria Energy:116415
Gren A, Colding J, Berghauser-Pont M, Marcus L (2019) How smart is smart growth? Examining the environmental validation behind city compaction. Ambio 48:580–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1087-y
He Z, Xu S, Shen W, Long R, Chen H (2017a) Impact of urbanization on energy related CO2 emission at different development levels: regional difference in China based on panel estimation. J Clean Prod 140:1719–1730
He Z, Xu S, Shen W, Long R, Chen H (2017b) Impact of urbanization on energy related CO2 emission at different development levels: regional difference in China based on panel estimation. J Clean Prod 140:1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.155
IMF (2019) World Economic Outlook Database Washington DC: International Monetary Fund
Kahn ME (2010) New evidence on trends in the cost of urban agglomeration. In: Agglomeration economics. University of Chicago Press, pp. 339–354
Kaya A, Koc M (2019) Over-agglomeration and its effects on sustainable development: a case study on Istanbul Sustainability 11:135
Khan I, Khan N, Yaqub A, Sabir M (2019) An empirical investigation of the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:9099–9112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04342-8
Khoshnevis Yazdi S, Dariani AG (2019) CO2 emissions, urbanisation and economic growth: evidence from Asian countries. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 32:510–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2018.1556107
Li K, Lin B (2015) Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: does the level of development matter? Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.185
Li S, Zhou C (2019) What are the impacts of demographic structure on CO2 emissions? A regional analysis in China via heterogeneous panel estimates. Sci Total Environ 650:2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.304
Li H, Mu H, Zhang M, Li N (2011) Analysis on influence factors of China’s CO2 emissions based on Path–STIRPAT model. Energy Policy 39:6906–6911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.056
Liang L, Wang Z, Li J (2019) The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations J Clean Prod 237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649, 237
Liddle B, Lung S (2010) Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts. Popul Environ 31:317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0101-5
Makido Y, Dhakal S, Yamagata Y (2012) Relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions: evidence from fifty Japanese cities. Urban Clim 2:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2012.10.006
Marcotullio P, Lee Y-s (2003) Urban environmental transitions and urban transportation systems: a comparison of the North American and Asian experiences. Int Dev Plan Rev 25:325–354
Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353
McGee JA, York R (2018) Asymmetric relationship of urbanization and CO2 emissions in less developed countries PLoS One 13:e0208388 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208388
Neuman M (2005) The compact city fallacy. J Plan Educ Res 25:11–26
Okibe S (2019) How environmental issues affect human rights: a case study of air pollution in Canada Available at SSRN 3539517
Onafowora OA, Owoye O (2014) Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis Energy Econ 44:47–62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.025
Ou J, Liu X, Wang S, Xie R, Li X (2019) Investigating the differentiated impacts of socioeconomic factors and urban forms on CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from Chinese cities of different developmental levels. J Clean Prod 226:601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.123
Ouyang X, Lin B (2017) Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions during urbanization: a comparative study between China and Japan. J Clean Prod 143:356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.102
Perron P, (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1361–1401. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913712
Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029
Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153
Salim R, Rafiq S, Shafiei S, Yao Y (2019) Does urbanization increase pollutant emission and energy intensity? evidence from some Asian developing economies. Appl Econ 51:4008–4024. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1588947
Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Muzaffar AT, Ahmed K, Ali Jabran M (2016) How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.096
Shahbaz M, Chaudhary AR, Ozturk I (2017) Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model. Energy 122:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.080
Shahbaz M, Zakaria M, Shahzad SJH, Mahalik MK (2018) The energy consumption and economic growth nexus in top ten energy-consuming countries: fresh evidence from using the quantile-on-quantile approach. Energy Econ 71:282–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.023
Shahzad F, Shahzad U, Fareed Z, Iqbal N, Hashmi SH, Ahmad F (2020) Asymmetric nexus between temperature and COVID-19 in the top ten affected provinces of China: A current application of quantile-on-quantile approach. Sci Total Enviro 139115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139115
Sharif Hossain M (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39:6991–6999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.042
Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi MA (2019) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:11191–11211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7
Shrestha MB, Chowdhury K (2005) A sequential procedure for testing unit roots in the presence of structural break in time series data. Department of Economics, University of Wollongong. https://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/112
Sim N, Zhou H (2015) Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles. J Bank Financ 55:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24845–24859
Su W, Liu Y, Wang S, Zhao Y, Su Y, Li S (2018) Regional inequality, spatial spillover effects, and the factors influencing city-level energy-related carbon emissions in China. J Geogr Sci 28:495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1486-9
Troster V, Shahbaz M, Uddin GS (2018) Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: a Granger-causality in quantiles analysis. Energy Econ 70:440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.029
UN (2018) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revisions. United Nations,
Wang Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2012) An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing city, China. Appl Energy 100:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038
Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy 106:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036
Wang Q, Zeng Y-e, Wu B-w (2016a) Exploring the relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in different provinces of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1563–1579
Wang Y, Chen L, Kubota J (2016b) The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. J Clean Prod 112:1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.041
Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J, Han R, Zhu X, Lu G (2016c) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.105
Wang Y, Liu H, Mao G, Zuo J, Ma J (2017) Inter-regional and sectoral linkage analysis of air pollution in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (Jing-Jin-Ji) urban agglomeration of China. J Clean Prod 165:1436–1444
Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025
WHO (2018) Who Global Ambient Air Quality Database (update 2018)
Xie Q, Liu J (2019) Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy 186:115868
York R (2007) Demographic trends and energy consumption in European Union nations, 1960–2025. Soc Sci Res 36:855–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.007
Zhang C, Lin Y (2012) Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 49:488–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.048
Zhang N, Yu K, Chen Z (2017) How does urbanization affect carbon dioxide emissions? A cross-country panel data analysis. Energy Policy 107:678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.072
Zhang G, Zhang N, Liao W (2018) How do population and land urbanization affect CO2 emissions under gravity center change? A spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 202:510–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.146
Zhu H-M, You W-H, Zeng Z-f (2012) Urbanization and CO2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis. Econ Lett 117:848–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.001
Zhu H, Xia H, Guo Y, Peng C (2018) The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO2 emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:17176–17193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1900-y
Zi C, Jie W, Hong-Bo C (2016a) CO2 emissions and urbanization correlation in China based on threshold analysis. Ecol Indic 61:193–201
Zi C, Jie W, Hong-Bo C (2016b) CO 2 emissions and urbanization correlation in China based on threshold analysis. Ecol Indic 61:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.013
Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 20:25–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SHH conceptualized the main idea, devised the methodology, administered the overall project and wrote the original draft. FH supervised the overall research and validated the final results. ZF applied the methodology and managed the resources and software. FS executed the final review and editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hashmi, S.H., Fan, H., Fareed, Z. et al. Asymmetric nexus between urban agglomerations and environmental pollution in top ten urban agglomerated countries using quantile methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 13404–13424 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10669-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10669-4