Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decarbonization of Vietnam’s economy: decomposing the drivers for a low-carbon growth

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vietnam has witnessed a rapid increase in national-level CO2 emissions due to rising urbanization, economic expansion, export growth, and industrial development. Moreover, to support the ambitious economic growth targets, reliance on and consumption of fossil fuels are increasing by each passing year. With this circumstance, this study aims to analyze the key drivers of CO2 emissions in Vietnam from 1990 to 2016 using the Kaya identity and decomposition method. Following this approach, CO2 emissions have been decomposed into five effect categories comprising population, affluence, energy intensity, fuel mix, and emission intensity. As per the results, CO2 emissions in Vietnam were mainly driven by rising affluence (58.5%) and changing fuel mix (33.2%) which have resulted from improved living standards, rapid industrial development, and higher fossil fuel consumption. Moreover, population (13.8%) and emission intensity (3.1%) exhibited a relatively lower impact on CO2 emissions during 1990–2016. However, energy intensity (− 8.7%) was the only negative driver which has resulted in the slowdown of carbon emissions in Vietnam. Based on the analysis of energy policy development, the share of renewable energy resources was still quite low in the national energy mix with higher reliance on traditional fossil fuels (mainly coal and petroleum). Therefore, to make a transition towards low-carbon economic growth, significant improvements in energy efficiency and emission intensity are necessary together with national energy mix restructuring for low-carbon economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASEAN:

Association of Southeast Asian Nations

BRICS:

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

FFC:

Fossil fuel consumption

GDP:

Gross domestic product

IEA:

International Energy Agency

IPCC:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

LMDI:

Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index

Mtoe:

Million metric tons of oil equivalent

OECD:

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

TFC:

Total final consumption

TPES:

Total primary energy supply

UNFCCC:

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

WTO:

World Trade Organization

References

  • Al-mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni V, Galmarini S (2016) Drivers in CO2 emissions variation: a decomposition analysis for 33 world countries. Energy 103:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW (1995) Decomposition methodology in industrial energy demand analysis. Energy 20:1081–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BW, Liu FL (2001) A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 26:537–548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anh NTK (2012) Structural decomposition analysis of CO2 emission variability in Vietnam during the 1986-2008 period. VNU J Sci Econ Bus 28:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Gangopadhyay P (2020) The asymmetric relationships between pollution, energy use and oil prices in Vietnam: some behavioural implications for energy policy-making. Energy Policy 140:111430

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo MFR, Miguel LJ (2019) The trends of the energy intensity and CO2 emissions related to final energy consumption in Ecuador: scenarios of national and worldwide strategies. Sustainability 12:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Baffes J, Kose MA, Ohnsorge F, Stocker M (2015) The great plunge in oil prices: causes, consequences, and policy responses. World Bank Group Policy Research Note. SSRN Electron J.

  • Baruya P (2010) Prospects for coal and clean coal technologies in Vietnam. IEA Clean Coal Centre, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist MM, Samuel Wårdh K, Das A, Ahlgren EO (2008) A techno-economic assessment of rice husk-based power generation in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. Int J Energy Res 32:1136–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Binh PT (2011) Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam: threshold cointegration and causality analysis. Int J Energy Econ Policy 1(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Boqiang L, Liu K (2017) Using LMDI to analyze the decoupling of carbon dioxide emissions from China’s heavy industry. Sustainability 9:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (2012) Climate and logic. In: Evaluating philosophies, 295th edn. Springer Netherlands, pp 57–59

  • Cao Q, Kang W, Xu S, Sajid MJ, Cao M (2019) Estimation and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from the entire production cycle for Chinese household consumption. J Environ Manage 247:525–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Chontanawat J (2019) Driving forces of energy-related CO2 emissions based on expanded IPAT decomposition analysis: evidence from ASEAN and four selected countries. Energies 12:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard BR (2013) Some challenges to sustainability. Sustainability 5:3368–3381

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Hochman G, Timilsina GR (2020) Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? Energy Policy 140:111420

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Wu M, Che Y, Wang M, Huang Y, Bai Y (2015) The strategy of a low-carbon economy based on the STIRPAT and SD models. Acta Ecol Sin 35:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraguchi N, Martorano B, Sanfilippo M (2019) What factors drive successful industrialization? Evidence and implications for developing countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 49:266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisingh D, Zhang Z, Moore JC, Qiao Q, Li Q (2015) Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. J Clean Prod 103:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017-highlights. International Energy Agency, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong K, Kim S (2013) LMDI decomposition analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the Korean manufacturing sector. Energy Policy 62:1245–1253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Li R, Wu Q (2019) Investigation for the decomposition of carbon emissions in the USA with C-D function and LMDI methods. Sustain 11:334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-oja J, Luukkanen J, Panula-Ontto J, Vehmas J, Chen Y, Mikkonen S, Auffermann B (2014) Are structural change and modernisation leading to convergence in the CO2 economy? Decomposition analysis of China, EU and USA. Energy 72:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanchana K, Unesaki H (2014) ASEAN energy security: an indicator-based assessment. Energy Procedia 56:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmela A, Stephen N, Danielle K et al (2016) Decomposition analysis of Philippine CO2 emissions from fuel combustion and electricity generation. Appl Energy 164:795–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Y (1989) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. IPCC Response Strategies Working Group Memorandum.

  • Li W, Shen Y, Zhang H (2015) A factor decomposition on China’s carbon emission from 1997 to 2012 based on IPAT-LMDI model. Math Probl Eng 1:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Long H (2016) Emissions reduction in China’s chemical industry–based on LMDI. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:1348–1355, Emissions reduction in China׳s chemical industry – Based on LMDI.

  • Liu Q, Wang Q (2017) How China achieved its 11th Five-Year Plan emissions reduction target: a structural decomposition analysis of industrial SO2 and chemical oxygen demand. Sci Total Environ 574:1104–1116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Shi J, Wang H, Su X, Zhou P (2019) Driving factors of carbon emissions in China: a joint decomposition approach based on meta-frontier. Appl Energy 256:113986

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma M, Cai W (2018) What drives the carbon mitigation in Chinese commercial building sector? Evidence from decomposing an extended Kaya identity. Sci Total Environ 634:884–899

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatidis G, Orehounig K, Richner P, Carmeliet J (2016) A strategy for reducing CO2 emissions from buildings with the Kaya identity-a Swiss energy system analysis and a case study. Energy Policy 88:343–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29678–29698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minh DT, Sharma D (2011) Vietnam’s energy sector: a review of current energy policies and strategies. Energy Policy 39:5770–5777

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT (2019) Ministry of Industry and Trade. Vietnam energy outlook report 2019. Government of Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam

  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R (2000) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: emissions scenarios. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen KQ (2007) Alternatives to grid extension for rural electrification: decentralized renewable energy technologies in Vietnam. Energy Policy 35:2579–2589

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NT, Ha-Duong M (2009) Economic potential of renewable energy in Vietnam’s power sector. Energy Policy 37:1601–1613

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HT, Aviso KB, Le DQ, Tokai A (2018) Main drivers of carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam trajectory 2000-2011: an input-output structural decomposition analysis. J Sustain Dev 11:129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen PA, Abbott M, Nguyen TLT (2019) The development and cost of renewable energy resources in Vietnam. Util Policy 57:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Ryan R, Nasirov S, Álvarez-Espinosa A (2020) Renewable energy expansion in the Chilean power market: a dynamic general equilibrium modeling approach to determine CO2 emission baselines. J Clean Prod 247:119645

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa L, Sheinbaum C, Martin N et al (2002) Energy use and CO2 emissions in Mexico’s iron and steel industry. Energy 27:225–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pani R, Mukhopadhyay U (2011) Variance analysis of global CO2 emission-a management accounting approach for decomposition study. Energy 36:486–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Pani R, Mukhopadhyay U (2013) Management accounting approach to analyse energy related CO2 emission: a variance analysis study of top 10 emitters of the world. Energy Policy 52:639–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins DH, Anh VTT (2009) Vietnam’s industrial policy designing policies for sustainable development. Harvard Policy Dialogue. Pap Ser Vietnam’s WTO assession Int Compet Res:1–57

  • Rafaj P, Amann M, Siri JG (2014) Factorization of air pollutant emissions: projections versus observed trends in Europe. Sci Total Environ 494–495:272–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2013) Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries? Energy Econ 37:52–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu S, Yang M, Mahlia TMI et al (2019) Energy-related greenhouse-gas emissions in the ASEAN countries: trends, drivers and policy implications. Energies 12:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah IH, Zeeshan M (2016) Estimation of light duty vehicle emissions in Islamabad and climate co-benefits of improved emission standards implementation. Atmos Environ 127:236–243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah IH, Dawood UF, Jalil UA, Adnan Y (2019) Climate co-benefits of alternate strategies for tourist transportation: the case of Murree Hills in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:13263–13274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah IH, Dong L, Park H-S (2020a) Tracking urban sustainability transition: an eco-efficiency analysis on eco-industrial development in Ulsan, Korea. J Clean Prod 262:121286

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah IH, Dong L, Park HS (2020b) Characterization of resource consumption and efficiency trends in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: economy-wide biotic and abiotic material flow accounting from 1978 to 2017. J Clean Prod 250:119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Haouas I, Van Hoang TH (2019) Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture? Emerg Mark Rev 38:197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Shem C, Simsek Y, Hutfilter UF, Urmee T (2019) Potentials and opportunities for low carbon energy transition in Vietnam: a policy analysis. Energy Policy 134:110818

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki J, Flammini A, Beers et al (2019) Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) development in Vietnam: results and key insights from UNIDO’s EIP project (2014–2019). Sustainability 11:4667

    Google Scholar 

  • Taka GN, Huong TT, Shah IH, Park H-S (2020) Determinants of energy-based CO2 emissions in Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis from 1990 to 2017. Sustainability 12:4175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang CF, Tan BW, Ozturk I (2016) Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54:1506–1514

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanh PT, Saito K, Duong PB (2019) Impact of microcredit on rural household welfare and economic growth in Vietnam. J Policy Model 41:120–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunc GI, Asik ST, Akbostancı E (2009) A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from energy use: Turkish case. Energy Policy 37:4689–4699

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2012) Fossil fuel fiscal policies and greenhouse gas emissions in Viet Nam. United Nations Development Programme, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2019) UN Environment International Resource Panel: global material flows database. https://www.resourcepanel.org/global-material-flows-database. Accessed 3 Sep 2019

  • Urban F, Siciliano G, Wallbott L, Lederer M, Dang Nguyen A (2018) Green transformations in Vietnam’ s energy sector. Asia Paci Policy Stud 5:558–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nguyen TC, Le QH (2020) Impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in Vietnam: an autoregressive distributed lag approach. Decis Sci Lett 9:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Van HTH, Sam DT (2008) Vietnam-China trade, FDI and ODA relations (1998-2008) and the impacts upon Vietnam. 368–401. Project report. Hanoi, Vietnam.

  • Wang H, Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y, Yue Q, Lu Z (2012) Resource use in growing China: past trends, influence factors, and future demand. J Ind Ecol 16:481–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li L, Kubota J, Han R, Zhu X, Lu G (2016) Does urbanization lead to more carbon emission? Evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Appl Energy 168:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Li S, Li R (2019) Will Trump’s coal revival plan work? Comparison of results based on the optimal combined forecasting technique and an extended IPAT forecasting technique. Energy 169:762–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood N, Roelich K (2019) Tensions, capabilities, and justice in climate change mitigation of fossil fuels. Energy Res Soc Sci 52:114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World Development Indicators. National accounts data, and OECD national accounts data files. https://data.worldbank.org. Accessed 11 Apr 2020

  • Yao C, Feng K, Hubacek K (2015) Driving forces of CO2 emissions in the G20 countries: an index decomposition analysis from 1971 to 2010. Ecol Inform 26:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Wang Z (2014) Inter-firm collaborations on carbon emission reduction within industrial chains in China: practices, drivers and effects on firms’ performances. Energy Econ 42:115–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, He J, Hong X et al (2017) Regional-level carbon emissions modelling and scenario analysis: a STIRPAT case study in Henan province, China. Sustain 9:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Shi X, Wang K, Xue J, Song L, Sun Y (2020) Intertemporal lifestyle changes and carbon emissions: evidence from a China household survey. Energy Econ 86:104655

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer A, Jakob M, Steckel JC (2015) What motivates Vietnam to strive for a low-carbon economy? On the drivers of climate policy in a developing country. Energy Sustain Dev 24:19–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from Brain Korea 21 plus (BK21 plus) program from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology through the Environmental Engineering Program at the University of Ulsan. We also acknowledge the support from the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0008421, The Competency Development Program for Industry Specialist).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-Suck Park.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Correlation analysis

We used the regression method (ANOVA) to evaluate the results, which helped increase the reliability of the results. In addition, the correlation between variables was included in the study. Specifically, the R2 values for regression models were high (R2 = 0.9858), which is in reasonable agreement with the adjusted R2 of 0.9823 (i.e., the difference is less than 0.2). Besides, p value is less than 0.05 (p value = 8.766E-18) indicating the robustness of our results. Moreover, a simple linear correlation analysis was performed by selecting two variables from the Kaya identity equation. Every variable on the right side of Eq. 4 was compared with that on the left side and their R2 value was determined. Based on the correlation analysis using second-order regression curves, affluence was highly correlated, whereas energy intensity was least correlated with CO2 emissions. The fifth variable added in this study was the fuel mix variable and it was found to be highly correlated with CO2 emissions in Vietnam having an R2 value of 0.8223, as shown in Fig. 5. The results indicate the very high correlation between all Kaya identity variables, including the substitution effect (∆F); thus, the inclusion of the fifth variable can be termed robust.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Correlation analysis results for the selected Kaya identity variables and CO2 emissions (Y-axis represents CO2 emissions in Mt, and X-axis is based on variables given in Eq. 4. R2 values are based on second-order regression)

Table 2 Important strategies and policies for sustainable/low-carbon growth in Vietnam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huong, T.T., Shah, I.H. & Park, HS. Decarbonization of Vietnam’s economy: decomposing the drivers for a low-carbon growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 518–529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10481-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10481-0

Keywords

Navigation