Abstract
This paper proposes a three-step process, based on the definition of absolute decoupling (AbsDec), to analyze the role of nuclear energy in the absolute decoupling between environmental pressures (including Energy resource use and CO2Emissions) and Economic growth (3-E) during the period 1987–2016. First, we select the top four Nuclear-Dependent Countries (4-NDC), including France, Belgium, Sweden, and Switzerland, from high-income economies and the USA as a sample (i.e., 5-country). Second, we provide compound annual growth rate (CAGR) statistics for all relevant variables in each country. Third, we assess the Carbon Kuznets Curve (CKC) and investigate the dynamic interactions between 3-E by using Lotka–Volterra ecosystem model. For the 5-country, we find that the CAGR of GDP is positive, the CAGRs of CO2 emissions, CO2 intensity, and energy intensity are negative, the panel CKC exists, and the projected CAGRs of CO2 emissions are negative between 2017 and 2025. For the USA, a commensalism of energy-led growth and an amensalism of emissions-limited growth exist. For the 4-NDC, neutralisms between 3-E exist. The aggregated results indicate that the 4-NDC seem to have achieved an AbsDec between 3-E, the USA appears to achieve an AbsDec between economic growth and emissions while undergoing a relative, and perhaps absolute, decoupling between 3-E. The findings can infer that nuclear power is one of the most important energy sources for achieving absolute decoupling and genuinely sustainable development. The policy implication is that measures to reduce energy consumption and control CO2 emissions may not significantly impair economic growth in countries that rely on nuclear power.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addison LM, Bhatt BS, Owen DR (2016) A prey-predator model for investing in stocks. I Int J Pure Appl Math 107(2):487–504. https://doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v107i2.17
Ajmi AN, Hammoudeh S, Nguyen DK, Sato JR (2015) On the relationships between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and income: the importance of time variation. Energy Econ 49:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.02.007
Allard A, Takman J, Uddin GS, Ahmed A (2018) The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(6):5848–5861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1622–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131
Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energ Policy 35(10):4772–4778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.032
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105
Apergis N, Payne JE, Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69(11):2255–2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.014
Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2402–2408. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-017-0548-3
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energ Policy 113:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050
Biello D (2013) How nuclear power can stop global warming. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-nuclear-power-can-stop-global-warming. .
Bildirici ME (2017) The causal link among militarization, economic growth, CO2 emission, and energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(5):4625–4636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8158-z
BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2017) https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. .
Breitung J (2001) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
Can M, Gozgor G (2017) The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16364–16370. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-017-9219-7
CEM (Clean Energy Ministerial) (2018) NICE future initiative. http://www.cleanenergyministerial.org. .
Chen PY, Chen ST, Hsu CS, Chen CC (2016) Modeling the global relationships among economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.074
Chiang SY (2012) An application of Lotka–Volterra model to Taiwan’s transition from 200 mm to 300 mm silicon wafers. Technol Forecast Soc 79(2):383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.007
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
Congregado E, Feria-Gallardo J, Golpe AA, Iglesias J (2016) The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA: is the relationship between GDP and CO2 emissions time varying? Evidence across economic sectors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:18407–18420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6982-9
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94(18):429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6982-9
Du Y, Song B, Duan H, Wu Y (2019) Multi-renewable management: Interactions between wind and solar within uncertain technology ecological system. Energ Convers Manage 187:232–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.032
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co–integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. J Econometric Soc 55(2):251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
Fu X, Zhang P, Zhang J (2017) Forecasting and analyzing internet users of China with Lotka–Volterra Model. Asia Pac J Oper Res 34(1):1740006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595917400061
Gozgor G, Demir E (2017) Evaluating the efficiency of nuclear energy policies: an empirical examination for 26 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(22):18596–18604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9486-3
Hung HC, Chiu YC, Huang HC, Wu MC (2017) An enhanced application of Lotka–Volterra model to forecast the sales of two competing retail formats. Comput Ind Eng 109:325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.022
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
International Atomic Energy Agency (2017) International status and prospects for nuclear power. https://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC61/GC61InfDocuments/English/gc61inf-8_en.pdf; 2017. .
Johansen S (2000) Modelling of cointegration in the vector autoregressive model. Econ Model 17(3):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(99)00043-7
Kaika D, Zervas E (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory—Part A: concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energ Policy 62:1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.131
Kamimura A, Guerra S, Sauer I (2006) On the substitution of energy sources: prospective of the natural gas market share in the Brazilian urban transportation and dwelling sectors. Energ Policy 34(18):3583–3590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.020
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual–based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90(1):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
Kim J, Lee DJ, Ahn J (2006) A dynamic competition analysis on the Korean mobile phone market using competitive diffusion model. Comput Ind Eng 51(1):174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2006.07.009
Knight KW, Schor JB (2014) Economic growth and climate change: a cross-national analysis of territorial and consumption-based carbon emissions in high-income countries. Sustainability 6(6):3722–3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063722
Kreng VB, Wang TC, Wang HT (2012) Tripartite dynamic competition and equilibrium analysis on global television market. Comput Ind Eng 63(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.01.015
Lakka S, Michalakelis C, Varoutas D, Martakos D (2013) Competitive dynamics in the operating systems market: modeling and policy implications. Technol Forecast Soc 80(1):88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.011
Lapinskienė G, Peleckis K, Radavičius M (2015) Economic development and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries. J Bus Econ Manag 16(6):1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2015.1112830
Lee S, Kim M, Lee J (2017) Analyzing the impact of nuclear power on CO2 emissions. Sustainability 9(8):1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081428
Lee SJ, Lee DJ, Oh HS (2005) Technological forecasting at the Korean stock market: a dynamic competition analysis using Lotka–Volterra model. Technol Forecast Soc 72(8):1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2002.11.001
Leslie P (1985) A stochastic model for studying the properties of certain biological systems by numerical methods. Biometrika 45:16–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333042
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite–sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Liu P, Gopalsamy K (1997) On a model of competition in periodic environments. Appl Math Comput 82(2–3):207–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(96)00044-6
Marasco A, Picucci A, Romano A (2016) Market share dynamics using Lotka–Volterra models. Technol Forecast Soc 105:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.017
Marques AC, Fuinhas JA, Leal PA (2018) The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Australia: the environmental Kuznets curve and the decoupling index. Environ Sci Pollut R 25(27):27283–27296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2768-6
Marques AC, Fuinhas JA, Nunes AR (2016) Electricity generation mix and economic growth: what role is being played by nuclear sources and carbon dioxide emissions in France? Energ Policy 92:7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.027
Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energ Policy 38:2911–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.024
Mikayilov JI, Hasanov FJ, Galeotti M (2018) Decoupling of CO2 emissions and GDP: A time-varying cointegration approach. Ecol Indic 95:615–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.051
Mir GUR, Storm S (2016) Carbon emissions and economic growth: production–based versus consumption–based evidence on decoupling. (Working paper). https://www.ineteconomics.org/research/research-papers/carbon-emissions-and-economic-growth-production-based-versus-consumption-based-evidence-on-decoupling .
Omri A, Ben Mabrouk N, Sassi-Tmar A (2015) Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in developed and developing countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.046
Onater-Isberk E (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve under noncarbohydrate energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 64:338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.022
Pao HT, Chen CC (2019) Decoupling strategies: CO2 emissions, energy resources, and economic growth in the group of twenty. J Clean Prod 206:907–919 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.190
Pao HT, Chen H, Li YY (2015) Competitive dynamics of energy, environment, and economy in the U.S. Energy 89:449–460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.113
Pao HT, Fu HC (2015) Competition and stability analyses among emissions, energy, and economy: application for Mexico. Energy 82:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.076
Pao HT, Fu HC, Tseng CL (2012) Forecasting of CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China using an improved grey model. Energy 40:400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.037
Pao HT, Yu HC, Yang YH (2011) Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy 36:5094–5100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.004
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy 36:2450–2458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.032
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford B Econ Stat 61:653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
Saad W, Taleb A (2017) The causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from Europe. Clean Technol Envir 20(1):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10098-017-1463-5
Saidi K, Ben Mbarek M (2016) Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests. Prog Nucl Energy 88:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.01.018
Shuai C, Chen X, Shen L, Jiao L, Wu Y, Tan Y (2017) The turning points of carbon Kuznets curve: evidences from panel and time–series data of 164 countries. J Clean Prod 162(20):1031–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.049
Tseng FM, Liu YL, Wu HH (2014) Market penetration among competitive innovation products: the case of the smartphone operating system. J Eng Technol Manag 32:40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.002
Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025
Wang ZX, Chen YN (2015) Tripartite dynamic competition and prediction analysis: coal, oil and gas, and clean energy consumption in China. Energ Environ 26(6-7):1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.6-7.1115
Ward JD, Sutton PC, Werner AD, Costanza R, Mohr SH, Simmons CT (2016) Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS One 11:e0164733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164733
Wei T, Zhu Z, Li Y, Yao N (2017) The evolution of competition in innovation resource: a theoretical study based on Lotka–Volterra model. Technol Anal Strateg 30(3):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1309014
World Bank Open Data (2019) https://data.worldbank.org/. .
World Nuclear Association (2019) Safety of nuclear power reactors. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library. .
Zaman K, Moemen MAE (2017) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renew Sust Energ Rev 74:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.072
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments. We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) for financial support. The grant no. is MOST 108-2410-H-009-038.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pao, HT., Chen, CC. Decoupling of environmental pressure and economic growth: evidence from high-income and nuclear-dependent countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 5192–5210 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07122-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07122-6