Abstract
Based on the idea of a “Community of Human Destiny,” the Chinese government proposed the “Belt and Road” initiative, and clearly proposed to promote green development and strengthen ecological environmental protection. However, a considerable number of countries are resource-rich economies with serious market misallocations. Using the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) combined with the directional distance function (DDF) framework, this paper measures the green total factor productivity (GTFP) and its items (i.e., technical change and efficiency change) of 33 countries along the Belt and Road in 1995–2012, and then the impact of market misallocations on GTFP is analyzed. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The main driving force for GTFP promotion in Asian countries came from technical change, while in European countries, it came from efficiency change. (2) Market misallocations had significantly hindered the GTFP of these economies. Countries with greater market misallocations have smaller GTFP. (3) Results based on counterfactual measures showed that GTFP could be increased by up to 4.04% and the average can be increased by 1.24% after eliminating market misallocations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angulo-Guerrero MJ, Pérez-Moreno S, Abad-Guerrero IM (2017) How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. J Bus Res 73:30–37
Aslam AQ, Ahmad SR, Ahmad I, Hussain Y, Hussain MS (2017) Vulnerability and impact assessment of extreme climatic event: a case study of southern Punjab, Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 580:468–481
Bai C, Du K, Yu Y, Feng C (2019) Understanding the trend of total factor carbon productivity in the world: Insights from convergence analysis. Energy Econ 81:698–708
Banerjee A, Dhillon IS, Ghosh J, Sra S (2005) Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher distributions. J Mach Learn Res 6:1345–1382
Bartelsman E, Haltiwanger J, Scarpetta S (2013) Cross-country differences in productivity: the role of allocation and selection. Am Econ Rev 103:305–334
Battese GE, Corra GS (1977) Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Econ 21:169–179
Bennett DL, Nikolaev B (2016) On the ambiguous economic freedom–inequality relationship. Empir Econ 53:717–754
Berggren N (2003) The benefits of economic freedom: a survey. Indep Rev 8:193–211
Bergh A, Nilsson T (2010) Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? Eur J Polit Econ 26:488–505
Bian W, Wang X (2016) A review of research on random frontier analysis of panel data. Stat Re 33:13–20 (in Chinese)
Chen S, Golley J (2014) ‘Green’ productivity growth in China’s industrial economy. Energy Econ 44:89–98
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240
Clark OR (1940) Interception of rainfall by prairie grasses, weeds, and certain crop plants. Ecol Monogr 10:243–277
Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O'Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media
Da-Rocha J-M, Restuccia D, Tavares MM (2019) Firing costs, misallocation, and aggregate productivity. J Econ Dyn Control 98:60–81
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455
Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250
Eslava M, Haltiwanger J, Kugler A, Kugler M (2013) Trade and market selection: evidence from manufacturing plants in Colombia. Rev Econ Dyn 16:135–158
Farhadi M, Islam MR, Moslehi S (2015) Economic freedom and productivity growth in resource-rich economies. World Dev 72:109–126
Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizan CJ (2001) Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence, New developments in productivity analysis. University of Chicago Press, pp 303–372
Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Q J Econ 114:83–116
Hsieh C-T, Klenow PJ (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 124:1403–1448
Jin L, Mo C, Zhang B, Yu B (2018) What is the focus of structural reform in China?—Comparison of the factor misallocation degree within the manufacturing industry with a unified model. Sustainability 10:4051
Kuznets S (1957) Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: II. industrial distribution of national product and labor force. Econ Dev Cult Chang 5:1–111
Li K, Lin B (2015) Measuring green productivity growth of Chinese industrial sectors during 1998–2011. China Econ Rev 36:279–295
Li K, Lin B (2018) How to promote energy efficiency through technological progress in China? Energy 143:812–821
Li K, Song M (2016) Green development performance in China: A metafrontier non-radial approach. Sustainability 8:219–240
Lin B, Du K (2015) Modeling the dynamics of carbon emission performance in China: a parametric Malmquist index approach. Energy Econ 49:550–557
Oh D-h (2010) A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Prod Anal 34:183–197
Quazi R (2007) Economic Freedom and foreign direct investment in East Asia. J Asia Pac Econ 12:329–344
Restuccia D, Rogerson R (2008) Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Rev Econ Dyn 11:707–720
Restuccia D, Rogerson R (2013) Misallocation and productivity. Rev Econ Dyn 16:1–10
Robin I, Salim R, Bloch H (2018) Cost efficiency in Bangladesh banking: does financial reform matter? Appl Econ 50:891–904
Shen Z, Boussemart J-P, Leleu H (2017) Aggregate green productivity growth in OECD’s countries. Int J Prod Econ 189:30–39
Tombe T (2015) The missing food problem: trade, agriculture, and international productivity differences. Am Econ J Macroecon 7:226–258
Wang H-J, Ho C-W (2010) Estimating fixed-effect panel stochastic frontier models by model transformation. J Econ 157:286–296
Wang X, Shao Q (2019) Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: evidence from panel threshold regression. Sci Total Environ 660:1346–1354
Wang Q, Zhou P, Shen N, Wang S (2013) Measuring carbon dioxide emission performance in Chinese provinces: a parametric approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:324–330
Yeung LL, Azevedo PF (2010) Measuring efficiency of Brazilian courts with data envelopment analysis (DEA). IMA J Manag Math 22:343–356
Zhou P, Ang BW, Han JY (2010) Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ 32:194–201
Zhou P, Ang BW, Zhou D (2012) Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Appl Energy 90:196–200
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71773028, 71804044, 71603079, 71974054), the Hunan Natural Science Foundation (No. 2019JJ40039), the Education Department Project of Hunan Province (No. 17A142), and the International Clean Energy Talent Programme (No. LIUJINFA[2017]5047-201702660011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Q., Yan, F., Li, K. et al. Impact of market misallocations on green TFP: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 35034–35048 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06601-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06601-0