Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sb(V) adsorption and desorption onto ferrihydrite: influence of pH and competing organic and inorganic anions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the Sb(V) adsorption on ferrihydrite (Fh) at different pH values, in the presence and absence of common competing anions in soil such as phosphate (P(V)) and arsenate (As(V)). Batch adsorption experiments, carried out at pH 4.5, 6.0, and 7.0, showed a greater affinity of Fh towards P(V) and As(V) with respect to Sb(V), especially at higher pH values, while the opposite was true at acidic pH. The capacity of Fh to accumulate greater amounts of phosphate and arsenate in the 6.0–7.0 pH range was mainly linked to the different acid properties of P(V), As(V), and Sb(V) oxyanions. The Sb(V) adsorption on Fh was highly pH-dependent and followed the following order: pH 4.5 (0.957 mmol·g−1 Fh) > pH 6.0 (0.701 mmol·g−1 Fh) > pH 7.0 (0.583 mmol·g−1 Fh). Desorption of antimonate from Sb(V)-saturated Fh, treated with citric and malic acid solutions, was ~equal to 55, 68, and 76% of that sorbed at pH 4.5, 6.0, and 7.0, respectively, while phosphate, arsenate, and sulfate were able to release significantly lower Sb(V) amounts. The FT-IR spectra revealed substantial absorbance shifts related to the surface hydroxyl groups of Fh, which were attributed to the formation of Fe-O-Sb(V) bonds and supported the formation of inner-sphere bonding between Sb(V) and Fh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Jefferson WA, Liang J, Yang T, Qu J (2017) Antimony oxidation and adsorption by in-situ formed biogenic Mn oxide and Fe–Mn oxides. J Environ Sci 54:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley R, Chastee TG (2002) Microbial methylation of metalloids: arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(2):250–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Silvetti M, Garau G, Deiana S (2012) Simultaneous sorption of phosphate and arsenate by red muds (a bauxite ore processing waste). Fresenius Environ Bull 21(3a):713–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Silvetti M, Mele E, Garau G, Deiana S, (2013) Arsenic mobilization by citrate and malate from a red mud–treated contaminated soil. J Environ Qual 42 (3):774–781

  • Castaldi P, Mele E, Silvetti M, Garau G, Deiana S (2014) Water treatment residues as accumulators of oxoanions in soil. Sorption of arsenate and phosphate anions from an aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 264:144–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Garau G, Lauro GP, Pigna M, Violante A, Deiana S (2015) Role of root exudates on the sorption of arsenate by ferrihydrite. Eur J Soil Sci 66(4):813–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Diquattro S, Lauro GP, Marceddu S, Garau G (2018) Water treatment residuals as a resource for the recovery of soil and water polluted with Sb(V): sorption and desorption trials at different pH values. Water Air Soil Pollut 229(6):174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chorover J, Brusseau ML (2008) Kinetics of sorption–desorption. In: Kinetics of Water–Rock Interaction. Spinger, New York, pp 109–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cidu R, Biddau R, Dore E, Vacca A, Marini L (2014) Antimony in the soil–water–plant system at the Su Suergiu abandoned mine (Sardinia, Italy): strategies to mitigate contamination. Sci Total Environ 319:497–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Diquattro S, Garau G, Lauro GP, Silvetti M, Deiana S, Castaldi P (2018) Municipal solid waste compost as a novel sorbent for antimony(V): adsorption and release trials at acidic pH. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5603–5615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dore E, Frau F (2018) Antimonate uptake by calcined and uncalcined layered double hydroxides: effect of cationic composition and M2+/M3+ molar ratio. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:916–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou X, Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang T, Wang Y (2011) Performance of granular zirconium–iron oxide in the removal of fluoride from drinking water. Water Res 45(12):3571–3578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dousova B, Lhotka M, Filip J, Kolousek D (2018) Removal of arsenate and antimonate by acid–treated Fe–rich clays. J Hazard Mater 357:440–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Belzile N, Che YW (2002a) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters I. Occurrence. Earth Sci Rev 57:125–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Belzile N, Chen YW (2002b) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters: II. Relevant solution chemistry. Earth Sci Rev 59:265–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Philippo S, Belzile N, Chen Y, Quentel F (2009) Natural attenuation processes applying to antimony: a study in the abandoned mine of Goesdorf, Luxembourg. Sci Total Environ 407(24):6205–6216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garau G, Silvetti M, Vasileiadis S, Donner E, Diquattro S, Deiana S, Lombi E, Castaldi P (2017) Use of municipal solid wastes for chemical and microbiological recovery of soils contaminated with metal(loid)s. Soil Biol Biochem 111:25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Sposito G (1985) On the mechanism of specific phosphate adsorption by hydroxylated mineral surfaces: a review. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 16(8):801–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Wu Z, He M, Meng X, Jin X, Qiu N, Zhang J (2014) Adsorption of antimony onto iron oxyhydroxides: adsorption behavior and surface structure. J Hazard Mater 276:339–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Fu Z, Wang H, Liu S, Wu F, Giesy JP (2018) Removal of antimonate (Sb(V)) and antimonite (Sb(III)) from aqueous solutions by coagulation–flocculation–sedimentation (CFS): dependence on influencing factors and insights into removal mechanisms. Sci Total Environ 644:1277–1285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herath I, Vithanage M, Bundschuh J (2017) Antimony as a global dilemma: geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport. Environ Pollut 223:545–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen G, Trainor TP (2012) Sb(III) and Sb(V) sorption onto Al–rich phases: hydrous al oxide and the clay minerals kaolinite KGa–1b and oxidized and reduced nontronite NAu–1. Environ Sci Technol 46:843–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jianhong X, Mengchang H, Kunpeng W, Guizhi Z (2013) Adsorption of antimony(III) on goethite in the presence of competitive anions. J Geochem Explor 132:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL (1998) Organic acids in the rhizosphere – a critical review. Plant Soil 205:25–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Blagodatskaya E (2015) Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biol Biochem 83:184–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz AK, Monch H, Johnson CA (2006) Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization. Environ Sci Technol 40:7277–7282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McComb KA, Craw D, McQuillan AJ (2007) ATR–IR spectroscopic study of antimonate adsorption to iron oxide. Langmuir 23(24):12125–12130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunobu S, Muramatsu C, Watanabe K, Sakata M (2013) Behavior of antimony(V) during the transformation of ferrihydrite and its environmental implications. Environ Sci Technol 47:9660–9667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamaru Y, Tagami K, Uchida S (2006) Antimony mobility in Japanese agricultural soils and the factors affecting antimony sorption behavior. Environ Pollut 141:321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onireti OO, Lin C (2016) Mobilization of soil–borne arsenic by three common organic acids: dosage and time effects. Chemosphere 147:352–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G (2008) The Chemistry of Soils, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten CM, Peña J (2016) Antimonate and arsenate speciation on reactive soil minerals studied by differential pair distribution function analysis. Chem Geol 429:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vithanage M, Rajapaksha AU, Dou X, Bolan NS, Yang JE, Ok YS (2013) Surface complexation modeling and spectroscopic evidence of antimony adsorption on iron–oxide–rich red earth soils. J Colloid Interf Sci 406:217–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QS, He MC, Wang Y (2011) Influence of combined pollution of antimony and arsenic on culturable soil microbial populations and enzyme activities. Ecotoxicology 20:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson NJ, Craw D, Hunter K (2004) Antimony distribution and environmental mobility at an historic antimony smelter site, New Zealand. Environ Pollut 129(2):257–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC, Lockwood PV, Ashley PM, Tighe M (2010) The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environ Pollut 158:1169–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Sun S-P, He M, Wu Z, Xiao J, Dong Chen X, Wu DW (2018) As(V) and Sb(V) co–adsorption onto ferrihydrite: synergistic effect of Sb(V) on As(V) under competitive conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:14585–14594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang M, Dou XM, He H, Wang DS (2005) Arsenate adsorption on an Fe−Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent: role of surface properties. Environ Sci Technol 39(18):7246–7253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Pigna M, Cozzolino V, Caporale AG, Violante A (2011) Sorption of arsenite and arsenate on ferrihydrite: effect of organic and inorganic ligands. J Hazard Mater 189:564–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Castaldi.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research highlights

Sb(V), P(V), and As(V) were sorbed by ferrihydrite (Fh) at pH 4.5, 6.0, and 7.0.

Sb(V) sorption by Fh was more pH-dependent compared to As(V) and P(V).

More stable Sb(V)-Fh complexes were formed at lower pH values.

Common soil organic anions released more Sb(V) from Fh with respect to inorganic ones.

Significant amounts of Sb(V) were retained by Fh through strong chemical interactions.

Electronic supplementary material

Fig. S1.

XRD pattern of the ferrihydrite used in this study (PPTX 117 kb)

Fig. S2.

Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of the ferrihydrite used in this study. Aggregated particles (a-c) and detail of single particles aggregated (d) (PPTX 521 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garau, G., Lauro, G.P., Diquattro, S. et al. Sb(V) adsorption and desorption onto ferrihydrite: influence of pH and competing organic and inorganic anions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 27268–27280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05919-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05919-z

Keywords

Navigation