Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An assessment of energy efficiency based on environmental constraints and its influencing factors in China

  • Reducing air and soil pollution in China: issues in environmental technologies and management
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The super-efficiency directional distance function (DDF) with data envelopment analysis (DEA) model (SEDDF-DEA) is more facilitative than to increase traditional method as a rise of energy efficiency in China, which is currently important energy development from Asia-pacific region countries. SEDDF-DEA is promoted as sustained total-factor energy efficiency (TFEE), value added outputs, and Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index (MLPI) to otherwise thorny environmental energy productivity problems with environmental constraint to concrete the means of regression model. This paper assesses the energy efficiency under environmental constraints using panel data covering the years of 2000–2015 in China. Considering the environmental constraints, the results showed that the average TFEE of the whole country followed an upward trend after 2006. The average MLPI score for the whole country increased by 10.57% during 2005–2010, which was mainly due to the progress made in developing and applying environmental technologies. The TFEE of the whole nation was promoted by the accumulation of capital stock, while it was suppressed by excessive production in secondary industries and foreign investment. The primary challenge for the northeast of China is to strengthen industrial transformation and upgrade traditional industries, as well as adjusting the economy and energy structure. The eastern and central regions of the country need to exploit clean- or low-energy industry to improve inefficiencies due to excessive consumption. The western region of China needs to implement renewable energy strategies to promote regional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2006. IGS, Japan: the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programmer.

References

  • Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39:1261–1264

  • Arabi B, Doraisamy MS, Emrouznejad A, Khoshroo A (2017) Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index. Ann Oper Res 255(1–2):221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2017) BP statistical review of world energy, June 2017. Available from: (https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html)

  • Chang Y, Zhang N, Danao D et al (2013) Total energy efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: a non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy 58(9):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YT, Zhang N, Danao N, Zhang N (2013) Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy 58(9):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Liu J, Wang X et al (2014) Analysis on Chinese manufacturing environmental performance based on the direction distance function. J Arid Land Resour Environ 28:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Song M, Xu L (2015) Evaluation of total energy efficiency in China using data envelopment analysis. Ecol Indic 52:577–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:29–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environmental. Q J Econ CX 2:353–379

  • Diabat A, Shetty U, Pakkala TPM (2015) Improved efficiency measures through directional distance formulation of data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 229(1):325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du L, Hanley A, Zhang N (2016) Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fueled power plants in China: a parametric meta-efficiency frontier analysis. Resour Energy Econ 43:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Chen Y, Huang Y (2017) A modified Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index: assessing environmental productivity performance in China. Eur J Oper Res https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.006

  • EAPI (2017) Global energy architecture performance index report. World Economic Forum. Available from: (http://reports.weforum.org/global-energy-architecture-performance-index-2017/?doing_wp_cron=1520478806.7356379032135009765625)

  • Emrouznejad A, Yang GL (2016) A framework for measuring global Malmquiste-Luenberger productivity index with CO2 emissions on Chinese manufacturing industries. Energy 115:840–856

  • Färe R, Grosskopf SA, Carl A et al (2007) Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32:1055–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang Tian G, Shi J, Sun LC et al (2017) Dynamic changes in the energy–carbon performance of Chinese transportation sector: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function approach. Nat Hazards 89(2):585–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto M, Otsuka A, Sueyoshi T (2014) DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries. Energy 66(4):535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Sun T, Zhou P (2015) Evaluation of China regional TFEE and its spatial convergence—based on the improved undesirable SBM model. Syst Eng 33:70–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzereme NG (2009) Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries’ total energy efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecol Econ 68:2168–2176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzereme NG (2012) The effect of access to improved water sources and sanitation on economic efficiency and growth: The case of Sub-Saharan African countries. South African Journal of Economics 80(2):246–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Managi S (2017) Measuring the effect of economic growth on countries’ environmental efficiency: a conditional directional distance function approach. Environ Resour Econ 68:753–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He W, Liu C, Guo S (2016) Empirical study on evaluation and determinants of atmospheric environmental efficiency of Tianjin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 30(1):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Honma S, Hu J (2008) Total-factor energy efficiency of provinces in Japan. Energy Policy 36:821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu JL, Wang S (2006) Total-factor energy efficiency of provinces in China. Energy Policy 34:3206–3217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Shi Q (2015) Research on total energy efficiency and environmental total factor productivity in China’s regional economies. China Popul Resour Environ 25:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Available from: (http://wenku.baidu.com/link?url1/4gcFmt_h2PddckW3nViNAaWYmgFH0xgPKlgysRQgzXtDnAH2e1tg8tMWz3iUkAPv461f7jMcsA3UEfY-BENgdO6fkyyoFKzs6vHrCZ296K1y)

  • Lee BL, Wilson C, Pasurka CA et al (2017) Sources of airline productivity from carbon emissions: an analysis of operational performance under good and bad outputs. J Prod Anal 47:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Xie J, Zhang EZ (2014) Convergence of China regional energy efficiency difference—based on China’s provincial data. Economic Science 1:23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yang J, Liu X (2013) Analysis of Beijing’s total energy efficiency and related factors using a DEA model that considers undesirable outputs. Math Comput Model 58:956–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma HL, Huang DC, Yao HZ (2011) Total-factor energy efficiency analysis of three major economic provinces in China: based on super-DEA and Malmquist. China Popul Resour Environ 21:38–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Liu Y, Wei X et al (2017) Measurement and decomposition of energy efficiency of Northeast China—based on super efficiency DEA model and Malmquist index. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19859–11987

  • Mai Y, Sun F, Shi L et al (2014) Evaluation of China’s industrial water efficiency based on DEA model. J Arid Land Resour Environ 28:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Fan L, Zhou P, Zhou D (2013) Measuring environmental performance in China’s industrial sectors with non-radial DEA. Math Comput Model 58:1047–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munisamy S, Arabi B (2015) Eco-efficiency change in power plants: using a slacks-based measure for the meta-frontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Clean Prod 105:218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli NA, Munisamy S, Arabi B (2013) Scale directional distance function and its application to the measurement of eco-efficiency in the manufacturing sector. Ann Oper Res 211(1):381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan HJ (2008) Re-estimating the capital stock of China: 1952-2006. J Quant Tech Econ 10:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen M, Cheng Y (2015) China’s industrial water use and pollutants emission efficiency: a study based on provincial data from 2003 to 2012. J China Univ Geosci (Social Sciences Edition) 15:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Yuan Y (2015) China’s regional sustainability and diversified resource allocation: DEA environmental assessment on economic development and air pollution. Energy Econ 49:239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, Nijkamp P (2016) An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: design of a target-oriented DFM model with fixed factors in data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 88:100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu ZG, Liu LK (2011) Efficiency evaluation of industrial sectors in China accounting for the energy and environment factors: based on provincial data by a SBM approach. Econ Rev 2:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlontzos G, Niavis S, Manos B (2014) A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wu Y, Yan P (2010) Total energy efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth in China’s regional economics. Econ Anal 10:95–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Li S, Sueyoshi T (2014) DEA environmental assessment on U.S. industrial sectors: investment for improvement in operational and environmental performance to attain corporate sustainability. Energy Econ 45:254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhao T, Zhang XH (2016) Energy and environmental unified efficiency of industrial subsectors and its influencing factors in China. Resources Science 38(2):0311–0320

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Feng GF (2013) Evaluation of China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency based on DEA window model. China Industrial Economics 304(7):56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Yu S, Zhang W (2013) China’s regional energy and total energy efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Math Comput Model 58:1117–1127

  • Wang MS, Ji JY (2014) An analysis of energy efficiency and its influential in China—based on SBM-Tobit two stage model. Journal of northeastern university (society Science) 16:584–589

  • Wang QW, Zhou DQ (2008) An empirical study on the change of total factor energy efficiency in China. Syst Eng 26(7):74–80

  • Wei C, Shen M (2007) Energy efficiency and energy productivity: a comparison based on the panel data by province. J Quant Tech Econ 9:110–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Fan L, Zhou P et al (2012) Industrial energy efficiency with emissions in China: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Policy 49:164–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yagi M, Fujii H, Hoang H, Managi S (2015) Total energy efficiency of energy, materials, and emissions. J Environ Manag 161:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Ouyang H, Fang K (2015) Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecol Indic 51:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Zhou H, Zhang A, Li A (2015) Regional energy efficiency, carbon emission performance and technology gaps in China: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energy Policy 84:142–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Shi L, Wang Y et al (2016) The eco-efficiency of pulp and paper industry in China: an assessment based on slacks-based measure and Malmquist-Luenberger index. J Clean Prod 127:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan XL, Zhang B, Yang WP (2009) The total factor energy measurement of China based on environmental pollution. China Ind Econ 251:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wu W (2011) Research on total-factor energy efficiency of metropolitan provinces of Yangtze River Delta based on environmental performance. Econ Res 10:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Zhu Q, Li H (2013) Energy use, carbon emission and China’s total factor carbon emission reduction efficiency. Econ Res 10:138–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaojun M, Yan L, Xiaoxue W et al (2017) (2017) Measurement and decomposition of energy efficiency of Northeast China—based on super efficiency DEA model and Malmquist index. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19859–11987

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Furthermore, we are grateful to Prof. Chung-chou Tsai for providing useful advice.

Funding

This study was supported by the Youth Social Society Foundation of School in Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. Skqn2017002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Chen.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Xu, Jt. An assessment of energy efficiency based on environmental constraints and its influencing factors in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 16887–16900 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1912-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1912-7

Keywords

Navigation