Skip to main content
Log in

Gas permeability of biochar-amended clay: potential alternative landfill final cover material

  • Biological waste as resource, with a focus on food waste
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compacted biochar-amended clay (BAC) has been proposed as an alternative landfill final cover material in this study. Biochar has long been proposed to promote crop growth, mitigate odor emission, and promote methane oxidation in field soils. However, previous studies showed that soil-gas permeability was increased upon biochar application, which will promote landfill gas emission. The objective of the present study is to investigate the possibility of using compacted BAC as an alternative material in landfill final cover by evaluating its gas permeability. BAC samples were prepared by mixing 425-μm-sieved peanut shell biochar with kaolin clay in different ratios (0, 5, 10, and 15 %, w/w) and compacting at different degrees of compactions (DOC) (80, 85, and 90 %) with an optimum water content of 35 %. The gas permeability of the BACs was measured by flexible wall gas permeameter and the microstructure of the BACs was analyzed by SEM with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results show that the effects of biochar content on BAC gas permeability is highly dependent on the DOC. At high DOC (90 %), the gas permeability of BAC decreases with increasing biochar content due to the combined effect of the clay aggregation and the inhibition of biochar in the gas flow. However, at low DOC (80 %), biochar incorporation has no effects on gas permeability because it no longer acts as a filling material to the retard gas flow. The results from the present study imply that compacted BAC can be used as an alternative final cover material with decreased gas permeability when compared with clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in northern Laos: 1. soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111(1):81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-63. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouazza A, Vangpaisal T (2003) An apparatus to measure gas permeability of geosynthetic clay liners. Geotext Geomembr 21(2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124(1):3–22

  • Deepagoda T, Moldrup P, Schjønning P, Jonge LW, Kawamoto K, Komatsu T (2011) Density-corrected models for gas diffusivity and air permeability in unsaturated soil. Vadose Zone J 10(1):226–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elshorbagy W, Mohamed A (2000) Evaluation of using municipal solid waste compost in landfill closure caps in arid areas. Waste Manag 20(7):499–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallé C (2001) Effect of drying on cement-based materials pore structure as identified by mercury intrusion porosimetry: a comparative study between oven-, vacuum-, and freeze-drying. Cem Concr Res 31(10):1467–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto S, Moldrup P, Kawamoto K, Komatsu T (2009) Effect of particle size and soil compaction on gas transport parameters in variably saturated, sandy soils. Vadose Zone J 8(4):986–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen RH, Einola JM, Rintala JA (2006) Landfill methane oxidation in engineered soil columns at low temperature. Water Air Soil Pollut 177(1-4):313–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner RM (2012) Designing with geosynthetics. Xlibris Corporation

  • Kolb T, Agee J, Fule P, McDowell N, Pearson K, Sala A, Waring R (2007) Perpetuating old ponderosa pine. For Ecol Manag 249(3):141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5(7):381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan

  • Liu X, Han F, Zhang X (2012) Effect of biochar on soil aggregates in the loess plateau: results from incubation experiments. Int J Agric Biol 14(6):975–979

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry MP (2011) Soil organic carbon, biochar, and applicable research results for increasing farm productivity under Australian agricultural conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42(10):1187–1199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—a critical review. Bioresour Technol 160:191–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moldrup P, Olesen T, Komatsu T, Schjønning P, Rolston D (2001) Tortuosity, diffusivity, and permeability in the soil liquid and gaseous phases. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(3):613–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moo-Young HK, Zimmie TF (1996) Geotechnical properties of paper mill sludges for use in landfill covers. J Geotech Eng 122(9):768–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco B, Battaglini R, Lelli M (2010) Gas emission into the atmosphere from controlled landfills: an example from Legoli landfill (Tuscany, Italy). Environ Sci Pollut Res 17(6):1197–1206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Yargicoglu EN, Yue D, Yaghoubi P (2014) Enhanced microbial methane oxidation in landfill cover soil amended with biochar. J Geotech Geoenviron 140(9):04014047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheutz C, Pedersen GB, Costa G, Kjeldsen P (2009) Biodegradation of methane and halocarbons in simulated landfill biocover systems containing compost materials. J Environ Qual 38(4):1363–1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shang G, Shen G, Wang T, Chen Q (2012) Effectiveness and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by camphor-derived biochar. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 62(8):873–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shang G, Shen G, Liu L, Chen Q, Xu Z (2013) Kinetics and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by biochars. Bioresour Technol 133:495–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sombroek W, Ruivo MDL, Fearnside PM, Glaser B, Lehmann J (2003) Amazonian dark earths as carbon stores and sinks. Amazonian dark earths. pp. 125-139 Springer

  • Sun Z, Moldrup P, Elsgaard L, Arthur E, Bruun EW, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, de Jonge LW (2013) Direct and indirect short-term effects of biochar on physical characteristics of an arable sandy loam. Soil Sci 178(9):465–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1989) Technical guidance document: final covers on hazardous waste landfills and surface impoundments. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Cao X, Zhao L, Sun T (2014) Comparison of sewage sludge-and pig manure-derived biochars for hydrogen sulfide removal. Chemosphere 111:296–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Tang J, Zhang R, Wu Q, Gong M (2013) Effects of biochar application on soil methane emission at different soil moisture levels. Biol Fertil Soils 49(2):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Cao X, Mašek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256:1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the research grant 2012CB719805 of 2012CB719800 provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China through the National Basic Research Program (973 project) and Collaborative Research Fund (CRF) provided by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (HKUST6/CRF/12R). The authors would like to thank Mr. Yeung Yin Hon and Ms. Charlotte Ma for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charles Wang Wai Ng or Ming Hung Wong.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, J.T.F., Chen, Z., Ng, C.W.W. et al. Gas permeability of biochar-amended clay: potential alternative landfill final cover material. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 7126–7131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4871-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4871-2

Keywords

Navigation