Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aimed at developing comprehensive assessments of physicochemical quality of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes at Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea. The mean concentration of major ions represented as follows: Ca (94.3 mg/L) > Mg (41.7 mg/L) > Na (19.2 mg/L) > K (3.2 mg/L) for cations and SO4 (351 mg/L) > HCO3 (169 mg/L) > Cl (19 mg/L) for anions. Thematic maps for physicochemical parameters of groundwater were prepared, classified, weighted, and integrated in GIS method with fuzzy logic. The maps exhibited that suitable zone of drinking and irrigation purpose occupied in SE, NE, and NW sectors. The undesirable zone of drinking purpose was observed in SW and central parts and that of irrigation was in the western part of the study area. This was influenced by improperly treated effluents from an abandoned iron ore mine, irrigation, and domestic fields. By grouping analysis, groundwater types were classified into Ca(HCO3)2, (Ca,Mg)Cl2, and CaCl2, and CaHCO3 was the most predominant type. Grouping analysis also showed three types of irrigation water such as C1S1, C1S2, and C1S3. C1S3 type of high salinity to low sodium hazard was the most dominant in the study area. Equilibrium processes elucidated the groundwater samples were in the saturated to undersaturated condition with respect to aragonite, calcite, dolomite, and gypsum due to precipitation and deposition processes. Cluster analysis suggested that high contents of SO4 and HCO3 with low Cl was related with water-rock interactions and along with mining impact. This study showed that the effluents discharged from mining waste was the main sources of groundwater quality deterioration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agencia Catalana del Agua (ACA) (2005) Catalonia, Spain

  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. Public health association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Calinski T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 3:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (CCME) Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (Canada) (2004) An assessment of the application and testing of the water quality index of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment for selected water bodies in Atlantic Canada. National indicators and reporting office

  • Chang N, Chen HW, King SK (2001) Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. J Environ Manage 63:293–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SY, Venkatramanan S, Kim TH, Kim DS, Ramkumar T (2014) Influence of hydrogeochemical processes and assessment of suitability for groundwater uses in Busan City, Korea. Environ Dev Sustain. doi:10.1007/s10668-014-9552-7

  • Cude CO (2001) Water quality index: a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:125–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya S, Kaur A (1999) Assessment of physico-chemical characteristic of under groundwater in rural areas of Tosham subdivision, Bhiwani-Haryana. J Environ Pollut 6:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya S, Datta D, Kushwaha HS (2005) A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for assessment of physico-chemical quality of groundwater for drinking purposes. Environ Geol 8:158–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya S, Singh B, Gaur S, Garg VK, Kushwaha HS (2007) Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. J Hazard Mater 147:938–946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Despande AW, Raj DV, Khanna P (1996) Fuzzy description of river water quality, Paper for International Conference EUFIT

  • Eaton FM (1950) Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters. Soil Sci 39:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2010) ArcGIS 10.2 Software and user manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA. http://www.esri.com/

  • Garg VK, Dahiya S, Chaudhary S, Deepshikha (1998) Fluoride distribution in underground waters of Jind district, Haryana, India. Ecol Environ Cons 4:19–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gharibi H, Mahvi AH, Nabizadeh R, Arabalibeik H, Yunesian M, Sowlat MH (2012) A novel approach in water quality assessment based on fuzzy logic. J Environ Manage 112:87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Mujumdar PP (2006) Risk minimization in water quality control problems of a river system. Adv Water Resour 29:458–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guler C, Thyne GD, McCray JE, Turner AK (2002) Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol J 10:455–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37:300–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim TH, Chung SY, Park N, Hamm SY, Lee SY, Kim BW (2012) Combined analyses of chemometric and kriging for identifying groundwater contamination sources and origins at the Masan coastal area in Korea. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1582-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic, theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou YT, Lo SL (2005) A fuzzy index model for trophic status evaluation of reservoir waters. Water Res 39:1415–1423

  • Liou S, Lo S, Wang SA (2004) Generalized water quality index for Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 96:35–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani EH (1976) Advances in the linguistic synthesis of fuzzy controllers. Intern J Man Machine Stud 8:669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoud AA (2014) Groundwater quality assessment of the shallow aquifers west of the Nile Delta (Egypt) using multivariate statistical and geostatistical techniques. J Afr Earth Sci 95:123–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKone TE, Deshpande AW (2005) Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus? Environ Sci Technol 39:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng SX, Maynard JB (2001) Use of statistical analysis to formulate conceptual models of geochemical behavior: water chemical data from Butucatu aquifer in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. J Hydrol 250:78–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MK, Stapp WB (1996) Field manual for water quality monitoring: an environmental education program or schools. Thomson-Shore Inc., Dexter, p 277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo-Duque W, Ferré-Huguet N, Domingo JL, Schuhmacher M (2006) Assessing water quality in rivers with fuzzy inference systems: a case study. Environ Int 32:733–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ott WR (1978) Water quality indices: a survey of indices used in the United States, EPA-600/4-78-005. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p p.128

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) User’s guide to PHREEQC (version 2) a computer program for speciation, batch-retaction. one-dimensional transport and inverse geochemical calculations. Water resources investigations report 99–4259

  • Pham DT, Pham PTN (1999) Artificial intelligence in engineering. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 39:937–949

  • Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. Trans Am Geophys Union 25(6):914–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (USDA). Handbook 60. Oxford and IBA publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano D, Bernetti A, De Lauretis R (2004) Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions. Environ Int 30:1099–1107

  • Ross T (2004). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Wiley, Chichester

  • Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ (2004) Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of disinfection by products- a risk based indexing system. J Environ Manag 73:1–13

  • Silvert W (2000) Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecol Model 130:111–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcs I, Darab C (1964) The influence of irrigation water of high sodium carbonate content of soils. In: Proceedings of 8th International Congress of Isss, Trans, vol II, pp 803–812

  • Todd DK (1980) Ground water hydrology. Wiley, New York, p. 535

  • Todd DK (2001) Groundwater hydrology. Wiley, Canada, pp 280–281

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1994) Water quality standards handbook, 2nd ed

  • Vemula VR, Mujumdar PP, Gosh S (2004) Risk evaluation in water quality management of a river system. J Water Resour Plan Manag-ASCE 130:411–423

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Ramkumar T, Gnanachandrasamy G, Vasudevan S (2013) A multivariate statistical approaches on physicochemical characteristics of groundwater in and around Nagapattinam district, Cauvery deltaic region of Tamil Nadu, India. Earth Sci Res J 17(2):97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Lee SY, Park N (2014a) Assessment of river water quality via environmetric multivariate statistical tools and water quality index: a case study of Nakdong River basin, Korea. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 9:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Ramkumar T, Gnanachandrasamy G, Vasudevan S, Lee SY (2014b) Application of GIS and hydrogeochemistry of groundwater pollution status of Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3728-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2006) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 3rd edn. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, p 969

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadesh LA (1973) Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1:28–44

  • Zadesh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4:103–111

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Research Grant of Pukyong National University (2015 Year).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Institute of Environmental Geosciences, Pukyong National University, 599-1 Daeyeon-dong, Nam-gu, Busan, 608-737, South Korea

    S. Venkatramanan, S. Y. Chung & R. Rajesh

  2. HLW Disposal Research Center, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 989-111 Daedeok-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-353, South Korea

    S. Y. Lee

  3. Department of Earth Sciences, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, 608002, India

    T. Ramkumar

  4. Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University, CDT 250, 98009, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia

    M. V. Prasanna

Authors
  1. S. Venkatramanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Y. Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Rajesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Y. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Ramkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. V. Prasanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Y. Chung.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Michael Matthies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venkatramanan, S., Chung, S.Y., Rajesh, R. et al. Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 11209–11223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4290-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4290-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation