Abstract
In order to determine the pollution sources in a suburban area and identify the main direction of their origin, PM2.5 was collected with samplers coupled with a wind select sensor and then subjected to Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis. In each sample, soluble ions, organic carbon, elemental carbon, levoglucosan, metals, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined. PMF results identified six main sources affecting the area: natural gas home appliances, motor vehicles, regional transport, biomass combustion, manufacturing activities, and secondary aerosol. The connection of factor temporal trends with other parameters (i.e., temperature, PM2.5 concentration, and photochemical processes) confirms factor attributions. PMF analysis indicated that the main source of PM2.5 in the area is secondary aerosol. This should be mainly due to regional contributions, owing to both the secondary nature of the source itself and the higher concentration registered in inland air masses. The motor vehicle emission source contribution is also important. This source likely has a prevalent local origin. The most toxic determined components, i.e., PAHs, Cd, Pb, and Ni, are mainly due to vehicular traffic. Even if this is not the main source in the study area, it is the one of greatest concern. The application of PMF analysis to PM2.5 collected with this new sampling technique made it possible to obtain more detailed results on the sources affecting the area compared to a classical PMF analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akyüz M, Çabuk H (2008) Particle-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment of Zonguldak, Turkey. Sci of the Total Environ 405:62–70. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.026
Alleman LY, Lamaison L, Perdrix E, Robache A, Galloo J (2010) PM10 metal concentrations and source identification using positive matrix factorization and wind sectoring in a French industrial zone. Atmos Res 96:612–625. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.02.008
Alolayan MA, Brown KW, Evans JS, Bouhamra WS, Koutrakis P (2013) Source apportionment of fine particles in Kuwait City. Sci Total Environ 448:14–25. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.090
Amador-Muñoz O, Bazán-Torija S, Villa-Ferreira SA, Villalobos-Pietrini R, Bravo-Cabrera JL, Munive-Colín Z et al (2013) Opposing seasonal trends for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PM10: health risk and sources in southwest Mexico City. Atmos Res 122:199–212. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.10.003
ARPA (2013). Sistema Dexter per l’accesso diretto al database del Servizio IdroMeteorologico. http://www.arpa.emr.it/sim/?osservazioni_e_dati/dexter. Accessed 18 November 2013. (in Italian)
Azimi S, Rocher V, Muller M, Moilleron R, Thevenot DR (2005) Sources, distribution and variability of hydrocarbons and metals in atmospheric deposition in an urban area (Paris, France). Sci Total Environ 337:223–239. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.06.020
Begum BA, Hopke PK, Weixiang Z (2005) Source identification of fine particles in Washington, DC, by expanded factor analysis modeling. Environ Sci Technol 39:1129–1137. doi:10.1021/es049804v
Bernardoni V, Vecchi R, Valli G, Piazzalunga A, Fermo P (2011) PM10 source apportionment in Milan (Italy) using time-resolved data. Sci Total Environ 409:4788–4795. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.048
Besombes J-L, Maître A, Patissier O, Marchand N, Chevron N, Stoklov M et al (2001) Particulate PAHs observed in the surrounding of a municipal incinerator. Atmos Environ 35:6093–6104. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00399-5
Betha R, Balasubramanian R (2011) Emissions of particulate-bound elements from stationary diesel engine: characterization and risk assessment. Atmos Environ 45:5273–5281. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.060
Bourotte C, Forti M-C, Taniguchi S, Caruso Bícego M, Andrade Lotufo P (2005) A wintertime study of PAHs in fine and coarse aerosols in São Paulo City, Brazil. Atmos Environ 39:3799–3811. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.02.054
Canepari S, Perrino C, Astolfi ML, Catrambone M, Perret D (2009) Determination of soluble ions and elements in ambient air suspended particulate matter: inter-technique comparison of XRF, IC and ICP for sample-by-sample quality control. Talanta 77:1821–1829. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2008.10.029
CEN EN (1998). Method 12341—Air Quality—determination of the PM10 fraction of suspended particulate matter. Reference method and field test procedure to demonstrate reference equivalence of measurement methods
CEN EN (2005) Method 14907—Ambient air quality—Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM2,5 mass fraction of suspended particulate matter
Chan Y, Hawas O, Hawker D, Vowles P, Cohen DD, Stelcer E et al (2011) Using multiple type composition data and wind data in PMF analysis to apportion and locate sources of air pollutants. Atmos Environ 45:439–449. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.060
Comero S, Servida D, De Capitani L, Gawlik BM (2012) Geochemical characterization of an abandoned mine site: a combined positive matrix factorization and GIS approach compared with principal component analysis. J Geochem Explor 118:30–37. doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.04.003
EC (2008) Directive 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. L 152/1. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:152:0001:0044:EN:PDF. Accessed 29 January 2013
EPA (2006) National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Final Rule. 40 CFR Part 50. Federal Register 71, No. 200. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25. Accessed 19 September 2013.
Fabbri D, Modelli S, Torri C, Cemin A, Ragazzi M, Scaramuzza P (2008) GC-MS determination of levoglucosan in atmospheric particulate matter collected over different filter materials. J Environ Monit 10:1519–1523. doi:10.1039/b808976k
Fang G-C, Wu Y-S, Fu PP-C, Yang I-L, Chen M-H (2004) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air of suburban and industrial regions of central Taiwan. Chemosphere 54:443–452. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00706-9
Gildemeister AE, Hopke PK, Kim E (2007) Sources of fine urban particulate matter in Detroit, MI. Chemosphere 69:1064–1074. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.027
Gratz LE, Keeler GJ (2011) Sources of mercury in precipitation to Underhill, VT. Atmos Environ 45:5440–5449. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.001
Hellebust S, Allanic A, O’Connor IP, Wenger JC, Sodeau JR (2010) The use of real-time monitoring data to evaluate major sources of airborne particulate matter. Atmos Environ 44:1116–1125. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.035
Hopke PK (2000) A guide to positive matrix factorization. In EPA, Workshop on UNMIX and PMF as Applied to PM2.5: Final Report. EPA 600/A-00/048. New York: Willis, R.D. (Ed)
Horemans B, Cardell C, Bencs L, Kontozova-Deutsch V, De Wael K, Van Grieken R (2011) Evaluation of airborne particles at the Alhambra monument in Granada, Spain. Microchem J 99:429–438. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2011.06.018
Hueglin C, Gehrig R, Baltensperger U, Gysel M, Monn C, Vonmont H (2005) Chemical characterisation of PM2.5, PM10 and coarse particles at urban, near-city and rural sites in Switzerland. Atmos Environ 39:637–651. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.027
ISPRA (2010) Italian provincial pollutant emission inventory. http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/it/sia-ispra/inventaria/disaggregazione-dellinventario-nazionale-2005/emissioni-provinciali/view. Accessed 1 August 2013. (in Italian)
Jia Y, Clements AL, Fraser MP (2010) Saccharide composition in atmospheric particulate matter in the southwest US and estimates of source contributions. J Aerosol Sci 41:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.08.005
Karar K, Gupta AK (2007) Source apportionment of PM10 at residential and industrial sites of an urban region of Kolkata, India. Atmos Res 84:30–41. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.05.001
Karnae S, John K (2011) Source apportionment of fine particulate matter measured in an industrialized coastal urban area of South Texas. Atmos Environ 45:3769–3776. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.040
Kim E, Hopke PK (2004) Comparison between conditional probability function and nonparametric regression for fine particle source directions. Atmos Environ 38:4667–4673. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.035
Kim E, Larson TV, Hopke PK, Slaughter C, Sheppard LE, Claiborn C (2003) Source identification of PM2.5 in an arid northwest U.S. city by positive matrix factorization. Atmos Res 66:291–305. doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00025-5
Lakhani A (2012) Source apportionment of particle bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at an industrial location in Agra, India. Sci World J. doi:10.1100/2012/781291, no. 781291
Lall R, Thurston GD (2006) Identifying and quantifying transported vs. local sources of New York City PM2.5 fine particulate matter air pollution. Atmos Environ 40:S333–S346. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.068
Lee JH, Hopke PK (2006) Apportioning sources of PM2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data. Atmos Environ 40:S360–S377. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.074
Lee E, Chan CK, Paatero P (1999) Application of positive matrix factorization in source apportionment of particulate pollutants in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 33:3201–3212. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00113-2
Lee JH, Yoshida Y, Turpin BJ, Hopke PK, Poirot RL, Lioy PJ et al (2002) Identification of sources contributing to Mid-Atlantic regional aerosol. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52:1186–1205. doi:10.1080/10473289.2002.10470850
Liu W, Hopke PK, Han Y, Yi S, Holsen TM, Cybart S et al (2003) Application of receptor modeling to atmospheric constituents at Potsdam and Stockton, NY. Atmos Environ 37:4997–5007. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.036
Liu W, Wang Y, Russell A, Edgerton ES (2005) Atmospheric aerosol over two urban–rural pairs in the southeastern United States: chemical composition and possible sources. Atmos Environ 39:4453–4470. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.048
Lonati G, Giugliano M, Butelli P, Romele L, Tardivo R (2005) Major chemical components of PM2.5 in Milan (Italy). Atmos Environ 39:1925–1934. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.012
Lough G, Schauer JJ, Park J-S, Shafer MM, Deminter JT, Weinstein JP (2005) Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways. Environ Sci Technol 39:826–836. doi:10.1021/es048715f
Manoli E, Kouras A, Samara C (2004) Profile analysis of ambient and source emitted particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from three sites in northern Greece. Chemosphere 56:867–878. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.03.013
Mantis J, Chaloulakou A, Samara C (2005) PM10-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Greater Area of Athens, Greece. Chemosphere 59:593–604. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.019
Marcazzan GM, Ceriani M, Valli G, Vecchi R (2003) Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in Milan (Italy) using receptor modelling. Sci Total Environ 317:137–147. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00368-1
Martínez K, Austrui JR, Jover E, Ábalos M, Rivera J, Abad E (2010) Assessment of the emission of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs from an industrial area over a nearby town using a selective wind direction sampling device. Environ Pollut 158:764–769. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.011
Masiol M, Rampazzo G, Ceccato D, Squizzato S, Pavoni B (2010) Characterization of PM10 sources in a coastal area near Venice (Italy): an application of factor-cluster analysis. Chemosphere 80:771–778. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.008
Masiol M, Hofer A, Squizzato S, Piazza R, Rampazzo G, Pavoni B (2012) Carcinogenic and mutagenic risk associated to airborne particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a source apportionment. Atmos Environ 60:375–382. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.073
McGuire ML, Jeong C-H, Slowik JG, Chang RY-W, Corbin JC, Lu G et al (2011) Elucidating determinants of aerosol composition through particle-type-based receptor modeling. Atmos Chem Phys 11:8133–8155. doi:10.5194/acp-11-8133-2011
Menichini E, Viviano G, the Working group Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2004) Treatment of data below the detection limit in the calculation of analytical results. Rapporti ISTISAN 04/15. http://www.iss.it/binary/aria/cont/Rapporti%20Istisan%200415.1234858430.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2013. (in Italian)
Minguillón MC, Monfort E, Escrig A, Celades I, Guerra L, Busani G et al (2013) Air quality comparison between two European ceramic tile clusters. Atmos Environ 74:311–319. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.010
Na K, Cocker DR III (2009) Characterization and source identification of trace elements in PM2.5 from Mira Loma, Southern California. Atmos Res 93:793–800. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.03.012
Niu Z, Zhang F, Chen J, Yin L, Wang S, Xu L (2013) Carbonaceous species in PM2.5 in the coastal urban agglomeration in the Western Taiwan Strait Region, China. Atmos Res 122:102–110. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.11.002
Ogulei D, Hopke PK, Wallace LA (2006a) Analysis of indoor particle size distributions in an occupied townhouse using positive matrix factorization. Indoor Air 16:204–215. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00418.x
Ogulei D, Hopke PK, Zhou L, Pancras JP, Nair N, Ondov JM (2006b) Source apportionment of Baltimore aerosol from combined size distribution and chemical composition data. Atmos Environ 40:S396–S410. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.075
Olmez I, Sheffield AE, Gordon GE, Houck JE, Pritchett LC, Cooper JA et al (1988) Compositions of particles from selected sources in Philadelphia for receptor modeling applications. JAPCA 38:1392–1402. doi:10.1080/08940630.1988.10466479
Paatero P (2007) User’s Guide for Positive Matrix Factorization programs PMF2 and PMF3, Part 2: reference. University of Helsinki, Department of Physics, Helsinki
Paatero P, Hopke PK (2002) Utilizing wind direction and wind speed as independent variables in multilinear receptor modeling studies. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 60:25–41. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00183-6
Pacyna JM, Pacyna EG (2001) An assessment of global and regional emissions of trace metals to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources worldwide. Environ Rev 9:269–29. doi:10.1139/er-9-4-269
Pashynska V, Vermeylen R, Vas G, Maenhaut W, Claeys M (2002) Development of a gas chromatographic/ion trap mass spectrometric method for the determination of levoglucosan and saccharidic compounds in atmospheric aerosols. Application to urban aerosols. J Mass Spectrom 37:1249–1257. doi:10.1002/jms.391
Pekney NJ, Davidson CI, Zhou L, Hopke PK (2006) Application of PSCF and CPF to PMF-modeled sources of PM2.5 in Pittsburgh. Aerosol Sci Technol 40:952–961. doi:10.1080/02786820500543324
Perrino C, Catrambone M, Dalla Torre S, Rantica E, Sargolini T, Canepari S (2013). Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of particulate matter: a case study in the Po Valley. Part I: macro-components and mass closure. Environ Sci and Pollut Res 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2067-1
Perrone MR, Piazzalunga A, Prato M, Carofalo I (2011) Composition of fine and coarse particles in a coastal site of the central Mediterranean: carbonaceous species contributions. Atmos Environ 45:7470–7477. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.030
Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A (2009) Variations of levels and composition of PM10 and PM2.5 at an insular site in the Western Mediterranean. Atmos Res 94:285–299. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.06.006
Piazzalunga A, Bernardoni V, Fermo P, Valli G, Vecchi R (2011) Technical note: on the effect of water-soluble compounds removal on EC quantification by TOT analysis in urban aerosol samples. Atmos Chem Phys 11:10193–10203. doi:10.5194/acp-11-10193-2011
Polissar AV, Hopke PK (2001) Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: chemical composition and sources. Environ Sci Technol 35:4604–4621. doi:10.1021/es0105865
Polissar AV, Hopke PK, Malm WC, Sisler JF (1996) The ratio of aerosol optical absorption coefficients to sulfur concentrations, as an indicator of smoke from forest fires when sampling in polar regions. Atmos Environ 30:1147–1157. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00334-7
Polissar AV, Hopke PK, Paatero P, Kaufmann YJ, Hall DK, Bodhaine BA et al (1999) The aerosol at Barrow, Alaska: long-term trends and source locations. Atmos Environ 33:2441–2458. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00423-3
Pope CA III, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:709–742. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
Province of Rimini and ARPA Emilia Romagna (2011). Rete di Monitoraggio Qualità dell’Aria. Report 2010. http://www.arpa.emr.it/cms3/documenti/_cerca_doc/aria/rimini/rn_report_aria_2010.pdf. Accessed 6 September 2013. (in Italian)
Pulles T, van der Gon HD, Appelman W, Verheul M (2012) Emission factors for heavy metals from diesel and petrol used in European vehicles. Atmos Environ 61:641–651. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.022
Qadir RM, Abbaszade G, Schnelle-Kreis J, Chow JC, Zimmermann R (2013) Concentrations and source contributions of particulate organic matter before and after implementation of a low emission zone in Munich, Germany. Environ Pollut 175:158–167. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.002
Ramadan Z, Song X-H, Hopke PK (2000) Identification of sources of Phoenix aerosol by positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:1308–1320. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464173
Ravindra K, Bencs L, Wauters E, de Hoog J, Deutsch F, Roekens E et al (2006) Seasonal and site-specific variation in vapour and aerosol phase PAHs over Flanders (Belgium) and their relation with anthropogenic activities. Atmos Environ 40:771–785. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.011
Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR (1993) Sources of fine organic aerosol. 5. Natural gas home appliances. Environ Sci Technol 27:2736–2744. doi:10.1021/es00049a012
Saarikoski S, Timonen H, Saarnio K, Aurela M, Järvi L, Keronen P et al (2008) Sources of organic carbon in fine particulate matter in northern European urban air. Atmos Chem Phys 8:6281–6295. doi:10.5194/acp-8-6281-2008
Schwartz J, Neas L (2000) Fine particles are more strongly associated than coarse particles with acute respiratory health effects in school children. Epidemiol 11:6–10. doi:10.1097/00001648-200001000-00004
Simcik MF, Eisenreich SJ, Lioy PJ (1999) Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan. Atmos Environ 33:5071–5079. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00233-2
Squizzato S, Masiol M, Innocente E, Pecorari E, Rampazzo G, Pavoni B (2012) A procedure to assess local and l ong-range transport contributions to PM2.5 and secondary inorganic aerosol. J Aerosol Sci 46:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.12.001
Sternbeck J, Sjödin Å, Andréasson K (2002) Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension—results from two tunnel studies. Atmos Environ 36:4735–4744. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00561-7
Sun Y-L, Zhang Q, Schwab JJ, Demerjian KL, Chen W-N, Bae M-S et al (2011) Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic aerosols in New York City with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1581–1602. doi:10.5194/acp-11-1581-2011
Tao J, Zhang L, Engling G, Zhang R, Yang Y, Cao J et al (2013) Chemical composition of PM2.5 in an urban environment in Chengdu, China: importance of springtime dust storms and biomass burning. Atmos Res 122:270–283. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.11.004
Vassura I, Passarini F, Ferroni L, Bernardi E, Morselli L (2011) PCDD/Fs atmospheric deposition fluxes and soil contamination close to a municipal solid waste incinerator. Chemosphere 83:1366–1373. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.072
Vassura I, Venturini E, Marchetti S, Piazzalunga A, Bernardi E, Fermo P, Passarini F (2014) Markers and influence of open biomass burning on atmospheric particulate size and composition during a major bonfire event. Atmos Environ 82:218–225. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.037
Venturini E, Vassura I, Ferroni L, Raffo S, Passarini F, Beddows DC, Harrison RM (2013a) Bulk deposition close to a municipal solid waste incinerator: one source among many. Sci Total Environ 456–457:392–403. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.097
Venturini E, Vassura I, Passarini F, Morselli L (2013b) Source apportionment study based on selective wind direction sampling. Environ Eng Manag J 12:233–236, eISSN 1843-3707
Wang Y-F, Huang K-L, Li C-T, Mi H-H, Luo J-H, Tsai P-J (2003) Emissions of fuel metals content from a diesel vehicle engine. Atmos Environ 37:4637–4643. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.07.007
Wang Y, Huang J, Hopke PK, Rattigan OV, Chalupa DC, Utell MJ et al (2013) Effect of the shutdown of a large coal-fired power plant on ambient mercury species. Chemosphere 92:360–367. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.024
Yang B, Zhou L, Xue N, Li F, Li Y, Vogt RD et al (2013) Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of Huanghuai Plain, China: comparison of three receptor models. Sci Total Environ 443:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.094
Yin J, Allen AG, Harrison RM, Jennings SG, Wright E, Fitzpatrick M et al (2005) Major component composition of urban PM10 and PM2.5 in Ireland. Atmos Res 78:149–165. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.03.006
Yubero E, Carratalá A, Crespo J, Nicolás J, Santacatal M, Nava S et al (2011) PM10 source apportionment in the surroundings of the San Vicente del Raspeig cement plant complex in southeastern Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:64–74. doi:10.1007/s11356-010-0352-9
Zhang Y, Obrist D, Zielinska B, Gertler A (2013) Particulate emissions from different types of biomass burning. Atmos Environ 72:27–35. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.026
Zhou L, Hopke PK, Liu W (2004) Comparison of two trajectory based models for locating particle sources for two rural New York sites. Atmos Environ 38:1955–1963. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.12.034
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Constantini Samara
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 134 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Venturini, E., Vassura, I., Raffo, S. et al. Source apportionment and location by selective wind sampling and Positive Matrix Factorization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 11634–11648 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2507-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2507-6