Abstract
Conservation of surrogate species is expected to benefit co-occurring species with similar distributions that share the same habitat, yet the usefulness of this approach to protect nontarget species has been extensively challenged. In this study, we aimed to assess whether co-occurring species could be afforded protection under the conservation of two proposed surrogate species, the giant panda and the takin. We undertook a thorough study on the habitat requirements of these two endangered species, based on the analysis of their habitat preferences. The results revealed that the giant panda exhibits more specialized habitat preferences than does the takin and that habitat separation between these species mainly reflected differences in their dietary requirements and preferences. We suggest that these differences might facilitate their coexistence in sympatric areas. Meanwhile, results of a discriminant function analysis showed that protection of giant pandas would protect 82.1 % of the panda’s habitat, but only 25.4 % of the takin’s habitat and just 57.0 % of the joint habitats of these species. Importantly, our results also showed that a joint surrogate species approach to conservation would protect 86.9 % of the panda’s habitat, 53.7 % of the takin’s habitat, and 72.2 % of the joint habitats of these species. This is a higher degree of habitat protection than the single surrogate conservation of pandas. We conclude that the joint surrogate species approach should be adopted to improve biodiversity conservation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47
Chen YP, Jiang SW, Zhao LJ, Huang JZ (2003) Surveillance on giant panda habitats in Wanglang nature reserve, Sichuan. Sichuan J Zool 22:49–50 (in Chinese)
Hu JC (2001) Research on the giant pandas. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Press, Shanghai (in Chinese)
Hu JC, Zhang ZJ, Wei FW (2011) History, current situation and prospects on nature reserve for giant pandas (Ailuropioda melanoleuce) in China. Acta Theriol Sin 31:10–14 (in Chinese)
Jiang GS, Zhang MH, Ma JZ (2008) Habitat use and separation between red deer Cervus elaphus xanthopygus and roe deer Capreolus pygargus bedfordi in relation to human disturbance in the Wandashan Mountains, northeastern China. Wildlife Biol 14:92–100
Kang DW, Zhao LJ, Song GH (2011a) Competition relationship between giant panda and livestock in Wanglang national nature reserve, Sichuan. J Northeast Forestry Univ 39:74–76 (in Chinese)
Kang DW, Zhao ZJ, Guo WX, Tan LY, Kang W, Li JQ (2011b) Habitat selection attributes of giant panda. Chin J Appl Ecol 22:519–525 (in Chinese)
Li MF, Li S, Wang DJ, William JM, Guan TP, Chen LM (2011) The daily activity patterns of takin Budorcas taxicolor in winter and spring at Tangjiahe nature reserve, Sichuan province. Sichuan J Zool 30:850–855 (in Chinese)
Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2011) Direct measurement versus surrogate indicator species for evaluating environmental change and biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 14:47–59
Liu XH, Toxopeus AG, Skidmore AK, Shao XM, Dang GD, Wang TJ, Prins HHT (2005a) Giant panda habitat selection in Foping nature reserve, China. J Wildl Manage 69:1623–1632
Liu GQ, Wang H, Yin YF (2005b) Giant panda’s scent marks and scent mark trees in Wanglang national nature reserve, Sichuan. Biodiv Sci 13:445–450 (in Chinese)
Morris DW, Douglas LD (2000) Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81:2061–2066
Nie YG, Swaisgood RR, Zhang ZJ, Liu XB, Wei FW (2012) Reproductive competition and fecal testosterone in wild male giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:721–730
Niemi GJ, McDonald ME (2004) Application of eco-logical indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 35:89–111
Qi DW, Zhang SN, Zhang ZJ, Hu YB, Yang XY, Wang HJ, Wei FW (2011) Different habitat preferences of male and female giant pandas. J Zool 285:205–214
Schweiger AK, Ursula NM, Margit Z (2012) Small-scale habitat use of black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) and rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta helvetica Thienemann) in the Austrian Alps. Eur J Wildl Res 58:35–45
Shen GZ, Feng CY, Xie ZQ, Ouyang ZY, Li JQ, Pascal M (2008) Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan mountains, China. Conserv Biol 22:1144–1153
Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83:247–257
Administration SF (2006) The third national survey report on giant panda in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Swaisgood RR, Wei FW, Wildt DE, Kouba AJ, Zhang ZJ (2010) Giant panda conservation science: how far we have come. Biol Lett 6:143–145
Wang MJ, Li JQ (2008) Research on habitat restoration of giant panda after a grave disturbance of earthquake in Wanglang nature reserve, Sichuan province. Acta Ecol Sin 28:5848–5855 (in Chinese)
Wang TJ, Skidmore AK, Zeng ZG, Beck PSA, Si YL, Song YL, Liu XH, Prins HHT (2010) Migration patterns of two endangered sympatric species from a remote sensing perspective. Photogramm Eng Rem S 76:1343–1352
Wei FW, Wang ZW, Hu JC (2000) Habitat use and separation between the giant panda and the red panda. J Mammal 81:448–455
Wesner JS, Belk MC (2012) Habitat relationships among biodiversity indicators and co-occurring species in a freshwater fish community. Anim Conserv 15:445–456
Wu H, Hu JC (2001) A comparison in spring and winter habitat selection of Takin, Swtow and Groal in Tangjiahe, Sichuan. Acta Ecol Sin 21:1627–1633 (in Chinese)
Xu X, Wu Y, Liao YM (2006) Topographic variation of vegetation types in Xiaohegou nature reserve of Sichuan province. Acta Bot Boreal 26:0572–0578 (in Chinese)
Yan SQ (2004) Current status of Xiaohegou nature reserve. Sichuan J Zool 23:58 (in Chinese)
Zhang ZJ, Wei FW, Li M, Hu JC (2006) Winter microhabitat separation between giant and red pandas in Bashania faberi bamboo forest in Fengtongzhai nature reserve. J Wildl Manage 70:231–235
Zhang ZJ, Zhan XJ, Yan L, Li M, Hu JC, Wei FW (2009) What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in winter? Environ Sci Pollut R 16:79–84
Zhang ZJ, Ronald RS, Zhang SN, Lisa AN, Wang HJ, Gu XD, Hu JC, Wei FW (2011) Old-growth forest is what giant pandas really need. Biol Lett 7:403–406
Zhao XM (2005) Giant pandas: natural heritage of the humanity. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program in the 11th Five-Year Plan of China (2008BADB0B04) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170500). We would like to thank Wang Xiaorong, Zheng Yong, Ouyang Jie, Zhao Jixu, Lan Gaoshan, Li Yunxi, Gao Xiong, Jiang Wenlong, Huang Jian, Zhang Anlin, Dong Yubin, Zhang Yubo, Xiang Nan, and Duan Lijuan for their participating in the field work. We also thank Zhao Lianjun and Yuan Zhiwei in Wanglang Nature Reserve, and Yan Shuqi and Song Zheng in Xiaohegou Nature Reserve for the assistance during the fieldwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, D., Yang, H., Li, J. et al. Can conservation of single surrogate species protect co-occurring species?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 6290–6296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1675-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1675-0