Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproductive competition and fecal testosterone in wild male giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is notoriously difficult to study in the wild, but its interesting reproductive ecology makes the effort worthwhile. Perhaps more than most species, the panda is energy-limited, which alters the cost/benefit analysis of its reproductive ecology. Using global positioning system/very high frequency radiocollars to locate mating aggregations, we used behavioral observations and fecal testosterone assays to gain insight into male panda reproductive effort and strategies, and test theories relating to reproductive competition. Male pandas initially competed fiercely for access to females that were about to be fertile, but once male competitive status was determined, aggression rates declined. Contact aggression was only observed during the first 2 days of mating aggregations; thereafter, it was replaced with noncontact aggression and avoidance. Agonistic interactions were highly asymmetrical, with contest losers (subordinates) showing less aggression and more avoidance than contest winners (dominants), both before and after contest outcome was established. The competitively superior male displayed mate-guarding tactics and secured all observed copulations. Contrary to theoretical predictions, testosterone levels did not predict aggression levels or contest winners and also were not affected by winning or losing a contest. Body size appeared to be the primary determinant of contest outcome. We discuss our findings in light of theoretical predictions, such as those arising from the “challenge hypothesis,” in the context of the giant panda’s foraging and nutritional ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony LL, Blumstein DT (2000) Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce N e. Biol Conserv 95:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer J (1988) The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett GM, Shimizu K, Bardi M, Asaba S, Mori A (2002) Endocrine correlates of rank, reproduction, and female-directed aggression in male Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Horm Behav 42:85–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Whitten PT (2006) Testosterone predicts future dominance rank and mating activity among male chacma baboons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briffa M, Sneddon LU (2007) Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Funct Ecol 21:627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton BD, Keating JL, Li R, Yan H, Swaisgood RR (2010) Female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) chirps advertise the caller’s fertile phase. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:1101–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Chamba: Proc R Soc Lond B 236:339–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertising. Behaviour 69:145–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello CM, Creel SR, Kalinowski ST, Vu NV, Quigley HB (2009) Determinants of male reproductive success in American black bears. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Le Boeuf JB (1977) Female incitation of male competition, a mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:318–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristobal-Azkarate J, Chavira R, Boeck L, Rodriguez-Luna E, Veal JJ (2006) Testosterone levels of free-ranging resident mantled howler monkey males in relation to the number and density of solitary males: a test of the challenge hypothesis. Horm Behav 49:261–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DO, Lara MC (1999) Effects of body size and home range on access to mates and paternity in male bridled nailtail wallabies. Anim Behav 58:121–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher HS, Swaisgood RR, Fitch-Snyder H (2003) Odor familiarity and female preferences for males in a threatened primate, the pygmy loris, Nycticebus pygmaeus: applications for genetic management of small populations. Naturwissenschaften 90:509–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschenhauser K, Oliveira RF (2006) Social modulation of androgens in male vertebrates: meta-analyses of the challenge hypothesis. Anim Behav 71:265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford F, Turner A (1987) Animal conflict. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kersey DC (2009) Reproductive and adrenal endocrinology of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Environmental science and public policy. PhD thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA

  • Kersey DC, Wildt DE, Brown JL, Huang Y, Snyder RJ, Monfort SL (2010) Parallel and seasonal changes in gonadal and adrenal hormones in male giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). J Mamm 91:1496–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG (1983) Ethology and reproduction of captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Z Tierpsychol 62:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman DG, Peters G (1990) Auditory communication in the giant panda: motivation and function. In: Asakura S, Nakagawa S (eds) Second international symposium on the giant panda. Tokyo Zoological Park Society, Tokyo, Japan, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach AI, Powell RA (2003) Effects of body size on male mating tactics and paternity in black bears, Ursus americanus. Can J Zool 81:1257–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Jiang Z, Jiang G, Fang J (2001) Seasonal changes of reproductive behavior and fecal steroid concentrations in Pe’re David’s deer. Horm Behav 40:518–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JW, Ziegler TE, Strier KB (2002) Individual and seasonal variation in fecal testosterone and cortisol levels of wild male tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus paella nigritus. Anim Behav 41:275–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marler CA, Moore MC (1988) Evolutionary costs of aggression revealed by testosterone manipulations in free-living male lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, Hayden TJ (2001) Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlman PT, Higley JD, Fernald BJ, Sallee FR, Suomi SJ, Linnoila M (1997) CSF 5-HIAA, testosterone and sociosexual behaviors in free-ranging male rhesus macaques in the mating season. Psychiat Res 72:89–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills SC, Grapputo A, Koskela E, Mappes T (2007) Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller MN, Wrangham RW (2004) Dominance, aggression and testosterone in wild chimpanzees: a test of the “challenge hypothesis”. Anim Behav 67:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie Y, Zhang Z, Swaisgood RR, Wei F (2011) Effects of season and social interaction on fecal testosterone metabolites in wild male giant pandas: implications for energetics and mating strategies. Eur J Wildl Res. doi:10.1007/s10344-011-0569-z

  • Oyegbile TO, Marler CA (2005) Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm Behav 48:259–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan W, Lu Z, Zhu X, Wang D, Wang H, L Y, Fu D, Zhou X (2001) A chance for lasting survival. Peking University Press, Beijing (In Chinese)

  • Parker GA (1974) Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal contests. Anim Behav 29:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole JH (1989) Mate guarding, reproductive success and female choice in African elephants. Anim Behav 37:842–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ros AFH, Dieleman SJ, Groothuis TGG (2002) Social stimuli, testosterone, and aggression in gull chicks: support for the challenge hypothesis. Horm Behav 41:334–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandell M (1989) The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behaviour, ecology, and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 164–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller GB, Hu J, Pan W, Zhu J (1985) The giant panda of Wolong. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL (1995) Searching today for tomorrow’s mates. Anim Behav 50:759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration, P.R. China (2006) The third national survey report on giant panda in China. Science Press Beijing (In Chinese)

  • Swaisgood RR, Lindburg DG, Zhou X, Owen MA (2000) The effects of sex, reproductive condition and context on discrimination of conspecific odours by giant pandas. Anim Behav 60:227–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Lindburg DG, Zhang H (2002) Discrimination of oestrous status in giant pandas via chemical cues in urine. J Zool (Lond) 257:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Lindburg DG, White AM, Zhang H, Zhou X (2004) Chemical communication in giant pandas: experimentation and application. In: Lindburg D, Baragona K (eds) Giant pandas: biology and conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 106–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Wei F, Wildt DE, Kouba AJ, Zhang Z (2010) Giant panda conservation science: how far we have come. Biol Lett 6:143–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Wei F, McShea WJ, Wildt DE, Kouba AJ, Zhang Z (2011) Can science save the giant panda? Unifying science and policy in an adaptive management paradigm. Integr Zool 6:290–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser SK, Monfort SL, Southers J, Wildt DE (1994) Excretion rates and metabolites of oestradiol and progesterone in baboon (Papio cynocephalus cynocephalus) faeces. J Reprod Fertil 101:213–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C (2002) Sexual selection and life-history decisions: implications for supportive breeding and the management of captive populations. Conserv Biol 16:1204–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei F, Hu J (1994) Studies on the reproduction of giant panda in Wolong nature reserve. Acta Theriol Sin 14:243–248 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Poston J (1996) Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield JC, Hegner RE, Ball GF, Dufty AM (1990) The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am Nat 136:829–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield JC, Jacobs JD, Soma K, Maney DL, Hunt K, Wisti-Peterson D, Meddle SL, Ramenofsky M, Sullivan K (1999) Testosterone, aggression and communication: ecological bases of endocrine phenomena. In: Konishi M, Hauser M (eds) The biology of communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 255–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura N (1987) A model of correlation between precopulatory guarding and short receptivity to copulation. J Theor Biol 127:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong Y, Wei F, Ye X, Zhang Z, Li Y (2004) Mating behaviors of wild giant panda in Foping Nature Reserve. Acta Theriol Sin 24:346–349 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan X, Li M, Zhang Z, Goossens B, Chen Y, Wang H, Bruford MW, Wei F (2006) Molecular censusing doubles giant panda population estimate in a key nature reserve. Curr Biol 16:451–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of Foping National Nature Reserve and the filed staffs including XL Wang, QG He, and AX Zhang. We thank Dr. Russell Van Horn, James Elser, Arianne Cease, Laura Steger provided useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and Dr. XH. Li for helpful comments on the statistical analysis. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for invaluable suggestions improving the final version of the manuscript. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30830020), Key Program of Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-Z-4, CZBZX-1) and San Diego Zoo Global.

Ethical standards

The authors declare the experiments comply with the current laws of People’s Republic of China and were approved by State Forestry Administration of People’s Republic of China (2009-261).

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuwen Wei.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Huchard

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nie, Y., Swaisgood, R.R., Zhang, Z. et al. Reproductive competition and fecal testosterone in wild male giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 721–730 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1320-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1320-9

Keywords

Navigation