Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new challenge—development of test systems for the infochemical effect

  • AREA 7 • IMPACTS AND INTERACTIONS OF CHEMICALS • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Many—if not all—organisms depend on so-called infochemicals, chemical substances in their surroundings which inform the receivers about their biotic and abiotic environment and which allow them to react adequately to these signals. Anthropogenic substances can interfere with this complex chemical communication system. This finding is called infochemical effect. So far, it is not known to what extent anthropogenic discharges act as infochemicals and influence life and reproduction of organisms in the environment because adequate testing methods to identify chemicals which show the infochemical effect and to quantify their effects have not been developed yet. The purpose of this article is to help and find suitable test designs.

Main features

Test systems used in basic research to elucidate the olfactory cascade and the communication of environmental organisms by infochemicals are plentiful. Some of them might be the basis for a quantified ecotoxicological analysis of the infochemical effect. In principle, test systems for the infochemical effect could be developed at each step of the chemosensory signal transduction and processing cascade.

Results

Experimental set-ups were compiled systematically under the aspect whether they might be usable for testing the infochemical effect of single chemicals in standardized quantifying laboratory experiments. For an appropriate ecotoxicological assessment of the infochemical effect, experimental studies of many disciplines, such as molecular biology, neurobiology, physiology, chemical ecology, and population dynamics, should be evaluated in detail before a decision can be made which test system, respectively which test battery, might be suited best. The test systems presented here are based on the knowledge of the genetic sequences for olfactory receptors, binding studies of odorants, signal transmission, and reactions of the receivers on the level of the organisms or the populations. The following basic approaches are conceivable to identify the role of an infochemical: binding studies to the odorant-binding protein or to the odorant receptor binding protein (e.g., by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies), measurement of electrical signals of the receptor cells in the tissue (e.g., electroolfactograms, electroantennograms), registration of phenotypic changes (e.g., observation under the microscope), behavioral tests (e.g., in situ online biomonitoring, use of T-shaped olfactometers, tests of avoidance responses), measurement of population changes (e.g., cell density or turbidity measurements), and multispecies tests with observation of community structure and community function. The main focus of this study is on aquatic organisms.

Discussion

It is evident that the infochemical effect is a very complex sublethal endpoint, and it needs further studies with standardized quantitative methods to elucidate whether and to what extent the ecosystem is affected. The collection of approaches presented here is far from being complete but should serve as a point of depart for further experimental research.

Conclusions

This article is the first to compare various approaches for testing the infochemical effect. The development of a suitable test system will not be easy as there are a multitude of relevant chemicals, a multitude of relevant receptors, and a multitude of relevant reactions, and it must be expected that the effective concentrations are very low. The chemical communication is of utmost importance for the ecosystem and justifies great endeavors to find solutions to these technical problems.

Recommendations and perspectives

The infochemical effect is a new chapter in ecotoxicology. Will a new endpoint, the so-called infochemical effect, be required in addition to the actual standard test battery of Annex 5 to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (EC 1992)? Finding the answer to this question is a big challenge that could be met by a comprehensive research project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Infochemicals:

are chemical cues that inform an organism about its environment. Infochemicals can be emitted or released by senders and perceived by receivers. Natural infochemicals are infochemicals used by organisms in a “natural” environment undisturbed by man.

Infochemical Effect:

describes that anthropogenic substances—so called anthropogenic infochemicals—can influence an organism so that it perceives its chemical environment differently.

Anthropogenic Infochemicals:

are substances discharged by man which are responsible for the infochemical effect.

References

  • Ache BW, Restrepo D (2000) Olfactory Transduction. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature 401:60–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alioto TS, Ngai J (2006) The repertoire of olfactory C family G protein-coupled receptors in zebrafish: candidate chemosensory receptors for amino acids. BMC Genomics 7:309

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry MJ (2000) Effects of endosulfan on Chaoborus-induced life-history shifts and morphological defenses in Daphnia pulex. J Plankton Res 22:1705–1718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beets M (1970) The molecular parameters of olfactory response. Pharmacol Rev 22:1–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blechinger SR, Matz C, Kusch RC, Chivers DP, Krone PH (2007) Brief embryonic cadmium exposure induces a stress response and cell death in the developing olfactory system followed by long-term olfactory deficits in juvenile zebrafish. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 224:72–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boeing WJ, Ramcharan CW, Riessen HP (2006) Multiple predator defence strategies in Daphnia pulex and their relation to native habitat. Jl of Plankton Res 28(6):571–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma M, Spaak P, de Meester L (1998) Predator-mediated plasticity in morphology, life history and behavior in Daphnia: the uncoupling of responses. Am Nat 152:237–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boller T (1995) Chemoperception of microbial signals in plant cells. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:189–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boriss H, Boersma M, Witshire KH (1999) Trimethylamine induces migration of waterfleas. Nature 398:382–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MC, Dawidowicz P, Dodson SI (1999) Interactive effects of fish kairomone and light on Daphnia escape behavior. J Plankton Res 21:1317–1335

    Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Hansson LA (2000) Chemical communication in aquatic systems: an introduction. Oikos 88:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Chivers DP (2006) Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and predation risk assessment by fishes. In: Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (eds) Fish Cognition and Behaviour. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Smith RJF (1998) Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): conditioning hatchery-reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Can J Fisheries Aqua Sci 55:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Naderi NT, Harvey MC, Kelly JM (2003) Nitrogen oxides elicit antipredator responses in juvenile channel catfish, but not in convict cichlids or rainbow trout: Conservation of the Ostariophysan alarm pheromone. J Chem Ecol 29:1781–1796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Rive AC, Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP (2006) The dynamic nature of anti-predator behaviour: prey fish integrate threat-sensitive anti-predator responses within background levels of predation risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne KA, Tamburri MN, Zimmer-Faust RK (1998) Modelling quantitative structure–activity relationships between animal behaviour and environmental signal molecules. J of Exp Biol 201:245–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant B, Silver WL (2000) Chemesthesis: the common chemical sense. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck L, Axel R (1991) A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buhr K, Fritzler R, Guth H (2001) Structure–odour relationships of g- and d- lactones. In: Rothe M (ed) Flavour: Perception, release, evaluation, formation, acceptance, nutrition, health. Proceedings of the 6th Wartburg Aroma Symposium. Wartburg-Stiftung, Eigenverlag Bergholz-Re, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks RL, Lodge DM (2002) Cued in: Advances and opportunities in freshwater chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 28:1901–1917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Oh BC, Stryer L (1998) Cloning and localization of two multigene receptor families in goldfish olfactory epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11987–11992

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carr WE (1988) The molecular nature of chemical stimuli in the aquatic environment. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Charoy C, Janssen CR (1999) The swimming behaviour of Brachionus calyciflorus (rotifer) under toxic stress. II. Comparative sensitivity of various behavioural criteria. Chemosphere 38(14):3247–3260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charoy CP, Janssen CR, Persoone G, Clément P (1995) The swimming behaviour of Brachionus calyciflorus (rotifer) under toxic stress. I. The use of automated trajectometry for determining sublethal effects of chemicals. Aquatic Toxicology 32(4):271–282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF (1996) Evolution of chemical alarm signals: attracting predators benefits alarm signal senders. American Naturalist 148:649–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Zhao X, Brown GE, Marchant TA, Ferrari MCO (2007a) Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk. Evol Ecol 22:561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Wisenden BD, Hindman CJ, Michalak TA, Kusch RC, Kaminskyj SGW, Jack KL, Ferrari MCO, Pollock RJ, Halbgewachs CF, Pollock MS, Alemadi S, James CT, Savaloja RK, Goater CP, Corwin A, Mirza RS, Kiesecker JM, Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Krone PH, Blaustein AR, Mathis A (2007b) Epidermal ‘alarm substance’ cells of fishes are maintained by non-alarm functions: possible defence against pathogens, parasites and UVB radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274:2611–2619

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieri MD, Stearns DE (1999) Reduction of grazing activity of two estuarine copepods in response to the exudate of a visual predator. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Crasto C, Marenco L, Miller PL, Shepherd GS (2002) Nucleic Acids. Research 1:354–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington KM, McCauley E (1994) Food dependent aggregation and mobility of the water fleas Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia pulex. Can J Zool 72:1217–1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Czesnik D, Schild D, Kuduz J, Manzini I (2007) Cannabinoid action in the olfactory epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(8):2967–2972

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daughton CG, Ternes T (1999) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Agents of subtle changes. Environmental Health Perspectives 107:907–938

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dicke M, Hilker M (2003) Induced plant responses: from molecular to evolutionary biology. Basic Appl Ecol 4:3–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI (1989) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia 78:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI, Hanazato T (1995) Commentary on effects of anthropogenic and natural organic chemicals on development, Swimming behavior, and reproduction of Daphnia, a key member of aquatic ecosystems. Environ Health Perspect 103(4):7–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI, Crowl TA, Peckarsky BL, Kats LB, Covich AP, Culp JM (1994) Non-visual communication in freshwater benthos: an overview. J N Am Benthol Soc 13:268–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI, Ryan S, Tollrian R, Lampert W (1997) Individual swimming behavior of Daphnia: effects of food, light and container size. J Plankton Res 19:1537–1552

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryer L (2000) Evolution of odorant receptors. BioEssays 22:803–810

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dulac C, Axel R (1995) A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell 83:195–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (1992) Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances

  • Eilers M, Hornak V, Smith SO, Konopka JB (2005) Comparison of class A and D G-protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation. Biochemistry 44:8959–8975

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ejdung G (1998) Behavioural responses to chemical cues of predation risk in a three-trophic-level Baltic Sea food chain. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 165:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Epel D, Luckenbach T, Stevenson CN, Macmanus-Spencer LA, Hamdoun A, Smital T (2008) Efflux transporters: newly appreciated roles in protection against pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 32:3914–3920

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild WL, Brown SB, Moore A (2002) Effects of freshwater contaminants on marine survival in Atlantic salmon. NPAFC Technical Report 4:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP (2006a) The role of latent inhibition in acquired predator recognition by fathead minnows. Can J Zool 84:505–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP (2006b) Learning threat-sensitive predator avoidance: how do fathead minnows incorporate conflicting information? Anim Behav 71:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Trowell JJ, Brown GE, Chivers DP (2005) The role of learning in the development of threat-sensitive predator avoidance in fathead minnows. Anim Behav 70:777–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Brown MR, Pollock MS, Chivers DP (2007a) The paradox of risk assessment: comparing responses of fathead minnows to capture-released and diet-released alarm cues from two different predators. Chemoecology 17:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Messier F, Chivers DP (2007b) First documentation of cultural transmission of predator recognition by amphibians. Ethology 113:621–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Filser J (2008) Ecotoxicology and ecosystems: relevance, restrictions, research needs. Basic Appl Ecol 9:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Filser J, Koehler H, Ruf A, Römbke J, Prinzing A, Schaefer M (2008) Ecology meets soil ecotoxicology: Challenge and Chance. Basic Appl Ecol 9:346–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fine JM, Vrieze LA, Sorensen PW (2004) Evidence that petromyzontid lampreys employ a common migratory pheromone that is partially comprised of bile acids. J Chem Ecol 30(11):2091–2110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) (2000) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn, Wiley, New York

  • Fleeger JW, Carman KR, Nisbet RM (2003) Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 317:207–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag J, Ludwig G, Andreini P, Rössler P, Breer H (1998) Olfactory receptors in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A 183:635–650

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag J, Beck A, Ludwig G, von Buchlotz L, Breer H (1999) On the origin of the olfactory receptor family: Receptor genes of the jawless fish (Lampetra fluviatilis). Gene 226:165–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen RG, Chivers DP (2006) Underwater video reveals strong avoidance of alarm cues by prey fishes. Ethology 112:339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Galizia CG, Szyszka P (2008) Olfactory coding in the insect brain: molecular receptive ranges, spatial and temporal coding. Entomol Exp Appl 128:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt A (2007) Aquatic behavioral ecotoxicology—prospects and limitations. HERA 13(3):481–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt A, de Bisthoven JL (1995) Behavioural, developmental and morphological responses of Chironomus gr. thummi larvae (Diptera) to aquatic pollution. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 4:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt A, de Bisthoven JL, Schmidt S (2006a) Automated recording of vertical negative phototactic behaviour in Daphnia magna (Crustacea). Hydrobiologia 559:433–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt A, Ingram M-K, Kang J, Ultizur S (2006b) In situ on-line toxicity biomonitoring in water: recent developments. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(9):2263–2272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JJ (1999) Kairomone-induced morphological defences in Rotifers. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Glusman G, Bahar A, Sharon D, Pilpel Y, White J, Lancet D (2000) The olfactory receptor gene superfamily: data mining, classification and nomenclature. Mamm Genome 11(11):1016–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glusman G, Yanai I, Rubin I, Lancet D (2001) The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res 11(5):685–702

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey PA, Malnic B, Buck LB (2004) The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2156–2161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad R, Khan R, Takahashi YK, Mori K, Harel D, Sobel N (2008) A metric for odorant comparison. Nat Methods 5(5):425–429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazato T (1999) Anthropogenic chemicals (insecticides) disturb natural organic chemical communication in the plankton community. Environ Pollut 105:137–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazato T, Dodson SI (1993) Morphological responses of four species of cyclomorphic Daphnia to a short-term exposure to the insecticide carbaryl. J Plankton Res 15:1087–1095

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazato T, Dodson SI (1995) Synergistic effects of low oxygen concentration, predator kairomone and a pesticide on the cladoceran Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 40(4):700–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1992) Mechanisms in olfaction. In: Hara TJ (eds) (1992) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Healy MD, Smith JE, Singer MS, Nadkarni PM, Skoufos E, Miller PL, Shepherd GM (1997) Olfactory receptor database (ORDB) a resource for sharing and analyzing published and unpublished data. Chem Senses 22:321–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilker M, McNeil J (2007) Chemical and behavioral ecology in insect parasitoids: how to behave optimally in a complex odorous environment? Chapter 5. In: Wajnberg E, Bernstein C, van Alphen J (eds) Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications. Oxford, United Kingdom Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilker M, Kobs C, Varama M, Schrank K (2002) Insect egg deposition induces Pinus sylvestris to attract egg parasitoids. J Exp Biol 205:455–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodin J (2006) Expanding networks: signaling components in and a hypothesis for the evolution of metamorphosis. Integr Comp Biol 46(6):719–742

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel P, Vaidehi N, Floriano WB, Hall SE, Goddard WA III (2005) Test of the binding treshold hypothesis for odorant receptors: explanation of the differential binding of ketones to the mouse and human orthologs of olfactory receptor 912-93. Protein Sci 14:703–710

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iida A, Kashiwayanagi M (2000) Responses to putative second messengers and odorants in water nose olfactory neurons of Xenopus laevis. Chem Senses 25:55–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE (2000) Chemical communication and pheromones: the types of chemical signals and the role of the vomeronasal system. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 101–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Katada S, Hirokawa T, Oka Y, Suwa M, Touhara K (2005) Structural basis of a broad but selective ligand spectrum of a mouse olfactory receptor: mapping the odorant-binding site. J Neurosc 25:1806–1816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khafizov K, Anselmi C, Menini A, Carloni P (2007) Ligand specificity of odorant receptors. J Mol Model 13:401–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer H, Krieger J, Olszewski JD, Von Heijne G, Prestwich GD, Breer H (1996) Expression of an olfactory receptor in Escherichia coli: purification, reconstitution and ligand binding. Biochemistry 35:16077–16084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP, Blaustein AR (1996) The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western tadpoles. Anim Behav 52:1237–1245

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiørboe T, Visser AW (1999) Predator and prey perception in copepods due to hydromechanical signals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179(1):81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaprat DA, Evans RE, Hara TJ (1992) Environmental contaminants and chemoreception in fishes. In: Hara TJ (ed) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaschka U (2008a) Odorants—potent substances at minor concentrations. The ecological role of infochemicals. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Sources, fate, effect and risks, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaschka U (2008b) The infochemical effect—a new chapter in ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15(6):448–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaschka U, Kolossa-Gehring M (2007) Fragrances in the environment: pleasant odours for nature. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(Special Issue 1):44–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krautwurst D, Chirokova E (2001) The olfactory receptor expression library as a tool for structure-function studies. In: Rothe M (ed) Flavour: Perception, release, evaluation, formation, acceptance, nutrition, health. Proceedings of the 6th Wartburg Aroma Symposium. Wartburg-Stiftung, Eigenverlag Bergholz-Re, pp 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Krautwurst D, Yau K-W, Reed RR (1998) Identification of ligands for olfactory receptors by functional expression of a receptor library. Cell 95:917–926

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger J, Breer H (1999) Olfactory reception in invertebrates. Science 286:720–723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann H-W, Kusch J, Heckmann K (1999) Predator-induced defenses in ciliated Protozoa. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch J (1993a) Behavioural and morphological changes in ciliates induced by the predator Amoeba proteus. Oecologia 96:354–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch J (1993b) Induction of defensive morphological changes in ciliates. Oecologia 94:571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch J (1993c) Adaptation of inducible defense in Euplotes daidaleos (Ciliophora) to predation risks by various predators. Microb Ecol 30:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch RC, Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2004) Making sense of predator scents: investigating the sophistication of predator assessment abilities of fathead minnows. Behav Ecolo Socio 55:551–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson P (1997) Ideal free distribution in Daphnia? Are daphnids able to consider both the food patch quality and the position of competitors? Hydrobiologia 360:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson P, Dodson S (1993) Invited Review: Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch Hydrobiol 129:129–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A, Crochet P-A, Merilä J (2001) Predation induced effetcs on hatchling morphology in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Can J Zool 79:926–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Leick V, Grave M, Hellung-Larsen (1996) Signal peptide-induced sensory behavior in free ciliates: bioassays and cellular mechanisms. In: Czaba G, Müller WEG (eds) Signalling mechanisms in protozoa and invertebrates. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Sorensen PW (1997) Highly independent olfactory receptor sites for naturally occurring bile acids in the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. J Comp Physiol A 180:429–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z-X, Pickett JA, Field LM, Zhou J-J (2005) Identification and expression of odorant-binding proteins of the malaria-carrying mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 58(3):175–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig M, Schmidt G, Daniel Bontje D, Kooi BW, Streck G, Traunspurger W, Knacker T (2008) Direct and indirect effects of pollutants on algae and algivorous ciliates in an aquatic indoor microcosm. Aquat Toxicol 88:102–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschitz DL, Michel WC (2002) Amino acid odorants stimulate microvillar sensory neurons. Chem Senses 27:277–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Little EE, Archeski RD, Flerov BA, Kozlovskaya VI (1990) Behavioral indicators of sublethal toxicity in rainbow trout. Arch Environ Contamin Toxicol 19:380–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little EE, Fairchild JF, DeLonay AJ (1993) Behavioral methods for assessing impacts of contaminats on early life stage fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp 14:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JD, Hay ME (2006) When intraspecific exceeds interspecific variance: effects of phytoplankton morphology and growth phase on copepod feeding and fitness. Limnol Oceanogr 51(2):988–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbach T, Epel D (2005) Nitromusk and polycyclic musk compounds as long-term inhibitors of cellular xenobiotic defense systems mediated by multidrug transporters. Environ Health Perspect 113:17–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luporini P, Miceli C, Ortenzi C, Vallesi A (1996) Ciliate pheromones. In: Czaba G, Müller WEG (eds) Signalling mechanisms in protozoa and invertebrates. Springer, Berlin, pp 80–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lürling M, Beekmann W (2002) Extractable substances (anionic surfactants) from membrane filters induce morphological changes in the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus (Chlorophyceae). Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1213–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Luu P, Acher F, Bertrand H-O, Fan J, Ngai J (2004) Molecular determinants of ligand selectivity in a vertebrate odorant receptor. J Neurosci 24(45):10128–10137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malnic B, Hirono J, Sato T, Buck L (1999) Combinatorial teceptor codes for odors. Cell 96:713–723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini I, Schild D (2003a) Multidrug resistance transporters in the olfactory receptor neurons of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J Physiol 546(2):375–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini I, Schild D (2003b) cAMP—independent olfactory transduction of amino acids in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. J Physiol 551:115–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock TS (2000) Molecular Biology of Olfaction. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels E, Semsari S, Bin C, de Meester L (2000) Effect of sublethal doses of cadmium on phototactic behaviour of Daphnia magna. Ecotox Env Saf 47:261–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza RS, Ferrari MCO, Kiesecker JM, Chivers DP (2006) Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition. Behaviour 143:877–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Mombaerts P (2004) Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(4):263–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A, Lower N (2001) The impact of two pesticides on olfactory-mediated endocrine function in mature male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B: Biochem Mol Biol 129(2–3):269–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A, Waring CP (1998) Mechanistic effects of a triazine pesticide on reproductive endocrine function in mature male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Pestic Biochem Physiol 62:41–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikonov AA, Caprio J (2004) Odorant specificity of single olfactory bulb neurons to amino acids in the channel catfish. J Neurophysiol 92:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohloff G (1994) Scent and fragrances: the fascination of odors and their chemical perspectives. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Olender T, Feldmesser E, Atarot T, Eisenstein M, Lancet D (2004) The olfactory receptor universe—from whole genome analysis to structure and evolution. Genet Mol Res 3:545–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen KH (1992) Kin recognition in fish mediated by chemical cues. In: Hara TJ (ed) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi P, Zhou JJ, Ban LP, Calvello M (2006) Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication. Cell Mol Life Sci 63(13):1460–1466

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohnert G (2004) Chemical defense strategies of marine organisms. Top Curr Chem 239:179–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pohnert G, Steinke M, Tollrian R (2007) Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:198–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak EH (1973) Multiple profile-multiple receptor site model for vertebrate olfaction. J Theor Biol 40:469–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock MS, Pollock RJ, Chivers DP (2006a) Effects of body size, body condition and breeding state on responses to alarm cues by fathead minnows. Can J Zool 84:1351–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock MS, Pollock RJ, Chivers DP (2006b) Social context influences the anti-predator behaviour of fathead minnows to chemical alarm cues. Ethology 112:801–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodacy PJ, Bender SFA, Bromenshenk JJ, Henderson CB, Bender G (2002) The training and deployment of honeybees to detect explosives and other agents of harm. Detection and remediation technologies for mines and mine-like targets. Proc SPIE 4742:474–481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolen SH, Sorensen PW, Mattson D, Caprio J (2003) Polyamines as olfactory stimuli in the goldfish Carassius auratus. J Exp Biol 206:1683–1696

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roozen F, Lürling M (2001) Behavioural response of Daphnia to olfactory cues from food, competitors and predators. J Plankton Res 23(8):797–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter KJ (1996) Structure-odor relationships. Chem Rev 96:3201–3240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sachse S, Peele P, Silberling AF, Guhmann M, Galizia CG (2006) Role of histamine as a putative inhibitory transmitter in the honeybee antennal lobe. Front Zool 3:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito H, Kubota M, Roberts RW, Chi Q, Matsunami H (2004) RTP Family members induce functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors. Cell 119:679–691

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Suzuki N (2001) Whole-cell response characteristics of ciliated and microvillous olfactory receptor neurons to amino acids. Pheromone candidates and urine in rainbow trout. Chem Senses 26:1145–1156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiestl FP, Ayasse M (2001) Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success. Oecologia 126:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Schild D, Restrepo D (1998) Transduction mechanisms in vertebrate olfactory receptor cells. Physiol Rev 78:429–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder R, Hilker M (2008) The relevance of background odor in resource location by insects: a behavioral approach. BioScience 58:308–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta I, Chou JH, Bargmann CI (1996) odr-10 encodes a seven transmembrane domain olfactory receptor required for responses to the odorant diacetyl. Cell 84:875–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirokova E, Schmiedeberg K, Bedner P, Niessen H, Willecke K, Raguse J-D, Meyerhof W, Krautwurst D (2005) Identification of specific ligands for orphan olfactory receptors. G protein-dependent agonism and antagonism of odorants. J Biol Chem 280:11807–11815

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skoufos E, Healy MD, Singer MS, Nadkarni PM, Miller PL, Shepherd GM (1999) Olfactory receptor database: a database of the largest eukaryotic gene family. Nucleic Acids Res 27:343–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smital T, Luckenbach T, Sauerborn R, Hamdoun AM, Vega RL, Epel D (2004) Emerging contaminants-pesticides, PPCPs, microbial degradation products and natural substances as inhibitors of multixenobiotic defense in aquatic organisms. Mutat Res 552:101–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen PW, Caprio JC (1998) Chemoreception. In: Evans DH (ed) The physiology of fishes, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 375–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Speca DJ, Lin DM, Sorensen PW, Isacoff EY, Ngai J, Dittman AH (1999) Functional identification of a goldfish odorant receptor. Neuron 23:487–498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spehr M, Schwane K, Heimann S, Gisselmann G, Hummel T, Hatt H (2004) Dual capacity of a human olfactory receptor. Curr Biol 14(19):832–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabell OB, Ogbebo F, Primicerio R (2003) Inducible Defences in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators. Chem Senses 28:141–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szulkin M, Dawidowicz P, Dodson SI (2006) Behavioural uniformity as a response to cues of predation risk. Anim Behav 71(5):1013–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabanino RJ, Hall SE, Vaidehi N, Floriano WB, Kam VW, Goddard WA (2004) First principles predictions of the structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors: Validation for bovine rhodopsin. Biophys J 86:1904–1921

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor FR (1998) Biological aspects of Scenedesmus (Chlorophyceae)—phenotypic plasticity. Nova Hedwigia 117:1–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Troemel ER, Kimmel EB, Bargmann CI (1997) Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91:161–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Duren LA, Videler JJ (1996) The trade-off between feeding, mate seeking and predator avoidance in copepods: behavioural responses to chemical cues. J Plankt Res 18(5):805–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gool E, Ringelberg J (1996) Daphnids respond to algae-associated odours. J Plankt Res 18(2):197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten J (2000) Chemoreception in Microorganisms. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser AW (2007) Motility of zooplankton: fitness, foraging and predation. J Plankt Res 29(5):447–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelker D, Vess C, Tillmann M, Nagel R, Otto GW, Geisler R, Schirmer C, Scholz S (2007) Differential gene expression as a toxicant- sensitive endpoint in zebrafish embryos and larvae. Aqu Toxicol 81:355–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waring CP, Moore A (1997) Sublethal effects of a carbamate pesticide on pheromonal mediated endocrine function in mature Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Fish Physiol Biochem 17:203–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber A (2001) Interactions between predator kairomone and food level complicate the ecological interpretation of Daphnia laboratory results. J Plankton Res 23(1):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellerdieck C, Oles M, Pott L, Korsching S, Gisselmann G, Hatt H (1997) Functional expression of odorant receptors of the zebrafish Danio rerio and of the nematode C. elegans in HEK293 cells. Chem Senses 22:467–476

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel CH, Oles M, Wellerdieck C, Kuczkowiak M, Gisselman G, Hatt H (1999) Specificity and sensitivity of a human olfactory receptor functionally expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Neurosci 19(17):7426–7433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe GV (2000) The chemical defence ecology of marine unicellular plankton: constraints, mechanisms and impacts. Biol Bull 198:225–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita S, Yamada T, Hara TJ (2006) Gustatory responses to feeding- and non-feeding-stimulant chemicals, with an emphasis on amino acids, in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 68(3):783–800

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasumoto K, Nishigami A, Kasai F, Kusumi T, Ooi T (2006) Isolation and absolute configuration determination of aliphatic sulfates as the Daphnia kairomones inducing morphological defense of a phytoplankton. Chem Pharmaceut Bull 54:271–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Firestein S (2002) The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse. Nat Neurosci 5:124–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Firestein S (1999) Vertebrate odorant receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 56:647–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Ivic L, Otaki JM, Hashimoto M, Mikoshiba K, Firestein S (1998) Functional expression of a mammalian odorant receptor. Science 279:237–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J-J, Zhang G-A, Huang W, Birkett MA, Field LM, Pickett JA, Pelosi P (2004) Revisiting odorant-binding protein LUSH of Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for odour recognition and discrimination. FEBS Lett 558:23–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JJ, Kan Y, Antoniw J, Pickett JA, Field LM (2006) Genome and EST analyses and expression of a gene family with putative functions in insect chemoreception. Chem Senses 31(5):453–465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JJ, He XL, Pickett JA, Field LM (2008) Identification of odorant-binding proteins of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti: genome annotation and comparative analyses. Insect Mol Biol 17(2):147–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Z, Buck L (2006) Combinatorial effects of odorant mixes in olfactory cortex. Science 311:1477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 10, 89075, Ulm, Germany

    Ursula Klaschka

Authors
  1. Ursula Klaschka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Klaschka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaschka, U. A new challenge—development of test systems for the infochemical effect. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16, 370–388 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0093-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0093-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation