Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated framework of system dynamics and meta-heuristic for multi-objective land use planning problem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use optimization as a resource allocation problem can be defined as the process of assigning different land uses to a region. Sustainable development also involves the exploitation of environmental resources, investment orientation, technology development, and industrial changes in a coordinated form. This paper studies the multi-objective sustainable land use planning problem and proposes an integrated framework, including simulation, forecasting, and optimization approaches for this problem. Land use optimization, a multifaceted process, requires complex decisions, including selection of land uses, forecasting land use allocation percentage, and assigning locations to land uses. The land use allocation percentage in the selected horizons is simulated and predicted by designing a System Dynamics (SD) model based on socio-economic variables. Furthermore, land use assignment is accomplished with a multi-objective integer programming model that is solved using augmented ε-constraint and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) methods. According to the results of the SD model, land use changes depend on population growth rate and labor productivity variables. Among the possible scenarios, a scenario focusing more on sustainable planning is chosen and the forecasting results of this scenario are used for optimal land use allocation. The computational results show that the augmented ε-constraint method cannot solve this problem even for medium sizes. The NSGA-II method not only solves the problem at large sizes over a reasonable time, but also generates good-quality solutions. NSGA-II showed better performance in metrics, including number of non-dominated Pareto solutions (NNPS), mean ideal distance (MID), and dispersion metric (DM). Integrated framework is implemented to allocate four types of land uses consisting of residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural to a given region with 900 cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basse R, Omrani H, Charif O, Gerber P, Bodis K (2014) Land use changes modelling using advanced methods: cellular automata and artificial neural networks. The spatial and explicit representation of land cover dynamics at the cross-border region scale. Appl Geogr 53:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basse R, Charif O, Bodis K (2016) Spatial and temporal dimensions of land use change in cross border region of Luxembourg. Development of a hybrid approach integrating GIS, cellular automata and decision learning tree models. Appl Geogr 67:94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisschop J (2006) AIMMS optimization modeling. Paragon Decision Technology B.V., Harlem

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos J (1993) Zoning in forest management: a quadratic assignment problem solved by simulated annealing. J Environ Manag 37:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broere W (2016) Urban underground space: solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 55:245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Batty M, Huang B, Liu Y, Yu L, Chen J (2011) Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(12):1949–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Huang B, Wang S, Lin H (2012) Sustainable land use optimization using boundary-based fast genetic algorithm. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakir R, Le-Gallo J (2013) Predicting land use allocation in France: a spatial panel data analysis. Ecol Econ 92:114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li X, Liu X, Liu Y (2010) An agent-based model for optimal land allocation (AgentLA) with a contiguity constraint. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(8):1269–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen V, Ferdãna Z, Steenbeek J (2009) Spatial Optimization of Protected Area Placement Incorporating Ecological, Social and Economical Criteria. Ecol Model 220:2583–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Proceedings of the parallel problem solving from nature VI conference, pp 849–858

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugardin F, Yalaoui F, Amodeo L (2010) New multi-objective method to solve reentrant hybrid flow shop scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 203:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldrandaly K (2012) A GEP-based spatial decision support system for multisite land use allocation. Appl Soft Comput 10:694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Haggar PESM (2007) Sustainable development and environmental reform. Sustainable industrial design and waste management, pp 125–148

  • Feng Y, Liu Y, Tong X, Liu M, Deng S (2011) Modeling dynamic urban growth using cellular automata and particle swarm optimization rules. Landsc Urban Plan 102:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galdavi S, Mohammadzadeh M, Mahiny AS, Nejad AN (2019) Comparison of logistic regression and geomod approaches to forest change modeling in the period of 1988–2025. Asian J Res Agric Forest 4(4):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamper A, Seppelt R (2007) A generic tool for optimising land-use patterns and landscape structures. Environ Model Softw 22:1801–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R, van Herwijnen M, Stewart TJ, Aerts JC (2008) Multiobjective decision support for land-use planning. Environ Plann B Plann Des 35(4):740–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kai C (2010) Multi-objective land use optimization using genetic algorithm. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, the Chinese University of Hong Kong

  • Knoke T, Paul C, Härtl F, Maria-Castro L, Calvas B, Hildebrandt P (2015) Optimizing agricultural land-use portfolios with scarce data: a non-stochastic model. Ecol Econ 120:250–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Ou J, Li X, Ai B (2013) Combining system dynamics and hybrid particle swarm optimization for land use allocation. Ecol Model 257:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Tang W, He J, Liu Y, Ai T, Liu D (2015) A land-use spatial optimization model based on genetic optimization and game theory. Comput Environ Urban Syst 49:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo G, Yin C, Chen X, Xu W, Lu L (2010) Combining system dynamic model and CLUE-S model to improve land use scenario analyses at regional scale: a case study of sangong watershed in Xinjiang, China. Ecol Complex 7:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrotas G (2009) Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput 213(2):455–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2000) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabiuny E (2012) Calculation of productivity of production factors (workforce, land and capital) in the agricultural sector of Markazi province. Work Soc 141:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth C, Peck A, Simonovi S (2015) Modeling structural change in spatial system dynamics: a daisyworld example. Environ Model Softw 65:30–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porta J, Parapar P, Doallo R, Rivera F, Sante I, Crecente R (2013) High performance genetic algorithm for land use planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 37:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang L, Zhang C, Yang J, Zhu D, Yun W (2011) Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Math Comput Model 54:938–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sante-Riveira I, Boullon-Magan M, Crecente-Maseda R, Miranda-Barros D (2008a) Algorithm based on simulated annealing for land-use allocation. Comput Geosci 34:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sante-Riveira I, Crecente-Maseda R, Miranda-Barros D (2008b) GIS-based planning support system for rural land-use allocation. Comput Electron Agric 63:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer C, Priess J, Das S (2011) A generic framework for land-use modeling. Environ Model Softw 26:1052–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart TJ, Janssen R, van Herwijnen M (2004) A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Comput Oper Res 31(14):2293–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G (2000) Introduction to quality engineering. Asian Productivity Organization/UNIPUB, White Plains

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wang X, Zhang H (2015) Simulation on optimized allocation of land resource based on DE-CA model. Ecol Model 314:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, Zhang X, Murray AT (2017) Spatial optimization for land-use allocation: accounting for sustainability concerns. Int Reg Sci Rev 41(6):579–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon EJ, Lee DK, Kim HG, Kim HR, Jung E, Yoon H (2017) Multi-objective land-use allocation considering landslide risk under climate change: case study in Pyeongchang-gun, Korea. Sustainability 9(12):2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang H, Ni D, Song W (2012) Agricultural land use optimal allocation system in developing area: application to Yili watershed Xinjiang Region. Chin Geogr Sci 22(2):232–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Zeng Y, Jin X, Shue B, Zhou Y, Yang X (2016) Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using multi-agent system. A case study in Changsha, China. Ecol Model 320:334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ramezanian.

Appendix 1: Equations in SD

Appendix 1: Equations in SD

Other equations are used in the proposed system dynamics are as follows:

$$ {\text{PO}} = {\text{POP}} \times {\text{POR}} $$
(24)
$$ {\text{AP}} = {\text{EAR}} \times {\text{PO}} $$
(25)
$$ {\text{EP}} = {\text{EPR}} \times {\text{AP}} $$
(26)
$$ J = {\text{EP}} = {\text{WF}} $$
(27)
$$ {\text{NP}} = {\text{NPC}} \times {\text{GDP}} $$
(28)
$$ {\text{JC}} = {\text{NP}} + {\text{WF}} $$
(29)
$$ {\text{PG}} = ({\text{PGR}} + {\text{PC}}) \times {\text{POP}} $$
(30)
$$ {\text{IL}} = {\text{RLU}} + {\text{ILU}} + {\text{CLU}} + {\text{FLU}} $$
(31)
$$ {\text{LC}} = {\text{IL/DLpP}} $$
(32)
$$ {\text{NF}} = L{\text{/IL}} $$
(33)
$$ {\text{LU}} = {\text{NF}} \times L $$
(34)
$$ {\text{IMG}} = {\text{Max}}\left( {{\text{JC}},\,{\text{LC}}} \right) - {\text{POP}} $$
(35)

Equation (35) is used to formulate the phenomenon of migration. This equation is based on the assumption that immigrating to city occurs when there is one of two conditions: (1) there is a vacancy for population and (2) there is vacancy for employment. On this basis, if the maximum available capacity for population and employment is greater than the current population, immigration to the city will occur. The negative value of the PC parameter means that (1) the city does not have the capacity of the current population; and (2) the city does not have the capacity of employment for the current population. Accordingly, a number of people are migrating from the city.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramezanian, R., Hajipour, M. Integrated framework of system dynamics and meta-heuristic for multi-objective land use planning problem. Landscape Ecol Eng 16, 113–133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-020-00410-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-020-00410-1

Keywords

Navigation