Skip to main content
Log in

Warm and Hot Deformation Behavior of As-Cast ZEK100 Magnesium Alloy

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isothermal warm and hot deformation behavior of as-cast ZEK100 (Mg-1.2Zn-0.25Zr-0.17Nd, in wt.%) magnesium alloy was studied using the Gleeble® 3500 thermal-mechanical simulation testing system. The study was conducted over a wide range of temperatures (100 °C-500 °C) and strain rates (5.0 × 10−4 s−1–1.0 × 10 s−1), for a low true strain regime (i.e. 0.2) associated with general deformation level during twin roll casting process. For the range of studied strain, steady state flow stress was obtained at low strain rates (5.0 × 10−4 and 1.0 × 10−3 s−1) and high deformation temperatures (350, 400 and 450 °C). At medium strain rates of 1.0 × 10−2 and 1.0 × 10−1 s−1, steady state flow stress was observed for deformation temperatures of 400–450 °C and 450 °C, respectively. In the rest of conditions, strain hardening was the dominant deformation mechanism. A modified Ludwig equation was successfully used to develop constitutive model for the ZEK100. The model was validated by compression of material under continuous cooling or an abrupt change in the strain rate conditions. Deformed microstructure was consisted of twinning at low temperature deformation; while, at higher temperatures discrete regions of discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (by bulging at serrated boundaries) were observed. The former is associated with the strain hardening observed in the stress strain curves while the latter is the main reason of steady state flow stress. Strain hardening sensitivity and strain rate sensitivity exponents were also correlated to the deformed microstructure of the alloy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Gleeble® is a trademark of Dynamic Systems, Inc., Poestenkill, NY, USA.

References

  1. Pollock TM (2010) Weight loss with magnesium alloys. Science 328:986–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song GL, Atrens A (1999) Corrosion mechanisms of magnesium alloys. Adv Eng Mater 1(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feliu Jr S, Pardo A, Merino MC, Coy AE, Viejo F, Arrabal R (2009) Correlation between the surface chemistry and the atmospheric corrosion of AZ31, AZ80 and AZ91D magnesium alloys. Appl Surf Sci 255:4102–4108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liang D, Cowley CB (2004) The twin-roll strip casting of magnesium. JOM 56(2):26–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agnew SR, Duygulu O (2005) Plastic anisotropy and the role of non-basal slip in magnesium alloy AZ31B. Int J Plast 21:1161–1193

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim J, Okayasu K, Fukutomi H (2012) Texture evolution in AZ80 magnesium alloy by the plane strain compression deformation at high temperature. Mater Trans 53(11):1870–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra RK, Gupta AK, Rao PR, Sachdev AK, Kumard AM, Luo AA (2008) Influence of cerium on the texture and ductility of magnesium extrusions. Scr Mater 59:562–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo AA, Mishra RK, Sachdev AK (2011) High-ductility magnesium–zinc–cerium extrusion alloys. Scr Mater 64:410–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford N (2013) The effect of rare earth elements on the behaviour of magnesium-based alloys: Part2–recrystallisation and texture development. Mater Sci Eng A 565:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Min J, Hector Jr LG, Lin J, Carter JT (2013) Analytical method for forming limit diagram prediction with application to a magnesium ZEK100-O alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 22(11):3324–3336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohlen J, Nurnberg MR, Senn JW, Letzig D, Agnew SR (2007) The texture and anisotropy of magnesium–zinc–rare earth alloy sheets. Acta Mater 55:2101–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter JT, Melo AR, Savic V, Hector LG, Krajewski PE (2011) Structural evaluation of an experimental aluminum/magnesium decklid. SAE Inter J Mater Manuf 4(1):166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoniswamy AR, Carpenter AJ, Carter JT, Hector Jr LG, Taleff EM (2013) Forming-limit diagrams for magnesium AZ31B and ZEK100 alloy sheets at elevated temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 22(11):3389–3397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aljarrah M, Essadiqi E, Kang DH, Jung IH (2011) Solidification microstructure and mechanical properties of hot rolled and annealed Mg sheet produced through twin roll casting route. Mater Sci Forum 690:331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurz G, Bohlen J, Letzig D, Kainer KU (2013) Influence of process parameters on twin roll cast strip of the alloy AZ31. Mater Sci Forum 765:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watari H, Haga T, Koga N, Davey K (2007) Feasibility study of twin roll casting process for magnesium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 192–193:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bian Z, Bayandorian I, Zhang HW, Scamans G, Fan Z (2009) Extremely fine and uniform microstructure of magnesium AZ91D alloy sheets produced by melt conditioned twin roll casting. Mater Sci Technol 25(5):599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Javaid A, Czerwinski F, Zavadil R, Aniolek M, Hadadzadeh A (2014) Solidification characteristics of wrought magnesium alloys containing rare earth metals. In. Magnes Technol 2014:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cai J, Li F, Liu T, Chen B, He M (2011) Constitutive equations for elevated temperature flow stress of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy considering the effect of strain. Mater Des 32:1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alankar A, Wells MA (2010) Constitutive behavior of as-cast aluminum alloys AA3104, AA5182 and AA6111 at below solidus temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7812–7820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsao LC, Huang YT, Fan KH (2014) Flow stress behavior of AZ61 magnesium alloy during hot compression deformation. Mater Des 53:865–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Liu L, Cui Z (2014) Characterization of hot deformation behavior of extruded ZK60 magnesium alloy using 3D processing maps. Mater Des 56:889–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abbasi SM, Shokuhfar A (2007) Prediction of hot deformation behaviour of 10Cr–10Ni–5Mo–2Cu steel. Mater Lett 61:2523–2526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Li L, Yuan D, Peng D (2007) Hot deformation behavior of the new Al–Mg–Si–Cu aluminum alloy during compression at elevated temperatures. Mater Charact 58:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirzadeh H, Najafizadeh A (2010) Flow stress prediction at hot working conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 527:1160–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li D, Feng Y, Yin Z, Shangguan F, Wang K, Liu Q, Hu F (2011) Prediction of hot deformation behaviour of Fe–25Mn–3Si–3Al TWIP steel. Mater Sci Eng A 528:8084–8089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin YC, Chen MS, Zhang J (2009) Modeling of flow stress of 42CrMo steel under hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A 499:88–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li D, Feng Y, Yin Z, Shangguan F, Wang K, Liu Q, Hu F (2012) Hot deformation behavior of an austenitic Fe–20Mn–3Si–3Al transformation induced plasticity steel. Mater Des 34:713–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. He A, Chen L, Hu S, Wang C, Huangfu L (2013) Constitutive analysis to predict high temperature flow stress in 20CrMo continuous casting billet. Mater Des 46:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mandal S, Rakesh V, Sivaprasad PV, Venugopal S, Kasiviswanathan KV (2009) Constitutive equations to predict high temperature flow stress in a Ti-modified austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 500:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phaniraj C, Samantaray D, Mandal S, Bhaduri AK (2011) A new relationship between the stress multipliers of garofalo equation for constitutive analysis of hot deformation in modified 9Cr–1Mo (P91) steel. Mater Sci Eng A 528:6066–6071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei G, Peng X, Hadadzadeh A, Mahmoodkhani Y, Xie W, Yang Y, Wells MA (2015) Constitutive modeling of Mg-9Li-3Al-2Sr-2Y at elevated temperatures. Mech Mater 89:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Haaften WM, Magnin B, Kool WH, Katgerman L (1999) Thermomechanical behavior of an AA3004 alloy at low strain rate. In Light Metals, C.E. Eckert, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp. 829–833.

  34. Howes BJ, Wells MA, Bathla R, Maijer DM (2005) Constitutive Behaviour of As-Cast Magnesium Alloy AZ31 Under Deformation Conditions Relevant to DC Casting. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Light Metals Technology Conference, St. Wolfgang, Austria, 8–10 June, 2005.

  35. Carpenter AJ, Antoniswamy AR, Carter JT, Hector LG, Taleff EM (2014) A mechanism-dependent material model for the effects of grain growth and anisotropy on plastic deformation of magnesium alloy AZ31 sheet at 450 °C. Acta Mater 68:254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dzwonczyk J, Prasad YVRK, Hort N, Kainer KU (2006) Enhancement of workability in AZ31 alloy – processing maps: part I, cast material. Adv Eng Mater 8(10):966–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rao KP, Prasad YVRK (2014) Advanced techniques to evaluate hot workability of materials. In: Hashmi S (ed) Comprehensive Materials Processing, vol 3. Elsevier Ltd. pp 397–426.

  38. Fjær HG, Mo A (1990) ALSPEN - a mathematical model for thermal stresses in direct chill casting of aluminium billets. Metall Trans B 21:1049–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mortensen D, Henriksen BR, M’Hamdi M, Fjær HG (2008) Coupled modelling of air-gap formation and surface exudation during extrusion ingot DC-casting. In Light Metals, TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 773–779

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hao H, Maijer DM, Wells MA, Phillion A, Cockcroft SL (2010) Modeling the stress-strain behavior and hot tearing during direct chill casting of an AZ31 magnesium billet. Metall Mater Trans A 41:2067–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hadadzadeh A, Wells MA (2013) Mathematical modeling of thermo-mechanical behavior of strip during twin roll casting of an AZ31 magnesium alloy. J Magnes Alloys 1(2):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Picu RC, Vincze G, Ozturk F, Gracio JJ, Barlat F, Maniatty AM (2005) Strain rate sensitivity of the commercial aluminum alloy AA5182-O. Mater Sci Eng A 390:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mandal S, Sivaprasad PV, Venugopal S, Murthy KPN (2009) Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304 L during hot torsion. Appl Soft Comput 9:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Agnew SR, Horton JA, Yoo MH (2002) Transmission electron microscopy investigation of <c + a > dislocations in Mg and a–solid solution Mg-Li alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 33(3):851–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaya A (2013) Physical metallurgy of magnesium. In: Pekgüleryüz M, Kainer K, Kaya A (eds) Fundamentals of magnesium alloy metallurgy. Cambridge, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Sawston, pp. 33–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Gottstein G (2001) Correlation of plastic deformation and dynamic recrystallization in magnesium alloy ZK60. Acta Mater 49:1199–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Samman T, Gottstein G (2008) Dynamic recrystallization during high temperature deformation of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 490:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang Z, Wang M, Li Z, Jiang N, Hao S, Gong J, Hu H (2011) Twinning, dynamic recovery and recrystallization in the hot rolling process of twin-roll cast AZ31B alloy. J Alloys Compd 509:5571–5580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Somekawa H, Mukai T (2013) Hall–petch relation for deformation twinning in solid solution magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 561:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Somekawa H, Singh A, Mukai T (2009) Fracture mechanism of a coarse-grained magnesium alloy during fracture toughness testing. Philos Mag Lett 89(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sakai T, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R, Miura H, Jonas JJ (2014) Dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization under hot, cold and severe plastic deformation conditions. Prog Mater Sci 60:130–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Hadadzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadadzadeh, A., Wells, M.A. & Javaid, A. Warm and Hot Deformation Behavior of As-Cast ZEK100 Magnesium Alloy. Exp Mech 56, 259–271 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0094-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0094-1

Keywords

Navigation