Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of Small Amplitude Vibration Dynamic Properties with Displacement in Reinforced Concrete Structures

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correlating damage level and changes in dynamic characteristics of a structure forms the basis for damage detection techniques in structural health monitoring. In reinforced concrete building structures such correlation is not well established. A damage detection technique capable of identifying the structural condition of the system based on its small amplitude vibration response is desirable because such response is easier to obtain. It is a common practice in engineering applications to estimate dynamic parameters from small-amplitude vibrations assuming a linear behavior of the structure. This simplification causes inaccurate estimation of the dynamic properties in reinforced concrete structures due to the presence of nonlinear elastic behavior. In this study no such assumption is made and a linear model is only used for sets of data corresponding to the same displacement amplitude of a nonlinear elastic system. The trends found between small-amplitude vibration dynamic properties and past levels of maximum displacement in various reinforced concrete structures are reported. In addition to analytical and numerical studies, results from a series of laboratory tests are reported to demonstrate the use of the approach. One full-scale three-story reinforced concrete flat-plate building and six small-scale reinforced concrete beams were examined. In this study, small displacements are defined as displacements below an overall drift ratio of 0.03%. The displacement dependence of the dynamic properties is considered explicitly. It was found that while fundamental frequencies of the examined reinforced concrete specimens were found to decrease uniformly as past peak displacement level increased, the equivalent viscous damping ratio was found to increase until the past peak displacement reached the neighborhood of nominal yield displacement and then observed to decrease when the specimens are pushed beyond the nominal yield displacement level, which has not been reported in literature before. Recommendations are provided as to how small amplitude vibration tests should be set up to avoid misleading observations due to nonlinear response at small amplitude response, observations that could lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the damage state of a structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Concrete Institute [ACI] (2002) Building code requirements from structural concrete and commentary. ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1986) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bousman WG, Winkler DJ (1981) Application of the moving-block analysis. Proceedings, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 22nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Atlanta, Georgia 755–763

  4. Celebi M (1986) Comparison of damping in buildings under low-amplitude and strong motions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 59(2–3):309–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang PC, Flatau A, Liu SC (2003) Review paper: structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct Health Monit 2(3):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinton JF, Bradford SC, Heaton TH, Favela J (2006) The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(1):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clough RW, Penzien J (1975) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen L (1995) Time-frequency analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  9. Consuegra F (2009) On the relationship between small amplitude vibration dynamic properties and the past maximum displacement in reinforced concrete structures, PhD Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University

  10. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB (1998) Summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib Digest 30(2):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doebling SW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos Laboratory, New Mexico

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrar CR, Doebling SW, Nix DA (2001) Vibration-based structural damage identification. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A 359:131–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman M (2007) Considering high harmonics for identification of non-linear systems by Hilbert transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(2):943–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman M (1994) Non-linear system vibration analysis using Hilbert transform-I, Free Vibration Analysis Method ‘FREEVIB’. Mech Syst Signal Process 8(2):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fick D (2008) Experimental investigation and analytical modeling of the nonlinear response of flat-plate structures subjected to cycling loading failure. PhD Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University

  16. Galambos TV, Mayes RL (1978) Dynamic tests of a reinforced concrete building. Report, Washington University

  17. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long ST, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen N, Tung CC, Liu HH (1996) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 454:903–995

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeary AP (1997) Damping in structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 72(1–3):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The MathWorks, Matlab (2010) The language of technical computing. R2010A

  20. Neild SA, Williams MS, McFadden PD (2003) Nonlinear vibration characteristics of damaged concrete beams. J Struct Eng, ASCE, 129: 2(260).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW, Buck JR (1999) Discrete-time signal processing. Prentice Hall

  22. Priestley MJN (1998) Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and significance to seismic design. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthquake Eng 31(4):246–259

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pugno N, Surace C (2000) Evaluation of the nonlinear dynamic response to harmonic excitation of a beam with several breathing cracks. J Sound Vib 235(5):749–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salawu OS (1997) Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Eng Struct 19(9):718–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takeda T, Sozen M, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Div, Proc Am Soc Civ Eng

  26. Trifunac MD (1972) Comparison between ambient and forced vibration experiments. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 1:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Worden K, Farrar CR, Haywood J, Tood M (2008) A review of nonlinear dynamic applications to structural health monitoring. Struct Contr Health Monit 15:540–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Z, Liu H, Liu L, Yuan D (2007) Identification of nonlinear viscous damping and Coulomb friction from the free response data. J Sound Vib 304(1–2):407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Irfanoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Consuegra, F., Irfanoglu, A. Variation of Small Amplitude Vibration Dynamic Properties with Displacement in Reinforced Concrete Structures. Exp Mech 52, 817–828 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9590-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9590-0

Keywords

Navigation