Skip to main content
Log in

Nanoscale Broadband Viscoelastic Spectroscopy of Soft Materials Using Iterative Control

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel approach to nanoscale broadband viscoelastic spectroscopy is presented. The proposed approach utilizes the recently developed modeling-free inversion-based iterative control (MIIC) technique to achieve accurate measurement of the material response to the applied excitation force over a broad frequency band. Scanning probe microscope (SPM) and nanoindenter have become enabling tools to quantitatively measure the mechanical properties of a wide variety of materials at nanoscale. Current nanomechanical measurement, however, is limited by the slow measurement speed: the nanomechanical measurement is slow and narrow-banded and thus not capable of measuring rate-dependent phenomena of materials. As a result, large measurement (temporal) errors are generated when material is undergoing dynamic evolution during the measurement. The low-speed operation of SPM is due to the inability of current approaches to (1) rapidly excite the broadband nanomechanical behavior of materials, and (2) compensate for the convolution of the hardware adverse effects with the material response during high-speed measurements. These adverse effects include the hysteresis of the piezo actuator (used to position the probe relative to the sample); the vibrational dynamics of the piezo actuator and the cantilever along with the related mechanical mounting; and the dynamics uncertainties caused by the probe variation and the operation condition. In the proposed approach, an input force signal with frequency characteristics of band-limited white-noise is utilized to rapidly excite the nanomechanical response of materials over a broad frequency range. The MIIC technique is used to compensate for the hardware adverse effects, thereby allowing the precise application of such an excitation force and measurement of the material response (to the applied force). The proposed approach is illustrated by implementing it to measure the frequency-dependent plane-strain modulus of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) over a broad frequency range extending over 3 orders of magnitude (~1 Hz to 4.5 kHz).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim K-S, Zou Q (2008) Model-less inversion-based iterative control for output tracking: piezo actuator example. In: Proceedings of american control conference. Seattle, WA, pp 2710–2715

  2. Vliet V, Bao KJG, Suresh S (2003) The biomechanics toolbox: experimental approaches for living cells and biomolecules. Acta Mater 51(19):5881–5905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guck J, Ananthakrishnan R, Mahmood H, Moon TJ, Cunningham J, Kas CC (2001) The optical stretcher: a novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells. Biophys J 81(2):767–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lupton EM, Nonnenberg C, Frank I, Achenbach F, Weis J, Bräuchle C (2005) Stretching siloxanes: an ab initio molecular ics study. Chem Phys 414:132–137

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charras GT, Horton MA (2002) Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling. Biophys J 83(2):858–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Butt H-J, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59:1–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Syed Asif SA, Wahl KJ, Colton RJ (1999) Nanoindentation and contact stiffness measurement using force modulation with a capacitive load-displacement transducer. Rev Sci Instrum 70(5):2408–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Y, Zou Q (2007) Iterative control approach to compensate for both the hysteresis and the dynamics effects of piezo actuators. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15:936–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Croft D, Shedd G, Devasia S (2001) Creep, hysteresis, and vibration compensation for piezoactuators: atomic force microscopy application. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123(1):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim K, Zou Q, Su C (2008) A new approach to scan-trajectory design and track: AFM force measurement example. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 130(5):051005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salapaka S, Sebastian A, Cleveland JP, Salapaka MV (2002) High bandwidth nano-positioner: a robust control approach. Rev Sci Instrum 73(9):3232–3241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Y, Zou Q (2008) Robust inversion-based 2DOF-control design for output tracking: piezoelectric actuator example. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 17(5):1069–1082

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR

  14. Takano H, Kenseth JR, Wong S-S, O’Brien JC, Porter MD (1999) Chemical and biochemical analysis using scanning force microscopy. Chem Rev 99:2845–2890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall GW, Wu-Magidi IC, Watanabe LG, Inai N, Balooch M, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ (1998) Effect of citric acid concentration on dentin demineralization, dehydration, and rehydration: atomic force microscopy study. J Biomed Materi Res 42:500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El Feninat F, Ellis TH, Sacher E, Stangel I (2001) A tapping mode AFM study of collapse and denaturation in dentinal collagen. Dent Mater 17:284–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McNeil PL, Steinhardt RA (2003) Plasmamembrane disruption: repair, prevention, adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:697–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmid AE, Cleveland JP, Anczykowski B, Elings VB (1998) Energy dissipation in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 72(20):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  19. Syed SAA, Wahl KJ, Colton RJ, Warren OL (2001) Quantitative imaging of nanoscale mechanical properties using hybrid nanoindentation and force modulation. J Appl Physi 90(3):1192–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim K, Zou Q (2007) Iteration-based scan-trajectory design and control with output-oscillation minimization: atomic force microscope example. In: Proceedings of american control conference. New York, NY, pp 4227–4233

  21. Jesse S, Kalinin SV, Proksch R, Baddorf AP, Rodriguez BJ (2007) The band excitation method in scanning probe microscopy for rapid mapping of energy dissipation on the nanoscale. Nanotechnology 18(43):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lozano JR, Garcia R (2008) Theory of multifrequency atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 100(7):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Proksch R (2006) Multifrequency, repulsive-mode amplitude-modulated atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 89(11):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim K, Lin Z, Shriotrya P, Sundararajan S, Zou Q (2007) Iterative control approach to high-speed force-distance curve measurement using AFM: time dependent response of PDMS example. Ultramicroscopy 108(9):911–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu Z, Kim K, Zou Q, Shrotriya P (2008) Broadband measurement of rate-dependent viscoelasticity at nanoscale using scanning probe microscope: poly(dimethylsiloxane) example. Appl Phys Lett 93:133103–133105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang S, Zhang YW (2004) Analysis of nanoindentation creep for polymeric materials. J Appl Physi 95(7):3655–3666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutter JL, Bechhoefer J (1993) Calibration of atomic-force miscroscope tips. Rev Sci Instrum 64(7):1868–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wahl KJ, Asif SAS, Greenwood JA, Johnson JA (2006) Oscillating adhesive contacts between micron-scale tips and compliant polymers. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenwood JA, Johnson KL (2006) Oscillatory loading of a viscoelastic adhesive contact. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barthel E (2008) Adhesive elastic contacts: JKR and more. J Phys D Appl Phys 41(16):163001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tambe NS, Bhushan B (2005) Micro/nanotribological characterization of PDMS and PMMA used for BioMEMS/NEMS applications. Ultramicroscopy 105(1–4):238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell A, Shrotriya P (2007) Onset of nanoscale wear of metallic implant materials: influence of surface residual stresses and contact loads. Wear 263:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell A, Shrotriya P (2008) Mechanical load assisted dissolution of metallic implant surfaces: influence of contact loads and surface stress state. Acta Biomaterialia 4(2):296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oyen ML (2005) Spherical indentation creep following ramp loading. J Mater Res 20(8):2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu Y, Zou Q, Su C (2008) A current cycle feedback iterative learning control approach to AFM imaging. In: Proceedings of American control conference. Seattle, WA, pp 2040–2045

  36. Shtark A, Grosbein H, Sameach G, Hilton HH (2007) An alternative protocol for determining viscoelastic material properties based on tensile tests without the use of poisson’s ratios. In: Proceedings of IMECE2007, mechanics of solids and structures, parts A and B, vol 10, pp 437–454

  37. Michaeli M, Shtark A, Grossbein H, Hilton HH (2010) Computational protocols for viscoelastic material property characterizations without the use of poisson’s ratios. AIP Conf Proc 1255:37–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Brien DJ, Mather PT, Scott R (2001) White viscoelastic properties of an epoxy resin during cure. J Compos Mater 35(10):883–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brinson HF, Brinson LC (2008) Polymer engineering science and viscoelasticity: an introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Maugis D (1992) Adhesion of spheres: the JKR-DMT transition using a dugdale model. J Colloid Interface Sci 150(1):243–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu Z, Zou Q (2010) A model-based approach to compensate for the dynamics convolution effect on nanomechanical property measurement. J Appl Physi 107(6):064315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Sriram Sundararajan from Iowa State University and Prof. Zhiqun Lin from Georgia Instistute of Technology, for their help on the tip radius characterization and the PDMS sample preparation, respectively. The financial support of NSF Grants CMMI-0626417 and CAREER award CMMI-1066055 are also gratefully acknowledged. PS and DT were supported through a NSF career development grant CAREER CMMI-0547280.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Zou.

Appendix

Appendix

We present the convergence analysis result of the MIIC algorithm in the presence of random noise/disturbance as follows.

Theorem 1

Kim and Zou [1]

Let G() be a stable single-input-single-output (SISO), linear time invariant (LTI) system, and at each frequency ω , consider the system output z(t) to be affected by the disturbance and/or the measurement noise z n (t) as (see Fig. 1 in [25])

$$ z(j\omega) = z_{l}(j\omega) + z_{n}(j\omega), $$
(14)

where z l () denotes the linear part of the system response to the input u(), i.e. z l () = G() u(), and z n () denotes the output component caused by the disturbances and/or the measurement noise. Then,

  1. 1.

    the ratio of the iterative input u k () to the desired input u d () is bounded in magnitude and phase, respectively, as

    $$ 1-\epsilon(\omega) \leq \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} \left| \frac{u_k(j\omega)}{u_d(j\omega)} \right| \leq \frac{1-\epsilon(\omega)}{1-2\epsilon(\omega)}, $$
    (15)
    $$ \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} \left| \angle \left( \frac{u_k(j\omega)}{u_d(j\omega)} \right) \right| \leq \sin^{-1}\left( \frac{\epsilon(\omega)}{1-\epsilon(\omega)}\right), $$
    (16)

    provided that the noise to signal ratio (NSR) as defined below, is upper-bounded by a less-than-half constant, ϵ(ω),

    $$ \left|\frac{z_{k,n}(j\omega)}{z_d(j\omega)}\right| \leq \epsilon(\omega) < 1/2, \forall k, $$
    (17)

    where the desired input u d () enables the linear part of the system output to exactly track the desired output, i.e., z d () = G() u d (), and z k,n () denotes the part of the output caused by disturbances and/or measurement noise in the kth iteration. Moreover, the relative tracking error is bounded as

    $$ \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} \left|\frac{z_{k}(j\omega)-z_{d}(j\omega)}{z_d(j\omega)} \right| \le \frac{2 \epsilon(\omega) (1 - \epsilon(\omega))}{1-2\epsilon(\omega)}; $$
    (18)
  2. 2.

    The use of the MIIC algorithm will improve the output tracking at frequency ω , i.e.,

    $$ \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} \left|\frac{z_{k}(j\omega)-z_{d}(j\omega)}{z_d(j\omega)} \right| < 1, $$
    (19)

    provided that the upper bound of the NSR is less than \(1- \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\approx 0.3\) , i.e.,

    $$ \left|\frac{z_{k,n}(j\omega)}{z_d(j\omega)} \right| \leq \epsilon(\omega) <1- \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}, \forall k. \\ $$
    (20)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Tramp, D., Zou, Q. et al. Nanoscale Broadband Viscoelastic Spectroscopy of Soft Materials Using Iterative Control. Exp Mech 52, 757–769 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9547-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9547-3

Keywords

Navigation