Unidimensional factor models imply weaker partial correlations than zero-order correlations

Abstract

In this paper we present a new implication of the unidimensional factor model. We prove that the partial correlation between two observed variables that load on one factor given any subset of other observed variables that load on this factor lies between zero and the zero-order correlation between these two observed variables. We implement this result in an empirical bootstrap test that rejects the unidimensional factor model when partial correlations are identified that are either stronger than the zero-order correlation or have a different sign than the zero-order correlation. We demonstrate the use of the test in an empirical data example with data consisting of fourteen items that measure extraversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Let \(x = \rho _{y_iy_j\cdot Z}/\rho _{y_iy_j}\). It follows that \(0< x< 1 \iff 0< (x - 0.5) + 0.5< 1 \iff -0.5< x - 0.5< 0.5 \iff |x - 0.5|< 0.5 \iff 2|x - 0.5|< 1 \iff |2x - 1| < 1\).

References

  1. Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. (1993). Confirmatory tetrad analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, B., & Pearl, J. (2014). Graphical tools for linear structural equation modeling. Technical Report R-432, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Psychometrika (forthcoming). http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat ser/r432.pdf

  4. Claeskens, G., & Hjort, N. L. (2008). Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., et al. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Fátima Salgueiro, M., Smith, P. W., & McDonald, J. W. (2008). The manifest association structure of the single-factor model: Insights from partial correlations. Psychometrika, 73, 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, J. L. (2014). An inequality for correlations in unidimensional monotone latent variable models for binary variables. Psychometrika, 79, 303–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshout, J. J., & Akkerman, A. E. (1975). Vijf persoonlijkheidsfactoren test 5PFT: Handleiding (The Five Personality Factor Test (5PFT): Manual). Nijmegen: Berkhout B.V.

  10. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Psychophysiology and personality: Extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism. In: Individual differences and psychopathology (pp. 13–30). Elsevier.

  11. Guttman, L. (1940). Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components. Psychometrika, 5, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guttman, L. (1953). Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 18, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langford, E., Schwertman, N., & Owens, M. (2001). Is the property of being positively correlated transitive? The American Statistician, 55, 322–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory. Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherman, J., & Morrison, W. J. (1950). Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smits, I. A. M., Dolan, C. V., Vorst, H. C., Wicherts, J. M., & Timmerman, M. E. (2013). Data from "cohort differences in big five personality factors over a periof of 25 years". Journal of Open Psychology Data, 1, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by European Research Council (Career Integration Grant) (Grand No 631145) and European Research Council (Consolidator Grant) (Grand No 647209).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riet van Bork.

Additional information

We would like to thank Mijke Rhemtulla and Denny Borsboom for their help in constructing the theory that later resulted in the proof presented in this paper. We would like to thank Sacha Epskamp for his helpful comments.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 311 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Bork, R., Grasman, R.P.P.P. & Waldorp, L.J. Unidimensional factor models imply weaker partial correlations than zero-order correlations. Psychometrika 83, 443–452 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9607-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • factor models
  • partial correlations
  • zero-order correlations