Abstract
Management techniques, such as marketization and performance measurement of academic activities, can be evidenced in universities around the globe. They have given rise to extensive research in the higher education sector. This paper provides a systematic literature review of 236 papers on public sector accounting research in higher education from 83 analysed journals from the three areas of accounting, public management and administration, and higher education between 1980 and 2014. We analyse research location, theoretical approaches, research methods, and topics used in these fields and their change over time. We also compare our results with those of reviews on general public sector accounting research. Our results show a dominance of research from Anglo-American countries. The majority of papers informed by a radical/alternative theoretical approach use descriptive case and field research whereas studies with a functionalist approach apply mathematical analyses, surveys and archival research. In terms of topics, high importance is attached to accountability/governance, performance measurement, external reporting, and budgeting in which the adoption of accounting systems and their usefulness is often discussed. Furthermore, we cluster papers in 12 groups and find a highly fragmented body of research reflecting the different specifics of the higher education sector. From this we derive opportunities for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
van Helden (2005) considers the topics, theories and research methods applied in the reviewed research studies and weighs them equally. In this case one research study dealt with two public sector branches which results in a coding of 0.5 points each.
The Journal Quality List by Harzing is based on different journal rankings, see http://www.harzing.com/jql.html.
Journals without any papers on PSAR in the HE sectors are Abacus, Account Educ: Int J, Account Eur, Account Hist J, Account Hist Rev, Account Public Interest, Account Res J, Account Rev, Adm Soc, Adv Account, Adv Manag Account, Asia-Pac J Account Econ, Behav Res Account, Contemp Account Res, Gov, Inf Org, Int J Account, Int J Account Audit Perform Eval, Int J Account Inf Syst, Int J Econ Account, Int J Manag Financ Account, Int J Public Sect Perform Manag, Int Public Manag J, Int Public Manag Rev, Int Rev Public Adm, Issues Account Educ, J Account Audit Financ, J Account Educ, J Account Lit, J Account Res, J Bus Financ Account, J Contemp Account Econ, J Financ Quant Anal, J Int Account Res, J Int Financ Manag Account, J Public Econ, J Public Policy, Public Adm Dev, Public Adm Q, Res Account Regul, Rev Account Financ, Rev Account Stud, Rev Quant Financ Account, Soc Environ Account J andSoc Policy Adm.
The complete linkage clustering technique has been found to generate the most compact clustering solutions (Hair et al. 2006).
For an overview on distance measures for binary and nominal data see Choi et al. (2010).
References
Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2006) Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Acc Org Soc 31(8):819–841
Ahrens T (2008) Overcoming the subjective–objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Acc Org Soc 33(2):292–297
Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK (1996) Cluster analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
Angluin D, Scapens RW (2000) Transparency, accounting knowledge and perceived fairness in UK universities’ resource allocation: results from a survey of accounting and finance. Br Acc Rev 32:1–42
Arnaboldi M, Azzone G (2010) Constructing performance measurement in the public sector. Crit Perspect Acc 21:266–282
Baxter J, Chua WF (2003) Alternative management accounting research—whence and wither. Acc Org Soc 28:97–126
Beverungen A, Hoedemaekers C, Veldman J (2014) Charity and finance in the university. Crit Perspect Acc 25:58–66
Bourn M, Ezzamel M (1987) Budgetary devolution in the national health service and universities in the UK. Financ Acc Manag 3:29–45
Brinn T, Jones MJ, Pendlebury M (2001) The impact of research assessment exercises on UK accounting and finance faculty. Br Acc Rev 33:333–355
Broadbent J (1999) The state of public sector accounting research. The APIRA conference and some personal reflections. Acc Audit Acc J 12:52–57
Broadbent J, Guthrie J (1992) Changes in the public sector: a review of recent “alternative” accounting research. Acc Audit Acc J 5:3–31
Broadbent J, Guthrie J (2008) Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. Acc Audit Acc J 21:129–169
Brown R, Brignall S (2007) Reflections on the use of a dual-methodology research design to evaluate accounting and management practice in UK university central administrative services. Manag Acc Res 18:32–48
Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann, London
Callon M (1999) Actor-network theory, the market test. Sociol Rev 47(S1):181–195
Cameron J, Guthrie J (1993) External annual reporting by an Australian university: changing patterns. Financ Acc Manag 9:1–15
Carrizales T, Kim ST, Kim CG (2006) Digital governance worldwide. Int J Electr Gov Res 2(4):1–23
Chenhall RH (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Acc Org Soc 28:127–168
Chenhall RH, Langfield-Smith K (1998) The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Acc Org Soc 23:243–264
Choi SS, Cha SH, Tappert CC (2010) A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. J Syst Cyber Inform 8(1):43–48
Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007a) Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, Aldershot
Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007b) The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Admin Rev 67(6):1059–1066
Christensen T, Lægreid P (2011) Democracy and administrative policy: contrasting elements of new public management (NPM) and post-NPM. Eur Policy Sci Rev 3(1):125–146
Christiaens J, De Wielemaker E (2003) Financial accounting reform in Flemish universities: an empirical study of the implementation. Financ Acc Manag 19:185–204
Churchman D (2002) Voices of the academy: academics’ responses to the corporatizing of academia. Crit Perspect Acc 13:643–656
Chung TKJ, Harrison GL, Reeve RC (2009) Interdependencies in organization design: a test in universities. J Manag Acc Res 21:55–73
Coen D, Thatcher M (2008) Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. J Public Policy 28(1):49–71
Colville I, Tomkins C (1994) Administrators as managers of change at the Karolinska Institute. Financ Acc Manag 10:355–368
Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW (1988) The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: an historically informed field study. Acc Org Soc 13:1–24
Coy D, Fischer ML, Gordon T (2001) Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Crit Perspect Acc 12:1–31
Coy D, Pratt M (1998) An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Acc Audit Acc J 11:540–561
Coy D, Tower G, Dixon K (1994) Public sector reform in New Zealand: the progress of tertiary education annual reports, 1990–1992. Financ Acc Manag 10:253–261
Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci 32:554–571
Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. J Public Admin Res Theory 16(3):467–494
Dunn WN, Miller DY (2007) A critique of the new public management and the neo-Weberian state: advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Org Rev 7(4):345–358
Dyer WG, Wilkins AL (1991) Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Acad Manag Rev 16:613–619
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad Manag Rev 16:620–627
Fischer ML, Gordon TP, Kraut MA (2010) Meeting user information needs: the impact of major changes in FASB and GASB standards on financial reporting by colleges and universities. J Account Public Policy 29:374–399
Fischer ML, Johnson LE, Elder RJ (2004) The demand for auditor specialization and its effect on private college and university audit fees. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 11:117–133
Fischer ML, Montondon L (2005) Qualifications, diversity and workplace practices: an investigation of higher education internal audit departments. J Public Budget Acc Financ Manag 17:488–521
Goddard A (2010) Contemporary public sector accounting research: an international comparison of journal papers. Br Acc Rev 42:75–87
Godemann J, Bebbington J, Herzig C, Moon J (2014) Higher education and sustainable development. Exploring possibilities for organisational change. Acc Audit Acc J 27:218–233
Gordon T, Fischer ML, Malone D, Tower G (2002) A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the US. J Acc Public Policy 21:235–275
Gordon TP, Fischer ML (2008) Communicating performance: the extent and effectiveness of performance reporting by US colleges and universities. J Public Budget Acc Financ Manag 20:217–255
Grabner I, Moers F (2013) Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Acc Org Soc 38:407–419
Gray R, Guthrie J, Parker L (2002) Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship. Acc Forum 26:1–30
Gray R, Haslam J (1990) External reporting by UK universities: an exploratory study of accounting change. Financ Acc Manag 6:51–72
Groot T (1999) Budgetary reforms in the non-profit sector: a comparative analysis of experiences in health care and higher education in the Netherlands. Financ Acc Manag 15:353–487
Groves REV, Pendlebury MW, Stiles DR (1997) A critical appreciation of the uses for strategic management thinking, systems and techniques in British Universities. Financ Acc Manag 13:293–312
Guthrie J, Olson O, Humphrey C (1999) Debating developments in new public financial management: the limits of global theorising and some ways forward. Financ Acc Manag 15:209–228
Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Harley S (2000) Accountants divided: research selectivity and academic accounting labour in UK universities. Crit Perspect Acc 11:549–582
Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Admin 69:3–19
Hood C (1995) The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: variation on a theme. Acc Org Soc 20:93–109
Hoon C (2013) Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building. Org Res Methods 16(4):522–556
Hopper T, Powell A (1985) Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: a review of its underlying assumptions. J Manag Stud 22:429–465
Humphrey C, Miller P, Scapens RW (1993) Accountability and accountable management in the UK Public sector. Acc Audit Acc J 6:7–29
Lapsley I (1988) Research in public sector accounting: an appraisal. Acc Audit Acc J 1:21–33
Latour B (1996) On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soziale Welt:369–381
Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Syst Pract 5(4):379–393
Lawrence S, Sharma U (2002) Commodification of education and academic labour: using the balanced scorecard in a university setting. Crit Perspect Acc 13:661–677
Lepori B, Usher J, Montauti M (2013) Budgetary allocation and organizational characteristics of higher education institutions: a review of existing studies and a framework for future research. High Educ 65:59–78
Lewis B, Pendlebury M (2002) Surplus or deficit—who cares? Cross-subsidy in colleges of higher education. Financ Acc Manag 18:25–38
Lomax VW, Wilson ER (1986) Predicting failure of private colleges: financial and nonfinancial determinants. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 2:213–232
Lowensohn S, Samelson DP (2006) An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research. Issues Acc Educ 21:219–239
Luft J, Shields MD (2003) Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Acc Org Soc 28(2):169–249
Malmi T, Brown DA (2008) Management control systems as a package: opportunities, challenges and research directions. Manag Acc Res 19(2):287–300
Melián-González S, Bulchand-Gidumal J (2009) Good moves, mistakes and unexpected events in an initiative to improve public management in the ICT service provision at a university. Int Rev Admin Sci 75(2):271–291
Mellet H, Peel MJ, Karbhari Y (2007) Audit fee determinants in the UK university sector. Financ Acc Manag 23:155–188
Mensah YM, Werner RH (2003) Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. J Acc Publ Pol 22:293–323
Modell S (2003) Goals versus institutions: the development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Manag Acc Res 14:333–359
Modell S (2005) Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Acc Audit Acc J 18:537–563
Modell S (2006) Institutional and negotiated order perspectives on cost allocations: the case of the Swedish university sector. Eur Acc Rev 15:219–251
Montondon LG, Fischer ML (1999) University audit departments in the US. Financ Acc Manag 15:85–94
Nagy J, Robb A (2008) Can universities be good corporate citizens? Crit Perspect Acc 19:1414–1430
Nelson M, Banks W, Fisher J (2003) Improved accountability disclosures by Canadian universities. Can Acc Perspect 2:77–107
Neu D, Ocampo Gomez E, Ponce de León OG, Flores Zepeda M (2002) ’Facilitating’ globalization processes: financial technologies and the World Bank. Acc Forum 26:271–290
Neu D, Silva L, Ocampo Gomez E (2008) Diffusing financial practices in Latin American higher education. Understanding the intersection between global influence and the local context. Acc Audit Acc J 21:49–77
Oakes H, Berry A (2009) Accounting colonization: three case studies in further education. Crit Perspect Acc 20:343–378
Osborne SP (2006) The new public governance? Public Man Rev 8(3):377–387
Otley DT, Pollanen RM (2000) Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence. Acc Org Soc 25:483–496
Parker LD (2002) It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Crit Perspect Acc 13:603–619
Parker LD (2011) University corporatisation: driving redefinition. Crit Perspect Acc 11:434–450
Parker LD, Roffey BH (1997) Methodological themes: back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality. Acc Audit Acc J 10(2):212–247
Pettersen I-J, Solstad E (2007) The role of accounting information in a reforming area: a study of higher education institutions. Financ Acc Manag 23:133–154
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Bachrach DG, Podsakoff NP (2005) The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strat Manag J 26:473–488
Pollitt C (2002) Clarifying convergence: striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Manag Rev 4:471–492
Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Provan KG, Kenis P (2008) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Admin Res Theory 18(2):229–252
Puxty AG, Sikka P, Willmott HC (1994) Systems of surveillance and the silencing of UK academic accounting labour. Br Acc Rev 26:137–171
Roberts RW (2004) Managerialism in US universities: implications for the academic accounting profession. Crit Perspect Acc 15:461–467
Saliterer I, Korac S (2013) Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Crit Perspect Acc 24:502–517
Scapens RW, Bromwich M (2001) Management accounting research: the first decade. Manag Acc Res 12:245–254
Schick AG, Lorenzi P (1986) Bureaucratic and political models of the university budgetary process: consensus on departmental merit. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 2:191–211
Shattock M (2000) Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutinal self reliance. Tert Educ Manag 6:93–104
Shields MD (1997) Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. J Manag Acc Res 9:3–61
Skaerbaek P (2005) Annual reports as interactions devices: the hidden constructions of mediated communication. Financ Acc Manag 21:385–411
Standish PEM (1985) Market incentives and organisational response in higher education. Acc Financ 25:1–18
Tahar S, Boutellier R (2013) Resource allocation in higher education in the context of New Public Management. Public Manag Rev 15:687–711
Teixeira PN, Rocha V, Biscaia R, Cardoso MF (2014) Revenue diversification in public higher education: comparing the university and polytechnic sectors. Public Admin Rev 74:398–412
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14:207–222
Tsamenyi M, Noormansyah I, Uddin S (2008) Management controls in family-owned businesses (FOBs): a case study of an Indonesian family-owned University. Acc Forum 32:62–74
van Helden GJ (2005) Researching public sector transformation: the role of managment accounting. Financ Acc Manag 21:99–133
Venieris G, Cohen S (2004) Accounting reform in Greek universities: a slow moving process. Financ Acc Manag 20:183–204
Venter ER, de Villiers C (2013) The accounting profession’s influence on academe: South African evidence. Acc Audit Acc J 26:1246–1278
Watts EW (1996) Internal allocation of funds: changes and challenges for Australian universities. Financ Acc Manag 12:53–69
Yamamoto K (2004) Corporatization of national universities in Japan: revolution for governance or rhetoric for downsizing. Financ Acc Manag 20:153–181
Zaman Mir M, Rahaman AS (2003) The role of accounting in the enterprise bargaining process of an Australian university. Acc Audit Acc J 16:298–315
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Jan van Helden and Giuseppe Grossi for giving helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank participants at the 8th European Network for Research in Organisational and Accounting Change (ENROAC) Conference in Lisbon (Portugal) as well as participants at the 13th Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research (CIGAR) PhD seminar in Ghent (Belgium) in 2011 for their invaluable comments on a first draft of this paper. The authors also appreciate the remarks and recommendations of two anonymous reviewers and of the editor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, U., Günther, T. Public sector accounting research in the higher education sector: a systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q 66, 235–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-016-0120-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-016-0120-0