Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public sector accounting research in the higher education sector: a systematic literature review

  • State-of-the-Art
  • Published:
Management Review Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management techniques, such as marketization and performance measurement of academic activities, can be evidenced in universities around the globe. They have given rise to extensive research in the higher education sector. This paper provides a systematic literature review of 236 papers on public sector accounting research in higher education from 83 analysed journals from the three areas of accounting, public management and administration, and higher education between 1980 and 2014. We analyse research location, theoretical approaches, research methods, and topics used in these fields and their change over time. We also compare our results with those of reviews on general public sector accounting research. Our results show a dominance of research from Anglo-American countries. The majority of papers informed by a radical/alternative theoretical approach use descriptive case and field research whereas studies with a functionalist approach apply mathematical analyses, surveys and archival research. In terms of topics, high importance is attached to accountability/governance, performance measurement, external reporting, and budgeting in which the adoption of accounting systems and their usefulness is often discussed. Furthermore, we cluster papers in 12 groups and find a highly fragmented body of research reflecting the different specifics of the higher education sector. From this we derive opportunities for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. van Helden (2005) considers the topics, theories and research methods applied in the reviewed research studies and weighs them equally. In this case one research study dealt with two public sector branches which results in a coding of 0.5 points each.

  2. The Journal Quality List by Harzing is based on different journal rankings, see http://www.harzing.com/jql.html.

  3. Journals without any papers on PSAR in the HE sectors are Abacus, Account Educ: Int J, Account Eur, Account Hist J, Account Hist Rev, Account Public Interest, Account Res J, Account Rev, Adm Soc, Adv Account, Adv Manag Account, Asia-Pac J Account Econ, Behav Res Account, Contemp Account Res, Gov, Inf Org, Int J Account, Int J Account Audit Perform Eval, Int J Account Inf Syst, Int J Econ Account, Int J Manag Financ Account, Int J Public Sect Perform Manag, Int Public Manag J, Int Public Manag Rev, Int Rev Public Adm, Issues Account Educ, J Account Audit Financ, J Account Educ, J Account Lit, J Account Res, J Bus Financ Account, J Contemp Account Econ, J Financ Quant Anal, J Int Account Res, J Int Financ Manag Account, J Public Econ, J Public Policy, Public Adm Dev, Public Adm Q, Res Account Regul, Rev Account Financ, Rev Account Stud, Rev Quant Financ Account, Soc Environ Account J andSoc Policy Adm.

  4. The complete linkage clustering technique has been found to generate the most compact clustering solutions (Hair et al. 2006).

  5. For an overview on distance measures for binary and nominal data see Choi et al. (2010).

References

  • Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2006) Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Acc Org Soc 31(8):819–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens T (2008) Overcoming the subjective–objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Acc Org Soc 33(2):292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK (1996) Cluster analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Angluin D, Scapens RW (2000) Transparency, accounting knowledge and perceived fairness in UK universities’ resource allocation: results from a survey of accounting and finance. Br Acc Rev 32:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaboldi M, Azzone G (2010) Constructing performance measurement in the public sector. Crit Perspect Acc 21:266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J, Chua WF (2003) Alternative management accounting research—whence and wither. Acc Org Soc 28:97–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverungen A, Hoedemaekers C, Veldman J (2014) Charity and finance in the university. Crit Perspect Acc 25:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourn M, Ezzamel M (1987) Budgetary devolution in the national health service and universities in the UK. Financ Acc Manag 3:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinn T, Jones MJ, Pendlebury M (2001) The impact of research assessment exercises on UK accounting and finance faculty. Br Acc Rev 33:333–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent J (1999) The state of public sector accounting research. The APIRA conference and some personal reflections. Acc Audit Acc J 12:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent J, Guthrie J (1992) Changes in the public sector: a review of recent “alternative” accounting research. Acc Audit Acc J 5:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent J, Guthrie J (2008) Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. Acc Audit Acc J 21:129–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Brignall S (2007) Reflections on the use of a dual-methodology research design to evaluate accounting and management practice in UK university central administrative services. Manag Acc Res 18:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1999) Actor-network theory, the market test. Sociol Rev 47(S1):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J, Guthrie J (1993) External annual reporting by an Australian university: changing patterns. Financ Acc Manag 9:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizales T, Kim ST, Kim CG (2006) Digital governance worldwide. Int J Electr Gov Res 2(4):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall RH (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Acc Org Soc 28:127–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall RH, Langfield-Smith K (1998) The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Acc Org Soc 23:243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SS, Cha SH, Tappert CC (2010) A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. J Syst Cyber Inform 8(1):43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007a) Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007b) The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Admin Rev 67(6):1059–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2011) Democracy and administrative policy: contrasting elements of new public management (NPM) and post-NPM. Eur Policy Sci Rev 3(1):125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaens J, De Wielemaker E (2003) Financial accounting reform in Flemish universities: an empirical study of the implementation. Financ Acc Manag 19:185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman D (2002) Voices of the academy: academics’ responses to the corporatizing of academia. Crit Perspect Acc 13:643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung TKJ, Harrison GL, Reeve RC (2009) Interdependencies in organization design: a test in universities. J Manag Acc Res 21:55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen D, Thatcher M (2008) Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. J Public Policy 28(1):49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colville I, Tomkins C (1994) Administrators as managers of change at the Karolinska Institute. Financ Acc Manag 10:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW (1988) The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: an historically informed field study. Acc Org Soc 13:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy D, Fischer ML, Gordon T (2001) Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Crit Perspect Acc 12:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy D, Pratt M (1998) An insight into accountability and politics in universities: a case study. Acc Audit Acc J 11:540–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy D, Tower G, Dixon K (1994) Public sector reform in New Zealand: the progress of tertiary education annual reports, 1990–1992. Financ Acc Manag 10:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag Sci 32:554–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. J Public Admin Res Theory 16(3):467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn WN, Miller DY (2007) A critique of the new public management and the neo-Weberian state: advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Org Rev 7(4):345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer WG, Wilkins AL (1991) Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Acad Manag Rev 16:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad Manag Rev 16:620–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer ML, Gordon TP, Kraut MA (2010) Meeting user information needs: the impact of major changes in FASB and GASB standards on financial reporting by colleges and universities. J Account Public Policy 29:374–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer ML, Johnson LE, Elder RJ (2004) The demand for auditor specialization and its effect on private college and university audit fees. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 11:117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer ML, Montondon L (2005) Qualifications, diversity and workplace practices: an investigation of higher education internal audit departments. J Public Budget Acc Financ Manag 17:488–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard A (2010) Contemporary public sector accounting research: an international comparison of journal papers. Br Acc Rev 42:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godemann J, Bebbington J, Herzig C, Moon J (2014) Higher education and sustainable development. Exploring possibilities for organisational change. Acc Audit Acc J 27:218–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon T, Fischer ML, Malone D, Tower G (2002) A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the US. J Acc Public Policy 21:235–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon TP, Fischer ML (2008) Communicating performance: the extent and effectiveness of performance reporting by US colleges and universities. J Public Budget Acc Financ Manag 20:217–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabner I, Moers F (2013) Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Acc Org Soc 38:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Guthrie J, Parker L (2002) Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship. Acc Forum 26:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Haslam J (1990) External reporting by UK universities: an exploratory study of accounting change. Financ Acc Manag 6:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot T (1999) Budgetary reforms in the non-profit sector: a comparative analysis of experiences in health care and higher education in the Netherlands. Financ Acc Manag 15:353–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves REV, Pendlebury MW, Stiles DR (1997) A critical appreciation of the uses for strategic management thinking, systems and techniques in British Universities. Financ Acc Manag 13:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie J, Olson O, Humphrey C (1999) Debating developments in new public financial management: the limits of global theorising and some ways forward. Financ Acc Manag 15:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley S (2000) Accountants divided: research selectivity and academic accounting labour in UK universities. Crit Perspect Acc 11:549–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Admin 69:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1995) The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: variation on a theme. Acc Org Soc 20:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoon C (2013) Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building. Org Res Methods 16(4):522–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper T, Powell A (1985) Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: a review of its underlying assumptions. J Manag Stud 22:429–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey C, Miller P, Scapens RW (1993) Accountability and accountable management in the UK Public sector. Acc Audit Acc J 6:7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley I (1988) Research in public sector accounting: an appraisal. Acc Audit Acc J 1:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1996) On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soziale Welt:369–381

  • Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Syst Pract 5(4):379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence S, Sharma U (2002) Commodification of education and academic labour: using the balanced scorecard in a university setting. Crit Perspect Acc 13:661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori B, Usher J, Montauti M (2013) Budgetary allocation and organizational characteristics of higher education institutions: a review of existing studies and a framework for future research. High Educ 65:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis B, Pendlebury M (2002) Surplus or deficit—who cares? Cross-subsidy in colleges of higher education. Financ Acc Manag 18:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax VW, Wilson ER (1986) Predicting failure of private colleges: financial and nonfinancial determinants. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 2:213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowensohn S, Samelson DP (2006) An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research. Issues Acc Educ 21:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft J, Shields MD (2003) Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Acc Org Soc 28(2):169–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmi T, Brown DA (2008) Management control systems as a package: opportunities, challenges and research directions. Manag Acc Res 19(2):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melián-González S, Bulchand-Gidumal J (2009) Good moves, mistakes and unexpected events in an initiative to improve public management in the ICT service provision at a university. Int Rev Admin Sci 75(2):271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellet H, Peel MJ, Karbhari Y (2007) Audit fee determinants in the UK university sector. Financ Acc Manag 23:155–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah YM, Werner RH (2003) Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. J Acc Publ Pol 22:293–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modell S (2003) Goals versus institutions: the development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Manag Acc Res 14:333–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modell S (2005) Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Acc Audit Acc J 18:537–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modell S (2006) Institutional and negotiated order perspectives on cost allocations: the case of the Swedish university sector. Eur Acc Rev 15:219–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montondon LG, Fischer ML (1999) University audit departments in the US. Financ Acc Manag 15:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy J, Robb A (2008) Can universities be good corporate citizens? Crit Perspect Acc 19:1414–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson M, Banks W, Fisher J (2003) Improved accountability disclosures by Canadian universities. Can Acc Perspect 2:77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D, Ocampo Gomez E, Ponce de León OG, Flores Zepeda M (2002) ’Facilitating’ globalization processes: financial technologies and the World Bank. Acc Forum 26:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D, Silva L, Ocampo Gomez E (2008) Diffusing financial practices in Latin American higher education. Understanding the intersection between global influence and the local context. Acc Audit Acc J 21:49–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes H, Berry A (2009) Accounting colonization: three case studies in further education. Crit Perspect Acc 20:343–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP (2006) The new public governance? Public Man Rev 8(3):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley DT, Pollanen RM (2000) Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence. Acc Org Soc 25:483–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker LD (2002) It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Crit Perspect Acc 13:603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker LD (2011) University corporatisation: driving redefinition. Crit Perspect Acc 11:434–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker LD, Roffey BH (1997) Methodological themes: back to the drawing board: revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality. Acc Audit Acc J 10(2):212–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen I-J, Solstad E (2007) The role of accounting information in a reforming area: a study of higher education institutions. Financ Acc Manag 23:133–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Bachrach DG, Podsakoff NP (2005) The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strat Manag J 26:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C (2002) Clarifying convergence: striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Manag Rev 4:471–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Kenis P (2008) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Admin Res Theory 18(2):229–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puxty AG, Sikka P, Willmott HC (1994) Systems of surveillance and the silencing of UK academic accounting labour. Br Acc Rev 26:137–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts RW (2004) Managerialism in US universities: implications for the academic accounting profession. Crit Perspect Acc 15:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saliterer I, Korac S (2013) Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Crit Perspect Acc 24:502–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scapens RW, Bromwich M (2001) Management accounting research: the first decade. Manag Acc Res 12:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick AG, Lorenzi P (1986) Bureaucratic and political models of the university budgetary process: consensus on departmental merit. Res Gov Nonprofit Acc 2:191–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock M (2000) Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutinal self reliance. Tert Educ Manag 6:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields MD (1997) Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. J Manag Acc Res 9:3–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaerbaek P (2005) Annual reports as interactions devices: the hidden constructions of mediated communication. Financ Acc Manag 21:385–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish PEM (1985) Market incentives and organisational response in higher education. Acc Financ 25:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahar S, Boutellier R (2013) Resource allocation in higher education in the context of New Public Management. Public Manag Rev 15:687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN, Rocha V, Biscaia R, Cardoso MF (2014) Revenue diversification in public higher education: comparing the university and polytechnic sectors. Public Admin Rev 74:398–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsamenyi M, Noormansyah I, Uddin S (2008) Management controls in family-owned businesses (FOBs): a case study of an Indonesian family-owned University. Acc Forum 32:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Helden GJ (2005) Researching public sector transformation: the role of managment accounting. Financ Acc Manag 21:99–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venieris G, Cohen S (2004) Accounting reform in Greek universities: a slow moving process. Financ Acc Manag 20:183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter ER, de Villiers C (2013) The accounting profession’s influence on academe: South African evidence. Acc Audit Acc J 26:1246–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts EW (1996) Internal allocation of funds: changes and challenges for Australian universities. Financ Acc Manag 12:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto K (2004) Corporatization of national universities in Japan: revolution for governance or rhetoric for downsizing. Financ Acc Manag 20:153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman Mir M, Rahaman AS (2003) The role of accounting in the enterprise bargaining process of an Australian university. Acc Audit Acc J 16:298–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Jan van Helden and Giuseppe Grossi for giving helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank participants at the 8th European Network for Research in Organisational and Accounting Change (ENROAC) Conference in Lisbon (Portugal) as well as participants at the 13th Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research (CIGAR) PhD seminar in Ghent (Belgium) in 2011 for their invaluable comments on a first draft of this paper. The authors also appreciate the remarks and recommendations of two anonymous reviewers and of the editor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Günther.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 60 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, U., Günther, T. Public sector accounting research in the higher education sector: a systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q 66, 235–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-016-0120-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-016-0120-0

Keywords

JEL Classsification

Navigation