Abstract
This paper presents a pull–push theory of industrial revolutions. Generalizing from the first industrial revolution in England and the second industrial revolution in the United States, it points to the presence of three necessary conditions, namely (i) the existence of a trigger event which creates (ii) new market opportunities (pull) as well as (iii) new process technologies (push). The result is a novel approach to the underlying cause(s) of industrial revolutions, one that is consistent with both material and non-material views in the literature, as well as with demand-shock and supply-shock views. Furthermore, it is consistent with previous accounts of the 19th-century rise of managerial capitalism. Lastly, it provides a set of necessary conditions for what constitutes an industrial revolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: Mitchell (1988), pp. 370–378.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce (1975), Series S124 (p.828), D130 (p.137), D685 (p.162)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baruch, B. M. (1941). American Industry in the War: A Report of the War Industries Board. Government Printing Office
Beaudreau, B. C. (2017). The economies of speed, KE=1/2mv2 and the productivity slowdown. Energy, 124, 100–113
Beaudreau, B. C. (2020). The Economics of Speed: Machine Speed as the Key Factor in Productivity. Springer Nature
Beaudreau, B. C. (2021). Protestant refugees, The Calvinist ethic and the industrial revolution. Atlantic Economic Journal., 49(3), 273–291
Behera, J., & Sahoo, D. (2022). Asymmetric relationships between information and communication technology (ICT), globalization, and human development in India: Evidence from non-linear ARDL analysis. Economic Structures, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00269-5
Bosher, J. F. (1995). Huguenot merchants and the Protestant International in the seventeenth century. The William and Mary Quarterly., 52(1), 77–102
Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Revolution in American Business. Harvard University Press
Crafts, N. F. R. (2005). The first industrial revolution: Resolving the slow growth/rapid industrialization paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(April/May), 525–534
David, P. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 355–361
Desmet, K., & Parente, S. L. (2010). Bigger is better: Market size, demand elasticity and innovation. International Economic Review., 51(2), 319–333
Devine, W. (1983). From shafts to wires: Historical perspective on electrification. The Journal of Economic History., 43(2), 347–372
Evans, C. (2010). Slave Wales: The Welsh and Atlantic Slavery 1660–1850. University of Wales Press
Garloch, A. (2015). A framework for a push/pull approach to inclusive market systems development. https://beamexchange.org/resources/543/
Gwynn, R. (2000). Huguenot Heritage: The History and Contribution of the Huguenots in Britain (2nd ed.). Sussex Academic Press
Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society 1880–1930. The Johns Hopkins University Press
McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. University of Chicago Press
Mitchell, B. R. (1988). British Historical Statistics. Cambridge University Press
Mokyr, J. (2016). A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton University Press.
Ogunsola L. A. (2005). Information and communication technologies and the effects of globalization: twenty-first century “digital slavery” for developing countries—myth or reality?.Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 6, 1–2
Schmookler, J. (1962). Economic sources of inventive activity. The Journal of Economic History., 22(1), 1–20
Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press
Scoville, W. C. (1960). The Persecution of Huguenots and French Economic Development, 1680–1720. University of California Press
Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, PF Collier and Sons (1892)
Solow, R. (1987). We’d Better Watch Out. New York Times Book Review
Thomas, R.P. and D. McCloskey (1984). Overseas Trade and Empire, 1700–1820. in Floud, R. and D. McCloskey, The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present, 87–102
U.S. Agency for International Development (2020). A Framework for a Push/Pull Approach to Inclusive Market Systems Development. https://www.beamexchange.org/uploads/filer_public/42/83/42836e59-f29b-4543-b6a8-340dc8c00baa/pushpull_compressed.pdf
U.S. Department of Commerce 1975 Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C.
World Bank (2023). World Bank Open Data, Exports of goods and services (current US$) - China https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.CD?locations=CN
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Beaudreau, B.C. A Pull–Push Theory of Industrial Revolutions. Int Adv Econ Res 29, 303–317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-023-09883-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-023-09883-w