Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 81–101 | Cite as

The Spatial Impact of Cultural Distances on Home Bias across Asian Emerging Markets



Using a set of individual country-pair data on cross-border equity transactions between seven Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Australia) in the years 2002–2012, we document that investors are more likely to show similar extent of home bias across Asian emerging markets than the developed markets. The spatial panel regression analysis indicates that the spillover effects of cultural and economic distances are more significant than the effect of geometric distance. Investors’ familiarity about Asian countries seems to influence the similar extent of home bias across Asian financial markets, while not so in the developed countries. In particular, the spatial spillover influences of risk associated with cultural and economic distances are more prominent among the Asian financial markets than the developed countries. Our home bias model can be spatially applied to not only different regions but also to different types of investors in international portfolio flows.


Home bias Culture spatial dependence Asian emerging markets Portfolio risk 


F1 F3 G10 



I would like to thank the anonymous referees for their great comments on the revision of the article. Remaining error are our own.


  1. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choe, H., Kho, B., & Stulz, R. (2005). Do domestic investors have an edge? The trading experience of foreign Investors in Korea. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(3), 795–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coeurdacier, N. (2009). Do trade costs in goods markets lead to home bias in equities? Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coeurdacier, N., Rey, H. (2011). Home Bias in Open Economy Financial Macroeconomics. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 17691.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, I., & Kaplanis, E. (1994). Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging and international capital market equilibrium. Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coval, J., & Moskowitz, T. (2001). The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 811–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeMoor, L., Sercu, P., & Vanpee, R. (2010). The plausibility of risk estimates and implied costs to international equity investments. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(4), 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dvořák, T. (2005). Do domestic investors have an information advantage? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2000). The investment behavior and performance of various investor-types: a study of Finland's unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001). How distance, language and culture influence stockholdings and trades. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1053–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J., Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Hall, J. (2015). 2015 Economic freedom dataset. Published in. Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report.
  12. Hamberg, M., Mavruk, T., & Sjogren, S. (2013). Investment allocation decisions, home bias and the mandatory IFRS adoption. Journal of International Money and Finance, 36, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hau, H., & Rey, H. (2004). Can portfolio rebalancing explain the dynamics of equity returns, equity flows, and exchange rates? American Economic Review, 94(2), 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hau, H., & Rey, H. (2006). Exchange rates, equity prices, and capital flows. Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 273–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity breeds investment. Review of Financial Studies, 14(3), 659–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Monetary Fund. Statistics Dept. (2013). Balance of payments database.
  18. International Monetary Fund. Statistics Dept. (2015a) Coordinated portfolio investment survey.
  19. International Monetary Fund. Statistics Dept. (2015b) International financial statistics by country.
  20. Kai, L. (2004). Confidence in the familiarity: an international perspective. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, H. (2011). The risk adjusted uncovered equity parity. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30, 1491–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, H., Cho, S., & Kim, Y. (2015). Home bias, risk differential, and cultural spatial spillover effect. Journal of International Money and Finance, 51, 114–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lau, S. T., Ng, L., & Zhang, B. (2010). The world price of home bias. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2), 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, P., & Rey, H. (2004). Financial super-markets: size matters for asset trade. Journal of International Economics, 64(2), 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayer, T. & Zignago, S. (2011) Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: the GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper 2011–2025.Google Scholar
  26. Mishra, A. (2008). Australia’s equity home bias. Australian Economic Papers, 47(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Portes, R., & Rey, H. (2005). The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Razin, A. (2010). Equity Prices and Equity Flows: Testing Theory of the Information–Efficiency Trade-off. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16651.Google Scholar
  29. Stulz, R. (2005). The limits of financial globalization. Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1595–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tesar, L., & Werner, I. (1995). Home bias and high turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wincoop, E., Warnock, F. (2006). Is Home Bias in Assets Related to Home Bias in Goods? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12728.Google Scholar
  32. World Bank. 2013. International debt statistics. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  33. The World Economic Forum. 2012. The financial development report.

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsKyungpook National UniversityBukgu, DeaguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations