Skip to main content
Log in

Do Credit Cards Really Reduce Aggregate Money Holdings?

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses whether the use of credit cards reduces aggregate money holdings in an economy. Applying and modifying the Baumol-Tobin model (Baumol Quarterly Journal of Economics 66:545–556, 1952 and Tobin Review of Economics and Statistics 38(3):241–247, 1956), it studies how much money a credit card bank would normally maintain to support retail trade, and shows that whether or not the use of credit cards actually reduces the aggregate demand for money depends on how often consumers visit the bank and how long it takes to clear a check. With innovations in the banking industry such as ATMs, online banking, and other electric funds transfer services, the cost of visiting banks (i.e., switching funds between a checkable account and an interest-earning account) is now very low. For the whole economy, as a result, the use of credit cards may not necessarily reduce aggregate money holdings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Credit card billing cycles are generally about one month with a due date approximately 15 days after the end of the cycle.

  2. In reality there is a great deal of variability in the number of days it takes for a merchant to receive payment from the credit card bank but between 1 and 7 days would not be unreasonable.

  3. Special thanks to Joe Evans, President and CEO, United Bankers, LLC for insight into this process.

  4. The homogeneity in consumers’ spending is not essential in the analysis, and it can be readily shown that heterogeneity in consumers’ spending does not change the outcome.

  5. In the real world, most employers pay their employees monthly or biweekly at the end of the period which can also be interpreted as the beginning of the next period.

  6. Akhand and Milbourne (1986) studied the determination of the optimal N, taking the interest rate of bonds and switching cost as the parameters. We treat N as an exogenous variable here, since our focus is on aggregate money holdings, including those held by credit card banks. Nonetheless, the current innovation in banking service makes the switching cost almost negligible.

  7. For an example of credit card securitization, see the Credit Card Securitization Manual published by the FDIC and available online at http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/credit_card_securitization/ch3.html.

References

  • Akhand, H., & Milbourne, R. (1986). Credit cards and aggregate money demand. Journal of Macroeconomics, 8(4), 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank of America (2004) Annual Report. http://www.bankofamerica.com/annualreport/2004/

  • Baumol, W. (1952). The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duca, J. V., & Whitesell, W. C. (1995). Credit cards and money demand: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27(2), 604–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile, Expansion of Bank Credit Card Lines, http://www2.fdic.gov/qbp/grgraph.asp

  • FDIC, Credit Card Securitization Manual, http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/credit_card_securitization/pdf_version/index.html

  • Friedman, M. (1956). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, G. R., & Walton, J. K. I. I. (2002). The use of checks and other noncash payment instruments in the united states, board of governors of the federal reserve system. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 88(2), 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. S. (2004). Untangling the Effects of credit cards on money demand: convenience usage vs borrowing. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 43(1&2), 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, W. W., Mester, L. J., & Vermilyea, T. A. (2008). Competitive effects of Basel II on US bank credit card lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 478–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G. (2006). Brief principles of macroeconomics, 4th ed., Thomas Southwestern

  • Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk I: a definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1971). Increasing risk II: its economic consequences. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(1), 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The 2007 Federal Reserve Payments Study: Noncash Payment Trends in the United States: 2003-2006, December 10, 2007.

  • Tobin, J. (1956). The interest elasticity of the transactions demand for cash. Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(3), 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill Z. Yang.

Additional information

Bill Z. Yang Thank Mr. Joe Evans, the President and CEO of United Bankers, LLC for his first-hand information about the practice in credit card business as well as Richard Cebula, George Carter and the participants of the IEAS Annual Conference at Charleston, SC for their comments on an earlier version. The standard disclaimer applies as usual.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, B.Z., King, A.S. Do Credit Cards Really Reduce Aggregate Money Holdings?. Atl Econ J 39, 85–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-010-9254-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-010-9254-y

Keywords

JEL

Navigation