Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peer Effects and Cigarette Use Among College Students

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study adds to the collegiate substance use literature by measuring the magnitude of peer effects upon individual cigarette use. The study employs data from the 2001 Harvard School of Health College Alcohol Survey to construct this peer effect measure and to study the effect of other variables upon a university student’s decision to smoke. The main finding of this paper is that moving a student from a university where no students smoke to an institution where 25 percent of the population smokes increases that student’s probability of smoking by 10.71 percent. The results of this paper suggest the potential for universities to institute student-led, anti-smoking organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ImpacTeen 2005. Toll of Tobacco in the United States of America.

  2. The economic work on substance use is quite large. To list all relevant works here is unnecessary. Becker’s work alone in the area would require more bibliographical entrants that are present in this study as it stands.

  3. Kawaguchi (2004).

  4. Manksi (1993); Powell et al. (2005). An example of this masking effect is the following: The price of cigarettes increases by 25 percent in a given state. A prominent member of a peer group quits smoking because of this price increase. The rest of the individual’s peer group also quits smoking, not because of the price increase, but because smoking is no longer as popular due to their friend quitting. One could easily mistake this decrease in smoking behavior to be attributed to the price increases when in fact the peer effect measure caused the majority of this fall in smoking levels.

  5. Powell et al. 2005.

  6. Manksi (1993); Powell et al. (2005).

References

  • Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 396–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. The Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 722–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, F. (1991). Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. The Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 722–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ImpacTeen (2004). Tobacco Control Policy and Prevalence Data: 1991–2001. Retrieved July 29, 2004, from http://www.impacteen.org/tobaccodata.htm.

  • ImpacTeen (2005). Toll of Tobacco in the United States of America. Retrieved December 7, 2005 from http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0072.pdf.

  • Kawaguchi, D. (2004). Peer effects on substance use among American teenagers. Journal of Population Economics, 17(2), 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., & Levy, D. M. (2003). Peer effects and alcohol use among college students. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Papers: 9876.

  • Levine, P. B, Gustafson, T. A., & Velenchik, A. D. (1997). More bad news for smokers? The effects of cigarette smoking on wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Reviews, 50(3), 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundborg, P. (2005). Having the wrong friends? Peer effects in adolescent substance use. Journal of Health Economics, Jun 15. [Epub Ahead of Print]. doi:10.1016/j.jhealco.2005.02.001.

  • Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E. C., Lindrooth, R. C., & Ennet, S. T. (1998). Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Health Economics, 7, 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, L. M., Tauras, J. A., & Ross, H. (2005). The importance of peer effects, cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behavior. Journal of health Economics, 24(5), 950–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results of Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, H., Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (2001). [Computer file]. ICPSR04291-v1. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health [producer], 2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005-08-08.

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Francesco Renna for all his assistance with this study. Thank you also to my readers Steven Myers, Randall King, Doug Brewer, Alexander Butler, Monika Dutka, and Jared Miller for all the additional assistance and input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Wilson.

Additional information

Jeffrey Wilson was the first place winner of the Undergraduate Best Paper Award Competition at the 62nd International Atlantic Economic Conference in Philadelphia, PA, October 5–8, 2006.

Appendix of Tables

Appendix of Tables

Table 1 Summary statistics
Table 2 2001 State cigarette prices
Table 3 Goodness of fit measures for probit models (Eqs. 1, 2, and 3)
Table 4 Parameter estimates (Eqs. 1, 2, and 3)
Table 5 Parameter significance statistics (Eqs. 1, 2, and 3)
Table 6 Marginal effects (Eqs. 1, 2, and 3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, J. Peer Effects and Cigarette Use Among College Students. Atl Econ J 35, 233–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-007-9064-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-007-9064-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation