Abstract
Voter participation rates vary widely across the 50 states. This empirical study seeks, within the context of a broadened version of the ‘rational voter model,’ to identify determinants of this interstate variation. Using the 2004 general election as the study period, it is found that the voter participation rate in a state is positively related to the percent of the state's adult population with at least a high school education, the state's unemployment rate, the percent of the state's population age 65 and older, and the female labor force participation rate in the state. In addition, it is found that voter turnout in a state is negatively related to the state's median family income and the percentage of its population that is Hispanic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich, J. H. “Rational Choice and Turnout,” American Journal of Political Science, 37, 2, March 1993, pp. 246–78.
Aldrich, J. H.; Simon, D. M. “Turnout in American National Elections,’ in Research in Micropolitics, S. Long (ed.), Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI, 1986, pp. 54–66.
Ashenfelter, O.; Kelley, S., Jr. “Determinants of Participation in Presidential Elections,” Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 4, December 1975, pp. 695–733.
Barreto, M. A.; Segura, G. M.; Woods, N. D. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority–Minority Districts on Latino Turnout,” American Political Science Review, 98, 1, March 2004, pp. 65–76.
Borgers, T. “Costly Voting,” American Economic Review, 94, 1, March 2004, pp. 57–66.
Brazel, Y.; Silberberg, E. “Is the Act of Voting Rational,” Public Choice, 16, 1, January 1973, pp. 51–8.
Buchanan, J. M. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Co., 1968.
Buchanan, J. M.; Tullock, G. The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1962.
Cebula, R. J. “Expressiveness and Voting: Alternative Evidence,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 32, 3, September 2004, pp. 216–21.
Cebula, R. J.; Kafoglis, M. “In Search of Optimum Relative Unanimity,” Public Choice, 40, 2, March 1983, pp. 195–202.
Copeland, C.; Laband, D. “Expressive Voting,” Public Choice, 110, 3, May 2002, pp. 351–63.
Council of Economic Advisors. Economic Report of the President, 2005, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2005.
Cox, G. W.; Munger, M. C. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections,” American Political Science Review, 83, 2, June 1989, pp. 217–31.
Downs, A. An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1957.
Feddersen, T. J. “Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 1, Winter 2004, pp. 99–112.
Green, D. P.; Shapiro, I. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.
Greene, K. V.; Nikolaev, O. “Voter Participation and the Redistributive State,” Public Choice, 98, 2, March 1999, pp. 213–26. http: //www.uselectionatlas.org/USPRESIDENT/vto.php?year=2004&datatype=national; http://www.census.gov/hhes/income/4person.html.
Kafoglis, M.; Cebula, R. J. ‘The Buchanan–Tullock Model: Some Extensions,” Public Choice, 36, 2, March 1981, pp. 179–86.
Knack, S. “Drivers Wanted: Motor Voter and the Election of 1996,” P.S.: Political Science and Politics, 32, 3, August 1999, pp. 237–43.
Lapp, M. “Incorporating Groups into Rational Choice Explanations of Turnout: An Empirical Test,” Public Choice, 98, 2, March 1999, pp. 171–85.
Ledyard, J. “The Pure Theory of Two Candidate Elections,” Public Choice, 44, 1, January 1984, pp. 7–41.
Leighly, J. “Group Membership and the Mobilization of Political Participation,” Journal of Politics, 58, 2, June 1996, pp. 447–63.
Morton, R. “A Group Majority Model of Voting,” Social Choice and Welfare, 4, 2, June 1987, pp. 117–31.
—. “Groups in Rational Turnout Models,” American Journal of Political Science, 35, 4, December 1991, pp. 758–76.
Piven, F. F.; Cloward, R. A. Why American Don't Vote, New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1988.
Putnam, R. D.: Bowling Alone, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
Riker, W. H.; Ordeshook, P. C. “A Theory to the Calculus of Voting,” American Political Science Review, 62, 1, March 1968, pp. 25–42.
Schwartz, T. “Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way it is Counted: An Institutional Solution to the Paradox of Voting,” Public Choice, 54, 1, May 1987, pp. 101–21.
Swartz, K. “Reinsuring Risk to Increase Access to Health Insurance,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 73, 3, May 2003, pp. 283–7.
Teixeira, R. The Disappearing American Voter, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1992.
Tiebout, C. M. “A Pure Theory of Public Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 64, 2, February 1956, pp. 416–24.
Tullock, G. “Public Decisions as Public Goods,” Journal of Political Economy, 79, 4, August 1971, pp. 913–8.
—. Towards a Mathematics of Politics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1967.
Verba, S.; Schlozman, K. L.; Brady, H. E. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2001, Washington, D.C. 2001.
—. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2004–2005, Washington, D.C., 2005.
White, H. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica, 48, 4, May 1980, pp. 817–38.
Wolfinger, R. E.; Rosenstone, S. J. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cebula, R.J., Toma, M. Determinants of Geographic Differentials in the Voter Participation Rate. Atl Econ J 34, 33–40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6118-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6118-6