Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pattern of carbon allocation across three different stages of stand development of a Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) forest

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

The pattern of carbon (C) allocation across different stages of stand development of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) forests is poorly documented. In order to understand the effects of stand age on the C pool of the Chinese pine forest ecosystem, we have examined the above- and belowground C pools in three differently aged stands of Chinese pine in the northern mountains of Beijing, China, by plot-level inventories and destructive sampling. Our results suggest that tree branch and foliage biomass should be estimated by age-specific equations. Reasonably accurate estimates of tree stem, tree root, aboveground, and total tree biomass in a Chinese pine forest at different development stages were obtained using age-independent allometric equations from tree diameter only. The ratio of belowground to aboveground tree biomass was relatively constant with stand aging, remaining around 21 %. The contribution of aboveground tree biomass C increased from 21 % of the total ecosystem C in a 25-year-old stand to 44 % in a 65-year-old stand, subsequently falling to 41 % in a 105-year-old stand, while the contribution of mineral soil C decreased from 64 % of the total ecosystem C in 25-year-old stand to 38 % in a 65-year-old stand, subsequently increasing to 41 % in a 105-year-old stand. The C stock of the total ecosystem and its aboveground tree, tree root, forest floor, and mineral soil components continuously increased with stand ageing, whereas the C stock of the understory showed a declining trend and contributed little to the total site C pool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bert D, Danjon F (2006) Carbon concentration variation in roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manag 222:279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Ren J, Bao X, Chen Q, Hu Y, Miao Y, Li Y (1984) Studies on the sociological characteristic and biomass of pine plantation on Xishan in Beijing. Chin J Plant Ecol 8:173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Chen Q, Bao X, Ren J, Miao Y, Hu Y (1986) Studies on Chinese arborvitae (Platycladus orientalis) forest and its biomass in Beijing. Chin J Plant Ecol 10:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chen J, Liu J, Cihlar J (2000) Approaches for reducing uncertainties in regional forest carbon balance. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14:827–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MR, Allen RB, Clinton PW (2003) Carbon storage along a stand development sequence in a New Zealand Nothofagus forest. For Ecol Manag 177:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieter M, Elsasser P (2002) Carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in the tree biomass of Germany’s forests. Forstwiss Cent 121:195–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystem. Science 263:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, Zhao S, Ci L (2001) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 292:2320–2322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang JY, Tang YH, Son Y (2010) Why are East Asian ecosystems important for carbon cycle research? Sci China Life Sci 53:753–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farley KA, Kelly EF, Hofstede RGM (2004) Soil organic carbon and water retention after conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ecosystem 7:729–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stock: make REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Gholz HL, Nakane K, Baldwin VC (1994) Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. Ecol Bull 43:115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünzweig JM, Gelfand I, Yakir D (2007) Biogeochemical factors contributing to enhanced carbon storage following afforestation of a semi-arid shrubland. Biogeosciences 4:891–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Wang B, Ma XQ, Zhao GD, Li SN (2008) Evaluation of ecosystem services of Chinese pine forests in China. Sci China Life Sci 51:662–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA (2003) Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Global Chang Biol 9:500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC. IPCC, Geneva

  • Kolari P, Pumpanen J, Rannik Ü, Ilvesniemi H, Hari P, Berninger F (2004) Carbon balance of different aged Scots pine forests in Southern Finland. Global Chang Biol 10:1106–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause H (1998) Forest floor mass and nutrients in two chronosequences of plantations: jack pine vs. black spruce. Can J Soil Sci 78:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law BE, Sun OJ, Campell J, Van Tuyl S, Thornton PE (2003) Changes in carbon storage and fluxes in a chronosequence of ponderosa pine. Global Chang Biol 9:510–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemma B, Kleja DB, Nilsson I, Olsson M (2006) Soil carbon sequestration under different exotic tree species in the southwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Geoderma 136:886–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yi MJ, Son Y, Park PS, Lee KH, Son YM, Kim RH, Jeong MJ (2011) Biomass and carbon storage in an age-sequence of Korea pine (Pinus koraiensis) plantation forests in central Korea. J Plant Biol 54:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Litton CM, Ryan MG, Knight DH (2004) Effects of tree density and stand age on carbon allocation patterns in postfire lodgepole pine. Ecol Appl 14:460–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GS (1996) Soil physical and chemical analysis and description of soil profiles. Standards Press of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2009) Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Springer SBM, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao R, Zeng D-H, Hu Y-L, Li L-J, Yang D (2010) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in an age-sequence of poplar stands planted on marginal agricultural land in Northeast China. Soil Plant 332:277–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JL, Gower ST, Plaut J, Holmes B (2005) Carbon pools in a boreal mixedwood logging chronosequence. Global Chang Biol 11:1883–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Mund M, Kummetz E, Hein M, Bauer GA, Schulze E-D (2002) Growth and carbon stocks of a spruce forest chronosequence in central Europe. For Ecol Manag 171:275–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh NJ, Son Y, Lee SK, Seo KW, Heo SJ, Yi MJ, Park PS, Kim RH, Son YM, Lee KH (2010) Carbon and nitrogen storage in an age-sequence of Pinus densiflora stands in Korea. Sci China Life sci 53:822–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul KI, Khanna PK, Polglase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, Khanna PK (2002) Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For Ecol Manag 168:241–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Arain MA (2006) Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forest. Agric For Meteorol 140:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Arain MA (2007) Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For Ecol Manag 253:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pregizer KS, Euskirchen ES (2004) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Global Chang Biol 10:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren H, Chen H, Li Z, Han W (2010) Biomass accumulation and carbon storage of four different aged Sonneratia apetala plantation in Southern China. Soil Plant 327:279–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK (2009) Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6082–6087

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG (1999) Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400:56–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein DE, Yermakov Z, Buell AL (2004) Loss and recovery of ecosystem carbon pools following stand-replacing wildfire in Michigan jack pine forests. Can J For Res 34:1908–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (1997) Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. Adv Ecol Res 27:213–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Peylin P, Braswell BH, Apps MJ, Baker D, Bondeau A, Canadell J, Churkina G, Cramer W, Denning AS, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Goodale C, Heimann M, Houghton RA, Melillo JM, Moore B III, Murdiyarso D, Noble I, Pacala SW, Prentice IC, Raupach MR, Rayner PJ, Scholes RJ, Steffen WL, Wirth C (2001) Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Wirth C, Heimann M (2000) Managing forests after Kyoto. Science 289:2058–2059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AR, Wang JR, Chen HYH (2007) Carbon storage in a chronosequence of red spruce (Picea rubens) forests in central Nova Scotia, Canada. Can J For Res 37:2260–2269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW, Mcguire AD, Helfrich JVK III, Moore B III, Vörösmarty CJ (1998) Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems. Nature 396:664–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M (2007) Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong). Carr.) in Ireland. Eur J For Res 126:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Koerper GJ, Harmon ME, Lee JJ (1995) A carbon budget for forests of the conterminous United States. Ecol Appl 5:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uri V, Varik M, Aosaar J, Kanal A, Kukumägi M, Lõhmus K (2012) Biomass production and carbon sequestration in a fertile silver birch (Betula pendula) forest chronosequence. For Ecol Manag 267:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Bond-Lamberty B, Gower ST (2003) Carbon distribution of a well- and poorly-drained black spruce fire chronosequence. Global Chang Biol 9:1066–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) Land use, land-use change and forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi W (1991) A study on ordination of deciduous broad-leaved scrubs in Beijing Huairou mountainous area. J Southwest China Teach Univ (Nat Sci) 16:479–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi W (1992) Analysis on the deciduous broad-leaved scrub in Beijing Huairou mountainous area. J Beijing Teach Coll (Nat Sci Ed) 13:84–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao C-W, Yuste JC, Janssens IA, Roskams P, Nachtergale L, Carrara A, Sanchez BY, Ceulemans R (2003) Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in a 73-year-old Scots pine forest. Tree Physiol 23:505–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y-R, Yu Z-L, Zhao S-D (2002) Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Acta Phytoecol Sin 24:518–522

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the grant (2008BAD95B07) from Ministry of Science and Technology, P. R. China and the grant (Z080405029908010) from Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory in Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating, Ministry of Education, College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, 35 East Qinhua Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jixin Cao, Yun Tian & Tianshan Zha

  2. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, State Forestry Administration of China, Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China

    Jixin Cao

  3. Beijing Forestry Carbon Administration (Beijing Forestry and Parks Department of International Cooperation), Beijing, 100013, China

    Xiaoping Wang

  4. Chinese Institute of Green Carbon, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xiaoping Wang & Tianshan Zha

  5. Huairou District Gardening and Greening Bureau, Beijing, 101400, China

    Zhiyong Wen

Authors
  1. Jixin Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiyong Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tianshan Zha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianshan Zha.

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, J., Wang, X., Tian, Y. et al. Pattern of carbon allocation across three different stages of stand development of a Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) forest. Ecol Res 27, 883–892 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0965-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0965-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation