Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Sensor Scheduling for Data Size Reduction in a Sensor Cloud System Based on Minimum Reconstruction Error

  • Research
  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sensing and subsequent analysis of the environmental data of a given geographical area is an essential requisite for the planned development of that region. Nowadays, IoT Sensor-Cloud ecosystem has been adopted to collect data from IoT sensors and transmit it to the chosen Cloud Server for further processing and dissemination. In a large Wireless Sensor Network formed by the IoT sensors, there will be a significant amount of redundancy in the dataset when the nodes are placed closely, and the sensed data varies slowly and gradually with regard to time and space. Then, avoiding redundant data transmission can lead to lower energy consumption and communication overhead. Adaptive subset selection of sensor nodes for data size reduction in a Wireless Sensor Network is an approach to efficiently managing the amount of data transmitted within the network. Then, in the current time schedule, it is possible to optimally select a subset of the sensor nodes for data collection without very much affecting the overall data fidelity. An optimal sensor node subset selection scheme that reduces the communication load with minimum information loss is proposed to achieve this task. The unselected nodes are put in sleep mode, which consequently results in lower sensor energy expenditure. The subset selection algorithm is implemented based on the derivative-free pattern search optimizer that minimizes the reconstruction error during the associated extrapolation. This approach differs entirely from the Compressive Data Gathering approach. The simulation results reveal that the performance of the proposed scheme is superior to other similar competitive methods in terms of the mean square error, which is found to be 1.95, with the percentage participation nodes equal to 50% and when the sensor data is uniformly distributed over 20 and 30 units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not Applicable.

References

  1. Nagaraj, A. (2021). Introduction to sensors in Iot and cloud computing applications. Bentham Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2174/97898114793591210101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanwal H. T., Arif F., Rubab S. (2021) IoT sensor systems mapping quality parameters using cloud computing. 2021 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 176–181https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT53504.2021.00041

  3. Khan A. R., Rakesh N., Bansal A., Chaudhary D. K. (2015) Comparative study of WSN protocols (LEACH, PEGASIS and TEEN). 2015 Third International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP), Waknaghat, India, pp. 422–427, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIP.2015.7414810

  4. Kaur G., Bhattacharya M., Chanak P. (2019) Energy conservation schemes of wireless sensor networks for IoT applications: A survey. 2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT48419.2019.9066228

  5. Das, K., Das, S., Darji, R., & Mishra, A. (2018). Survey of energy-efficient techniques for the cloud-integrated sensor network. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1597089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X., & Chen, H. (2022). A survey of compressive data gathering in WSNs for IoTs. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4490790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aziz, A., Singh, K., Osamy, W., & Khedr, A. M. (2020). An efficient compressive sensing routing scheme for internet of things based wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 114(3), 1905–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07454-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He, J., Sun, G., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Compressive data gathering with low-rank constraints for Wireless sensor networks. Signal Processing., 131, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Y., Sun, G., Geng, T., & Zheng, B. (2019). Compressive sparse data gathering with low-rank and total variation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 155242–155250. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tirani, S. P., Avokh, A., & Abouei, J. (2022). Dynamic compressive data gathering using angle-based random walk in hybrid WSNs. Ad Hoc Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xinmiao, Lu., Yanwen, Su., Qiong, Wu., Wei, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). An improved algorithm of segmented orthogonal matching pursuit based on wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 18(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goyal P., Singh B. (2019) Sparse signal recovery through regularized orthogonal matching pursuit for WSNs Applications 2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, India, pp. 461–465, https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN.2019.8711716

  13. Krishna, A.N., Srikantaiah, K.C., Naveena, C (2019). [Studies in Computational Intelligence] Integrated Intelligent Computing, Communication and Security Volume 771 || An Efficient Optimization Technique for Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8797-4(Chapter 24), 223–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8797-4_24

  14. Idrees, A. K., & Al-Yaseen, W. L. (2021). Distributed genetic algorithm for lifetime coverage optimisation in wireless sensor networks. International Journal Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 18(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, L., & Qu, J. (2023). AIMD rule-based duty cycle scheduling in wireless sensor networks using quartile-directed adaptive genetic algorithm. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(5), 4905–4921. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3234539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ZainEldin, H., Badawy, M., Elhosseini, M., et al. (2020). An improved dynamic deployment technique based-on genetic algorithm (IDDT-GA) for maximizing coverage in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence Humanized Computing, 11, 4177–4194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01698-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salim, A., Osamy, W., Khedr, A. M., Aziz, A., & Abdel-Mageed, M. (2021). A secure data gathering scheme based on properties of primes and compressive sensing for IoT-based WSNs. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(4), 5553–5571. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3032585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazaideh, M. A., & Levendovszky, J. (2021). A multi-hop routing algorithm for WSNs based on compressive sensing and multiple objective genetic algorithm. Journal of Communications and Network, 23(2), 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagwari, A., Logeshwaran, J., Usha, K., Raju, K., Alsharif, M., Uthansakul, P., & Uthansakul, M. (2023). An enhanced energy optimization model for industrial wireless sensor networks using machine learning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3311854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, X., Chen, H., & Li, S. (2023). A reinforcement learning-based sleep scheduling algorithm for compressive data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2023, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-023-02237-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang M., Zhang H., Yuan D., Zhang M. (2019) Compressive sensing and autoencoder based compressed data aggregation for green IoT Networks. 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Waikoloa, HI, USA, , pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013373

  22. Sekine M., Ikada S. (2021). Adaptive cooperative distributed compressed sensing for edge devices: a multiagent deep reinforcement learning approach In: 19th IEEE Internationa e cooperative distributed compressed sensing for edge devices: a multiagent deep reinforcement learning approach,” In: 19th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (IEEE PerCom), Kassel, Germany

  23. “Find minimum of function using genetic algorithm,” https://in.mathworks.com/help/gads/ga.html (accessed on 11–10–2023)

  24. “Interpolate 2-D or 3-D scattered data,” https://in.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/griddata.html#bvkwypt-1. (accessed on 11–10–2023)

  25. “Find indices and values of nonzero elements” https://in.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/find.html (accessed on 11–10–2023)

  26. “How the genetic algorithm works,” https://in.mathworks.com/help/gads/how-the-genetic-algorithm-works.html (accessed on 11–10–2023)

Download references

Funding

The study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication, RV College of Engineering, Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi, Bengaluru, 560059, India

    N. Shylashree

  2. Big Data and Machine Learning Lab, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    N. Shylashree & Sachin Kumar

Authors
  1. N. Shylashree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sachin Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.N. Conceptualized, performed experiments and wrote the article. S.K. participated in conceptualization, supervising the experiments and writing and editing the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The flow chart of DSS-DSR is shown below. The explanation of various operations is covered in the main document (Fig. 

Fig. 9
figure 9

Flowchart of DSS-DSR

Full size image

9).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shylashree, N., Kumar, S. Dynamic Sensor Scheduling for Data Size Reduction in a Sensor Cloud System Based on Minimum Reconstruction Error. Wireless Pers Commun 135, 1423–1447 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11090-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11090-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation