Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Water Body Segmentation from Landsat Imagery using Deep Neural Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The water body segmentation is precious for assessing its role in ecosystem services with the circumstances of climate change and global warming. The accurate water body segmentation from Landsat imagery is great implication for water resource planning and socioeconomic development. Deep Neural Network has capability to extract the useful features of the water body of Landsat imagery and classify as water body and non-water body. In this paper, the water body segmentation is carried out by creating and training a deep learning network called SegNet which is derived from VGG16. Pixel Labeled Data of the input dataset are used for training the deep hidden units and the learned features are used to extract the water body in input test images. The Landsat images are used to implement the proposed and the existing methods. The performance measures such as accuracy, mean Boundary F1 Score (BF) score and IoU (Intersection Over Union) are used to compare the proposed method with the existing methods. The proposed method shows improved performance than the existing methods with the average accuracy of 96.7%. Also, the performance of the proposed method is examined with different number of iterations and different sets of training samples. The performance analysis results are good reference for application developers of deep neural network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Source: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~frossard/post/vgg16/) [22]

Fig. 2

(Source: Vijay Badrinarayanan [19])

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anandkumar, Ramakrishnan, and Ramanujam Kalpana, (2019) Designing a fast image encryption scheme using fractal function and 3D Henon Map. Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol.49, pp.

  2. Jupp, D.L.B,(1985) Landsat based interpretation of the cairns section of the great barrier reef marine park, natural resources series/Division of water and land resources, commonwealth scientific and industrial research organization.

  3. Barton, I. J., & Bathols, J. M. (1989). Monitoring floods with AVHRR. Remote Sensing of Environment, 30(1), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmad, Anuar, Selamat, Ali, Rokni, Komeil, & Hazini, Sharifeh. (2014). Water feature extraction and change detection using Multitemporal landsat imagery. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6054173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lateef, F., & Ruichek, Y. (2019). Survey on semantic segmentation using deep learning techniques. Neurocomputing, 338, 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braud, D.H and Feng,W, (1998) Semi-automated construction of the Louisiana coastline digital land/water boundary using Landsat thematic mapper satellite imagery Louisiana applied oil spill research and development program, OSRAPD Technical Report Series, 97(2).

  7. Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Kong, G. (2004). ’The application of multi-band spectral relationship method in water body extraction. Mine Surveying, 4, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, H. (2005). Fast information extraction of urban built-up land based on the analysis of spectral signature and normalized difference index. Geographical Research, 9(5), 589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, H., Xu, J., Wang, L., & Jing, L. (2016). An effective modified water extraction method for Landsat-8 OLI imagery of mountainous plateau regions. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mcfeeters, S. K. (1996). The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Taylor & Francis - International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1425–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, Hao, Huang, Jianxi, Feng, Min, Ning, Lu., Xiao, Tong, & Zhu, Yunqiang. (2014). An automated method for extracting rivers and lakes from Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6065067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, MICCAI 2015. Part III, LNCS, 9351, 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chhor, G., & Aramburu, C.B. (2017), Satellite image segmentation for building detection using U-net.

  14. Mohammad Yousuf Saifi, Jimmy Singla, Nikita, (2020) Deep learning based framework for semantic segmentation of satellite images', proceedings of the fourth international conference on computing methodologies and communication, IEEE Xplore Part Number:CFP20K25-ART; ISBN:978–1–7281–4889–2.

  15. Xiaoyang, Xie, Bo, Li., & Xingxing, Wei. (2020). Ship detection in multispectral satellite images under complex environment. Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(792), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mishra, N. K., Kumar, A., & Choudhury, K. (2021). Deep convolutional neural network based ship images classification. Defence Science Journal, 71(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.71.16236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alqazzaz, S., Sun, X., Yang, X., & Nokes, L. (2019). ’Automated brain tumor segmentation on multi-modal MR image using SegNet. Computational Visual Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41095-019-0139-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Panboonyuen, T., Jitkajornwanich, K., Lawawirojwong, S., Srestasathiern, P., & Vateeku, P. (2017). ’Road segmentation of remotely-sensed images using deep convolutional neural networks with landscape metrics and conditional random fields. Remote Sens., 9(7), 680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2016). SegNet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for scene segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shervin Minaee, Yuri Boykov, Fatih Porikli, Antonio Plaza, Nasser Kehtarnavaz, and Demetri Terzopoulos,(2020), ' Image segmentation using deep learning: A Survey', arXiv:2001.05566v2 [cs.CV], pp.1–23.

  21. Long, J, Shelhamer, E and Darrell,T, (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation', in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3431–3440.

  22. Davi Frossard, (2016, June 17), Architecture of VGG16, from https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~frossard/post/vgg16/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Thayammal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thayammal, S., Jayaraghavi, R., Priyadarsini, S. et al. Analysis of Water Body Segmentation from Landsat Imagery using Deep Neural Network. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 1265–1282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09178-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09178-5

Keywords

Navigation