Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhance Energy Conservation Based on Residual Energy and Distance for WSNs

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have greatly facilitated life by reducing people’s efforts in different areas such as smart irrigation systems, environmental monitoring, military, medical monitoring, home security, etc. WSNs suffer from energy restriction and the difficulty of recharge or replacement sensors batteries in remote areas. So the energy consumption is one of the most significant issues in WSNs that needs to be addressed. The role of routing protocols to select the best path to transmit data has an obvious effect on saving energy. This paper proposed an enhance energy conservation based on residual energy and distance (EECRED) routing protocol which is an improvement on the LEACH protocol. The main objective of the EECRED proposed protocol is to reduce energy dissipated, reduce the process of exchanging control packets between cluster members and cluster head, delay the death of nodes that acts as routers, load balancing between nodes in the network, and prolong the network lifetime. The base idea of the EECRED is to elect the proper node as cluster head based on nodes’ residual energy and take the distance into account when selecting the path of a packet through using the multi-hop technique. The performance of EECRED protocol specified through compares the simulation results with LEACH, LEACH-C, PC-LEACH, and EMRCR protocols in terms of a number of alive nodes, energy consumption, and the network lifetime. The results show that the improvement rate of the EECRED proposed protocol is 50%, 39.76%, 50%, and 83.64% compared with LEACH, LEACH-C, PC-LEACH, and EMRCR protocols respectively in terms of the number of nodes stay alive. Consequently, EECRED added significant enhancement to WSNs in terms of minimizing energy consumption, load balancing between network nodes, and maximizing the network lifetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mann, P. S., & Singh, S. (2017). Improved metaheuristic based energy-efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 57, 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Sayed, H. H., & Hassan, H. S. (2019). Performance comparison of various hierarchical WSN routing protocols. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 11(2), 4218–4223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, L., Chavez, K. G., Rudolph, H., & Hourani, A. (2020). Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: A compressive survey. Wireless Networks, 26(5), 3291–3314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Echoukairi, H., Bourgba, K., & Ouzzif, M. (2015). A survey on flat routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In International symposium on ubiquitous networking (pp. 311–324).

  5. Heinzelman, W. R., Kulik, J., & Balakrishnan, H. (1999). Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 174–185).

  6. Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D. (2000). Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 56–67).

  7. Doohan, N. V., & Tokekar, S. (2012). A survey on routing techniques of data-centric wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 53(16), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aetesam, H., & Snigdh, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of flat, hierarchical and location-based routing in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(4), 5201–5211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karp, B., & Kung, H. T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 243–254).

  10. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–10).

  11. Mehta, R., Pandey, A., & Kapadia, P. (2012). Reforming clusters using C-LEACH in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings IEEE international conference on computer communication and informatics (pp. 1–4).

  12. Beiranvand, Z., Patooghy, A., & Fazeli, M. (2013). I-LEACH: An efficient routing algorithm to improve performance and to reduce energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. In The proceedings 5th IEEE conference on information and knowledge technology (pp. 13–18).

  13. Ma, Z. F., & Li, G. M. (2016). Improvement on LEACH-C protocol for wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the international conference artificial intelligence science and technology (AIST2016) (pp. 362–368).

  14. Azizi, R. (2016). Consumption of energy and routing protocols in wireless sensor network. Network Protocol Algorithms, 8(3), 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubey, A. K., Upadhyay, D., & Thilagam, P. S. (2018). An energy-efficient static multi-hop (ESM) routing protocol for wireless sensor network in agriculture. In 2nd IEEE international conference on micro-electronics and telecommunication engineering (ICMETE) (pp. 277–280).

  16. Razaque, A., Abdulgader, M., Joshi, C., Amsaad, F., & Chauhan, M. (2016). P-LEACH: Energy efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE long island systems, applications and technology conference (LISAT) (pp. 1–5).

  17. Chit, T. A., & Zar, K. T. (2018). Lifetime improvement of wireless sensor network using residual energy and distance parameters on LEACH protocol. In IEEE 18th international symposium on communications and information technologies (ISCIT) (pp. 1–5).

  18. Gantassi, R., Yagouta, A. B., & Gouissem, B. B. (2017). Improvement of the LEACH protocol in load balancing and energy-association conservation. In IEEE international conference on internet of things, embedded systems and communications (IINTEC) (pp. 53–59).

  19. Ai-Zubi, R. T., Abedsalam, N., Atieh, A., & Darabkh, K. A. (2018). Lifetime-improvement routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 15th IEEE international multi-conference on systems, signals and devices (SSD) (pp. 683–687).

  20. Alnawafa, E., & Marghescu, I. (2016). MHT: Multi-hop technique for the improvement of leach protocol. In IEEE 15th RoEduNet conference: Networking in education and research (pp. 1–5).

  21. Alnawafa, E., & Marghescu, I. (2017). DMHT-LEACH: Dynamic multi-hop technique for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international symposium on signals, circuits and systems (ISSCS) (pp. 1–4).

  22. Cai, X., Geng, S., Wu, D., Wang, L., & Wu, Q. (2020). A unified heuristic bat algorithm to optimize the LEACH protocol. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(9), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salem, A. O. A., & Shudifat, N. (2019). Enhanced LEACH protocol for increasing a lifetime of WSNs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23(5), 901–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Radhika, M., & Sivakumar, P. (2021). Energy optimized micro genetic algorithm based LEACH protocol for WSN. Wireless Networks, 27(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasr, S., & Quwaider, M. (2020). LEACH protocol enhancement for increasing WSN lifetime. In IEEE 11th international conference on information and communication systems (ICICS) (pp. 102–107).

  26. Nguyen, T., Hoang, T. M., Pham, V. Q., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, N. S. (2019). Enhancing energy efficiency of WSNs through a novel fuzzy logic based on LEACH protocol. In IEEE 19th international symposium on communications and information technologies (ISCIT) (pp. 108–112).

  27. Jaradat, Y., Masoud, M., Jannoud, I., Abu-Sharar, T., & Zerek, A. (2019). Performance analysis of homogeneous LEACH protocol in realistic noisy WSN. In 19th IEEE international conference on sciences and techniques of automatic control and computer engineering (STA) (pp. 590–594).

  28. Zeng, M., Huang, X., Zheng, B., & Fan, X. (2019). A heterogeneous energy wireless sensor network clustering protocol. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gou, P., Li, F., Li, Z., & Jia, X. (2019). Improved LEACH protocol based on efficient clustering in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 19(3), 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nandi, A., Sonowal, B., Rabha, D., & Vaibhav, A. (2019). Centered sink LEACH protocol for enhanced performance of wireless sensor network. In IEEE international conference on automation, computational and technology management (ICACTM) (pp. 436–440).

  31. Gal, Z., & Korteby, M. (2019). Energy sparing of the leach communication mechanism in heterogeneous WSN. In 8th International conference on advanced computer science and information technology (pp. 53–64).

  32. Pandey, S., & Kumar, R. (2019). Re-LEACH: An energy-efficient secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computer networks and communication technologies (pp. 777–787). Springer.

  33. Kirsan, A. S., Al Rasyid, U. H., Syarif, I., & Purnamasari, D. N. (2020). Energy efficiency optimization for intermediate node selection using MhSA-LEACH: Multi-hop simulated annealing in wireless sensor network. EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology, 8(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Behera, T. M., Mohapatra, S. K., Samal, U. C., Khan, M. S., Daneshmand, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2019). Residual energy-based cluster-head selection in WSNs for IoT application. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3), 5132–5139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Elsmany, E. F. A., Omar, M. A., Wan, T. C., & Altahir, A. A. (2019). EESRA: Energy efficient scalable routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7, 96974–96983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A., & Ballouk, A. (2020). An enhanced energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10(5), 2088–8708.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Behera, T. M., Samal, U. C., & Mohapatra, S. K. (2018). Energy-efficient modified LEACH protocol for IoT application. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 8(5), 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Daanoune, I., Baghdad, A., & Balllouk, A. (2019). BRE-LEACH: A new approach to extend the lifetime of wireless sensor network. In IEEE third international conference on intelligent computing in data sciences (ICDS) (pp. 1–6).

  39. Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Fault tolerance in WSN through PE-LEACH protocol. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 9(6), 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mohapatra, H., Debnath, S., & Rath, A. (2019). Energy management in wireless sensor network through EB-LEACH. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 66, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar, N., Desai, J. R., & Annapurna, D. (2020). ACHs-LEACH: Efficient and Enhanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international conference on electronics, computing and communication technologies (CONECCT) (pp. 1–6).

  42. El Khediri, S., Khan, R. U., Nasri, N., & Kachouri, A. (2020). MW-LEACH: Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy approach for WSN. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 10(3), 126–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jain, S., & Agrawal, N. (2020). Development of energy efficient modified LEACH protocol for IoT applications. In IEEE 12th international conference on computational intelligence and communication networks (CICN) (pp. 160–164).

  44. Li, Y. Z., Zhang, A. L., & Liang, Y. Z. (2013). Improvement of leach protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE third international conference on instrumentation, measurement, computer, communication and control (pp. 322–326).

  45. Liang, H., Yang, S., Li, L., & Gao, J. (2019). Research on routing optimization of WSNs based on improved LEACH protocol. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang, J., Sohn, I., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Enhanced message-passing based LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 19(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Zhao, T., Tie, Y., Bai, F., & Jin, M. (2019). An improved energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 19(20), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shen, L., Yin, Z., Gu, A., Zhang, J., & Jing, Y. H. (2019). A cluster head active switching algorithm for wireless sensor networks based on LEACH protocol. In IEEE 5th international conference on computer and communications (ICCC) (pp. 614–618).

  49. Feng, Y. F., Pan, S. G., Huang, Z. Y., & Lin, H. C. (2019). Improvement of energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks using low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH)-based energy betweenness model. Sensors and Materials, 31(9), 2691–2702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, Z. X., Zhang, M., Gao, X., Wang, W., & Li, X. (2019). A clustering WSN routing protocol based on node energy and multipath. Cluster Computing, 22(3), 5811–5823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bhola, J., Soni, S., & Cheema, G. K. (2020). Genetic algorithm based optimized leach protocol for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(3), 1281–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Abushiba, W., Johnson, P., Alharthi, S., & Wright, C. (2017). An energy efficient and adaptive clustering for wireless sensor network (CH-leach) using leach protocol. In IEEE 13th international computer engineering conference (ICENCO) (pp. 50–54).

  53. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Murata, T., & Ishibuchi, H. (1994). Performance evaluation of genetic algorithms for flowshop scheduling problems. In Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation. ieee world congress on computational intelligence (pp. 812–817).

  55. El Khediri, S., Khan, R. U., & Albattah, W. (2019). An optimal clustering algorithm-based distance aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 11(3), 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Khanouche, F., Maouche, L., Mir, F., & Khanouche, M. E. (2019). Energy efficient multi-hops routing protocol based on clusters reorganization for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on future networks and distributed systems (pp. 1–10).

  57. XingGuo, L. I., JunFeng, W. A. N. G., & LinLin, B. (2016). LEACH protocol and its improved algorithm in wireless sensor network. In IEEE international conference on cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC) (pp. 418–422).

  58. Omari, M., & Laroui, S. (2015). Simulation, comparison and analysis of wireless sensor networks protocols: LEACH, LEACH-C, LEACH-1R, and HEED. In IEEE 4th international conference on electrical engineering (ICEE) (pp. 1–5).

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salah Abdulghani Alabady.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alabady, S.A., Alhajji, S.S. Enhance Energy Conservation Based on Residual Energy and Distance for WSNs. Wireless Pers Commun 121, 3343–3364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08880-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08880-8

Keywords

Navigation