Abstract
Modern large road network systems pose real puzzles in the computation of optimal route selection. The mishaps, accidents and natural hazards vie with one another in throwing up multiple obstacles for drivers. In spite of the availability of ample literature on this issue, the problem remains undefined and enigmatic. Hence the present investigation is attempted in a scientific manner to assist the drivers in negotiating the impediments on the road by means of a conventional device—sign boards. These sign boards have embedded devices with pre-programmed information depending upon the conditions of the area and the information is emitted through radio frequency waves. These conditions are classified and decoded by the AHP intelligent systems in the approaching vehicles and facilitate the drivers in decision making in the selection of optimal routes. Among the wide variety of methods available in detecting communities in large networks, code based community network system is adopted in the current paper since it is reasonable, with the real communities remaining unequal in size, exceptionally fast in reducing search and achieving near optimal solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Song, Q., & Wang, X. (2011). Efficient routing on large road networks using hierarchical communities. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transporation Systems, 12(1), 132–140.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269–271.
Chen, Y. Y., Bell, M. G. H., & Bogenberger, K. (2007). Reliable pretrip multipath planning and dynamic adaptation for a centralize d road navigation system. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(1), 14–20.
Liu, B. (1997). Route finding by using knowledge about the road network. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(4), 436–448.
Rajagopalan, R., Mehrotra, K. G., Mohan, C. K., & Varshney, P. K. (2008). Hierarchical path computation approach for large graphs. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 44(2), 427–440.
Wang, X. F., & Chen, G. R. (2003). Complex networks: Small-world, scale-free and beyond. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 3(1), 6–20.
Angell I, Kietzmann J (2006). RFID and the end of cash? (PDF). Communications of the ACM 49(12): 90–96. doi: 10.1145/1183236.1183237. Retrieved 9 November 2013.
Wong, J. K., & Li, H. (2007). Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment,. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.019.
Cheng, E., & Li, H. (2002). Construction partnering process and associated critical success factors: Quantitative investigation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(4), 194–202.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saravanan, S., Sabari, A. The Application of RFID and AHP Intelligent Systems in DAS for Seeking the Automated Assistance of Sign Boards in Route Selection in Large Road Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 87, 369–380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2873-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2873-5