Abstract
Sherry wine is a pale-yellowish dry wine produced in Southern-Spain which features are mainly due to biological aging when the metabolism of biofilm-forming yeasts (flor yeasts) consumes ethanol (and other non-fermentable carbon sources) from a previous alcoholic fermentation, and produces volatile compounds such as acetaldehyde. To start aging and maintain the wine stability, a high alcohol content is required, which is achieved by the previous fermentation or by adding ethanol (fortification). Here, an alternative method is proposed which aims to produce a more economic, distinctive Sherry wine without fortification. For this, a flor yeast has been pre-acclimatized to glycerol consumption against ethanol, and later confined in a fungal-based immobilization system known as “microbial biocapsules”, to facilitate its inoculum. Once aged, the wines produced using biocapsules and free yeasts (the conventional method) exhibited chemical differences in terms of acidity and volatile concentrations. These differences were evaluated positively by a sensory panel. Pre-acclimatization of flor yeasts to glycerol consumption was not successful but when cells were immobilized in fungal pellets, ethanol consumption was lower. We believe that immobilization of flor yeasts in microbial biocapsules is an economic technique that can be used to produce high quality differentiated Sherry wines.
Key points
• Flor yeasts were immobilized in microbial biocapsules and used for Sherry winemaking.
• Biocapsules decrease ethanol consumption over free flor yeast cells during winemaking.
• Use of biocapsules improves Sherry wine organoleptic properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biological aging is a winemaking microbiological practice required for the production of a special type of wine known as “Sherry”, which is usually produced in the Southern-Spain in areas like Condado de Huelva, Jerez-Xérès-Sherry and Montilla-Moriles. This process is carried out after alcoholic fermentation, in oak casks for over 3 years where a biofilm, known as flor, produced by Saccharomyces flor yeast develops on wine-air interphase in a dynamic system called “criaderas and solera” in which the aged wine ready to consume is kept in the solera (Alexandre 2013; Moreno-García et al. 2013; Legras et al. 2016; Ferreiro-González et al. 2019; Sancho-Galán et al. 2019). This system facilitates the maintenance of Sherry wine organoleptic characteristics at their final stage (solera), by replacing the consumed volume with Sherry wine from the next aging level (first criadera) (Valcárcel-Muñoz et al. 2022).
Flor is mostly composed of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (Esteve-Zarzoso et al. 2004). However, the recent application of molecular identification tools such as microsatellite typing, Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)-metabarcoding and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry, has revealed the presence of non-Saccharomyces yeasts such as Pichia manshurica, Pichia membranifaciens, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Candida guillermondii, and Trichosporon asahii (Ruiz-Muñoz et al. 2020; Carbonero-Pacheco et al. 2021). These species were quantified in low amounts, and seem to not have a significant effect on the wine quality (Carbonero-Pacheco et al. 2021).
The yeast in the flor establishes an oxidative metabolism, in which they can consume non-fermentable carbon sources such as ethanol, glycerol, acetic acid, and/or lactic acid. In this way, acetaldehyde, 1,1-diethoxyethanem 2,3-butanediol, diacetyl, acetoin, fusel alcohols, among others, are released as reaction products, thus conferring a wide range of organoleptic properties to the wine such as ripe to overripe apple, creamy, or roundness (Peinado and Mauricio 2009; Moreno-García et al. 2018b; Sancho-Galán et al. 2019). The increased levels of acetaldehyde and the decreased concentration of ethanol, glycerol, and volatile acidity are the most significant chemical changes in biological aging (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011). Further, the flor protects wine from oxidation (Mauricio and Ortega 1997; Moreno-García et al. 2018b) while allowing evaporation of ethanol and other compounds (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011).
Usually, there is a fortification or alcohol addition step before biological aging. The objective of this phase is to increase the alcohol content and biological stability of the wine during the aging process. Nonetheless, this practice is not essential in some warm regions such as Montilla-Moriles (southern Spain), where wines reach > 15% (v/v) ethanol content naturally through alcoholic fermentation. Wines with a low alcohol content that will later be subjected to biological aging need to be added until they reach an alcohol content of over 14% (v/v) (BOJA 2023), which causes increases in imposed taxes and hence increases the price of the final product.
Here, we conducted microvinifications to produce Sherry wine using flor yeasts immobilized in a natural system known as microbial biocapsules. Immobilization systems facilitate yeast handling and recovery and increase protection of cells from stress conditions (physical and/or chemical) (Moreno-García et al. 2018a; López-Menchero et al. 2021). Microbial biocapsules use fungal spherical pellets where the yeast cells are encapsulated and attached to the hyphae. This system is an improvement of a previous technology known as “yeast biocapsules” that have been tested for the production of alcoholic beverages (Peinado et al. 2005, 2006; Puig-Pujol et al. 2013; García-Martínez et al. 2015; López de Lerma et al. 2018; López-Menchero et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022; Ogawa et al. 2022;). Through its utilization, sensory attributes of some of these beverages have been significantly enhanced. Further, flor yeasts have been pre-acclimatized for glycerol consumption to reduce ethanol consumption with the final goal of avoiding or complementing the fortification step and cheapen the process. We expect to produce a more economic and higher quality wine or at least a differentiated wine, through yeast immobilization on natural supports.
Materials and methods
Microorganisms, media and growth conditions
In this study, the strains used were S. cerevisiae G1 (ATCC: MYA-2451), a flor yeast used in the biological aging of Sherry-type wines, and the filamentous fungus (ff) Aspergillus oryzae UCD 76 − 2, a food-grade, generally recognized as safe (GRAS) ff, from the Agricultural Chemistry, Edaphology and Microbiology Department of the University of Córdoba (Spain) and Phaff Culture Collection at the University of California, Davis (USA); respectively. The yeasts were incubated in 50 mL of YPD (g/L): yeast extract, 10; peptone, 20; and dextrose, 20; in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks overnight at 175 rpm and 28ºC. The seed culture was pelleted by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 15 min; Hettich Zentrifugen Rotina 38R, ø 15 cm) and scaled up to 500 mL of YPD in 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks overnight at 175 rpm and 28ºC. The ff was cultured on sporulation agar medium (g/L): corn meal agar, 17; yeast extract, 1; glucose, 2; agar, 20; for 7 days at 28 °C.
Pre-acclimatization to glycerol consumption
Cultured yeast cells were pelleted by centrifugation (7000 rpm, 15 min; Beckman Coulter J2-HS Centrifuge, ø 30 cm) and transferred to a 500 mL YPG medium (g/L): yeast extract, 10; peptone, 20; and glycerol, 30; and cultured for 5 days at 175 rpm and 28ºC. Afterwards, the yeast cells were pelleted and inoculated in glycerol-added wine. This wine is the same base wine used for further biological aging but with a final glycerol concentration of 9 g/L. The acclimatization was performed for 5 days at 175 rpm and 28 ºC. Contamination tests through direct microscopic observation and sample cultures in YPD-agar were conducted after each acclimatization phase.
Yeast immobilization procedure
Once the pre-acclimatization finished, the yeast cells were pelleted by centrifugation (7000 rpm, 15 min; Beckman Coulter J2-HS Centrifuge, ø 30 cm) and a portion was used to immobilize in microbial biocapsules (MB). To produce MB, ff spores were harvested from the sporulation agar medium into a vessel with sterile distilled (DI) water, vortexed and sonicated for 5 min to obtain a homogeneous spore suspension. Ff spores were inoculated to reach a final population of 1 × 106 spores/mL in a fungal pellet culture medium (FPM) consisting of (g/L): glucose, 60; yeast extract, 3; NaNO3, 3; K2HPO4, 1; MgSO4, 0.5; KCl 0.5; and FeSO4; 0.01 and adjusted to pH 5.5 with HCl); and cultured for 3 days at 175 rpm, 30 °C; to form the fungal pellets. A 50 mL Falcon tube was filled with sterile DI water and cultured yeast cells and ff pellets were immersed in a ratio of 1:1 wet weight yeast:ff pellet. This suspension was subjected to vacuum infusion (< 0.3 atm pressure) for 1 min using a Bonsenkitchen system (Oakwood, GA, USA), which forces the yeast cells suspension into the ff pellets’ air pockets. To confirm infusion, absorbance at 580 nm was measured in the cell suspension both before and after the vacuum step; a 20% reduction in absorbance was obtained. Ff pellets with encapsulated yeast cells were submerged into a YPD solution and cultivated overnight at 175 rpm, 28 °C. The acquired MB were then rinsed thoroughly in sterile DI water to detach any surface cells that can cause cell leakage during the aging. The MB assembling methodology has been submitted to patent application (Application number: 64/411,843).
Biological aging conditions
The base wine (BW) used for biological aging was provided by Alvear, a local winery from Montilla-Moriles winemaking region, Córdoba (Spain). It consisted of a white wine obtained from Pedro Ximénez grape variety, stored for 8 months in a clay jar (i.e., “tinaja”), filtered over diatomaceous earth and kept under nitrogen in a stainless steel tank. It is a low alcoholic wine with 13.75% (v/v) ethanol, pH of 3.25, titratable acidity of 5.05 g of tartaric acid/L, volatile acidity of 0.42 g of acetic acid/L, and free SO2 of < 6 mg/L.
For biological aging microvinifications, 250 mL BW in sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks (air:wine proportion similar to wine barrels) were inoculated to reach a final concentration of 1.2 × 106 cells/mL, in different formats: microbial biocapsules (MB), suspended or free yeast cells (FY) and non-pre-acclimatized free yeast cells (NPFY) to analyze the impact of glycerol pre-acclimatization of yeasts. All flasks were covered with hydrophobic cotton and aged at 21ºC and a relative humidity (RH) of 70% for 3 months without agitation. Biological aging was monitored through the observation of flor formation and changes in ethanol and glycerol concentration after the first month of inoculation through enzymatic kits (Boehringer Manheim/R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany and Sigma-Aldritch, St. Louis, MO, USA; respectively). Contamination tests were conducted before and after biological aging.
Measurement of enological parameters
After aging, the sample supernatant was separated from the solid particles through centrifugation (7500 rpm for 15 min). Ethanol content, titratable and volatile acidity, and pH were quantified using the methods recommended by the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV). Glycerol was measured using the glycerol assay kits (R-Biopharm, St.Louis, USA). To quantify the effect of basal evaporation on the reduction of ethanol content, a condition was established with identical biological conditions (21ºC, 70% RH, 3 months, no stirring) but without the inoculation of flor yeast. A decrease of 2.55 ± 0.67% (v/v) ethanol was reported due to basal evaporation. It should be noted that ethanol evaporation rates are higher when aging is carried in Erlenmeyer flasks covered with a hydrophobic cotton versus the oak barrels (Moreno-García et al. 2013, 2014; Wollan et al. 2016).
Quantification of major aroma compounds and polyols
The major volatile compounds are those found > 10 mg/L that influence the wine organoleptic characteristics (aroma and flavor). To quantify them, 10 mL of wine sample was mixed with 1 mL of internal standard solution (4-methyl-2-pentanol) and 0.2 g of calcium carbonate. The mixture was then placed in an ultrasound bath for 30 s, and centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 rpm and 2ºC. After the centrifugation, the supernatant was separated and 1 μL was injected in a Gas Chromatograph (GC) Agilent 6890 (Palo Alto, California, USA) with a fused silica capillary column (60 m, 0.25 mm diameter and 0.4 μm film) coupled to a Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The oven was set to 45ºC during the first 15 min, and the temperature increased to 190ºC at a rate of 4 ºC/min for 35 min. The injector and detector were programmed to 270ºC and 300ºC, respectively. The chromatograph was set so that only a tenth of the sample was able to get through the column. Helium was used as the carrying gas. The flow speed was 0.7 mL/min for the first 16 min, and then it was increased to 1.1 mL/min at a rate of 0.2 mL maintained for 52 min. The chromatographic peaks were assigned to a specific compound by its retention time (RT) and by the addition of pure compounds provided by Fluka, Merck, and Sigma-Aldrich, and quantification was performed by means of a calibration table built with the injection of standard solutions with known concentrations analyzed in wine samples (Vararu et al. 2016). The quantified compounds were identified and confirmed by GC–MS by an Agilent 7890 A with MSD-5975-C (Wilmington, DE, USA) using the same capillary column and programs for temperature and helium.
Sensory analyses
Blind sensory analyses were carried out by a tasting panel of 9 judges, all tasters from the Department at the University of Córdoba. Randomized samples of 25–30 mL were served at 8–10 °C in clean and clear glasses with random letter labelling, and the aroma was preserved by covering the glasses with Petri dish lids. A descriptive test was conducted where the panel scored the wine visual, aromatic, and gustatory qualities on a scale of 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of intensity and 0 signifying absence of intensity. Further, tasters were asked to indicate specific characters in each sensory phase (visual, olfactory, or taste).
Statistical analysis
The significant differences between the various biological aging conditions were demonstrated by using Statgraphics v. XVI.I Multiple Variable Analysis (MVA) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and multiple sample comparisons by homogeneous groups (HG), (StatPoint Technologies Inc., Warrenton, Virginia, USA).
Results
Ethanol and glycerol consumption
Figure 1a shows total ethanol concentration decrease due to biological aging (not considering basal evaporation). Ethanol content dropped from 13.25 ± 0.67% (v/v) to 11.71 ± 0.45% (v/v) in MB wines while in FY wines, where pre-acclimatized flor yeast cells were not immobilized, ethanol decrease was more significant (from 13.25 ± 0.67% (v/v) to 9.97 ± 0.24% (v/v). Non-pre-acclimatized and non-immobilized flor yeasts (NPFY) consumed less ethanol than FY reaching a similar content than MB at day 90: from 13.25 ± 0.67% (v/v) to 11.02 ± 0.55% (v/v). As shown in Fig. 1b, in conditions using acclimatized yeasts, the glycerol concentration varied in a similar pattern between MB and FY: a slight increase in the first month (to 8.39 ± 0.36 g/L in MB and 8.02 ± 0.93 g/L in FY) and a drop from day 30 to 90 (to 4.28 ± 0.19 g/L in MB and 3.36 ± 0.39 g/L in FY). In NPFY the glycerol was mostly consumed during the first month (from 7.92 ± 0.17 to 2.43 ± 0.05 g/L). It is observed that ethanol and glycerol consumption by NPFY occurs mostly in the first month while in MB and FY agings, concentration of both metabolites decreased after this time.
Acidity changes and major volatile compounds
The acidity related values are represented in Table 1. pH was slightly higher in all aged wines versus BW. The acidity, especially volatile acidity, was less in the biologically aged wines than in the BW. In MB and FY, the titratable acidity remained similar to BW while in NPFY it decreased to 4.10 ± 0.16 g H2T/L. Fixed acidity varied in a similar fashion than titratable acidity. The volatile acidity significantly decreased in all conditions, mostly in FY, while MB and NPFY had similar concentrations.
Major volatile compounds quantified in the aged wines are shown in Table 2. The 14 compounds found were the result of the yeast oxidative metabolism and they are only perceptible in smell if they exceed the perception threshold or OT (included in the table). Acetaldehyde, 3-methylbutanol, acetoin, 2-phenylethanol and ethyl-lactate were quantified over their OT in all conditions (Zea et al. 2007). The ethyl-acetate was reported above its OT in BW and MB wines while isobutanol in BW, and NPFY; and 2-3-butanediol (levo) in NPFY.
Acetaldehyde, the main product of biological aging, provides an over-ripe apple aroma. Its concentration reached similar levels in NPFY and MB while FY remained constant versus BW. A comparable trend was observed for 1,1-diethoxyethane concentration, which originates from acetaldehyde and contributes to fruity aromas and balsamic notes found in Sherry wines. Ethyl acetate (pineapple, varnish and balsamic aromas), isobutanol (alcohol, wine like and nail polish), and 3-methylbutanol (unpleasant) decreased in all aged wines while acetoin (buttery and creamy), 2,3-butanediol (levo) (buttery and creamy) and 2-phenylethanol (aroma description not found) increased. Ethyl lactate that provides strawberry, raspberry and buttery was quantified in lower quantities in wines aged with the pre-acclimatized yeasts (FY and MB).
PCA analysis
All chemical variables quantified were subjected to a PCA. PC1 accounted for 54.438% and PC2 accounted for 27.272% (Fig. 2). The unaged wine samples (BW) remained to the left of the plot while the aged wines were clearly separated on the right. Ethyl acetate, glycerol, total acidity, fixed acidity, ethyl lactate, diethyl succinate, 2,3-butanediol (levo) have positive projections over PC2 while the rest of the compounds, 2-phenylethanol, 2,3-butanediol (meso), 1,1-diethoxyethane, pH, acetoin, acetaldehyde, 1-propanol, 2-methylbutanol, methanol, isobutanol, 3-methylbutanol, volatile acidity, and ethanol have a negative projection. On the other hand, 1-propanol, 2-methylbutanol, methanol, isobutanol, 3-methylbutanol, volatile acidity, ethanol, ethyl acetate, glycerol, total acidity, fixed acidity have negative projections over PC1; and ethyl lactate, diethyl succinate, 2,3-butanediol (levo), 2-phenylethanol, 2,3-butanediol (meso), 1,1-diethoxyethane, pH, acetoin, and acetaldehyde have a positive projection. Diethyl succinate direct towards FY samples, also to MB samples along with 2,3-butanediol (levo), and 2-phenylethanol; pH, acetoin, and acetaldehyde project towards NPFY; and ethyl acetate, ethanol, and volatile acidity towards BW.
Sensory analyses
The descriptive test showed that the wine with the highest quality score was MB among aged wines while FY wine had the lowest score (Fig. 3). Most of the tasters detected a pale straw yellow color in all wines and agreed that the most visually pleasant was the non-aged BW. Regarding odor, the highest intensity general olfactory scores were perceived in BW and MB wines. Floral and herbaceous smells were noticed in all wines by many tasters, especially in MB and NPFY. Tastewise, MB wines maintained their flavor intensity versus BW and were evaluated with the highest general score among the aged wines.
Discussion
Immobilization of flor yeast cells changes acidity and concentration of major volatile compounds
Immobilization of yeast cells results in changes in their physiology and metabolism (Norton and D’Amore 1994; Mallouchos et al. 2002; Moreno-García et al. 2018a). When using inert fungal supports as yeast cell carriers for alcoholic fermentations, increases in titratable acidity (or decreases), acetaldehyde, acetoin (or decreases), diacetyl and alcohols like isobutanol while decreases in volatile acidity have been reported (Peinado et al. 2005, 2006; Puig-Pujol et al. 2013; García-Martínez et al. 2015; López de Lerma et al. 2018; Ogawa et al. 2022). Here, we observed that immobilized flor yeast cells maintained titratable acidity while wines aged with the conventional method (NPFY) experienced a drop. Wines aged with FY showed a similar value to MB indicating that the difference between MB and NPFY is due to the pre-acclimatized to glycerol consumption rather than the immobilization effect. In white wines, this parameter is mostly dependent on the concentration of tartaric acid and other acids originated during alcoholic fermentation (i.e. succininc > malic > lactic acid, if they did not conduct malolactic fermentation). This decline could be due to the drop of concentration of some acids such as lactic, acetic, piruvic or gluconic acid during biological aging that are consumed as a carbon source by the yeast; or to their precipitation (e.g., tartaric acid into potassium bitartrate) (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011). Yeast cells in MB or FY aging could be using other carbon sources aside from succinic, malic and/or lactic acid. Despite the drop in some values, these are within the typical values in white wine (4.00–8.00 g/L) (Rajkovic et al. 2007).
Volatile acidity decreased in a similar fashion in MB and NPFY. None of the analyzed wines overpassed 1.2 g/L which is the maximum allowed by the International Organization of Vine and Wine because higher concentrations lead to a vinegar-like flavor (Swiegers et al. 2005) and/or could indicate contamination by acetic acid bacteria (Bartowsky and Henschke 2008). Acetic acid is produced by the alcoholic fermentation at very low concentrations (no more than 0.7 g/L) and when the yeasts change to oxidative metabolism, acetic acid is consumed as a carbon source in the Krebs Cycle (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011). A lower volatile acidity value in FY could be attributed to the unsuccessful pre-acclimatization step, which led yeast metabolism to prioritize consumption of acetic acid over glycerol.
Regarding the major volatile compounds, acetaldehyde is the most important compound in biological aging because it gives Sherry wines their characteristic aroma of ripe apples. Its concentration is usually found within 350–450 mg/L but sometimes can reach up to 1000 mg/L (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011). It is produced when yeasts oxidize ethanol with alcohol dehydrogenase II (ADH2), which synthesis is suppressed by a high glucose concentration. As mentioned before, in all wines, acetaldehyde content reached the standard value except in FY which remained similar to BW. It must be noted that FY wine was the one with the lowest ethanol content indicating that its decrease is not a result of oxidation to acetaldehyde. Acetaldehyde synthesis depends on multiple factors such as the temperature and ethanol quantity but especially the oxygen availability and the redox potential. Zea et al. (2015) demonstrated that acetaldehyde is mostly produced when flor is formed. Here, we did not observe flor formation after three months of FY inoculation; instead, yeast cells precipitated to the bottom of the Erlenmeyer flask and formed viable colonies (Fig. 4). A low dissolved oxygen availability could explain the low ethanol oxidation into acetaldehyde in FY. An alternative or complementary hypothesis is that acetaldehyde was rapidly transformed into acetic acid by the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALD) to use it as a carbon source (Pozo-Bayón et al. 2011; Moreno-García et al. 2015).
There is also shown that the pre-acclimatized yeast immobilized in fungal pellets promoted flor formation and acetaldehyde synthesis over the suspended yeast cells. Immobilization systems make cells immobilized more tolerant to stress conditions (i.e. high ethanol content) (Lapponi et al. 2022). A higher cell resistance can shorten the acclimatization phase or lag phase when inoculated in a new environment such as the BW, thus, shortening the onset of flor formation and acetaldehyde production.
Flor yeast immobilization and glycerol pre-acclimatization do not significantly impact sensorial profile of aged wines
Although some chemical differences were reported among the wines tested, the wine tasting panel did not perceive significant differences in many of the sensory characters. This could be due to a masking effect of other aroma compounds present. Cell immobilization and glycerol pre-acclimatization did not significantly influence the wine sensorial profiles. Volatiles detected over their OT that are fruity aromas (acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate and ethyl lactate) were not clearly perceived among the tasters (10–25%). At low concentrations, the ethyl-acetate, in MB, produces a fruity pineapple smell, while at high concentrations as in BW, it has a balsamic smell.
Wines aged with MB reported the highest values in all categories (visual, aroma, and flavor) and general score among the aged wines while FY had the lowest in all these parameters. These results indicate that under the studied conditions, cell immobilization improves the sensorial attributes over suspended yeast cells both pre-acclimatized to glycerol consumption or not (conventional technique). Higher sensorial qualities have also been reported when using biocapsules to produce sparkling wine, long aged sparkling wine, and IPA beer (Puig-Pujol et al. 2013; García-Martínez et al. 2015; López de Lerma et al. 2018).
Glycerol consumption was unsuccessful in pre-acclimatized yeast cells
In the absence of fermentable carbon sources, S. cerevisiae catabolizes ethanol, glycerol, and acetic acid as carbon sources during biological aging in order to synthesize hexoses and polysaccharides through gluconeogenesis or to produce energy through the Krebs Cycle, electron transport chain, and ATP synthesis (Mauricio et al. 1997). In this work, the wine aged using flor yeasts pre-acclimatized and immobilized in fungal pellets (MB) maintained a significantly higher ethanol content throughout the aging procedure while not consuming high amounts of glycerol. Furthermore, compared to non-pre-acclimatized free flor yeast (NPFY), unexpectedly low glycerol consumption rates and high ethanol consumption rates were observed in the pre-acclimatized flor yeasts (FY).
These results may be due to an unsuccessful glycerol pre-acclimatization where flor yeast did not activate the glycerol metabolic routes. As set out above, glycerol is a compound consumed during biological aging so it can be used instead or in combination with ethanol (Pozo-Bayón and Moreno-Arribas 2016). Growth of S. cerevisiae strains on glycerol is very low, with a reported growth rate of 0.05 h − 1 (Lu et al. 2005). This means that the flor yeast during the glycerol pre-acclimatization may still be in their lag phase at day 5 in the YPG culture and in the 9 g/L glycerol BW and yeast viability could be low leading to longer lag phases during biological aging (slighter changes in ethanol and glycerol concentrations during the first months as observed in Figs. 1 and 2). In the published literature, there is very little information about the maximum growth rate and biomass output of S. cerevisiae grown on glycerol as the only carbon source. (Lages and Lucas 1997) reported after 3 days of lag phase a maximal growth rate of 0.1 h − 1 for a S. cerevisiae strain grown on a mineral medium containing glycerol, peptone and yeast extract as carbon sources.
Some authors investigated techniques to promote yeast growth on glycerol. (Eugene Raj et al. 2002) used a culture medium containing glycerol, yeast extract, and glucose with vitamin and trace elements supplementation in a fed-batch bioreactor and reported growth rates of 0.35 h and attained a 20-fold growth rate (from 0.01 to 0.2 h − 1) through sequential sub-cultivations. These authors repeatedly transferred the yeast 20 times into fresh mineral medium (pH 4) containing 20 g/L glycerol as the sole carbon source and cultured at 30 °C on a rotary shaker (160 rpm) overnight. For each transfer, cells at the middle of their exponential phase were used to start the next sub-cultivation with fresh medium (10% v/v inoculation rate). The μmax increased during the first 50 cell generations (from 0.01 to 0.2 h − 1).
Considering the factors mentioned above, it is possible to enhance the growth of yeast cells on glycerol by utilizing lower concentrations, a vitamin supplement, a fed-batch bioreactor culture mode, and/or performing sequential yeast sub-cultivations. In addition, triggering biofilm formation under static conditions may also be beneficial as it can prepare the yeasts physiologically for the base wine inoculum.
Conclusion
In this work, we produced for the first time Sherry wine using an immobilization methodology, so-called microbial biocapsules, where flor yeast cells are entrapped in inactivated pellets of A. oryzae, a food-grade filamentous fungus generally recognized as safe. Chemical differences were reported when compared to a Sherry wine elaborated with suspended yeast cells (the conventional method) and significantly higher scores were given after the sensorial analysis to those wines produced with microbial biocapsules. Furthermore, before immobilization, flor yeasts have been pre-acclimatized for glycerol consumption to reduce ethanol catabolism with the final goal of avoiding or complementing the fortification step. Although the methodology used in this work was not successful, optimization in the pre-acclimatization step was suggested: using lower glycerol concentrations in the medium, a vitamin supplement, a fed-batch bioreactor culture mode, performing sequential yeast sub-cultivations, and/or use of static acclimatization so that the yeast forms flor and does not have to re-acclimatized when inoculated. Nonetheless, the immobilization of these cells reduced the ethanol consumption during aging which could be useful to maintain ethanol levels above 14% (v/v) thus, decreasing the ethanol volumes required in fortification. Taking into account that immobilization systems facilitate yeast handling and recovery, increase protection of cells from stress conditions, reduce ethanol consumption during aging, and improve wine sensorial characters; we believe that immobilization of flor yeasts in microbial biocapsules may be an economic technique which produces high quality differentiated wines. This combined with an optimized pre-acclimatization to glycerol consumption could be regarded as an interesting technique for Sherry winemaking. Further experiments at barrel scale and techno-economical analysis should be conducted in order to confirm the potential of this methodology.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Alexandre H (2013) Flor yeasts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae–their ecology, genetics and metabolism. Int J Food Microbiol 167:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.08.021
Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA (2008) Acetic acid bacteria spoilage of bottled red wine -- a review. Int J Food Microbiol 125:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.10.016
BOJA (2023) Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía - Histórico del BOJA. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/boja/2023/42/63. Accessed 14 of July 2023
Carbonero-Pacheco J, Moreno-García J, Moreno J, García-Martínez T, Mauricio JC (2021) Revealing the yeast diversity of the flor biofilm microbiota in Sherry wines through internal transcribed spacer-metabarcoding and matrix-assisted laser Desorption/Ionization time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Front Microbiol 12:825756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.825756
Esteve-Zarzoso B, Fernández-Espinar MT, Querol A (2004) Authentication and identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae “flor” yeast races involved in sherry ageing. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 85:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000020282.83717.bd
Eugene Raj A, Sathish Kumar HS, Umesh Kumar S, Misra MC, Ghildyal NP, Karanth NG (2002) High-cell-density fermentation of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae using glycerol. Biotechnol Prog 18:1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp0201105
Ferreiro-González M, Ruiz-Rodríguez A, Barbero GF, Ayuso J, Álvarez JA, Palma M, Barroso CG (2019) FT-IR, vis spectroscopy, color and multivariate analysis for the control of ageing processes in distinctive spanish wines. Food Chem 277:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.087
García-Martínez T, Moreno J, Mauricio JC, Peinado R (2015) Natural sweet wine production by repeated use of yeast cells immobilized on Penicillium chrysogenum. LWT - Food Science and Technology 61:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.029
Lages F, Lucas C (1997) Contribution to the physiological characterization of glycerol active uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1322:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(97)00062-5
Lapponi MJ, Méndez MB, Trelles JA, Rivero CW (2022) Cell immobilization strategies for biotransformations. Curr Opin Green Sustainable Chem 33:100565
Legras J-L, Moreno-Garcia J, Zara S, Zara G, Garcia-Martinez T, Mauricio JC, Mannazzu I, Coi AL, Bou Zeidan M, Dequin S, Moreno J, Budroni M (2016) Flor yeast: New Perspectives Beyond Wine Aging. Front Microbiol 7:503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00503
Liu M, Qin X, Wu X (2022) Study on the technology of brewing red raspberry wine by using new immobilized yeast technology. Sci Rep 12:21344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25410-z
López de Lerma N, Peinado RA, Puig-Pujol A, Mauricio JC, Moreno J, García-Martínez T (2018) Influence of two yeast strains in free, bioimmobilized or immobilized with alginate forms on the aromatic profile of long aged sparkling wines. Food Chem 250:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.036
López-Menchero JR, Ogawa M, Mauricio JC, Moreno J (2021) Effect of calcium alginate coating on the cell retention and fermentation of a fungus-yeast immobilization system. LWT 144:111250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111250
Lu L, Roberts GG, Oszust C, Hudson AP (2005) The YJR127C/ZMS1 gene product is involved in glycerol-based respiratory growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-005-0023-4
Mallouchos A, Reppa P, Aggelis G, Kanellaki M, Koutinas AA, Komaitis M (2002) Grape skins as a natural support for yeast immobilization. Biotechnol Lett 24:1331–1335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019892232296
Mauricio JC, Ortega JM (1997) Nitrogen compounds in wine during its biological aging by two flor film yeasts: an approach to accelerated biological aging of dry sherry-type wines. Biotechnol Bioeng 53:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970120)53:2<159::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-N
Mauricio JC, Moreno JJ, Ortega JM (1997) In vitro specific activities of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases from two flor yeasts during controlled wine aging. J Agric Food Chem 45:1967–1971. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960634i
Moreno-García J, Raposo RM, Moreno J (2013) Biological aging status characterization of Sherry type wines using statistical and oenological criteria. Food Res Int 54:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.031
Moreno-García J, García-Martínez T, Moreno J, Millán MC, Mauricio JC (2014) A proteomic and metabolomic approach for understanding the role of the flor yeast mitochondria in the velum formation. Int J Food Microbiol 172:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.030
Moreno-García J, García-Martínez T, Moreno J, Mauricio JC (2015) Proteins involved in flor yeast carbon metabolism under biofilm formation conditions. Food Microbiol 46:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.07.001
Moreno-García J, García-Martínez T, Mauricio JC, Moreno J (2018a) Yeast immobilization systems for alcoholic wine fermentations: actual trends and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 9:241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00241
Moreno-García J, Ogawa M, Joseph CML, Mauricio JC, Moreno J, García-Martínez T (2018b) Comparative analysis of intracellular metabolites, proteins and their molecular functions in a flor yeast strain under two enological conditions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2578-5
Norton S, D’Amore T (1994) Physiological effects of yeast cell immobilization: applications for brewing. Enzyme Microb Technol 16:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(94)90150-3
Ogawa M, Carmona-Jiménez P, García-Martínez T, Jorrín-Novo JV, Moreno J, Rey MD, Moreno-García J (2022) Use of yeast biocapsules as a fungal-based immobilized cell technology for indian Pale ale-type beer brewing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106:7615–7625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12239-9
Peinado RA, Mauricio JC (2009) Biologically aged wines. In: Moreno-Arribas MV, Polo MC (eds) Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 81–101
Peinado RA, Moreno JJ, Maestre O, Mauricio JC (2005) Use of a novel immobilization yeast system for winemaking. Biotechnol Lett 27:1421–1424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-0939-2
Peinado RA, Moreno JJ, Villalba JM, González-Reyes JA, Ortega JM, Mauricio JC (2006) Yeast biocapsules: a new immobilization method and their applications. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.040
Pozo-Bayón M, Ángeles Pozo-Bayón M, Victoria Moreno-Arribas M (2011) Sherry wines. Adv Food Nutr Res 17–40
Pozo-Bayón MÁ, Moreno-Arribas MV (2016) Sherry wines: manufacture, composition and analysis. In: Caballero B, Finglas P, Toldrá F (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 779–784
Puig-Pujol A, Bertran E, García-Martínez T, Capdevila F, Mínguez S, Mauricio JC (2013) Application of a new organic yeast immobilization method for sparkling wine production. Am J Enol Vitic 64:386–394. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2013.13031
Rajkovic M, Novakovic I, Petrovic A (2007) Determination of titratable acidity in white wine. J Agricultural Sci Belgrade 52:169–184
Ruiz-Muñoz M, Cordero-Bueso G, Benítez-Trujillo F, Martínez S, Pérez F, Cantoral JM (2020) Rethinking about flor yeast diversity and its dynamic in the “criaderas and soleras” biological aging system. Food Microbiol 92:103553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103553
Sancho-Galán P, Amores-Arrocha A, Jiménez-Cantizano A, Palacios V (2019) Use of multiflora bee pollen as a flor velum yeast growth activator in biological aging wines. Molecules 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091763
Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS (2005) Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11:139–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x
Valcárcel-Muñoz MJ, Guerrero-Chanivet M, Rodríguez-Dodero MDC, García-Moreno MD, Guillén-Sánchez DA (2022) Analytical and chemometric characterization of fino and amontillado sherries during aging in system. Molecules 27:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020365
Vararu F, Moreno-García J, Zamfir C-I, Cotea VV, Moreno J (2016) Selection of aroma compounds for the differentiation of wines obtained by fermenting musts with starter cultures of commercial yeast strains. Food Chem 197:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.111
Wollan D, Pham D-T, Wilkinson KL (2016) Changes in wine ethanol content due to evaporation from wine glasses and implications for sensory analysis. J Agric Food Chem 64:7569–7575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02691
Zea L, Moyano L, Moreno JA, Medina M (2007) Aroma series as fingerprints for biological ageing in fino sherrytype wines. J Sci Food Agric 87:2319–2326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2992
Zea L, Serratosa MP, Mérida J, Moyano L (2015) Acetaldehyde as key compound for the authenticity of sherry wines: a study covering 5 decades. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 14:681–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12159
Acknowledgements
We thank Alvear winery in Montilla-Moriles region (Spain) for kind help providing the base wine used for biological aging. Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Córdoba/CBUA.
Funding
Funding for open access publishing: Universidad de Córdoba/CBUA. This research was co-funded by the “Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación” (CDTI) (reference: IDI-20200363; JC-P, JCM), by ART. 83 contract granted by company “Perez Barquero” and “Oficina de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación” (OTRI) at the University of Córdoba (reference: 12020062; JCM), by “Ayudas para la Explotación de Resultados de Investigación de la Modalidad II del VI Plan Propio Galileo” (JM-G) granted by OTRI at the University of Córdoba, and by “Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad”, (reference: A1122062E0_AGROMIS; JM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, JCM, JM, and JMG; methodology, JCP, JCM, MO, NN, RR, and JMG; software, NPV and JMG.; validation, NPV, JCM, and JMG; formal analysis, NPV and JMG.; investigation, NPV, JCP, and JMG; resources, JCM, JM, TGM, and JMG.; data curation, JCM and JMG; writing—original draft preparation, NPV and JMG; writing—review and editing, NPV, JCM, TGM, MO, NN, RR, and JMG; visualization, JCM, RR, and JMG; supervision, JCP, JCM, and JMG; project administration, JCM, JM, TGM, and JMG; funding acquisition, JCM, JM, TGM, and JMG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
NP-V declares that she has no conflict of interest. JC-P declares that he has no conflict of interest. JCM declares that he has no conflict of interest. JM declares that he has no conflict of interest. TG-M declares that she has no conflict of interest. NN declares that he has no conflict of interest. MO declares that she has no conflict of interest. RR declares that she has no conflict of interest. JMG declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Patents
The microbial biocapsule assembling methodology has been submitted to patent application (Application number: 64/411,843).
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pastor-Vega, N., Carbonero-Pacheco, J., Mauricio, J.C. et al. Flor yeast immobilization in microbial biocapsules for Sherry wine production: microvinification approach. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39, 271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03713-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03713-1