Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What drives patchiness in palmiet wetlands?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland communities are shaped by high levels of stress, disturbance and competition. Using South African palmiet wetlands as a case study (Prionium serratum dominated valley-bottom wetlands), we explore whether autogenic or allogenic succession is the dominant process driving community dynamics in valley-bottom wetlands in drylands. Several wetland rehabilitation programmes in South Africa use the dominant wetland species palmiet (P. serratum) as a pioneer to facilitate recolonization. However research is needed on palmiet wetland dynamics and formation to guide these restoration efforts. We explore vegetation patterns by analyzing which environmental parameters drive dominance of palmiet, resulting in the characteristic patchiness of palmiet wetlands, and which plant functional traits account for this. In 20 plots from three palmiet wetlands distributed across the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, key soil, groundwater and vegetation parameters, as well as community composition were measured. Twenty-two dominant species were selected and 13 functional traits measured. Soil pH and relative groundwater depth were the main environmental parameters driving community assembly in palmiet wetlands. Palmiet-dominated communities were characterized by greater stem diameter, leaf length–width ratio, leaf area and cellulose and lignin concentration compared to fynbos communities. These traits suggest adaptations to disturbances such as fires (thicker stems) and floods (long, thin leaves, flexible shoots and thicker stems). We propose three hypotheses of palmiet wetland development which shed light on palmiet wetland restoration and highlight gaps for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Plate 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available upon acceptance.

Code availability

Code will be made available upon acceptance.

References

  • Barclay A (2016) Ecosystem engineering by the wetland plant palmiet: does it control fluvial form and promote diffuse flow in steep-sided valleys of the Cape Fold Mountains. MSc Dissertation. Rhodes University, Grahamstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Joergensen RG, Kandeler E, Makeschin F, Nuss E, Oberholzer HR, Scheu S (1997) An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biogeochem 29:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher C, Withers M (2004) Palmiet: Prionium serratum a Cape river plant. Veld & Flora 90:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Keddy PA (1993) A functional classification of wetland plants. J Veg Sci 4:591–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brag H (1972) The influence of potassium on the transpiration rate and stomatal opening in Triticum aestivum and Pisum sativum. Physilogia Plant 26:250–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown IC (1943) A rapid method of determining exchangable hydrogen and total exchangable bases of soils. Soil Sci 56:353–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AG, Tooth S, Bullard JE, Thomas DSG, Chiverrell RC, Plater AJ, Murton J, Thorndycraft VR, Tarolli P, Rose J, Wainwright J, Downs P, Aalto R (2017) The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: emergence, status and implications. Earth Surf Process Landf 42:71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catford JA, Jansson R (2014) Drowned, buried and carried away: effects of plant traits on the distribution of native and alien species in riparian ecosystems. New Phytol 204:19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clement B, Proctor MCF (2009) Ecological dynamics I: vegetation as bioindicators and dynamic community. In: Maltby E, Barker T (eds) The wetlands handbook, 1st edn. Wiley, Oxford, pp 282–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Colmer TD, Voesenek LACJ (2009) Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Funct Plant Biol 36:665–681. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibling MR, Davies NS, Falcon-Lang HJ, Bashforth AR, DiMichele WA, Rygel MC, Ielpi A (2014) Palaeozoic co-evolution of rivers and vegetation: a synthesis of current knowledge. Proc Geol Assoc 125:524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1917) The structure and development of the plant assosciation. Torrey Bot Club Bull 44:463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell SE, Ellery WN, Grenfell MC, Ramsay LF, Fluegel TJ (2010) Sedimentary facies and geomorphic evolution of a blocked-valley lake: lake Futululu, northern Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Sedimentology 57:1159–1174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell SE, Mamphoka MF, Grenfell MC, Job N (2020) Evaluating the potential for natural ecosystem recovery in cut-and-fill wetlands: case study of Pietersielieskloof palmiet wetland, South Africa. Wetl Ecol Manag 28:863–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09756-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houba R, Van der Lee JJ, Novozamsky I, Wallinga I (1989) Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi. Part 5. Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman RH, Black CA (1951) Solubility of iron, aluminium, calcium, and magnesium inositol phosphates at different pH values. Soil Sci 72:179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Job N (2014) Geomorphic origin and dynamics of deep, peat-filled, valley bottom wetlands dominated by palmiet (Prionium serratum)—a case study based on the Goukou Wetland, Western Cape. MSc Dissertation, Rhodes University, Eastern Cape

  • Kotze DC (2015) A survey of organic soils in the upper Riviersonderend catchment. World Wildlife Fund Report, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Low AB, Rebelo AG (1996) Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE, Davis JF (1961) Relationships between pH values of organic soils and availabilities of 12 plant nutrients. Soil Sci 92:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196109000-00005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens R (1995) Current methods for measuring microbial biomass C in soil: potentials and limitations. Biol Fertil Soils 19:87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurin O, Davies TJ, Burrows JE, Daru BH, Yessoufou K, Muasya AM, van der Bank M, Bond WJ (2014) Savanna fire and the origins of the ‘underground forests’ of Africa. New Phytol 204:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BJ, Bailey AK (2008) Water resources of South Africa 2005 study (WR2005). Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley GF, Hannah L, Millar D, Thuiller W, Booth A (2003) Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 112:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00414-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2015) Wetland vegetation and succession. Wetlands. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 215–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor H, Rydin H, Hylander K, Nilsson MB, Lindborg R, Norberg J (2017) Towards a trait-based ecology of wetland vegetation. Int J Lab Hematol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 93–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Niering WA (1989) Wetland vegetation development. In: Majumdar S, Brooks R, Brenner F, Tiner J (eds) Wetlands ecology and conservation: emphasis in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, pp 103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsor AC (2007) Plant community distribution and diversity, and threats to vegetation of the Kromme River Peat Basins, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. MSc Dissertation. Rhodes University, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onoda Y, Westoby M, Adler PB, Choong AMF, Clissold FJ, Cornelissen JHC, Díaz S, Dominy NJ, Elgart A, Enrico L, Fine PVA, Howard JJ, Jalili A, Kitajima K, Kurokawa H, McArthur C, Lucas PW, Markesteijn L, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Poorter L, Richards L, Santiago LS, Sosinski EE, Van Bael SA, Warton DI, Wright IJ, Joseph Wright S, Yamashita N (2011) Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. Ecol Lett 14:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01582.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, De VAC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, Steege H, Van Der HMGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulley S, Ellery WN, Lagesse JV, Schlegel PK, McNamara SJ (2018) Gully erosion as a mechanism for wetland formation: an examination of two contrasting landscapes. L Degrad Dev 29:1756–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG (2001) SASOL proteas: a field guide to the proteas of South Africa. Fernwood Press (Pty) Ltd, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AJ (2012) An ecological and hydrological evaluation of the effects of restoration on ecosystem services in the Kromme River system, South Africa. MSc Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape

  • Rebelo AJ (2017) Ecosystem services of palmiet wetlands: the role of ecosystem composition & function. Doctoral Thesis, University of Antwerp

  • Rebelo AJ, Le Maitre DC, Esler KJ, Cowling RM (2015) Hydrological responses of a valley-bottom wetland to land-use/land-cover change in a South African catchment: making a case for wetland restoration. Restor Ecol 23:829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AJ, Morris C, Meire P, Esler KJ (2019) Ecosystem services provided by South African palmiet wetlands: a case for investment in strategic water source areas. Ecol Indic 101:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AJ, Jarmain C, Esler KJ, Cowling RM, Le Maitre DC (2020) Water-use characteristics of palmiet (Prionium serratum), an endemic south African wetland plant. WSA 46:558–572. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i4.9069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke MK (2013) Links between riparian vegetation and flow. PhD Dissertation. Stellenbosch University, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF (1977) Maintenence of high diversity in coral reef fish communities. Am Nat 111:337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoelynck J, Bal K, Backx H, Okruszko T, Meire P, Struyf E (2010) Silica uptake in aquatic and wetland macrophytes: a strategic choice between silica, lignin and cellulose? New Phytol 186:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03176.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B, Keddy PA, Moore DR, Lemky K (1989) Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophtyes. J Ecol 77:1093–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieben EJJ (2012) Plant functional composition and ecosystem properties: the case of peatlands in South Africa. Plant Ecol 213:809–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0043-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieben EJJ, Glen RP, Muasya AM (2017a) The wetland flora of South Africa: occurrence patterns, frequency and dominance across a diverse landscape. Aquat Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2017.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieben EJJ, Khubeka SP, Sithole S, Job NM, Kotze DC (2017b) The classification of wetlands: integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches and their significance for ecosystem service determination. Wetl Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9585-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieben EJJ, Kotze DC, Job NM, Muasya AM (2017c) The sclerophyllous wetlands on quartzite substrates in South Africa: floristic description, classification and explanatory environmental factors. South African J Bot 113:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terer T, Muasya AM, Higgins S, Gaudet JJ, Triest L (2014) Importance of seedling recruitment for regeneration and maintaining genetic diversity of Cyperus papyrus during drawdown in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Aquat Bot 116:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S (2018) The geomorphology of wetlands in drylands: resilience, nonresilience, or …? Geomorphology 305:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S, McCarthy TS (2007) Wetlands in drylands: geomorphological and sedimentological characteristics, with emphasis on examples from southern Africa. Prog Phys Geogr 31:3–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133307073879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabucco A, Zomer R (2018) Global aridity index and potential evapotranspiration (ET0) climate database v2.CGIAR consortium for spatial information (CGIAR-CSI). https://cgiarcsi.community. Accessed 10 Nov 2021

  • Walinga I, Van Vark W, Houba VJG, Van Der Lee JJ (1989) Plant analysis procedures. Soil and plant analysis. Part 7. Wageningen Agricultural University, NL

    Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Wright TW, Wang Y (2012) Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Methods Ecol Evol 3:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierda A, Fresco L, Grootjans A, Van Diggelen R (1997) Numerical assessment of plant species as indicators of the groundwater regime. J Veg Sci 8:707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisheu IC, Keddy PA (1992) Competitive and centrifugal organization of plant communities: theory & tests. J Veg Sci 3:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.J.R. gratefully acknowledges the following organizations for funding: The Erasmus Mundus Programme (European Commission), Research Fund of the University of Antwerp (Belgium) and the National Research Foundation (South Africa). KJE acknowledges support by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Number 103841). Thank you to Byron-Mahieu van der Linde for assistance in the field. Research was conducted under permit number: 0052-AAA008-00019 (CapeNature).

Funding

Partial financial support was received from the Erasmus Mundus Programme (European Commission), the PhD Research Fund of the University of Antwerp (Belgium), an international PhD Scholarship through the National Research Foundation (South Africa) and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Number 103841).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJR, KJE, PM conceived the study, AJR performed data analysis, AJR wrote the manuscript and KJE, PM, ES, contributed and edited it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Rebelo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 6 The percentage cover of palmiet in each of the plots from three palmiet wetlands, South Africa, and the mean value for 2014 and 2015 combined

6,

Table 7 The 13 functional traits collected for the 22 dominant wetland species

7,

Table 8 Statistical results of the linear mixed models for community parameters

8,

Table 9 Results of the SIMPER analysis comparing palmiet and fynbos communities in palmiet wetlands for 2014 and 2015

9,

Table 10 Full names of species used in the detrended correspondence analysis

10.

See Figure

Fig. 8
figure 8

Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of the plant communities in fynbos and palmiet patches in three South African palmiet wetlands sampled in March 2015. Fynbos sites are in orange, palmiet in green. Symbols: ▲ Theewaterskloof, ■ Goukou, ● Kromme. Species names are given in black, and + indicates species with a lower abundance that are masked by other labels. Parameters that were interesting or significantly different (bold) between palmiet and fynbos wetland patches were overlain and are indicated by the arrows. CWM community weighted mean, LLWR leaf length–width ratio, Lig lignin, Cel cellulose, SD stem diameter, LA leaf area, Si silicon, No_sp number of species, Veg.K K in vegetation, Veg.Mg Mg in vegetation, MicrobialC microbial carbon, CEC cation exchange capacity, SWC soil water content. Stippled circles encompass sites from fynbos and palmiet communities. Soil parameters are in brown, vegetation composition in green, functional diversity indices in blue. For full species names see Table 9

8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rebelo, A.J., Sieben, E., Meire, P. et al. What drives patchiness in palmiet wetlands?. Wetlands Ecol Manage 30, 785–811 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09853-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09853-1

Keywords

Navigation