Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrogen removal in constructed marshes at sites protected from and exposed to waves

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrient removal is among the most valuable ecosystem services provided by marshes and is often a stated goal of coastal restoration projects. However, the removal capacity of constructed marshes is potentially affected by several site-specific and design factors, such as marsh platform elevation, slope, sediment type, initial planting density and wave climate. Here, the main and interactive effects of these factors on the capacity of constructed marshes to remove nitrate from runoff was explored in field experiments at sites protected from and exposed to waves. At both sites, three experimental blocks were established, each with 24 treatment combinations of factors in experimental flumes: two platform elevations (high and low), two slopes (steep and shallow), two sediment types (coarse and fine grain), and three initial planting densities (0%, 50% and 100% cover). Nutrient rich (KNO3) groundwater solution was fed through the marsh rhizosphere using subsurface diffusers. The relative effects of treatment combinations were then assessed by analyzing porewater NOx concentrations with ANOVA models. None of the treatment combinations had any observable effect on porewater NOx concentrations at the exposed site. However, both sediment type and planting density were significant main effects at the protected site with the lowest NOx concentrations found in flumes with fine sediments and initially planted. These results confirm that design factors can have large implications on nutrient dynamics of constructed marshes in areas protected from waves and that wave energy can substantially reduce the influence of these design factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Upon acceptance, the authors will publish data and associated metadate on the Mississippi State University Institutional Repository (https://ir.library.msstate.edu/).

References

  • Armstrong W (1979) Aeration in higher plants. Advances in botanical research, vol 7. Academic Press, London, pp 225–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Balke T, Bouma TJ, Horstman EM, Webb EL, Erftemeijer PL, Herman PM (2011) Windows of opportunity: thresholds to mangrove seedling establishment on tidal flats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 440:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (2015) Valuing the storm protection service of estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Ecosyst Serv 11:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamaschi BA, Tsamakis E, Keil RG, Eglinton TI, Montluçon DB, Hedges JI (1997) The effect of grain size and surface area on organic matter, lignin and carbohydrate concentration, and molecular compositions in Peru Margin sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61(6):1247–1260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkovic DM, Mitchell MM, Davis J, Herman J, Andrews E, King A, Mason P, Tahvildari N, Davis J, Dixon RL (2019) Defining boat wake impacts on shoreline stability toward management and policy solutions. Ocean Coast Manag 182:104945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coops H, Van der Velde G (1996) Effects of waves on helophyte stands: mechanical characteristics of stems of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris. Aquat Bot 53(3–4):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JL, Nowicki B, Wigand C (2004) Denitrification in fringing salt marshes of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. Wetlands 24(4):870–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK (2006) Nutrients and the “dead zone”: the link between nutrient ratios and dissolved oxygen in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Front Ecol Environ 4(4):211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleuterius LN (1984) Autecology of the black needlerush Juncus roemerianus. Gulf Caribb Res 7(4):339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelaar WM, Matsumaru T, Yoneyama T (2000) Combined effects of soil waterlogging and compaction on rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth, soil aeration, soil N transformations and 15N discrimination. Biol Fertil Soils 32(6):484–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin RA, Lozada-Bernard SM, Ravens TM, Möller I, Yeager KM, Baird AH (2009) Does vegetation prevent wave erosion of salt marsh edges? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(25):10109–10113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J, Acreman MC (2004) Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8(4):673–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox L, Valiela I, Kinney EL (2012) Vegetation cover and elevation in long-term experimental nutrient-enrichment plots in Great Sippewissett Salt Marsh, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: implications for eutrophication and sea level rise. Estuar Coast 35(2):445–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E, Barbier EB, Silliman BR (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Change 106(1):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin AE, Tobias CR, Song B, Weston N, Banta GT, Rivera-Monroy VH (2013) The importance of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) in the nitrogen cycle of coastal ecosystems. Oceanography 26(3):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittman RK, Peterson CH, Currin CA, Joel Fodrie F, Piehler MF, Bruno JF (2016) Living shorelines can enhance the nursery role of threatened estuarine habitats. Ecol Appl 26(1):249–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta TR, Foster JH (1973) Valuation of visual-cultural benefits from freshwater wetlands in Massachusetts. J Northeast Econ Counc 2(2):262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamersley MR, Howes BL (2003) Contribution of denitrification to nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen cycling in tidal creek sediments of a New England salt marsh. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 262:55–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoi M, Ishida A, Imoto K (1977) Study on Re-Aeration by Waves. Coast Eng Jpn 20(1):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes BL, Goehringer DD (1994) Porewater drainage and dissolved organic carbon and nutrient losses through the intertidal creekbanks of a New England salt marsh. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 114(3):289–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howes BL, Dacey JWH, Goehringer DD (1986) Factors controlling the growth form of Spartina alterniflora: feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity. J Ecol 74:881–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Zhang W, Zhang L, Lin X, Tong C, Lai DY, Chen Y, Zeng C (2019) Short-term changes in simulated inundation frequency differentially affect inorganic nitrogen, nitrification, and denitrification in estuarine marshes. Ecol Ind 107:105571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2019) Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press

  • Jesus B, Brotas V, Ribeiro L, Mendes CR, Cartaxana P, Paterson DM (2009) Adaptations of microphytobenthos assemblages to sediment type and tidal position. Cont Shelf Res 29(13):1624–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1985) Wave disturbance on lakeshores and the within-lake distribution of Ontario’s Atlantic coastal plain flora. Can J Bot 63(3):656–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504(7478):53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhuizen AA, Mortazavi B (2018) Denitrification capacity of a natural and a restored marsh in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Environ Manag 62(3):584–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch MS, Maltby E, Oliver GA, Bakker SA (1992) Factors controlling denitrification rates of tidal mudflats and fringing salt marshes in south-west England. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 34(5):471–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth R (2020) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

  • Liu Y, Jiao JJ, Liang W, Luo X (2017) Tidal pumping-induced nutrients dynamics and biogeochemical implications in an intertidal aquifer. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 122(12):3322–3342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas WC, Greenway M (2008) Nutrient retention in vegetated and nonvegetated bioretention mesocosms. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(5):613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Sparks EL, Constantin AJ, Cebrian J, Cherry JA (2020) Restoring fringing tidal marshes for ecological function and ecosystem resilience to moderate sea-level rise in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Environ Manag 67(2):384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConchie JA, Toleman IEJ (2003) Boat wakes as a cause of riverbank erosion: a case study from the Waikato River, New Zealand. J Hydrol (New Zealand) 42:163–179

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Hester MW (1988) Reexamination of pore water sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans. Am J Bot 75(9):1352–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehvar S, Filatova T, Sarker MH, Dastgheib A, Ranasinghe R (2019) Climate change-driven losses in ecosystem services of coastal wetlands: a case study in the West coast of Bangladesh. Ocean Coast Manag 169:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn IA, McKee KL (1988) Spartina alterniflora die-back in Louisiana: time-course investigation of soil waterlogging effects. J Ecol 76:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JT, Sundareshwar PV, Nietch CT, Kjerfve B, Cahoon DR (2002) Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83(10):2869–2877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JT, Shaffer GP, Nyman JA (2013) Brinson review: perspectives on the influence of nutrients on the sustainability of coastal wetlands. Wetlands 33(6):975–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2004) Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands 24(4):756–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer SC, Piehler MF, Smyth AR, Franklin RB (2019) Saltwater intrusion modifies microbial community structure and decreases denitrification in tidal freshwater marshes. Ecosystems 22(4):912–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2015) Guidance for considering the use of living shorelines. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 36p

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoveská L, MacIntyre HL (2019) Study of the seasonality and hydrology as drivers of phytoplankton abundance and composition in a shallow estuary, Weeks Bay, Alabama (USA). J Aquac Mar Biol 8(3):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman JA, Walters RJ, Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (2006) Marsh vertical accretion via vegetative growth. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 69(3–4):370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ Jr (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, aka “The dead zone.” Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33(1):235–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, DeLaune RD (2008) Biogeochemistry of wetlands: science and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roland RM, Douglass SL (2005) Estimating wave tolerance of Spartina alterniflora in coastal Alabama. J Coast Res 213:453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht F, Möller I, Evans B, Spencer T, Jensen K (2015) Biophysical properties of salt marsh canopies—quantifying plant stem flexibility and above ground biomass. Coast Eng 100:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze D, Rupprecht F, Nolte S, Jensen K (2019) Seasonal and spatial within-marsh differences of biophysical plant properties: implications for wave attenuation capacity of salt marshes. Aquat Sci 81(4):65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silinski A, Schoutens K, Puijalon S, Schoelynck J, Luyckx D, Troch P, Meire P, Temmerman S (2018) Coping with waves: plasticity in tidal marsh plants as self-adapting coastal ecosystem engineers. Limnol Oceanogr 63(2):799–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvan N, Vasander H, Laine J (2004) Vegetation is the main factor in nutrient retention in a constructed wetland buffer. Plant Soil 258(1):179–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Findlay S (1995) Microbial production, enzyme activity, and carbon turnover in surface sediments of the Hudson River estuary. Microb Ecol 30(2):127–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloey TM, Hester MW (2018) Impact of nitrogen and importance of silicon on mechanical stem strength in Schoenoplectus acutus and Schoenoplectus californicus: applications for restoration. Wetl Ecol Manag 26(3):459–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks EL, Cebrian J (2015) Effects of fertilization on grasshopper grazing of northern Gulf of Mexico salt marshes. Estuar Coast 38(3):988–999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks EL, Cebrian J, Biber PD, Sheehan KL, Tobias CR (2013) Cost-effectiveness of two small-scale salt marsh restoration designs. Ecol Eng 53:250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks EL, Cebrian J, Smith SM (2014) Removal of fast flowing nitrogen from marshes restored in sandy soils. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks EL, Cebrian J, Tobias CR, May CA (2015) Groundwater nitrogen processing in Northern Gulf of Mexico restored marshes. J Environ Manag 150:206–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spieles DJ, Mitsch WJ (1999) The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands: a comparison of low-and high-nutrient riverine systems. Ecol Eng 14(1–2):77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple NA (2021) Improving the cost effectiveness of water wave measurements and understanding of its impact on natural and restored marsh communities. Dissertation, Mississippi State University

  • Temple NA, Grace JB, Cherry JA (2019) Patterns of resource allocation in a coastal marsh plant (Schoenoplectus americanus) along a sediment-addition gradient. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 228:106337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias C, Neubauer SC (2019) Salt marsh biogeochemistry—an overview. Coastal wetlands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 539–596

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias CR, Anderson IC, Canuel EA, Macko SA (2001) Nitrogen cycling through a fringing marsh-aquifer ecotone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:25–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Slobbe E, de Vriend HJ, Aarninkhof S, Lulofs K, de Vries M, Dircke P (2013) Building with Nature: in search of resilient storm surge protection strategies. Nat Hazards 66(3):1461–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanZomeren CM, White JR, DeLaune RD (2012) Fate of nitrate in vegetated brackish coastal marsh. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76(5):1919–1927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez EA, Glenn EP, Guntenspergen GR, Brown JJ, Nelson SG (2006) Salt tolerance and osmotic adjustment of Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae) and the invasive M haplotype of Phragmites australis (Poaceae) along a salinity gradient. Am J Bot 93(12):1784–1790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology: lake and river ecosystems. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • White DS, Howes BL (1994) Long-term 15N-nitrogen retention in the vegetated sediments of a New England salt marsh. Limnol Oceanogr 39(8):1878–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand C, McKinney RA, Charpentier MA, Chintala MM, Thursby GB (2003) Relationships of nitrogen loadings, residential development, and physical characteristics with plant structure in New England salt marshes. Estuaries 26(6):1494–1504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe CD (2002) Coasts: form, process and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto N, Lopez G (1985) Bacterial abundance in relation to surface area and organic content of marine sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 90(3):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yozzo D, Titre J, Sexton J (1996) Planning and evaluating restoration of aquatic habitats from an ecological perspective. Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, IWR Report 96-EL-4

  • Zedler JB (1996) Tidal wetland restoration: a scientific perspective and southern California focus. California Sea Grant College System, University of California, La Jolla, CA, p 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Hou L, Liu M, Liu Z, Li X, Lin X, Yin G, Gao J, Yu C, Wang R, Jiang X (2016) Tidal pumping facilitates dissimilatory nitrate reduction in intertidal marshes. Sci Rep 6:21338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In addition to our funders, the authors would like to thank Gillian Palino, Andrew Lucore, Matthew Virden, Haley Moss, Jamie Amato, Aaron Macy, Ellee Temple, Bryan Miller and Jamie Phillips-Temple for their assistance with experimental set up and data collection. In addition, the authors thank partners at the Weeks Bay NERR and the Management Application Team for their assistance with the project.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided US EPA Wetlands Program (Grant Number: CD-00D40115-0) and NOAA—Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Program (GRANT NUMBER: 8200025414).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ELS and JC designed experiment; NAT, ELS, JC, SEM and DCF implemented experiment and collected data; NAT performed statistical analyses; NAT, ELS, JC, SEM and DCF prepared the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel A. Temple.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 2879 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Temple, N.A., Sparks, E.L., Cebrian, J. et al. Nitrogen removal in constructed marshes at sites protected from and exposed to waves. Wetlands Ecol Manage 29, 549–564 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09800-0

Keywords

Navigation