Abstract
This study aimed to recover U(VI) from sulfate-based acidic soil-washing effluent using the ion-exchange method. For effective ion exchange of U(VI) under acidic conditions, one chelate resin (Purolite S950) stable under low pH conditions and two anion-exchange resins (Ambersep 400 SO4 and 920U SO4) used in sulfuric acid leaching systems were selected. The ionic form of U(VI) changed according to the initial pH conditions of the soil-washing effluent, which affected the U(VI)-ion removal efficiency by the ion-exchange resins. U(VI) ion exchange was consistent with the Langmuir model and followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Thermodynamic experiments revealed that the U(VI) ion exchange by the ion-exchange resins is an endothermic and spontaneous process. U(VI) was effectively desorbed from the ion-exchange resins using 0.5 M H2SO4 or Na2CO3 solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahmed, S., Sharaby, C. M., & El Gammal, E. M. (2013). Uranium extraction from sulfuric acid medium using trioctylamine impregnated activated carbon. Hydrometallurgy, 134, 150–157.
Amphlett, J., Sharrad, C., & Ogden, M. D. (2018). Extraction of uranium from non-saline and hypersaline conditions using iminodiacetic acid chelating resin Purolite S930+. Chemical Engineering Journal, 342, 133–141.
Ang, K. L., Li, D., & Nikoloski, A. N. (2018). The effectiveness of ion exchange resins in separating uranium and thorium from rare earth elements in acidic aqueous sulfate media. Part 2. Chelating Resins. Minerals Engineering, 123, 8–15.
Bezzina, J. P., Robshaw, T., Dawson, R., & Ogden, M. D. (2020). Single metal isotherm study of the ion exchange removal of Cu (II), Fe (II), Pb (II) and Zn (II) from synthetic acetic acid leachate. Chemical Engineering Journal, 394, 124862.
Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M., & Mezzenga, R. (2019). Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: Review and analysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 48(2), 463–487.
Botelho Junior, A. B., Dreisinger, D. B., & Espinosa, D. C. (2019). A review of nickel, copper, and cobalt recovery by chelating ion exchange resins from mining processes and mining tailings. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 36(1), 199–213.
Cai, Y., Wu, C., Liu, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, L., Wang, J., Wang, X., Yang, S., & Wang, S. (2017). Fabrication of a phosphorylated graphene oxide–chitosan composite for highly effective and selective capture of U (VI). Environmental Science: Nano, 4(9), 1876–1886.
Chang, S., Lee, H.-K., Kang, H.-B., Kim, T.-J., Park, S., & Jeon, H. (2021). Decontamination of uranium-contaminated soil by acid washing with uranium recovery. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 232(10), 1–10.
Cheira, M. F., Atia, B. M., & Kouraim, M. N. (2017). Uranium (VI) recovery from acidic leach liquor by Ambersep 920U SO4 resin: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 10(4), 307–319.
Chen, F., Lv, M., Ye, Y., Miao, S., Tang, X., Liu, Y., Liang, B., Qin, Z., Chen, Y., & He, Z. (2022). Insights on uranium removal by ion exchange columns: The deactivation mechanisms, and an overlooked biological pathway. Chemical Engineering Journal, 134708.
Dermont, G., Bergeron, M., Mercier, G., & Richer-Laflèche, M. (2008). Soil washing for metal removal: A review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(1), 1–31.
He, Y.-R., Li, S.-C., Li, X.-L., Yang, Y., Tang, A.-M., Du, L., Tan, Z.-Y., Zhang, D., & Chen, H.-B. (2018). Graphene (rGO) hydrogel: A promising material for facile removal of uranium from aqueous solution. Chemical Engineering Journal, 338, 333–340.
Hubbe, M. A., Azizian, S., & Douven, S. (2019). Implications of apparent pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics onto cellulosic materials: A review. BioResources, 14(3).
Iborra, M., Tejero, J., Fité, C., Ramírez, E., & Cunill, F. (2019). Liquid-phase synthesis of butyl levulinate with simultaneous water removal catalyzed by acid ion exchange resins. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 78, 222–231.
Jamil, S., Loganathan, P., Kandasamy, J., Listowski, A., Khourshed, C., Naidu, R., & Vigneswaran, S. (2019). Removal of dissolved organic matter fractions from reverse osmosis concentrate: Comparing granular activated carbon and ion exchange resin adsorbents. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(3), 103126.
Jiang, X., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Hu, E., & Duan, Y. (2020). Immobilizing amino-functionalized mesoporous silica into sodium alginate for efficiently removing low concentrations of uranium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119162.
Jun, B.-M., Lee, H.-K., Park, S., & Kim, T.-J. (2021). Purification of uranium-contaminated radioactive water by adsorption: A review on adsorbent materials. Separation and Purification Technology, 278, 119675.
Khawassek, Y., Eliwa, A., Haggag, E., Mohamed, S., & Omar, S. (2017). Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics of uranium adsorption by ambersep 400 SO4 resin. Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, 50, 100–112.
Kim, I.-G., Kim, S.-S., Kim, G.-N., Han, G.-S., & Choi, J.-W. (2016). Reduction of radioactive waste from remediation of uranium-contaminated soil. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 48(3), 840–846.
Kumar, P. S., Korving, L., Keesman, K. J., van Loosdrecht, M. C., & Witkamp, G.-J. (2019). Effect of pore size distribution and particle size of porous metal oxides on phosphate adsorption capacity and kinetics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 358, 160–169.
Lee, J.-C., Hong, H.-J., Chung, K. W., & Kim, S. (2020). Separation of platinum, palladium and rhodium from aqueous solutions using ion exchange resin: A review. Separation and Purification Technology, 246, 116896.
Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., & Guo, M. (2018). Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Science of the Total Environment, 633, 206–219.
Liu, T., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Tan, H., Chen, Z., Wu, J., Chen, J., & Qiu, H. (2021). Metal–organic framework-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for selective separation of uranium. Analytical Chemistry, 93(48), 16175–16183.
Ma, Y., Li, X., Mao, H., Wang, B., & Wang, P. (2018). Remediation of hydrocarbon–heavy metal co-contaminated soil by electrokinetics combined with biostimulation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 353, 410–418.
Ma, A., Abushaikha, A., Allen, S. J., & McKay, G. (2019). Ion exchange homogeneous surface diffusion modelling by binary site resin for the removal of nickel ions from wastewater in fixed beds. Chemical Engineering Journal, 358, 1–10.
Mahinroosta, R., & Senevirathna, L. (2020). A review of the emerging treatment technologies for PFAS contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109896.
Masoud, A. M. (2020). Sorption behavior of uranium from sulfate media using purolite A400 as a strong base anion exchange resin. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 1–23.
Monroy-Guzmán, F. (2016). Isolation of uranium by anionic exchange resins. Journal of Chemistry, 10, 90–95.
Nesterenko, P., Shaw, M., Hill, S., & Jones, P. (1999). Aminophosphonate-functionalized silica: A versatile chromatographic stationary phase for high-performance chelation ion chromatography. Microchemical Journal, 62(1), 58–69.
Pastoor, K. J., Kemp, R. S., Jensen, M. P., & Shafer, J. C. (2021). Progress in uranium chemistry: Driving advances in front-end nuclear fuel cycle forensics. Inorganic Chemistry, 60(12), 8347–8367.
Reynier, N., Coudert, L., Blais, J.-F., Mercier, G., & Besner, S. (2015). Treatment of contaminated soil leachate by precipitation, adsorption and ion exchange. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 977–985.
Semer, R., & Reddy, K. R. (1996). Evaluation of soil washing process to remove mixed contaminants from a sandy loam. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 45(1), 45–57.
Shelar-Lohar, G., & Joshi, S. (2019). Comparative study of uranium and thorium metal ion adsorption by gum ghatti grafted poly (acrylamide) copolymer composites. RSC Advances, 9(70), 41326–41335.
Xoubi, N., Darda, S. A., Soliman, A. Y., & Abulfaraj, T. (2020). An investigative study of enrichment reduction impact on the neutron flux in the in-core flux-trap facility of MTR research reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(3), 469–476.
Ye, T., Huang, B., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., & Liu, Z. (2020). Rapid removal of uranium (VI) using functionalized luffa rattan biochar from aqueous solution. Colloids and Surfaces a: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 606, 125480.
Zhou, H., Xie, Y., Wang, X., Yang, H., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Efficient removal of uranium in aqueous solution by Al-doped hydroxyapatite: Static/dynamic adsorption behaviors and mechanism study. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 25, 102103.
Funding
This work was supported by a research grant from the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) [Grant No. 521220–22, South Korea].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, HK., Park, W., Chang, S. et al. Uranium Recovery from Sulfate-Based Acidic Soil Washing Effluent Using Ion-Exchange Resins. Water Air Soil Pollut 233, 453 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05913-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05913-1