Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical Modelling for Predicting Pollutant Removal Efficiencies of an Electrolysis System

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrolysis systems have been widely investigated for treating wastewater in laboratory-scale experiments, and most researchers reported efficient treatment outcomes. However, industrial scale implementation often necessitates assessing and prioritising various options involving different combinations of input parameters, which often requires mathematical models. This study presents mathematical models for predicting removal efficiencies of four different pollutants using electrolysis. Parametric equations were developed based on experimental results conducted in a previous study. Proposed equations are dependent on treatment retention time and current intensity (voltage). Results revealed that the experimental data followed consistent patterns, which lead to the derivations of generalised equations which were able to closely predict pollutants’ removal efficiencies obtained through experimental measurement. The developed equations also confirmed that beyond an optimum voltage, a further increase in voltage does not render higher removals of the pollutants, which is essential for enhancing the feasibility of industrial scale applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahsan, A., Kamaludin, M., Rahman, M. M., Anwar, A. H. M. F., Bek, M. A., & Idrus, S. (2014). Removal of various pollutants from leachate using a low-cost technique: integration of electrolysis with activated carbon contactor. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(2163), 1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayramoglu, M., Kobya, M., Eyvaz, M., & Senturk, E. (2006). Technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 51(3), 404–408.

  • Bonmatí, A., & Flotats, X. (2003). Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry: characterisation and feasibility as a pre- or post-treatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Waste Management, 23(3), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curteanu, S., Piuleac, C. G., Godini, K., & Azaryan, G. (2011). Modeling of electrolysis process in wastewater treatment using different types of neural networks. Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 267–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erabee, I. K., Ahsan, A., Jose, B., Arunkumar, T., Sathyamurthy, R., Idrus, S., & Daud, N. N. N. (2017). Effects of electric potential, NaCl, pH and distance between electrodes on efficiency of electrolysis in landfill leachate treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 52, 735–741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, A., Spranger, P., Fonseca, A. D., Pacheco, M. J., Ciríaco, L., & Lopes, A. (2014). Effect of electrochemical treatments on the biodegradability of sanitary landfill leachates. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 144, 514–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gößling, S., Stypka, S., Bahr, M., Oberschachtsiek, B., & Heinzel, A. (2018). Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis modeling for system simulation and degradation analysis. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 90, 1437–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabuk, H. A., Ilhan, F., Avsar, Y., Kurt, U., Apaydin, O., & Gönüllü, M. (2014). Investigation of leachate treatment with electrocoagulation and optimization by response surface methodology. CLEAN - Soil Air Water, 42(5), 571–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, A., & Hoadley, A. (2012). An evaluation of a hybrid ion exchange electrodialysis process in the recovery of heavy metals from simulated dilute industrial wastewater. Water Research, 46, 3364–3376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, D. D. P. D., Pinto, C. F., Tonhela, M. A., Granato, A. C., Motheo, A. D. J., Lima, A. D. F., Ferreira, D. C., Fernandes, D. M., Fornazari, A. L. D. T., & Malpass, G. R. P. (2019). Treatment of real dairy wastewater by electrolysis and photo-assisted electrolysis in presence of chlorides. Water Science and Technology, 80(5), 961–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, H.-C., Lei, T., Shi, G., Sun, X.-N., Wei, X.-Y., Zhang, L.-J., & Wu, W.-M. (2014). Removal of heavy metals from fly ash leachate using combined bioelectrochemical systems and electrolysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 264, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Chou, W., & Kuo, Y. (2009). Removal of COD from laundry wastewater by electrocoagulation/electroflotation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164(1), 81–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zailani, L. W. M., Amdan, N. S. M., & Zin, N. S. M. (2018). Removal efficiency of electrocoagulation treatment using aluminium electrode for stabilized leachate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 140, 012049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoulias, E., Varkaraki, E., Lymberopoulos, N., Christodoulou, C., & Karagiorgis, G. (2004). A review on water electrolysis. The Cyprus Journal of Science and Technology, 4, 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monzur A. Imteaz.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imteaz, M.A., Ahsan, A., Kaur, P. et al. Mathematical Modelling for Predicting Pollutant Removal Efficiencies of an Electrolysis System. Water Air Soil Pollut 231, 438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04809-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04809-2

Keywords

Navigation