Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Events Using HEC-HMS and CMIP5

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change may result in increased variability in rainfall intensity in the future, leading to more frequent flooding and a substantial loss of lives and properties. To mitigate the impact from flooding events, flood control facilities need to be designed and operated more efficiently, which requires a better understanding of the relationship between climate change and flood events. This study proposed a framework combining the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) and the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) general circulation models to assess the impact of climate change on flood events. HEC-HMS is one of the most commonly used hydrologic models in the USA, and CMIP5 provides the latest climate data for potential future climate scenarios. The proposed approach is applied to the Nippersink Creek watershed, which shows that 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year precipitations for the low, medium, and high emission scenarios are all greater than the historic observations. The corresponding 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year floods are remarkably higher than in the historic observations for the three climate scenarios. The high emission scenario results in dramatically increased flood risks in the future. The case study demonstrates that the framework combining HEC-HMS and CMIP5 is easy to use and efficient for assessing climate change impacts on flood events. It is a valuable tool when complicated and distributed hydrologic modeling is not an option because of time or monetary constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajwa, H. S., & Tim, U. S. (2002). Toward immersive virtual environments for GIS-based floodplain modeling and visualization. In: Proceedings of 22nd ESRI User Conference, San Diego, TX, USA.

  • Becker, A., & Grunewald, U. (2003). Flood risk in Central Europe. Science, 300(5622), 1099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N., Wood, A., Voisin, N., Lettenmaier, D., & Palmer, R. (2004). The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Climate Change, 62, 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, L. Q., Rui, H., Zuo, T., Zheng, D., Xu, Y., & C-Y, X. (2012). Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 464–465, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. D. (2000). Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS, Technical Reference Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC, Davis, CA, USA.

  • Filippo, G., Jones, C., & Asrar, G. R. (2009). Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: The CORDEX framework. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Bulletin, 58(3).

  • George, C., Kadifa, M., Ellis, L., & Blakinger, K. (2017). September 20. Storm deaths: Harvey claims 75 lives in Texas, including 50 in Houston area. Chron. Retrieved from http://www.chron.com/news/houston-weather/hurricaneharvey/article/Harvey-Aftermath-Houston-police-officer-dies-19-12159139.php. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  • Haan, C. T., Barfield, B. J., & Hayes, J. C. (1994). Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Cambridge: Academic Press. Elsevier.

  • Halwatura, D., & Najim, M. M. M. (2013). Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 46, 155e162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Fang, G., & Chen, Y. (2019). Assess river embankment impact on hydrologic alterations and floodplain vegetation. Ecological Indicators, 97, 372–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunukumbura, P. B., Weerakoon, S. B., & Herath, S. (2008). Runoff modeling in the upper Kotmale Basin. In N. Hennayake, N. Rekha, M. Nawfhal, R. Alagan, & C. Daskon (Eds.), Traversing no man’s land, interdisciplinary essays in Honor of Professor Madduma Bandara (pp. 169–184). Sri Lanka: University of Peradeniya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M., Arnold, J. G., Gassman, P. W., Giorgi, F., & Gu, R. R. (2006). Climate change sensitivity assessment on upper Mississippi river basin streamflows using SWAT. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(4), 997–1015.

  • Jiang, T., Chen, Y. D., Xu, C.-Y., Chen, X. H., Chen, X., & Singh, V. P. (2007). Comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by six hydrological models in the Dongjiang Basin, South China. Journal of Hydrology, 336, 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. G., Samuelsson, P., & Kjellström, E. (2011). Regional climate modelling at the Rossby Centre. Tellus A, 63(1), 1–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knebl, M. R., Yang, Z.-L., Hutchison, K., & Maidment, D. R. (2005). Regional scale flood modeling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: A case study for the San Antonio River basin summer 2002 storm event. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 325–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Zhang, Z., & Balay, J. W. (2018). Posterior assessment of reference gages for water resources management using instantaneous flow measurements. Science of the Total Environment, 634, 12–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meenu, R., Rehana, S., & Mujumdar, P. P. (2013). Assessment of hydrologic impacts of climate change in Tunga-Bhadra River basin, India with HEC-HMS and SDSM. Hydrological Processes, 27:1572–1589.

  • Melching, C., & Marquardt, J. S. (1997). Equations for estimating synthetic unit-hydrograph parameter values for small watersheds in Lake County, Illinois. U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Narasimhan, T. N., & Kanehiro, B. Y. (1980). A note on the meaning of storage coefficient. Water Resources Research, 16(2), 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarenko, L., Schmidt, G. A., Miller, R. L., Tausnev, N., Kelley, M., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., & Bleck, R. (2015). Future climate change under RCP emission scenarios with GISS ModelE2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 7(1), 244–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleyiblo, J. O., & Li, Z.-J. (2010). Application of HEC-HMS for flood forecasting in Misai and Wan’an catchment in China. Water Science and Engineering, 3(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathjens, H., Bieger, K., Srinivasan, R., Chaubey, I., & Arnold, J. G. (2016) CMhyd User Manual.

  • Samuelsson, P., Jones, C. G., Willén, U., Ullerstig, A., Gollvik, S., Hansson, U. L. F., & Wyser, K. (2011). The Rossby Centre regional climate model RCA3: model description and performance. Tellus A, 63(1), 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. P., & Woolhiser, D. A. (2002). Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7(4), 270–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan, M. (2003). Prediction in ungauged basins: A grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrological Processes, 17(15), 3163–3170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012). An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4), 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2012). Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 456, 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. A., & Walsh, S. J. (1998). Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology, 21(3/4), 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2008). Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) Applications Guide: Version 3.1.0. Davis: Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2013). Hydrologic modeling System (HEC-HMS) User’s Manual: Version 4.0. Institute for Water Resources. Davis: Hydrologic Engineering Center.

  • Vieux, B. E., Cui, Z., & Gaur, A. (2004). Evaluation of a physics-based distributed hydrologic model for flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 298(1), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuuren, V., Detlef, P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., et al. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change, 109(1–2).

  • Wadsworth, G. (1999). Flood damage statistics. Napa: Public Works Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watershed Resources Consultant, Inc, Fluid Clarity, Ltd and The Nippersink Creek Watershed Planning Committee. (2018). The Nippersink Creek Watershed Plan. Retrieved from http://nippersink.org/Plan/Reports3-08/NippersinkFullReport3-08.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  • Yimer, G., Jonoski, A., & Van Griensven, A. (2009). Hydrological response of a catchment to climate change in the upper Beles River basin, upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia. Nile Basin Water Engineering Scientific Magazine, 2.

  • Yusop, Z., Chan, C. H., & Katimon, A. (2007). Runoff characteristics and application of HEC-HMS for modelling stormflow hydrograph in an oil palm catchment. Water Science and Technology, 56(8), 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2017). The index gage method to develop long term flow duration curve from short term records. Journal of Hydrology, 553, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Wagener, T., Reed, P., & Bhushan, R. (2008). Reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins by combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multi-objective optimization. Water Resources Research, 44(12), W00B04. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Balay, J. W., Bertodi, K. M., & Macoy, P. O. (2016). Assessment of water capacity and availability from unregulated stream flow based on ecosystem limit of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) environmental flow goals. River Research and Applications, 32, 1469–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our colleagues at the ISWS at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Sally Ann McConkey, Laura Keefer, Clayton Ballerine, Amanda Flegel, and Lisa Sheppard. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Illinois.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Ye Bai

  2. School of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056021, Hebei, China

    Zhenxing Zhang & Weiguo Zhao

  3. Illinois State Water Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Weiguo Zhao

Authors
  1. Ye Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhenxing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weiguo Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenxing Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Y., Zhang, Z. & Zhao, W. Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Flood Events Using HEC-HMS and CMIP5. Water Air Soil Pollut 230, 119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4159-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4159-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation