Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of a Giant Pulp and Paper Mill on the Pollutant Accumulating Capacity of the Soil with Special Reference to its Carbon Sequestering Potential

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inadequately treated effluents from industry have serious environmental and public health concerns. Even low level discharges create problems through accumulation in water and soil. In the present work, the pollutant accumulating capacity and the general environmental health status of soil which is a repository of treated and untreated effluent discharges and solid waste dumping of a giant pulp and paper mill have been evaluated with respect to some selected physicochemical parameters. The pollutant accumulating capacity of the soil in seven well-defined sites in and around the mill was found with reference to a “control” site with no history of receiving effluent discharges or solid wastes. The changes in texture, bulk density, water-holding capacity, electrical conductivity, pH, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable sodium, etc. of the soil up to the normal tilled depth were observed in different seasons. In most sites, the soil organic carbon was poorly correlated to the bulk density, water-holding capacity, pH, and clay and sand contents, indicating an unhealthy state of the soil and, correspondingly, nearly exhausted pollutant accumulating capacity. Considerable differences in pH, electrical conductivity, bulk density, and water-holding capacity were observed between the soil receiving effluent discharge and solid waste dumping and the control soil. The soil had accumulated considerable amounts of the exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, Na, and K). The work has found that industrial activities have worked against the normal behavior of the soil and reduced its capacity to serve as a natural repository of carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, M., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2001). Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill: a review. Advances in environmental research, 5, 175–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. E., Brimblecombe, P., Jickells, T. D., Liss, P., & Reid, B. (2004). An introduction to environmental chemistry (2nd ed.). UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, P. (2010). Environmentally friendly production of pulp and paper. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.. doi:10.1002/9780470649657. ISBN 9780470528105.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bashour, I. I., & Sayegh, A. H. (2007). Method of soil analysis for arid and semi-arid regions. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 978-92-5-105661-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastida, F., Zsolnay, A., Harnandez, T., & Garcia, C. (2008). Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective. Geoderma, 147(3–4), 159–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R.G. & Wallenstein, M. D. (2010). Microbial extracellular enzymes and natural and synthetic polymer degradation in soil. In Current research and future prospects: Brisbane, Australia. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1–6 August 2010. URL: www.iuss.org/19th%20WCSS/Symposium/pdf/0549.pdf. Accessed on 30 July 2014.

  • Cannell, R. Q., & Hawes, J. D. (1994). Trends in tillage practices in relation to sustainable crop production with special reference to temperate climates. Soil Tillage Res., 30, 245–282. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(94)90007-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliver, D. O. (2000). Research needs in decentralized wastewater treatment and management: fate and transport of pathogens. In National Research Needs Conference Proceedings: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, 1001446, pp. 1–31. ndwrcdp.werf.org/…/research_needs_proceedings_cd.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2014

  • Cook, G. D., & Muller, W. J. (1997). Is exchangeable sodium content a better index of soil sodicity than exchangeable sodium percentage?: A reassessment of published data. Soil Science, 162(5), 343–349. doi:10.1097/00010694-199705000-00004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, L., Goonetilleke, A., & Cox, M. (2006). Assessment of physical and chemical properties of subtropical soil to predict long term effluent treatment potential. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 14: 211–230.

  • Doran, J. W., Sarrantonio, M., & Liebig, M. A. (1996). Soil health and sustainability. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy, (vol 56, pp. 1–54). San Diego, CA, Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60178-9.

  • Filep, T., Draskovits, E., Szabό, J., Koόs, S., Lászlό, P., & Szalai, Z. (2015). The dissolved organic matter as a potential soil quality indicator in arable soils of Hungary. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4700-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, AJ, Sims JT (2000) Research needs in decentralized wastewater treatment and management: a risk-based approach to nutrient contamination. In National Research Needs Conference Proceedings: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, 1001446) pp1-43. URL: ndwrcdp.werf.org/…/research_needs_proceedings_cd.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2014

  • Hasse, P. R. (1994). A textbook of soil analysis, Indian reprint. New Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 978-81-239-1833-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, K., & Ismail, N. (2015). Bioremediation and detoxification of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review research. Journal of Environmental Toxicology, 9(3), 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbe, M. A., Nazhad, M., & Sánchez, C. (2010). Composting as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic waste into high-value soil amendments: a review. Bio Resources, 5(4), 2808–2854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M., & Khodaparast, Z. (2015). Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 114, 326–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, W. A., Goonetilleke, A., Kokot, S., & Carroll, S. (2004). Use of chemometric methods and multicriteria decision-making for the site selection for sustainable onsite sewage effluent disposal. Analytica Chimica Acta, 506, 41–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P. K., Ludwig, B., Bauhus, J., & O’ttara, C. (2014). Assessment and significance of labile organic carbon pools in forest soil, chapter 12, p 167–182. In R. Lal, J. M. Kimble, R. F. Follet, & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Assessment methods for soil carbon. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1st Indian Reprint, 2014, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, H. D. (2013). Pulp and paper industry raw material scenario—ITC plantation a case study. Indian Pulp and Paper Technical Association (IPPTA) Journal, 25(1), 79–89. available on www.ipptaonline.org/jan-March…/2013_Issue_I_IPPTA_Article_07.pdf Accessed on 22nd August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson WE, Pierce FJ 1991 Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World. Vol. 2. J. Dumanski, E. Pushparajah, M. Latham, R. Myers (eds), IBSRAM Proc. 12, 2 Technical Papers, International Board for Soil Research and Management, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 175–203. ISSN 0260-485X, URL: www.sipr.ac.uk/cpnb/index_and_ proceedings_ 2010.pdf Accessed on 30 July 2014.

  • Pankhurst, C. E., Hawke, B. G., McDonald, H. J., Kirkby, C. A., Buckerfield, J. C., Michelsen, P., O’Brien, K. A., Gupta, V. V. S. R., & Doube, B. M. (1995). Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bio indicators of soil health. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35(7), 1015–1028. 10.071/EA9951015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokhrel, D., & Viraraghavan, T. (2004). Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater—a review. Science of Total Environment, 333, 37–58. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.05.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, B. P., Mohan, P. R., & Reddy, O. V. S. (2013). Impact of paper industry effluents on physico-chemical, microbiological and enzyme activities of soil. Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences, 2(1), 54–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeuwijk LP 2002 Procedure for soil analysis. 6th edition, Technical Paper 9, International Soil Reference and Information Centre: 6700, A J Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 2–1 & 3–7, ISBN 90-6672-044-1

  • Reeves, D. W. (1997). The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research., 43, 131–167. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00038-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. A., Cruse, R. M., & Kohler, K. A. (1994). Soil management. In J. L. Hatfield & D. L. Karlen (Eds.), Sustainable agriculture systems (pp. 109–134). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis Publishers, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousk, J., Brookes, P. C., & Bååth, E. (2009). Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75(6), 1589–1596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, D., & Halder, A. (2010). Physical and chemical methods in soil analysis (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers. ISBN 978-81-224-2725-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, K. T., Doick, K. J., Wick, L. Y., & Harms, H. (2007). Microbial interactions with organic contaminants in soil: definitions, processes and measurement. Environ Pout, 150(1), 166–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist RL, Tyler EJ, Jenssen PD 2000 Design and performance of onsite wastewater treatment soil adsorption systems. In National Research Needs Conference Proceedings: Risk-Based Decision Making for Onsite Wastewater Treatment. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, 1001446, pp 1–48. ndwrcdp.werf.org/…/research_needs_proceedings_cd.pdf Accessed on 14 May 2014.

  • Tabatabai, M. A. (1994). Soil enzymes. In R. W. Weaver, J. S. Angle, & P. S. Bottomley (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: microbiological and biochemical properties. Part 2 (p. 775833). Madison, America: ASA. doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vengadaramana, A., & Jashothan, P. T. J. (2012). Effect of organic fertilizers on the water holding capacity of soil in different terrains of Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour, 2(4), 500–503. http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. H., & Geary, P. M. (2000). Geotechnical aspects of domestic on-site effluent management systems. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 47, 75–82. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0952.2000.00769.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, B. M. (2005). Water holding capacity. In R. Margesim & F. Schinner (Eds.), Manual for soil analysis-monitoring and soil bioremediation, vol 5 (pp. 47–52). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-25346-4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Campbell, A. G., & Mahler, R. L. (1993). Newsprint pulp and paper sludge as a soil additive/amendment for Alfalfa and bluegrass: greenhouse study. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 24, 1371–1388. doi:10.1080/00103629309368883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. G., Xu, Z. W., Jiang, D. M., & Jiang, Y. (2013). Soil exchangeable base cations along a chronosequence of Caragana microphylla plantation in a semi-arid sandy land, China. J Arid Land, 5(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out under the Faculty Improvement Programme of University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India to one of the authors (GA).

Conflict of Interest

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna G. Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adhikari, G., Bhattacharyya, K.G. Effects of a Giant Pulp and Paper Mill on the Pollutant Accumulating Capacity of the Soil with Special Reference to its Carbon Sequestering Potential. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2563-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2563-7

Keywords

Navigation