Skip to main content
Log in

Attenuation of Bulk Organic Matter, Nutrients (N and P), and Pathogen Indicators During Soil Passage: Effect of Temperature and Redox Conditions in Simulated Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT)

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) is a cost-effective natural wastewater treatment and reuse technology. It is an environmentally friendly technology that does not require chemical usage and is applicable to both developing and developed countries. However, the presence of organic matter, nutrients, and pathogens poses a major health threat to the population exposed to partially treated wastewater or reclaimed water through SAT. Laboratory-based soil column and batch experiments simulating SAT were conducted to examine the influence of temperature variation and oxidation–reduction (redox) conditions on removal of bulk organic matter, nutrients, and indicator microorganisms using primary effluent. While an average dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal of 17.7 % was achieved in soil columns at 5 °C, removal at higher temperatures increased by 10 % increments with increase in temperature by 5 °C over the range of 15 to 25 °C. Furthermore, soil column and batch experiments conducted under different redox conditions revealed higher DOC removal in aerobic (oxic) experiments compared to anoxic experiments. Aerobic soil columns exhibited DOC removal 15 % higher than that achieved in the anoxic columns, while aerobic batch showed DOC removal 7.8 % higher than the corresponding anoxic batch experiments. Ammonium-nitrogen removal greater than 99 % was observed at 20 and 25 °C, while 89.7 % was removed at 15 °C, but the removal substantially decreased to 8.8 % at 5 °C. While ammonium-nitrogen was attenuated by 99.9 % in aerobic batch reactors carried out at room temperature, anoxic experiments under similar conditions revealed 12.1 % ammonium-nitrogen reduction, corresponding to increase in nitrate-nitrogen and decrease in sulfate concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amy, G., & Drewes, J. (2007). Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) as a natural and sustainable wastewater reclamation/reuse technology: fate of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) and trace organic compounds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 129(1), 19–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asano, T., & Cotruvo, J. A. (2004). Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. Water Research, 38(8), 1941–1951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2001). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(5), 948–953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, H. (2001). Water demand management and pollution control: keys to securing and safeguarding the water supplies of the Eastern Mediterranean Region in the 21st century. Proceedings of Joint WHO/UNEP First Regional Conference on Water Demand Management, Conservation and Pollution Control, Amman, Jordan: p. 33-46, 7-10 October, 2001.

  • Characklis, W. (1973). Attached microbial growths—I. Attachment and growth. Water Research, 7, 1113–1127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costán-Longares, A., Montemayor, M., Payán, A., Méndez, J., Jofre, J., Mujeriego, R., & Lucena, F. (2008). Microbial indicators and pathogens: removal, relationships and predictive capabilities in water reclamation facilities. Water Research, 42(17), 4439–4448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., Rice, E. W., & Greenberg, A. E. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, P., Houston, S., Westerhoff, P., Drewes, J., Nellor, M., Yanko, B., Baird, R., Rincon, M., Arnold, R., & Lansey, K. (2001). An investigation of soil-aquifer treatment for sustainable water reuse. Research Project Summary of the National Center for Sustainable Water Supply (NCSWS), USA, p 110.

  • Greskowiak, J., Prommer, H., Massmann, G., Johnston, C., Nützmann, G., & Pekdeger, A. (2005). The impact of variably saturated conditions on hydrogeochemical changes during artificial recharge of groundwater. Applied Geochemistry, 20(7), 1409–1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grüenheid, S., Amy, G., & Jekel, M. (2005). Removal of bulk dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and trace organic compounds by bank filtration and artificial recharge. Water Research, 39(14), 3219–3228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, G., Gibbs, R., Mathew, K., & Parker, W. (1992). Groundwater recharge of sewage effluent through amended sand. Water Research, 26(3), 285–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idelovitch, E., Icekson-Tal, N., Avraham, O., & Michail, M. (2003). The long-term performance of soil aquifer treatment (SAT) for effluent reuse. Water Science & Technology. Water Supply, 3(4), 239–246.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanarek, A., & Michail, M. (1996). Groundwater recharge with municipal effluent: Dan region reclamation project, Israel. Water Science and Technology, 34(11), 227–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, N., Ribbe, L., & Gaese, H. (2000). Wastewater reuse for agriculture. Technology Resource Management and Development-Scientific Contributions for Sustainable Development, 2, 47 pp.

  • Laangmark, J., Storey, M., Ashbolt, N., & Stenstroem, T. (2004). Artificial groundwater treatment: biofilm activity and organic carbon removal performance. Water Research, 38(3), 740–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bihan, Y., & Lessard, P. (2000). Monitoring biofilter clogging: biochemical characteristics of the biomass. Water Research, 34(17), 4284–4294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeng, S., Sharma, S., Magic-Knezev, A., & Amy, G. (2008). Fate of effluent organic matter (EfOM) and natural organic matter (NOM) through riverbank filtration. Water Science and Technology, 57(12), 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maeng, S. K., Sharma, S. K., Abel, C. D. T., Magic-Knezev, A., & Amy, G. L. (2011). Role of biodegradation in the removal of pharmaceutically active compounds with different bulk organic matter characteristics through managed aquifer recharge: batch and column studies. Water Research, 45(16), 4722–4736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massmann, G., Greskowiak, J., Dünnbier, U., Zuehlke, S., Knappe, A., & Pekdeger, A. (2006). The impact of variable temperatures on the redox conditions and the behaviour of pharmaceutical residues during artificial recharge. Journal of Hydrology, 328(1–2), 141–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michail, J., & Idelovitch, E. (1981). Gross organic measurements for monitoring of wastewater treatment and reuse. Chemistry in Water Reuse, 1, 35–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery-Brown, J., Drewes, J., Fox, P., & Reinhard, M. (2003). Behavior of alkylphenol polyethoxylate metabolites during soil aquifer treatment. Water Research, 37(15), 3672–3681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nema, P., Ojha, C., Kumar, A., & Khanna, P. (2001). Techno-economic evaluation of soil-aquifer treatment using primary effluent at Ahmedabad, India. Water Research, 35(9), 2179–2190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC. (2007). Prospects for managed underground storage of recoverable water (p. 133). Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescod, M. (1992). Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 47. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quanrud, D., Arnold, R., Wilson, L., & Conklin, M. (1996). Effect of soil type on water quality improvement during soil aquifer treatment. Water Science and Technology, 33(10), 419–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quanrud, D., Carroll, S., Gerba, C., & Arnold, R. (2003). Virus removal during simulated soil-aquifer treatment. Water Research, 37(4), 753–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reemtsma, T., Gnir, R., & Jekel, M. (2000). Infiltration of combined sewer overflow and tertiary municipal wastewater: an integrated laboratory and field study on nutrients and dissolved organics. Water Research, 34(4), 1179–1186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saadi, I., Borisover, M., Armon, R., & Laor, Y. (2006). Monitoring of effluent DOM biodegradation using fluorescence, UV and DOC measurements. Chemosphere, 63(3), 530–539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabumon, P. C. (2007). Anaerobic ammonia removal in presence of organic matter: a novel route. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(1), 49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samorn, M. (1996). Wastewater characteristics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 16(1–4), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, B., Schmalz, V., Brinkmann, T., & Worch, E. (2007). The effect of water temperature on the adsorption equilibrium of dissolved organic matter and atrazine on granular activated carbon. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(18), 6448–6453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. K., Katukiza, A., & Amy, G. (2007). Effect of wastewater quality and process parameters on removal of effluent organic matter (EfOM) during soil aquifer treatment. Proceedings of ISMAR6 Conference, Phoenix, USA: p. 272-284, 28 October to 2 November , 2007.

  • Sharma, S., Harun, C., & Amy, G. (2008). Framework for assessment of performance of soil aquifer treatment systems. Water Science and Technology, 57(5), 941–946.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. K., Hussen, M., & Amy, G. (2011). Soil aquifer treatment using advanced primary effluent. Water Science and Technology, 64(3), 640–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stedmon, C., Markager, S., & Bro, R. (2003). Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 82(3–4), 239–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevik, K. (2004). Retention and removal of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater percolating through porous media: a review. Water Research, 38(6), 1355–1367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbutt, T. (1982). Principles of water quality control (3rd ed.). Birmingham: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toze, S. (1997). Microbial pathogens in wastewater. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report, 1, 97 pp.

  • Toze, S. (1999). PCR and the detection of microbial pathogens in water and wastewater. Water Research, 33(17), 3545–3556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aa, L., Rietveld, L., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Effects of ozonation and temperature on biodegradation of natural organic matter in biological granular activated carbon filters. Water Engineering Science, 4, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kooij, D., Visser, A., & Hijnen, W. (1982). Determining the concentration of easily assimilable organic carbon in drinking water. Journal American Water Works Association, 74(10), 540–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigneswaran, S., & Sundaravadivel, M. (2004). Recycle and reuse of domestic wastewater. Saravanamuthu (Vigi) Vigneswaran, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford UK,[http://www.eolss.net][Retrieved April 24, 2006].

  • Vohla, C., Alas, R., Nurk, K., Baatz, S., & Mander, Ü. (2007). Dynamics of phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon removal in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 380(1–3), 66–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, D., Francke, C., Menzli, P., & Schön, U. (2007). Water: a market of the future. SAM, SERI. http://www.sam-group.com/images/2010_Water_study_e_tcm794-263789.pdf. Accessed on 16 July 2011.

  • Xue, S., Zhao, Q., Wei, L., & Ren, N. (2009). Behavior and characteristics of dissolved organic matter during column studies of soil aquifer treatment. Water Research, 43(2), 499–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, T., Moldrup, P., Rolston, D. E., Ito, S., & Teranishi, S. (1996). Nitrification in porous media during rapid, unsaturated water flow. Water Research, 30(3), 531–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz Corapcioglu, M., & Haridas, A. (1984). Transport and fate of microorganisms in porous media: a theoretical investigation. Journal of Hydrology, 72(1–2), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by UNESCO–IHE Partnership Research Fund (UPaRF) project No. 32019417 NATSYS. We are thankful to the UNESCO–IHE laboratory staff for their support in conducting experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chol D. T. Abel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abel, C.D.T., Sharma, S.K., Malolo, Y.N. et al. Attenuation of Bulk Organic Matter, Nutrients (N and P), and Pathogen Indicators During Soil Passage: Effect of Temperature and Redox Conditions in Simulated Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT). Water Air Soil Pollut 223, 5205–5220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1272-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1272-8

Keywords

Navigation