Skip to main content
Log in

River Flash Flood Economical Loss and its Uncertainty in Developing Countries

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Namely: Floods can inflict significant damage on buildings, particularly in urban areas. Effective flood risk management in such areas relies on the ability to identify potential damages and high-risk locations. In the twenty-first century, this issue has become even more critical due to the rapid urbanization process and the intensification of short-term rainstorms and flash floods caused by climate change. Unfortunately, many developing countries lack accurate models for predicting and estimating flood damages at a national level. This article focuses on assessing the direct damages incurred by floods on buildings and their contents in urban areas, especially in regions with limited field data and unreliable damage functions. Five different models, including Life-Sim, Debo (J Hydraul Div Proc ASCE 108(10):1059–1069, 1982), Dutta et al. (J Hydrol 277:24–49, 2003), Luino et al. (J Geoinformatica 13:339–353, 2009), and Arrighi et al. (J Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1375–1391, 2013), are discussed concerning building instability (or destruction) and percentage of damage to remaining buildings based on flood hydraulic characteristics such as depth and flow velocity. The economic damages caused by floods of varying return periods, representing the average long-term risk and expected annual damage (EAD), are examined for buildings in a specific region in Iran using the depth-damage functions from the aforementioned models. Moreover, the first-order variance estimation method (FOVE) is utilized to determine the confidence interval around the EAD, considering the challenge of defining probability density functions for damage across all cells in the basic. The depth-damage curve presented by Arrighi et al. (J Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1375–1391, 2013) yields the most accurate estimation when compared to observed flood data on economic losses. An important finding of this research is the potential applicability of functions developed in other countries, despite differences in culture, architecture, and urban infrastructure. The method proposed in this article allows for a rapid estimate of flood damages in the absence of information and historical data, providing an acceptable approximation. Additionally, this research investigates the existence of uncertainty in estimating the expected annual damage, and raster maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The most important parts of the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. More information and data are available from the authors, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aboelata MA, Bowles DS (2005) LIFESim: a model for estimating dam failure life loss. Report to the Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers and Australian National Committee on Large Dams by the Institute for Dam Safety Risk Management, Logan: Utah State University

  • Arrighi C, Brugioni M, Castelli F, Franceschini S, Mazzanti B (2013) Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modeling and census data. J Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1375–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SA (1985) Business depth-damage analysis procedures. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Engineer Institute for Water Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Debo TN (1982) Urban flood damage estimating curves. J Hydraul Div Proc ASCE 108(10):1059–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K (2003) A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol 277:24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Bilali A, Taleb A, Boutahri I (2021) Application of HEC-RAS and HEC-LifeSim models for flood risk assessment. J Appl Water Eng Res 9(4):336–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH: multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake Model-Technical Manual

  • Ghashghaie M, Eslami H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Applications of time series analysis to investigate components of Madiyan-rood river water quality. J Appl Water Sci 12:202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01693-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomariz EM, Ortiz EF, Hidalga MG, Castan S, Gomez M (2020) Flood depth-damage curves for Spanish urban areas. J Sustain 12(7):20666

    Google Scholar 

  • Handmer J, Abrahams J, Betts R, Dawson M (2005) Towards a consistent approach to disaster loss assessment across Australia. Aust J Emerg Manag 20(1):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga J, De Moel H, Szewczyk W (2017) Global flood depth-damage functions: Methodology and the database with guidelines (No. JRC105688). Joint Research Centre (Seville site)

  • Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. World Bank Publications

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karbasi M, Shokoohi A, Saghafian B (2019) Loss of life estimation due to flash floods in residential areas using a regional model. Water Resour Manag 32:4575–4589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luino F, Cirio CG, Biddoccu M, Agangi A, Giulietto W, Godone F, Nigrelli G (2009) Application of a model to the evaluation of flood damage. J Geoinformatica 13:339–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvi MT (2020) A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents. J Nat Hazards 102:967–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW, Tung YK (1992) Hydrosystems engineering and management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prihantini CI (2020) Estimating the economic losses value caused by flood disaster in Sampang Regency using tangible damage assessment. Int Conf Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RESCDAM (2000) The Use of physical models in dam-break flood analysis: rescue actions based on dam-break flood analysis. Final Report of Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland

  • Romalia NS, Yusopa Z, Sulaimanb M, Zulhilmi I (2018) Flood risk assessment: a review of flood damage estimation model for Malaysia. J Teknol 80(3):145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebmorad H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Hydro geo-sphere integrated hydrologic model in modeling of wide basins. Sustain Water Resour Manag 8:118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00689-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung YK (1993) Uncertainty and reliability analysis. In: Mays LW (ed) Water resources handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung YK, Yen BC (2005) Hydrosystem engineering uncertainty analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1996) Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies. Engineer manual 1110‐2‐1619

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2006) Depth-damage relationship for structures, contents, vehicles, and content-to-structure value ratios (CSVR) in support of the Donaldsonville to the Gulf, Louisiana, feasibility study, Report No, 22316638. http://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/Portals/56/docs/PD/Donaldsv-Gulf.pdf

  • Van der Sande C (2001) River flood damage assessment using IKONOS imagery, vol 77. EC Joint Research Centre & SAI, Ispra, Italy. http://natural-hazards.aris.sai.jrc.it/

  • White MD, Greer KA (2006) The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and Riparian Vegetation of Lospenasquitos Greek. California. Landsc Plan J 74(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Kimiya Amimoradi and Alireza Shokoohi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kimia Amimoradi and Alireza Shokoohi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimiya Amirmoradi.

Ethics declarations

Financial

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Consent for Publication

This paper has not been published elsewhere.

Disclosure

This paper is not under review in other journals.

Author Responsibility

Authors are responsible for the correctness of the statements provided in the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

No ethical approval is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amirmoradi, K., Shokoohi, A. River Flash Flood Economical Loss and its Uncertainty in Developing Countries. Water Resour Manage 38, 81–105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03653-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03653-3

Keywords

Navigation