Abstract
This work first studies the effects of several Low Impact development methods on urban flood control. The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (AHP-PROMETHEE) combination method is then used to select the best design. A drainage system in Golestan town of Semnan under a 5-year return period is investigated as the case study. The LID methods are selected based on the region's conditions and facilities. Then Rain Barrel (RB), Permeable Pavement (PP), and Infiltration Trench (IT) were considered as LID methods. The RB, PP, IT, IT-PP, IT-RB, PP-RB, and IT-PP-RB are considered the best LID usage scenarios. Four analytical ranking criteria, implementation cost, hydraulic performance, environmental impact during implementation, and ease of implementation, are chosen for the ranking procedure. Also, the weight of these criteria was obtained using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Finally, after determining the weight criteria, the LID designs are ranked using the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method. The results of hydraulic studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the PP-RB scenario with an average reduction of 90% of peak discharge and an average reduction of 80% of total flood volume. It is also observed that the weakest performance is related to the IT scenario, with an average decrease of 60% of peak flow and 47% of total flow volume. AHP-PROMETHEE analysis showed that the simultaneous use of RB and IT with a coverage percentage of 5% and a cost of $ 57,710 reduced the total volume by 51.54% and the peak discharge by 48.8% compared to the results of the current system. According to AHP-PROMETHEE, IT-RB-5 is the best project proposed among the 70 projects studied. This study showed that the AHP-PROMETHEE method is a practical method for choosing from several LID schemes for flood control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I (2012) Effectiveness of low impact development practices: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(7):4253–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
Ahmadi A, Abbaspour M, Afkhami Namin N (2020) Assessment of Iran academic environmental education needs with climate change approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02850-6
Ahmad I, Verma MK (2018) Application of Analytic Hierarchy process in water resources planning: a GIS based approach in the identification of suitable site for water storage. Water Resour Manag 32:5093–5114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2135-x
Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program (ACCWP) (2001) C. 3 Stormwater Technical Guidance e a Handbook for Developers, Builders and Project Applicant, pp 60–63
Alizadeh A (2006) Principles of applied hydrology. Emam Reza University
Babaei S, Ghazavi R, Erfanian M (2018) Urban flood simulation and prioritization of critical urban sub-catchment using SWMM model and PROMETHEE II approach. Phys Chem Earth 105(2018):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.02.002
Baek S-S, Choi D-H, Jung J-W, Lee H-J, Lee H, Yoon K-S, Cho KH (2015) Optimizing low impact development (LID) for stormwater runoff treatment in urban area, Korea: Experimental and modeling approach. Water Res 86:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.038
Behrouz MS, Zhu Z, Matott LS, Rabideau AJ (2020) A new tool for automatic calibration of the Storm water Management Model (SWMM). J Hydrol 581:124436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124436
Bisht DS, Chatterjee C, Kalakoti S et al (2016) Modeling urban floods and drainage using SWMM and MIKE URBAN: a case study. Nat Hazards 84:749–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2455-1
Brans J, Macharis C, Kunsch P, Chevalier A, Schwaninger M (1998) Combining multi-criteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedure. Eur J Oper Res 109(1998):428–441. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Discourse/Brans-Combining-Multicriteria-Decision-Aid-1998.pdf
Burgan HI, Icaga Y (2019) Flood analysis using Adaptive Hydraulics (AdH) model in Akarcay Basin. Teknik Dergi 30(2):9029–9051. https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.416067
California Stormwater Quality Association (2003) Stormwater best management practices handbook. https://www.casqa.org/sites/default/files/BMPHandbooks/BMP_Municipal_Complete.pdf
Caraco D, Claytor R (1997) Stormwater BMP design supplement for cold climates. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD. pp 1–96
Chen L, Qiu J, Wei G, Shen Z (2015) A preference-based multi-objective model for the optimization of best management practices. J Hydrol 520:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.032
Chitsaz N, Banihabib ME (2015) Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives. Water Resour Manag 29:2503–2525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0954-6
Clean Water Services (2009) Low impact development approaches handbook. https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/lid_handbook_clean_water_services.pdf
CNT (Center for Neighborhood Technology) (2009) National green values (tm) calculator methodology. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (2014) Low impact development standards manual. https://dpw.lacounty.gov/ldd/lddservices/docs/Low_Impact_Development_Standards_Manual.pdf
County of Mendocino (2018) Low impact development standards manual. https://www.mendocinocounty.org/home/showdocument?id=10357
Dadrasajirlou Y (2021) Quantitative flood mitigation in urban basins with optimal low-impact development and best management practices designs under climate change conditions. Master thesis, Semnan University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23050.34243
Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manag 87(4):560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.026
Eckart J, Sieker H, Vairavamoorthy K, Alsharif K (2012) Flexible design of urban drainage systems: Demand led research for Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 11(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9256-5
Efta JA, Chung W (2014) Planning best management practices to reduce sediment delivery from forest roads using WEPP: Road erosion modeling and simulated annealing optimization. Croat J For Eng 35(2):167–178. http://www.crojfe.com/site/assets/files/3984/efta.pdf
Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models for low impact urban storm water drainage. Environ Model Softw 22(3):394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005
EPA (2010) SWMM Application Manual. EPA
Faye M, Traore VB, Bob M et al (2016) Hydrologic modeling in diass river basin using rainfall. Int J Recent Sci Res 6:7290–7295
Flood J (1997) Urban and housing indicators. Urban Stud 34:1635–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/2F0042098975385
Fuamba M, Coulais C, Bertrand H (2011) An innovative method for selecting efficient Best Management Practices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 11–16 September 2011, p 8
Geng R, Sharpley AN (2019) A novel spatial optimization model for achieve the trade-offs placement of best management practices for agricultural non-point source pollution control at multi-spatial scales. Clean Prod 234:1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.277
Ghazavi R, Vali A, Eslamian S (2012) Impact of flood spreading on groundwater level variation and groundwater quality in an arid environment. Water Resour Manag 26:1651–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9977-4
Guo Y, Adams BJ (1998) Hydrologic analysis of urban catchments with event-based probabilistic models: 1. Runoff volume. Water Resour Res 34(12):3421–3431. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/98WR02449
Hamel P, Tan L (2022) Blue–green infrastructure for flood and water quality management in Southeast Asia: Evidence and knowledge gaps. Environ Manage 69:699–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01467-w
Hoang L, Fenner RA (2016) System interactions of stormwater management using sustainable urban drainage systems and green infrastructure. Urban Water J 13(7):739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1036083
Hu Z, Karami H, Rezaei A, DadrasAjirlou Y, Piran MJ, Band SS, Chau K-K, Mosavi A (2021) Using soft computing and machine learning algorithms to predict the discharge coefficient of curved labyrinth overflows. Eng App Comput Fluid Mech 15(1):1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1934546
Huang C-L, Hsu N-S, Liu H-J, Huang Y-H (2018) Optimization of low impact development layout design for megacity flood mitigation. J Hydrol 564:542e558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.044
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) (2003) The practice of low impact development. Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, D.C. Report prepared by NAHB Research Center, Inc. Contract No. H21314CA. https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/practlowimpctdevel.pdf
Jacobson CR (2011) Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: a review. J Environ Manag 92(6):1438–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.018
Jia H, Yao H, Tang Y, Yu SL, Zhen JX, Lu Y (2013) Development of a multi-criteria index ranking system for urban runoff best management practices (BMPs) selection. Environ Monit Assess 185(2013):7915–7933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3144-0
Jia H, Yao H, Tang Y, Shaw LY, Field R, Tafuri AN (2015) LID-BMPs planning for urban runoff control and the case study in China. J Environ Manag 149:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.003
Karami H, Dadrasajirlou YS, Band S, Mosavi A, Moslehpour M, Chau KW (2022) A novel approach for estimation of sediment load in Dam reservoir with hybrid intelligent algorithms. Front Environ Sci 165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.870488
Karleusa B, Hajdinger A, Tadic L (2019) The application of multi-criteria analysis methods for determination of priorities in the implementation of irrigation plans. Water Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030501
Kayhanian M, Fruchtman BD, Gulliver JS, Montanaro C, Ranieri E, Wuertz S (2012) Review of highway runoff characteristics: comparative analysis and universal implications. Water Res 46(20):6609–6624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.026
Latifi M, Rakhshaandehroo G, Nikoo MR, Sadegh M (2019) 2019, a game theoretical low impact development optimization for urban storm water management. J Clean Prod 241:118323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118323
Maharjan B, Pachel K, Loigu E (2017) Modelling stormwater runoff, quality, and pollutant loads in a large urban catchment. Proc Est Acad Sci 66:225. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2017.3.02
Marcharis C, Springael J, Brucker K, Verbeke A (2004) PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multi-criteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X
Martin C, Ruperd Y, Legret M (2007) Urban stormwater drainage management: the development of a multi criteria decision aid approach for best management practices. Eur J Oper Res 181(1):338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.019
Martin-Mikle CJ, Beurs KM, Julian JP, Mayer PM (2015) Identifying priority sites for low impact development (LID) in a mixed-use watershed. Landsc Urban Plan 140:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.002
Neshat A, Pradhan B (2015) An integrated DRASTIC model using frequency ration and two new hybrid methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards 76(1):543–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1503-y
Palla A, Gnecco I (2015) Hydrologic modeling of Low Impact Development systems at the urban catchment scale. J Hydrol 528:361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050
Park D, Song YI, Roesner LA (2013) Effect of the seasonal rainfall distribution on storm-water quality capture volume estimation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000204
Prez-Pedini C, Limbrunner J, Wogel R (2005) Optimal location of infiltration based best management practices for storm water management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(6):441–448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:6(441)
Prince Gerge’s County Maryland (1999) Low-impact development hydrologic analysis. Appendix B. https://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/87/Low-Impact-Development-Hydrologic-Analysis-PDF
Randhir TO, Raposa S (2014) Urbanization and watershed sustainability: Collaborative simulation modeling of future development states. J Hydrol 519(Part B):1526–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.051
Rossman LA (2015) Storm water management model user’s manual version 5.1
Saaty LT (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1990):9–26
Safari A, Abbaspour M, Javid AH (2020) The application of multi-criteria (AHP-PROMETHEE) decision-making methods in selecting and prioritizing the green area irrigation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18:1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02875-x
Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG, Helms BS (2006) Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the west Georgia piedmont. USA J Environ Qual 35(6):2123–2131. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0113
SEMCOG (2008) Low impact development manual for Michigan: a design guide for implementers and reviewers. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Detroit
Shen Z, Hou X, Li W, Aini G (2014) Relating landscape characteristics to nonpoint source pollution in a typical urbanized watershed in the municipality of Beijing. Landsc Urban Plan 123(96):107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.007
South Burlington Stormwater Utility (2009) Low impact development guidance manual. http://www.sburlstormwater.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/manuals/SB_Low_Impact_Development_Manual.pdf
Sriyana I, De Gijt JG, Parahyangsari SK, Niyomukiza JB (2020) Watershed management index based in the villiage watershed model (VQM) approach towards sustainability. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 8:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.01.003
Strecker E, Sheffield A, Cristina C, Leisenring M (2010) Stormwater BMP guidance tool. Geosyntec Consultants Press USA, p 142
Teymouri E, Mousavi S-F, Karami H, Farzin S, Kheirabad H (2020) Reducing urban runoff pollution using porous concrete containing mineral adsorbents. J Environ Treat Tech 8(1):429436. http://www.jett.dormaj.com/docs/Volume8/Issue%201/Reducing%20Urban%20Runoff%20Pollution%20Using%20Porous%20Concrete%20Containing%20Mineral%20Adsorbents.pdf
Thungngern J, Wijitkosum S, Sriburi T, Sukhsri C (2015) A review of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP): an approach to water resource management in Thailand. Appl Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.35762/aer.2015.37.3.2
Tscheikner-Gratl F, Egger P, Ruach W, Kleidorfer M (2017) Comparision of multi-citeria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization. Water Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020068
UACDA (University of Arkansas Community Design Center) (2010) Low impact development: a design manual for urban area. http://www.bwdh2o.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Low_Impact_Development_Manual-2010.pdf
UN U (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 Revision: United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/WUP2011_Report.pdf
Wang Y, Choi W, Deal BM (2005) Long-term impacts of land-use change on non-point source pollutant loads for the St. Louis metropolitan area. USA Environ Manag 35:194–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0315-8
Wang J, Meng Q, Zou Y, Qi Q, Tan K, Santamouris M, He B-J (2022) Performance synergism of pervious pavement on stormwater management and urban heat island mitigation: a review of its benefits, key parameters, and co-benefits approach. Water Res 221(118755). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118755
Young KD, Younos T, Dymond RL, Kibler DF, Lee DH (2010) Application of the analytic hierarchy process for selecting and modeling stormwater best management practices. J Contemp Water Res Educ 146(1):50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2010.00391.x
Yavari F, Salehi Neyshabouri SA, Yazdi J, Molajou A, Brysiewicz A (2022) A novel framework for urban flood damage assessment. Water Resour Manage 36:1991–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03122-3
Zou R, Riverson J, Liu Y, Murphy R, Sim Y (2015) Enhanced nonlinearity interval mapping scheme for high-performance simulation-optimization of watershed-scale BMP placement. Water Resour Res 51(3):1831–1845. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015772
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YD, HK, SM: Conceptualization; YD, HK, SA: Data curation; YD, HK, SM: Formal analysis; YA: Investigation; YD: Methodology; YD, HK, SM: Project administration; YD, HK: Resources; YD, HK, SM: Software; YD: Supervision; HK, SM: Validation; YD, HK, SM: Visualization; YD, HK: Roles/Writing – original draft; YD, HK, SM: Writing – review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dadrasajirlou, Y., Karami, H. & Mirjalili, S. Using AHP-PROMOTHEE for Selection of Best Low-Impact Development Designs for Urban Flood Mitigation. Water Resour Manage 37, 375–402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03378-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03378-9