Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Groundwater Level Fluctuations in Coastal Aquifer: Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict the Impacts of Climatical CMIP6 Scenarios

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater resources play a crucial role in supplying water for domestic, industrial, and agricultural use. In this study ACCESS-CM2, HadGEM3-GC31-LL, and NESM3 were selected for validation from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). In the following, the feedforward neural network was employed to predict monthly groundwater level (GWL) based on the emission scenarios of the sixth IPCC report (SSP2-4.5 and SSp5-8.5) for the next two decades (2021–2040) in the Sari-Neka coastal aquifer near the Caspian Sea, Iran. In this regard, the monthly maximum and minimum temperature, precipitation, and water table of previous month from four piezometers from 2000 to 2019 were used as input variables to forecast GWL. The evaluation of the three GCM models demonstrated that the ACCESS-CM2 provided the best values of the R2 and RMSE with observation parameters. The results of r, R2, RMSE, and MAE were evaluated for the model and indicated good performance of the model. The results also illustrated that under such mentioned scenarios, the mean monthly temperature would rise approximately from 0.1–1.2 °C. In addition, the mean monthly precipitation is likely to witness changes from -10% to 78% in the next two decades. As a result, this seems to lead to improvement and recharge of groundwater level for the near future. The results can help managers and policymakers to identify adaptation strategies more precisely for basins with similar climates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All GCM models are available online from: https://climate4impact.eu

Code Availability

ANN is commercial codes.

References

  • Abiodun BJ, Adegoke J, Abatan AA, Ibe CA, Egbebiyi TS, Engelbrecht F, Pinto I (2017) Potential impacts of climate change on extreme precipitation over four African coastal cities. Clim Change 143(3):399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adnan RM, Liang Z, Trajkovic S, Zounemat-Kermani M, Li B, Kisi O (2019) Daily streamflow prediction using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Hydrol 577:123981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi H, Massah Bavani AR, Roozbahani A (2020) Mitigating the impacts of climate change on the performance of multi-purpose reservoirs by changing the operation policy from SOP to MLDR. Water Resour Manage 34(4):1495–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Maktoumi A, Zekri S, El-Rawy M, Abdalla O, Al-Wardy M, Al-Rawas G, Charabi Y (2018) Assessment of the impact of climate change on coastal aquifers in Oman. Arab J Geosci 11(17). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3858-y

  • Anjum MN, Ding Y, Shangguan D (2019) Simulation of the projected climate change impacts on the river flow regimes under CMIP5 RCP scenarios in the westerlies dominated belt, northern Pakistan. Atmos Res 227:233–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araya-Osses D, Casanueva A, Román-Figueroa C, Uribe JM, Paneque M (2020) Climate change projections of temperature and precipitation in Chile based on statistical downscaling. Clim Dyn 54(9):4309–4330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayatvarkeshi M, Zhang B, Fasihi R, Adnan RM, Kisi O, Yuan X (2020) Investigation into the effects of climate change on reference evapotranspiration using the HadCM3 and LARS-WG. Water 12(3):666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodman RW, Karoly DJ, Dix MR, Harman IN, Srbinovsky J, Dobrohotoff PB, Mackallah C (2020) Evaluation of CMIP6 AMIP climate simulations with the ACCESS-AM2 model. J Southern Hemisphere Earth Syst Sci 70(1):166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudiaf B, Dabanli I, Boutaghane H, Şen Z (2020) Temperature and precipitation risk assessment under climate change effect in northeast Algeria. Earth Syst Environ 4(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco MJ, Steinley D (2007) A comparison of heuristic procedures for minimum within-cluster sums of squares partitioning. Psychometrika 72(4):583–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Wang G, Mao T (2015) Simulation and prediction of suprapermafrost groundwater level variation in response to climate change using a neural network model. J Hydrol 529:1211–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Song L, Liu Y, Yang L, Li D (2020) A review of the artificial neural network models for water quality prediction. Appl Sci 10(17):5776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitsazan M, Rahmani G, Neyamadpour A (2015) Forecasting groundwater level by artificial neural networks as an alternative approach to groundwater modeling. J Geol Soc India 85(1):98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola EA Jr, Rana AJ, Poulton MM, Szidarovszky F, Uhl VW (2005) A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations. Groundwater 43(2):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibaly P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309(1–4):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbela M, Nouiri I (2020) Intelligent approach to predict future groundwater level based on artificial neural networks (ANN). Euro-Mediterranean J Environ Integration 5(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Luca A, Pitman AJ, de Elía R (2020) Decomposing temperature extremes errors in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Geophys Res Lett 47(14):e2020GL088031

  • Di Nunno F, Granata F (2020) Groundwater level prediction in Apulia region (Southern Italy) using NARX neural network. Environ Res 190:110062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emamgholizadeh S, Moslemi K, Karami G (2014) Prediction the groundwater level of bastam plain (Iran) by artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Water Resour Manage 28(15):5433–5446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyring V, Bony S, Meehl GA, Senior CA, Stevens B, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2016) Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci Model Devel 9(5):1937–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazi B, Jeihouni E, Kalantari Z (2021) Predicting groundwater level fluctuations under climate change scenarios for Tasuj plain. Iran Arabian J Geosci 14(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo D, Wang H (2016) Comparison of a very-fine-resolution GCM with RCM dynamical downscaling in simulating climate in China. Adv Atmos Sci 33(5):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Singh V, Jain MK (2020) Assessment of precipitation extremes in India during the 21st century under SSP1–1.9 mitigation scenarios of CMIP6 GCMs. J Hydrol 590:125422

  • Hamidi M, Sabbagh-Yazdi SR (2008) Modeling of 2D density-dependent flow and transport in porous media using finite volume method. Comput Fluids 37(8):1047–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasda R, Rahaman MF, Jahan CS, Molla KI, Mazumder QH (2020) Climatic data analysis for groundwater level simulation in drought prone Barind Tract, Bangladesh: Modelling approach using artificial neural network. Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan Z, Shamsudin S, Harun S (2014) Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature. Theoret Appl Climatol 116(1):243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitson BC, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Climate Res 7(2):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 151

  • Konapala G, Mishra AK, Wada Y, Mann ME (2020) Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nat Commun 11(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SY, Miao LJ, Jiang ZH, Wang GJ, Gnyawali KR, Zhang J, Zhang H, Fang K, He Y, Li C (2020) Projected drought conditions in Northwest China with CMIP6 models under combined SSPs and RCPs for 2015–2099. Adv Clim Chang Res 11(3):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligotin VA, Savichev OG, Makushin JV (2010) The long-term changes of seasonal and annual levels and temperature of ground waters of the top hydro dynamical zone in Tomsk area. Geoecology 13(1):23–29 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc Fifth Berkeley Symp Math Stat Probab 1(14):281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghsood FF, Moradi H, Massah Bavani AR, Panahi M, Berndtsson R, Hashemi H (2019) Climate change impact on flood frequency and source area in Northern Iran under CMIP5 scenarios. Water 11(2):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020273

  • Maharjan M, Aryal A, Talchabhadel R, Thapa BR (2021) Impact of Climate Change on the Streamflow Modulated by Changes in Precipitation and Temperature in the North Latitude Watershed of Nepal. Hydrology 8(3):117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1997) Determining inputs for neural network models of multivariate time series. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 12(5):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirdashtvan M, Najafinejad A, Malekian A, Sa’doddin A (2021) Sustainable water supply and demand management in semi-arid regions: optimizing water resources allocation based on RCPs scenarios. Water Resour Manage 35(15):5307–5324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam HK, Moghaddam HK, Kivi ZR, Bahreinimotlagh M, Alizadeh MJ (2019) Developing comparative mathematic models, BN and ANN for forecasting of groundwater levels. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Jha MK, Kumar A, Sudheer KP (2010) Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of eastern India. Water Resour Manage 24(9):1845–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Msowoya K, Madani K, Davtalab R, Mirchi A, Lund JR (2016) Climate change impacts on maize production in the warm heart of Africa. Water Resour Manage 30(14):5299–5312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiri M, Moghaddam HK, Hamidi M (2021) Development of multi-criteria decision making methods for reduction of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers using SEAWAT code. J Contam Hydrol 242:103848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan N, Sudheer C (2020) Groundwater level forecasting using soft computing techniques. Neural Comput Appl 32(12):7691–7708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie S, Fu S, Cao W, Jia X (2020) Comparison of monthly air and land surface temperature extremes simulated using CMIP5 and CMIP6 versions of the Beijing Climate Center climate model. Theoret Appl Climatol 140(1):487–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nover DM, Witt JW, Butcher JB, Johnson TE, Weaver CP (2016) The effects of downscaling method on the variability of simulated watershed response to climate change in five US basins. Earth Interact 20(11):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS, van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP, Birkmann J, Kok K, Levy M (2017) The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouhamdouch S, Bahir M (2017) Climate change impact on future rainfall and temperature in semi-arid areas (Essaouira Basin, Morocco). Environ Process 4(4):975–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MD, Ackerley D, Catto JL, Hodges KI, McDonald RE, Lee RW (2020) An Overview of the Extratropical Storm Tracks in CMIP6 Historical Simulations. J Clim 33(15):6315–6343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racsko P, Szeidl L, Semenov M (1991) A serial approach to local stochastic weather models. Ecol Model 57(1–2):27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee T, Ebrahimi H, Nourani V (2019) A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol 572:336–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshan G, Ghanghermeh A, Nasrabadi T, Meimandi JB (2013) Effect of global warming on intensity and frequency curves of precipitation, case study of Northwestern Iran. Water Resour Manage 27(5):1563–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DK, Barzegar R, Quilty J, Adamowski J (2020) Using ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and optimization algorithms to predict reference evapotranspiration in subtropical climatic zones. J Hydrol 591:125509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahour H, Gholami V, Vazifedan M (2020) A comparative analysis of statistical and machine learning techniques for mapping the spatial distribution of groundwater salinity in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 591:125321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Barrow EM (1997) Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Clim Change 35(4):397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10:95–107. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr010095

  • Sha J, Li X, Wang ZL (2019) Estimation of future climate change in cold weather areas with the LARS-WG model under CMIP5 scenarios. Theoret Appl Climatol 137(3):3027–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahvari N, Khalilian S, Mosavi SH, Mortazavi SA (2019) Assessing climate change impacts on water resources and crop yield: a case study of Varamin plain basin Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7266-x

  • Sharma P, Madane D, Bhakar SR (2021) Monthly streamflow forecasting using artificial intelligence approach: a case study in a semi-arid region of India. Arab J Geosci 14(22):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen C (2018) A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists. Water Resour Res 54(11):8558–8593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Grotjahn R, Ullrich PA (2020) Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations of extreme precipitation over contiguous US regions. Weather Clim Extrem 29:100268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Wendi D, Kim DE, Liong SY (2016) Technical note: Application of artificial neural networks in groundwater table forecasting – a case study in a Singapore swamp forest. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(4):1405–1412. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1405-2016

  • Szidarovszky F, Coppola EA Jr, Long J, Hall AD, Poulton MM (2007) A hybrid artificial neural network-numerical model for ground water problems. Groundwater 45(5):590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H (2020) Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci Rep 10(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan ML, Yusop Z, Chua VP, Chan NW (2017) Climate change impacts under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on water resources of the Kelantan River Basin, Malaysia. Atmos Res 189:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodossiou N (2016) Assessing the impacts of climate change on the sustainability of groundwater aquifers. Application in Moudania Aquifer in N. Greece. Environ Process 3(4):1045–1061

  • Thorne KM, Elliott-Fisk DL, Freeman CM, Bui TV, Powelson KW, Janousek CN, Buffington KJ, Takekawa JY (2017) Are coastal managers ready for climate change? A case study from estuaries along the Pacific coast of the United States. Ocean Coast Manag 143:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnatzsch EA, Reay DS (2019) Temperature and precipitation change in Malawi: Evaluation of CORDEX-Africa climate simulations for climate change impact assessments and adaptation planning. Sci Total Environ 654:378–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TM (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21(4):530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams KD, Copsey D, Blockley EW, Bodas‐Salcedo A, Calvert D, Comer R, Davis P, Graham T, Hewitt HT, Hill R, Hyder P (2018) The Met Office global coupled model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3. 0 and GC3. 1) configurations. J Adv Model Earth Syst 10(2):357–380

  • Xin X, Wu T, Zhang J, Yao J, Fang Y (2020) Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 simulations of precipitation in China and the East Asian summer monsoon. Int J Climatol 40(15):6423–6440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan T, Bai J, Arsenio T, Liu J, Shen Z (2019) Future climate change impacts on streamflow and nitrogen exports based on CMIP5 projection in the Miyun Reservoir Basin. China Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 19(2):266–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon H, Jun SC, Hyun Y, Bae GO, Lee KK (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396(1–2):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, You Q, Chen C, Ge J (2016) Impacts of climate change on streamflows under RCP scenarios: A case study in Xin River Basin, China. Atmos Res 178:521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Dai T, Qiao Z, Sun P, Hao J, Yang Y (2020) Application of artificial intelligence to wastewater treatment: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review of technology, economy, management, and wastewater reuse. Process Saf Environ Prot 133:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not received support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Adib Roshani: Conceptualization and design of the study, Acquisition of data, Analysis and/or interpretation of data, Methodology, Software, Validation, and Drafting the manuscript. Mehdi Hamidi: Conceptualization and design of the study, Acquisition of data, Analysis and/or interpretation of data, Methodology, Software, Validation, Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, Approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Project administration, and Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Hamidi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Authors agreed to the ethical approval needed to publish this manuscript.

Consent to Participate

The authors declare their consent to participate in this work.

Consent to Publish

The authors declare their consent of the publication of this manuscript by “Water Resources Management” journal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roshani, A., Hamidi, M. Groundwater Level Fluctuations in Coastal Aquifer: Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict the Impacts of Climatical CMIP6 Scenarios. Water Resour Manage 36, 3981–4001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03204-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03204-2

Keywords

Navigation