Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Groundwater Level Forecasting in a River Island of Eastern India

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forecasting of groundwater levels is very useful for planning integrated management of groundwater and surface water resources in a basin. In the present study, artificial neural network models have been developed for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of tropical humid region, eastern India. ANN modeling was carried out to predict groundwater levels 1 week ahead at 18 sites over the study area. The inputs to the ANN models consisted of weekly rainfall, pan evaporation, river stage, water level in the drain, pumping rate and groundwater level in the previous week, which led to 40 input nodes and 18 output nodes. Three different ANN training algorithms, viz., gradient descent with momentum and adaptive learning rate backpropagation (GDX) algorithm, Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm and Bayesian regularization (BR) algorithm were employed and their performance was evaluated. As the neural network became very large with 40 input nodes and 18 output nodes, the LM and BR algorithms took too much time to complete a single iteration. Consequently, the study area was divided into three clusters and the performance evaluation of the three ANN training algorithms was done separately for all the clusters. The performance of all the three ANN training algorithms in predicting groundwater levels over the study area was found to be almost equally good. However, the performance of the BR algorithm was found slightly superior to that of the GDX and LM algorithms. The ANN model trained with BR algorithm was further used for predicting groundwater levels 2, 3 and 4 weeks ahead in the tubewells of one cluster using the same inputs. It was found that though the accuracy of predicted groundwater levels generally decreases with an increase in the lead time, the predicted groundwater levels are reasonable for the larger lead times as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley WM, Leake SA (2004) The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 42(1):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anctil F, Perrin C, Andreassian V (2004) Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models. Environ Model Softw 19(4):357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee (2000a) Artificial neural networks in hydrology—I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 5(2):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee (2000b) Artificial neural networks in hydrology—II: hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 5(2):124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz ARA, Wong KFV (1992) Neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Ground Water 30(2):164–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkhair KS (2002) Aquifer parameters determination for large diameter wells using neural network approach. J Hydrol 265(1):118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee P, Prasad RK, Singh VS (2009) Forecasting of groundwater level in hard rock region using artificial neural network. Environ Geol 58:1239–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campolo M, Andreussi P, Soldati A (1999) River flood forecasting with neural network model. Water Resour Res 35(4):1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola E, Szidarovszky F, Poulton M, Charles E (2003) Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 8(6):348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppola EA, Rana AJ, Poulton MM, Szidarovszky F, Uhl VW (2005) A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations. Ground Water 43(2):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobee B (1999) Hydrological forecasting using artificial neural networks: the state of art. Can J Civ Eng 26(3):293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobee B (2000) Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J Hydrol 230:244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Aravena R, Bobee B (2001) Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour Res 37(4):885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibaly P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural network. J Hydrol 309:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • French MN, Krajewski WF, Cuykendall RR (1992) Rainfall forecasting in space and time using neural network. J Hydrol 137:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia LA, Shigdi A (2006) Using neural networks for parameter estimation in ground water. J Hydrol 318(1–4):215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobindraju RS, Ramachandra Rao A (2000) Artificial neural network in hydrology. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen MT, Demceth HB, Beale MN (1996) Neural network design. PWS, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1999) Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong YS, Rosen MR (2001) Intelligent characterization and diagnosis of the groundwater quality in an urban fractured-rock aquifer using an artificial neural network. Urban Water 3(3):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchombe M, White M (1989) Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IWMI (2001) The strategic plan for IWMI 2000–2005. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, pp 28

  • Kalf FRP, Woolley DR (2005) Applicability and methodology for determining sustainable yield in groundwater systems. Hydrogeol J 13(1):295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karahan H, Ayvaz MT (2008) Simultaneous parameter identification of a heterogeneous aquifer system using artificial neural networks. Hydrogeol J 16:817–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna B, Rao YRS, Vijaya T (2008) Modeling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process 22:1180–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo V, Liu C, Lin K (2004) Evaluation of the ability of an artificial neural network model to assess the variation of groundwater quality in an area of blackfoot disease in Taiwan. Water Res 38(1):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay DJC (1991) A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Comput 4(3):448–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1997) Determining inputs for neural network models of multivariate time series. Microcomput Civ Eng 12:353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (1998) Understanding the behaviour and optimizing the performance of backpropagation neural networks: an empirical study. Environ Model Softw 13:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters T (1995) Advanced algorithms for neural networks: a C+ + source book. Wiley, New York, p 431

    Google Scholar 

  • Milot J, Rodriguez MJ, Serodes JB (2002) Contribution of neural networks for modeling trihalomethanes occurrence in drinking water. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 128(5):370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Jha MK, Kumar A, James BK (2009) Groundwater scenario in Kathajodi River basin of Orissa. Proceedings of workshop on groundwater scenario and quality in Orissa, 6–7 March 2009, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India, pp 82–90

  • Morshed J, Kaluarachchi JJ (1998) Parameter estimation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm for free-product migration and recovery. Water Resour Res 34(5):1101–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak PC, Rao YRS, Sudheer KP (2006) Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour Manag 20:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter DW, Gibbs PG, Jones WF Huyakorn PS, Hamm LL, Flach GP (2000) Data fusion modeling for groundwater systems. J Contam Hydrol 42:303–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajikumar N, Thandaveswara BS (1999) A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network. J Hydrol 216:32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samani M, Gohari-Moghadam M, Safavi AA (2007) A simple neural network model for the determination of aquifer parameters. J Hydrol 340:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigdi A, Garcia LA (2003) Parameter estimation in groundwater hydrology using artificial neural networks. J Comput Civ Eng ASCE 17(4):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M (2005) Groundwater recharge and sustainability in the high plains aquifer in Kansas, USA. Hydrogeol J 13(2):351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Process 16:1325–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirumalaiah K, Deo MC (2000) Hydrological forecasting using neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK, Mays LW (2005) Groundwater hydrology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth E, Brath A, Montanari A (2000) Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. J Hydrol 239:132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddameri V (2007) Using statistical and artificial neural network models to forecast potentiometric levels at a deep well in South Texas. Environ Geol 51:885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Directorate of Water Management, Bhubaneswar, 751 023, Orissa, India

    Sheelabhadra Mohanty & Ashwani Kumar

  2. AgFE Department, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721 302, West Bengal, India

    Madan K. Jha

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    K. P. Sudheer

Authors
  1. Sheelabhadra Mohanty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Madan K. Jha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashwani Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. P. Sudheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheelabhadra Mohanty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohanty, S., Jha, M.K., Kumar, A. et al. Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Groundwater Level Forecasting in a River Island of Eastern India. Water Resour Manage 24, 1845–1865 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9527-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9527-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation