Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Two Hydro-Economic Approaches for Multi-Objective Agricultural Water Resources Planning

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydro-economic models are valuable tools that can be used in irrigated agriculture in order to improve the understanding of the status quo of water resources, the role of water in agriculture, and the system behavior under changing conditions. The present paper attempts to give insights on how different water management objectives and data availability may influence the specification/application of hydro-economic modeling, as well as the reliability and interpretation of their results. A Greek rural watershed located in Central Greece (Region of Thessaly) is used as a case study application. A common hydro-economic framework for sustainable water resources management in irrigated agriculture is examined, aiming to provide a simple and understandable tool for policymakers. In this framework two hydro-economic models (HEMs) were developed to address challenges regarding data limitations, spatial analysis, and scenario-based problems (e.g. agri-economic scenarios, water policy scenarios, environmental scenarios, etc.). A set of selection criteria was then used to qualitatively compare these two models, based on their advantages and disadvantages. The results of this analysis indicate that HEMs’ development must be quite flexible about their settings and must take into consideration the desired accuracy level that is likely to satisfy their main purpose/goal. The optimal approach is the one that can achieve a balance between simplicity, flexibility, accuracy and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available after request from the authors.

References

  • Alamanos A, Latinopoulos D, Xenarios S, Tziatzios G, Mylopoulos N, Loukas A (2019a) Combining hydro-economic and water quality modeling for optimal management of a degraded watershed. J Hydroinf 21(6):1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamanos A, Latinopoulos D, Papaioannou G, Mylopoulos N (2019b) Integrated hydro-economic modeling for sustainable water resources management in data-scarce areas. Water Resour Manag 2775–2790:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02241-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alamanos A, Latinopoulos D, Mylopoulos N (2020) A methodological framework for an easy and reliable estimation of the full cost of irrigation water. Water Environ J. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12556

  • Barthel R, Reichenau TG, Krimly T, Dabbert S, Schneider K, Mauser W (2012) Integrated Modeling of Global Change Impacts on Agriculture and Groundwater Resources. Water Resour Manag 26:1929–1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0001-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekchanov M, Sood A, Jeuland M (2015) Review of hydro-economic models to address river basin management problems: structure, applications and research gaps. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. 60p (IWMI Working Paper 167). https://doi.org/10.5337/2015.218

  • Bekchanov M, Aditya S, Pinto A, Jeuland M (2017) Systematic review of water-economy modeling applications. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143(8):04017037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Gutiérrez I, Varela-Ortega C, Purkey DR (2013) Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: a hydro-economic modeling approach. J Environ Manag 128:144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1962) Determining consumptive use and irrigation water requirements. U.S. Dept. Agr. Agricultural Research Service Tech Bull 1275. 59p

  • Common Implementation Strategy Working Group 2 (WATECO) EU Guidance Document: Economics and the Environment. The Implementation Challenge of the Water Framework Directive. August 2002, WATECO. Available online: http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/wfd/library. Accessed 30 April 2015

  • Cornelissen T, Diekkrüger B, Giertz S (2013) A comparison of hydrological models for assessing the impact of land use and climate change on discharge in a tropical catchment. J Hydrol 498:221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission (2000) Water Framework Directive (WFD) 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 23 October 2000, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Economics L327/1,22.12.2000: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html

  • FAO (2015) Cropwat. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html (Accessed: 30 Nov 2018)

  • Gibbons DC (1986) The economic value of water. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Greek Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change, Special Water Secretariat (2012) Water Resources Management Plans for the Water Districts of Thessaly, Epirus and Central Greece, according to the Requirements of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, the Law 3199/2003 and the Presidential Decree 51/2007. Special Water Secretariat-YPEKA, Athens, Greek, 2012.

  • Greek Payment Authority of Common Agricultural Policy (GPACAP) www.opekepe.gr last Accessed: 26 Oct 2016

  • Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375:627–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heady EO (1952) Economics of Agricultural Production and Resource Use. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. European Geosciences Union, Adv Geosci, (5): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005

  • Latinopoulos P (2005) Valuation and pricing of irrigation water: an analysis in Greek agricultural areas. Global Nest J 7(3):323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Latinopoulos D (2006) Application of Multicriteria Analysis for the economic assessment of agricultural water under Sustainable Water Resources Management. PhD thesis, Aristotle University, Department of Civil Engineering, Division of Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering

  • Loukas A, Mylopoulos N, Vasiliades L (2007) A modeling system for the evaluation of water resources management scenarios in Thessaly, Greece. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1673–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9120-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukas A, Tzabiras J, Spiliotopoulos M, Fafoutis C, Mylopoulos N (2014) Development of a District Information System for Water Management Planning and Strategic Decision Making. RSCy 2014, Second International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation 2014, 7-10 April 2014, Paphos, Cyprus

  • Myung JI, Pitt MA (2018) Model comparison in psychology. Stevens’ Handbook Experiment Psychol Cognit Neurosci:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn503

  • Nakic Z (2017) Integrated hydro-economic models as a tool for the sustainable management of water resources. J Environ Geol 2(1):11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherafatpour Z, Roozbahani A, Hasani Y (2019) Water Resour Manag (33): 2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02240-9

  • Sidiropoulos P, Mylopoulos N, Loukas A (2013) Optimal Management of an Overexploited Aquifer under Climate Change: The Lake Karla Case. Water Resour Manag 27(6):1635–1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0083-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiliotopoulos M, Loukas A, Mylopoulos N (2015) A new remote sensing procedure for the estimation of crop water requirements. 3rd International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment 2015, 16-19 March 2015, Cyprus. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2192688

  • Tietenberg T, Lewis L (2011) Environmental & Natural Resource Economics 9th edition. Pearson, Boston

  • Tzabiras J, Vasiliades L, Sidiropoulos P, Loukas A, Mylopoulos N (2016) Evaluation of water resources management strategies to overturn climate change impacts on Lake Karla watershed. Water Resour Manag 30:5819–5844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1536-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Evaluation And Planning System (WEAP), Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) – www.weap21.org. Accessed 8 April 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

A previous version of this work has been presented in the 11th World Congress on Water Resources and Environment (EWRA 2019): Alamanos A, Mylopoulos N, Loukas A, Latinopoulos D, Xenarios S (2019) Hydro-economic modelling approaches for agricultural water resources management in a Greek Watershed. 11th World Congress on Water Resources and Environment (EWRA 2019), Madrid, Spain, 25–29 June 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Water Institute, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    A. Alamanos

  2. School of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    D. Latinopoulos

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    A. Loukas

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Hydrology and Aquatic Systems Analysis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    N. Mylopoulos

Authors
  1. A. Alamanos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Latinopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Loukas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Mylopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Alamanos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alamanos, A., Latinopoulos, D., Loukas, A. et al. Comparing Two Hydro-Economic Approaches for Multi-Objective Agricultural Water Resources Planning. Water Resour Manage 34, 4511–4526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02690-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02690-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation