Skip to main content
Log in

A Fuzzy Group Decision Making Framework Based on ISM-FANP-FTOPSIS for Evaluating Watershed Management Strategies

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Watershed planning and management is a complex process due to existing different influential criteria in social, economic and environmental sectors as well as complicated interactions among them. Therefore, evaluating watershed management programs needs a comprehensive approach considering network relations among criteria and diverse decision-makers’ judgments. This paper presents a new framework of group decision-making in evaluating and ranking watersheds for implementing development strategies. The model includes 18 criteria in social, economic, managerial and environmental clusters. Five watersheds are considered as alternatives. At first, the network relations among the various criteria are determined using the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method. Then, based on the relationships obtained by ISM and decision-makers’ judgments, the alternatives’ priority is determined through the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) method. To aggregate the group decision-making results, the extended fuzzy TOPSIS method is proposed and the decision-makers’ weights are calculated using Shannon’s entropy method. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of the decision-makers’ weights and alternatives priorities have been conducted. The Monte Carlo method is applied to generate data for sensitivity analysis. According to the results, Urmia Lake is the most preferred watershed and Atrak watershed is ranked in last.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Multiple Criteria Decision Making

  2. VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje

  3. Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution

  4. Analytical Hierarchy Process

References

  • Arab Ameri A, Pourghasemi HR, Cerda A (2018) Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: a comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models. Sci Total Environ 613-614:1385–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beikkhakhian Y, Javanmardi M, Karbasian M, Khayambashi B (2015) The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers’ selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert Syst Appl 42(15- 16):6224–6236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Vogel R, Ranjithan R (2013) Special issue on the role of systems analysis in watershed management. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 139(5):461–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Hsu CH (2009) Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-Wen reservoir watershed. J Environ Manag 90:3226–3230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TC (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. J Fuzzy Set Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen VYC, Lien HP, Liu CH, Liou JJH, Tzeng GH, Yang LS (2011) Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Krishna Murthy YVN, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multicriteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3555–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfi M, Marti MF, Bonoli A, Tondelli S (2011) Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manag 92:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri S, Nejadhashemi AP (2014) Application of analytical hierarchy process for effective selection of agricultural best management practices. J Environ Manag 132:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Palaniappan M, Zhu Q, Kannan D (2012) Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Prod Econ 140:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain M, Awasthi A, Tiwari MK (2016) An ISM-ANP integrated framework for evaluating alternatives for sustainable supply chain management. Appl Math Model 40(5–6):3671–3687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Ramsankaran R (2019) GIS-based integrated multi-criteria modelling framework for watershed prioritisation in India-a demonstration in Marol watershed. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Ghosh NC, Lohani AK, Thomas T (2015) Fuzzy AHP based multi criteria decision support for watershed prioritization. Water Resour Manag 29(12):4205–4227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan G, Haq AN (2007) Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier in the built-in-order supply chain environment. Int J Prod Res 45(17):3831–3852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu S, Khare D, Mondal A (2017) Landuse change impact on sub-watersheds prioritization by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Ecol Inform 42:100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao CH, Chiu AS (2011) Evaluate municipal solid waste management problems using hierarchical framework. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 25:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan K, Govindan K, NoorulHaq A, Geng Y (2013) An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 47:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohaghar A, Fathi MR, Faghih A, Turkayesh MM (2012) An integrated approach of fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for R&D project selection: a case study. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6(2):66–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (2011) Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 38:12983–12990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2003) Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 11(5):635–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piltan M, Sowlati T (2016) A multi-criteria decision support model for evaluating the performance of partnerships. Expert Syst Appl 45:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RazaviToosi SL, Samani JMV (2012) Evaluating water transfer projects using analytic network process (ANP). Water Resour Manag 26:1999–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RazaviToosi SL, Samani JMV (2014) A new integrated MADM technique combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and fuzzy max-min set method for evaluating water transfer projects. Water Resour Manag 28:4257–4272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RazaviToosi SL, Samani JMV (2016) Evaluating water management strategies in watersheds by new hybrid Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (FANP) methods. J Hydrol 534:364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RazaviToosi SL, Samani JMV (2017) Prioritizing watersheds using a novel hybrid decision model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR. Water Resour Manag 31(9):853–2867

    Google Scholar 

  • RazaviToosi SL, Samani JMV, Koorehpazan Dezfuli A (2009) Ranking water transfer projects using fuzzy methods. Water Manag_ICE WM4 163:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process: the organization and prioritization of complexity. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghian RJ, Zarghami M, Nejadhashemi AP, Sharifi MB, Herman MR, Daneshvar F (2016) Application of risk-based multiple criteria decision analysis for selection of the best agricultural scenario for effective watershed management. J Environ Manag 168:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Dhadse K, Garg C, Deshmukh A (2018) Sustainable management of a river basin by integrating an improved fuzzy based hybridized SWOT model and geo-statistical weighted thematic overlay analysis. J Hydrol 563:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzkaya G, Ozgen A, Ozgen D, Tuzkaya UR (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Ardakanian R, Memariani A, Szidarovszky F (2008) Extended OWA operator for group decision making on water resources projects. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 134:266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F, Ardakanian R (2009) Multi-attribute decision making on inter-basin water transfer projects. Sci Iran 16(1):73–80

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for supporting this project [grant number 92028376].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyedeh Leila RazaviToosi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

RazaviToosi, S.L., Samani, J.M.V. A Fuzzy Group Decision Making Framework Based on ISM-FANP-FTOPSIS for Evaluating Watershed Management Strategies. Water Resour Manage 33, 5169–5190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02423-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02423-4

Keywords

Navigation