Skip to main content
Log in

A Dynamic Flow Forecast Model for Urban Drainage Using the Coupled Artificial Neural Network

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic flow forecast, which is one of the critical technologies in the field of future Intelligent Drainage, has great potential for mitigating the damages resulting from extreme rainfalls. This study aims to develop a coupled neural network called RBF-NARX Forecast Model (RNFM) to predict urban drainage outflow. RNFM integrates the architecture advantages of the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the nonlinear autoregressive with an exogenous inputs neural network (NARXNN). By calculating the Square Sum of Error (SSE) between RNFM predictions and SWMM simulations, the network parameters are optimized and the optimal coupling site of RBFNN and NARXNN is found. The urban drainage in Tianjin is presented to justify the feasibility of RNFM, and the average SSE in test rainfalls is only 0.273. Based on the Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), the uncertainty analysis is quantified and the SWMM simulations lie within the 95% prediction confidential interval, which proves that RNFM have great potential in predictions and management of urban runoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Chang FJ, Chang LC et al (2016) Prediction of monthly regional groundwater levels through hybrid soft-computing techniques. J Hydrol 541:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM (1991) Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(2):302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha MC, Zeferino JA, Simões NE et al (2016) Optimal location and sizing of storage units in a drainage system. Environ Model Softw 83(C):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghani M, Saghafian B, Nasiri Saleh F et al (2014) Uncertainty analysis of streamflow drought forecast using artificial neural networks and Monte-Carlo simulation. Int J Climatol 34(4):1169–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao M, Yin L, Ning J (2018) Artificial neural network model for ozone concentration estimation and Monte Carlo analysis. Atmos Environ 2018:S1352231018301651

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman SM, Paz JO, Tagert MLM (2017) The use of NARX neural networks to forecast daily groundwater levels. Water Resour Manag 31(5):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GB, Saratchandran P, Sundararajan N (2005) A generalized growing and pruning RBF (GGAP-RBF) neural network for function approximation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(1):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Sheridan SC (2018) A new approach to modeling temperature-related mortality: non-linear autoregressive models with exogenous input. Environ Res 164:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Sheridan SC et al (2017) The development of a non-linear autoregressive model with exogenous input (NARX) to model climate-water clarity relationships: reconstructing a historical water clarity index for the coastal waters of the southeastern USA. Theor Appl Climatol 130:557–569

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Model Softw 15(1):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RJ, Dandy GC, Maier HR et al (2008) Application of partial mutual information variable selection to ANN forecasting of water quality in water distribution systems. Environ Model Softw 23(10–11):1289–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Mousavi S (2016) Spatiotemporal groundwater level modeling using hybrid artificial intelligence-meshless method. J Hydrol 536:10–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safari MJS, Aksoy H, Mohammadi M (2016) Artificial neural network and regression models for flow velocity at sediment incipient deposition. J Hydrol 541:1420–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegelmann HT, Horne BG, Giles CL (1997) Computational capabilities of recurrent NARX neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27(2):208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleymani SA, Goudarzi S, Anisi MH et al (2016) A novel method to water level prediction using RBF and FFA. Water Resour Manag 30(9):3265–3283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Chang JX, Qiang H (2010) Simulation with RBF neural network model for reservoir operation rules. Water Resour Manag 24(11):2597–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2014) Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modelling. Environ Model Softw 54(3):108–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Long J, Liu M (2015) Evolving RBF neural networks for rainfall prediction using hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. Neurocomputing. 148(2):136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch A, Liesch T, Broda S (2018) Forecasting groundwater levels using nonlinear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX). J Hydrol 2018:S0022169418300556

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Tianjin technical innovation guidance project program (16YDLJSF00030) and the key project in the control and management of national polluted water bodies (2017ZX07106001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-yi You.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

1. RNFM performs well in the dynamic prediction of drainage flow.

2. The advantages of RBFNN and NARXNN are integrated to RNFM.

3. The method of time coordinate segmentation for RNFM is found to achieve high prediction accuracy.

4. RNFM can be used in the dynamic prediction of environmental variables.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

She, L., You, Xy. A Dynamic Flow Forecast Model for Urban Drainage Using the Coupled Artificial Neural Network. Water Resour Manage 33, 3143–3153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02294-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02294-9

Keywords

Navigation