Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a New Integrated Framework for Improved Rainfall-Runoff Modeling under Climate Variability and Human Activities

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between rainfall and runoff is a complex phenomenon and understanding the physical processes, hydrological components and their impacts on response of watershed to precipitation is one of the challenging issues in watershed hydrology and planning. There is still a need to improve conceptual hydrological models in water scarce regions, such as Iran mainly because in many cases there is not enough data to fully describe this phenomenon. In this research, we aimed to present an improved and parsimonious framework that increases the performance of a conceptual model in water balance and discharge modeling for Delichay watershed located in Hablehroud basin, Iran as one of the main source of water supply for downstream fertile agricultural areas that produce a considerable amount of cereals and play a major role for food and water security of the region. In areas where data for water cycle components are not available or limited, it is recommended to use parsimonious approach in order to have an acceptable level of understanding of the system with minimum possible predictor variables. The Salas model used in current research to model water balance over the period 1983–2012 and evaluation of the results indicated an unsatisfactory performance when the entire period was modeled altogether (NSE = 0.35, d = 0.70, R2 = 0.63, RSR = 0.80, PBIAS = 4.96 and RMSE = 41.87). A key reason is that this watershed is intensively impacted by human activities and homogeneity analysis confirmed a sudden shift in runoff data during 1998–1999. Such a sudden shift reveals the role of human activities impacts on the watershed with a total reduction of 58 mm of runoff per year while the climate variability has not occurred in the region. Thus, the entire period (i.e. 1983–2012) was divided into two homogenous sub-periods of before and after the change point (i.e., pre-change and post-change periods). The results indicated that modeling performance in the sub-periods improved (e.g. the NSE was 0.77 and 0.66 for pre-change and post-change, respectively, vs. 0.35 for entire period). Meanwhile, it is revealed that water balance affected by human activities over the time and application of historical data for water balance modeling cannot be reliable without considering the homogeneous data. Since, many watersheds in the world have been affected by human activities or climate variability, it is recommended to consider the homogeneity of observed data before any application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad NH, Deni SM (2013) Homogeneity test on daily rainfall series for Malaysia. Matematika 29:141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Y, Al-Faraj F, Scholz M, Soliman A (2019) Assessment of upstream human intervention coupled with climate change impact for a transboundary River flow regime: Nile River basin. Water Resour Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02256-1

  • Ahn KH, Merwade V (2017) The effect of land cover change on duration and severity of high and low flows. Hydrol Process 31(1):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baydaroğlu Ö, Koçak K, Duran K (2018) River flow prediction using hybrid models of support vector regression with the wavelet transform, singular spectrum analysis and chaotic approach. Meteorog Atmos Phys 130:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-017-0518-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Warren R, Zaoui J (1980) SHE: towards a methodology for physically-based distributed forecasting in hydrology. International Association of Hydrological Sciences 129:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Caracciolo D, Pumo D, Viola F (2018) Budyko’s based method for annual runoff characterization across different climatic areas: an application to United States. Water Resour Manag 32:3189–3202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1984-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardille J, Coe MT, Vano JA (2004) Impacts of climate variation and catchment area on water balance and lake hydrologic type in groundwater-dominated systems: a generic lake model. Earth Interact 8:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choubin B, Darabi H, Rahmati O, Sajedi-Hosseini F, Kløve B (2018) River suspended sediment modelling using the CART model: a comparative study of machine learning techniques. Sci Total Environ 615:272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danandeh Mehr A, Nourani V (2018) Season algorithm-multigene genetic programming: a new approach for rainfall-runoff modelling. Water Resour Manag 32:2665–2679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1951-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehling H, Rooch A, Taqqu MS (2012) Non-parametric change point tests for long-range dependent data. Scand J Stat 40:153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan TY, Delamini EM, Biftu GF (2003) Effects of model complexity and structure, parameter interactions and data on watershed modeling. J Hydrol 192:1–4: 81-103

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro SB, Kilsby CG, Serinaldi F (2014) Analysis of time variation of rainfall in transnational basins in Iberia: sudden changes or trends? Int J Climatol 34:114–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AG (2012) A water-budget model and estimates of groundwater recharge for Guam. US Geol Surv Sci Invest Rep., 5028

  • Kashani MH, Ghorbani MA, Dinpasho Y, Shahmorad S, Kundzewicz ZW (2017) Comparative study of different wavelets for developing parsimonious Volterra model for rainfall-runoff simulation. Water Res 44:568–578. https://doi.org/10.1134/S009780781704008X

  • Kazemzadeh M, Malekian A (2016) Spatial characteristics and temporal trends of meteorological and hydrological droughts in northwestern Iran. Nat Hazards 80:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Moon YI (2007) Analysis and development of conceptual rainfall-runoff model structures for regionalization purposes. KSCE J Civ Eng 11:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Sun G, McNulty SG, Amatya DM (2003) Modeling actual evapotranspiration from forested watersheds across the southeastern United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallakpour I, and G Villarini (2017) Analysis of changes in the magnitude, frequency, and seasonality of heavy precipitation over the contiguous United States. Theor Appl Climatol 130:345–363.

  • Malekian A, Kazemzadeh M (2016) Spatio-temporal analysis of regional trends and shift changes of autocorrelated temperature series in Urmia Lake Basin. Water Resour Manag 30:785–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauger GW (1986) Darling rang catchment model. Vol. 1 conceptual model. Water Authority of Western Australia. Rep. No. WP 9: 47

  • McDonald JM, Harbaugh AW (1988) MODFLOW, a modular 3D finite difference ground-water flow model. US Geological Survey. Open File Report, 83–875

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Binger RL, Harmel RD, Veith T (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafaie A, Forootan E, Safari A, Schumacher M (2018) Comparing multi-objective optimization techniques to calibrate a conceptual hydrological model using in situ runoff and daily GRACE data. Comput Geosci 22:789–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9726-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Wohlfeil DI, Mielby S (2007) Modelling to support the assessment of interlinkages between groundwater and surface water in the context of the EU Water framework directive. ModelCARE2007, sixth international conference on calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling; credibility in modelling, 9–13 September 2007, Pre-published Proceedings, vol 1, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 211–217

  • Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 24(2):275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic P (1998) Measurement precision as a cause of inhomogeneity in weather data time series. Conference: proceedings from the 2nd Seminar on Homogenization of Surface Climatological Data, Budapest, Hungary

  • Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change point problem. J Appl Stat 28:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porhemmat, J, Siadat H, Oweis T (2012) Water resources of the Karkheh River basin: hydrology, runoff, and water balance. CPWF Karkheh River Basin Research Report 11. ICARDA, Aleppo, Viii + 150 pp

  • Saito L, Biondi F, Salas JD, Panorska AK, Kozubowski TJ (2008) A watershed modeling approach to streamflow reconstruction from tree-ring records. Environ Res Lett 3:024006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD (2002) Precipitation-streamflow relationship: watershed modeling. Lecture notes. Colorado State Univ., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD, Smith RA (1981) Physical basis of stochastic models of annual flows. Water Resour Res 17:428–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Viney NR, Zammitt C (2002) LASCAM: large scale catchment model. In: Singh VP (ed) Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. Water Resources Publications, Louisiana State University, pp 579–648

  • Um MJ, Heo JH, Markus M, Wuebbles DJ (2018) Performance evaluation of four statistical tests for trend and non-stationarity and assessment of observed and projected annual maximum precipitation series in Major United States cities. Water Resour Manag 32:913–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk AI, Kirby M, Mainuddin M, Peña-Arancibia J, Paydar Z, Marvanek S (2009) River water balance accounts for the Murray-Darling basin to support water assessment modelling. In: 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 international congress on modelling and simulation, pp 13–17

  • Wheater HS (2002) Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 360(1796):1409–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Liu S, Sohl TL, Young CJ (2013) Projecting the land cover change and its environmental impacts in the Cedar River basin in the Midwestern United States. Environ Res Lett 8(2):024025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu CY (1999) Estimation of parameters of a conceptual water balance model for ungauged catchments. Water Resour Manag 13:33–368

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), project number 91004488.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tehran, PO Box 31575-3314, Karaj, Iran

    Arash Malekian, Bahram Choubin & Farzaneh Sajedi-Hosseini

  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

    Junguo Liu

Authors
  1. Arash Malekian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bahram Choubin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junguo Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farzaneh Sajedi-Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arash Malekian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malekian, A., Choubin, B., Liu, J. et al. Development of a New Integrated Framework for Improved Rainfall-Runoff Modeling under Climate Variability and Human Activities. Water Resour Manage 33, 2501–2515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02281-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02281-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation