Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Combinatorial Procedure to Determine the Full Range of Potential Operating Scenarios for a Dam System

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional dam safety assessment tends to place the focus on estimating the probabilities of failure for the system based on a few subjectively-chosen operating scenarios. The techniques used to assess these systems rely on linear chains of events and are incapable of considering component interactions, feedbacks and non-linear behaviour. This paper uses a systems approach to develop a new technique that puts possibilities first and is capable of generating an exhaustive list of potential component operating state scenarios for the system. The scenarios can then be simulated using a Monte-Carlo approach to determine a wide range of system behaviour (outcomes) for each scenario, taking into account component interactions and feedbacks. A component operating states database is presented where the system can be broken down into various levels of detail and the operating states and causal factors for each component can be defined. The Cartesian product of each operating state set is used to derive the full range of potential operating scenarios, with each scenario consisting of a single operating state for every component in the system. The list of scenarios can be used as an input to a simulation model which can then be run many times for each scenario, using Monte-Carlo inputs which vary the timing and severity of events as well as the inflows. The approach for automated scenario generation is demonstrated on a simple and complex representation of a hydropower system and the scenarios are generated and counted. Results show that increasing system complexity results in exponentially increasing numbers of potential operating scenarios, with the simple system having a total of 1.1 × 106 operating states in comparison to the complex system which has 1.83 × 1027. The approach presented in this paper (a) reduces the subjectivity associated with traditional dam safety assessments through automated scenario generation, and (b) improves the ability to understand component interaction and feedbacks by describing a Monte Carlo simulation approach which can be used for scenario simulation. By understanding how the system responds to the full range of potential operating conditions, dam owners and asset managers can make informed decisions relating to the improvement of operating strategies and implementation of system upgrades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2004) Spatial system dynamics: new approach for simulation of water resources systems. J Comput Civ Eng 18:331–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:4(331)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecher G, Ascila R, Hartford DND (2013) Hydropower and dam safety. In: STAMP/STPA Workshop. Cambridge

  • Bahdra A, Bandyopadhyay A, Singh R, Raghuwanshi NS (2015) Development and application of a simulation model for reservoir management. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 20:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah S, Pierce SA, Hamilton SH et al (2017) An overview of the system dynamics process for integrated modelling of socio-ecological systems: lessons on good modelling practice from five case studies. Environ Model Softw 93:127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester J (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. Productivity Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartford DND, Baecher GB (2004) Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. Thomas Telford Limited, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartford DND, Baecher GB, Zielinski PA et al (2016) Operational safety of dams and reservoirs. ICE Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King LM, Keech S, Simonovic SP (2016) An investigation of the factors and components involved in dam safety flow control incidents. J Dam Eng 27:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King LM, Mcleod AI, Simonovic SP (2015) Improved weather generator algorithm for multisite simulation of preceipitation and temperature. J Am Water Resour Assoc 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12307

    Google Scholar 

  • King LM, Simonovic SP, Hartford DND (2017) Using system dynamics simulation for assessment of hydropower system safety. Water Resour Res 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020834

  • Komey A (2014) A systems reliability approach to flow control in dam safety risk analysis. University of Maryland College Park

  • Komey A, Deng Q, Baecher GB et al (2015) Systems reliability of flow control in dam safety. In: 12th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12. Vancouver, Canada, pp 1–8

  • Kotz S, van Dorp JR (2004) The triangular distribution. In: Beyond Beta: other continuous families of distributions with bounded support and applications. World Scientific Publishing Co. Ptc. Ltd., Singapore, pp 1–32

  • Leveson NG (2011) Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Micovic Z, Quick MC (1999) A rainfall and snowmelt runoff modelling approach to flow estimation at ungauged sites in British Columbia. J Hydrol 226:101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPG (2016) Madawaska river risk assessment study technical report. Toronto

  • Python Software Foundation (2012) Functions creating iterators for efficient looping. In: Python Stand. Libr

  • Quick MC (1995) The UBC watershed model. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA

  • Regan PJ (2010) Dams as systems - A holistic approach to dam safety. In: USSD Annual Meeting and Conference. Sacramento, California, pp 1307–1340

  • Simonovic SP (2009) Managing water resources. UNESCO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Arunkumar R (2016) Comparison of static and dynamic resilience for a multipurpose reservoir operation. Water Resour Res 52:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Peck A (2013) Dynamic resilience to climate change caused natural disasters in coastal megacities quantification framework. Br J Environ Clim Chang 3:378–401. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J (2012) Extending and automating a systems- theoretic hazard analysis for requirements generation and analysis. Albuquerque

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Science and Engineering Research Council and BC Hydro for their support of this research through the Collaborative Research and Development Grant. Thanks to Des Hartford and Derek Sakamoto from BC Hydro for their input and guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanna M. King.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King, L.M., Schardong, A. & Simonovic, S.P. A Combinatorial Procedure to Determine the Full Range of Potential Operating Scenarios for a Dam System. Water Resour Manage 33, 1451–1466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2182-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2182-3

Keywords

Navigation