Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban Water Conservation Evaluation Based on Multi-grade Uncertain Comprehensive Evaluation Method

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water is not only the resource of life but also the important resource for a nation survival and development. Nowadays, the water crisis has become one of the most essential factors to restrict urban development. In this case, taking reasonable and effective method for comprehensive evaluation of urban water conservation level is helpful for promoting the construction of water-saving city. The main contribution of this paper is providing a new evaluation method for urban water saving. First, an urban water-saving evaluation index system is built. And the index system takes six water-saving standards including comprehensive water saving, domestic water saving, ecological water saving, industrial water saving, agricultural water saving and social economy as criteria. Then, the water-saving assessment model is proposed based on the Multi-grade Uncertain Comprehensive Evaluation (MUCE) Method. In this method, the important degree and the corresponding remark of each evaluation index are both considered to be uncertain variables due to the human uncertainty. The weights as well as the final evaluation result are obtained according to their uncertainty distributions and the votes of experts. At last, the comprehensive evaluation for water-saving level of Handan City located in North China is studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov V, Genev M (2003) Climate variability and change impact on water resources in Bulgaria. Eur Water 1–2:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T W (1982) Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (2003) The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Supp 3(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelakis A N, Gikas P (2014) Water reuse: overview of current practices and trends in the world with emphasis on EU states. Water Util. J 8:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Li S (2006) Comprehensive assessment of urban water saving level based on AHM. Chin Water Waste Water 22(7):54–56. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Wang H, Yang W (2011) Research on water-saving society construction evaluation based on grey incidence model. Comput Sci Environ Eng Ecoinform 158:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Ma L, Wang C, Zhang H, Ha M (2014) Comprehensive evaluation model for coal mine safety based on uncertain random variables. Safe Sci 68(68):146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng J (1982) Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 1(5):288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Chen S, Karney B (2012) Comprehensive evaluation method of urban water resources utilization based on dynamic reduct. Water Resour Manag 26 (10):2733–2745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser G, Hill M P, Martin J A (2016) Economic evaluation of water loss saving due to the biological control of water hyacinth at New Years Dam, Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Afr J Aqua Sci 41(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gois E H B D, Rios C A S, Costanzi R N (2015) Evaluation of water conservation and reuse: a case study of a shopping mall in southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 96:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Shan L (2009) Water-saving social construction analysis of Yangtze River Basin. Express Water Resour Hydropower 2:12–15. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Su Y (2007) Comprehensive assessment of city water-saving level based on the unascertained measure model. J Water-Saving Irrig 6:7–9. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2007) Uncertain theory, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010) Uncertain theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2011) Uncertain comprehensive evaluation method. J Inf Comput Sci 8 (2):336–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Giurco D, Mukheibir P (2016) Urban water conservation through customised water and end-use information. J Clean Prod 112:3164–3175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimone M, Labiak M (2014) Assessing Nassau Countys water conservation program. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz D, Malik A H (2004) More yield with less water. How efficient can be water conservation in agriculture Eur Water 5–6:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T L (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sušnik J, Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia L S, Savić D A, Kapelan Z (2012) Integrated system dynamics modelling for water scarcity assessment: case study of the Kairouan region. Sci Total Environ 440(3):290–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnacki K (2013) Evaluating industrial water saving and water management options in order to mitigate water stress. Thesis PhD, RWTH Aachen

  • Tsakiris G (2015) The status of the European waters in 2015: a review. Environ Process 2(3):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umapathi S, Chong M N, Sharma A K (2013) Evaluation of plumbed rainwater tanks in households for sustainable water resource management: a real-time monitoring study. J Clean Prod 42(3):204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P (1980) Brief introduction of fuzzy mathematics (I), (II). Math Pract Theory 2(3):45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Liu J, Ning Y, Sha H (2012) Multi-grade uncertain comprehensive evaluation method. Adv Inf Sci Serv Sci 4(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Wang R (2010) Conceptual model used to construct an indicator system for evaluating a city’s water conservation level. Int Conf Manag Serv Sci 1–4

  • Yang H (2013) On comonotonic functions of uncertain variables. Fuzzy Optim Dec Mak 12(1):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Fu Y (2014) Uncertain comprehensive evaluation method based on expected value. J Syst Sci Inf 2(5):461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy Sets Inf Control 8(65):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. G2013402063) and the Foundation of Hebei Education Department (Grant No. ZD2017016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaosheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, X. & Wang, J. Urban Water Conservation Evaluation Based on Multi-grade Uncertain Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Water Resour Manage 32, 417–431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1817-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1817-0

Keywords

Navigation