Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Sediment Budget at a River Basin Scale Using a Process-Based Distributed Modelling Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a process-based distributed modelling approach for estimating sediment budget at a river basin scale with partitions of suspended and bed loads by simulating sediment loads and their interactions. In this approach, a river basin is represented by hillslopes and a network of channels. Hillslopes are divided into an array of homogeneous grid cells for modelling surface runoff and suspended sediments. Channels are defined by incorporating flow hydraulic properties into the respective hillslope grids as sub-grid attributes for modelling both suspended and bed loads. Suspended sediment transport is modelled using one dimensional kinematic wave approximation of Saint-Venant’s principles of conservation of mass and momentum. Transport capacity of runoff or streamflow is used to set the limit of suspended sediment transport rate. Bed load in channels is estimated based on the instantaneous water and hydraulic parameters. Fractional interchange between suspended load and bed load is then back calculated. The performance of the model was evaluated through a case study application in a large river basin in Japan. The model satisfactorily calculated the sediment transport and total sediment budget in the basin. The simulated bed load was found to be reasonable and consistent with the water flow and suspended sediment flux. The results showed the bed load can be expressed as a linear function of the suspended load. The fractions of different sediment loads also exhibit linear relationships with water discharge for the rising and recession limbs of the flood hydrographs. The case study has demonstrated that the process-based distributed modelling approach can efficiently describe the basin-scale sediment budgets with due consideration of the suspended and bed loads and their interactions in the hillslopes and channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams AD, Li G, Krishnan C, Atkinson JF (2001) A sediment transport equation for interrill overland flow on rough surfaces. Earth Surf Process Landf 26(13):1443–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam JA, Dutta D (2012) A process-based and distributed model for nutrient dynamics in a river basin: development, testing and applications. Ecol Model 247:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam JA, Dutta D (2013) Predicting climate change impact on nutrient pollution in waterways: a case study in the upper catchment of the Latrobe River, Australia. Ecohydrology 6:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A, Di Silvio G (1988) A one-dimensional model for the transport of a sediment mixture in non-equilibrium conditions. J Hydraul Res 26(3):275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashida K, Michiue M (1972) Study on hydraulic resistance and bedload transport rate in alluvial streams. JSCE 206:59–69 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashida K, Okumura T (1974) Study on sedimentation in reservoirs. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research, Institute, Kyoto University 17B, 555–570 (in Japanese with English abstract)

  • Asokan S, Dutta D (2008) Analysis of Water Resources in the Mahanadi River Basin, India Under Projected Climate Conditions. Hydrol Process 22:3589–3603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson E (1995) Methods for assessing sediment delivery in river systems. Hydrol Sci J 40(2):273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1980) An Empirical Correlation of Bedload Transport Rates in Flumes and Natural Rivers. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 372(1751):453–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JJ, Buffington JM, King JG (2004) A general power equation for predicting bed load transport rates in gravel bed rivers. Water Resour Res 40(10), W10401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JJ, Buffington JM, Goodwin P, King JG, Emmett WW (2008) Performance of bed-load transport equations relative to geomorphic significance: predicting effective discharge and its transport rate. J Hydraul Eng 134(5):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst JC, Wicks JM, O’Connell PE (1995) The SHE/SHESED basin scale water flow and sediment transport modelling system. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publication, Colorado, pp 563–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS-A model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23:938–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya B, Price RK, Solomatine DP (2007) Machine learning approach to modelling sediment transport. J Hydraul Eng 133(4):440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using gis at catchment scale. Water Resour Manag J 21:1635–1647

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2008) A comparative analysis of sediment yield simulation by SEDD, MUSLE and a process based model in Thailand. Hydrol Sci J 53(6):1253–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Trans ASAE 46(6):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1965) Handbook of applied hydrology, international association of scientific hydrology. Bulletin 10(1):82–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly RD, Carroll C, Francis J, Silburn DM, Simpson B, Freebairn DM (1999) A simulation study of erosion in the Emerald irrigation area. Aus J Soil Res 37:479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duna S, Wua JQ, Elliotb WJ, Robichaudb PR, Flanaganc DC, Frankenbergerc JR, Brownb RE, Xud AC (2009) Adapting the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model for forest applications. J Hydrol 366(1–4):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Nakayama K (2009) Effects of spatial grid resolution on river flow and surface inundation simulation by physically based distributed modeling approach. Hydrol Process 23:534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Das Gupta A, Ramnarong V (1998) Design and Optimisation of a Groundwater Monitoring System. Ground Water Monit Remediat 18:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K (2000) Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically based distributed hydrologic model. Hydrol Process 14:497–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HA (1950) The bed-load function for sediment transportation in open channel flows. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert W (1991) Empirical relations for the sediment transport capacity of interrill flow. Earth Surf Process Landf 16(6):513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen J, Parkin G, O’Connell PE (2000) SHETRAN: distributed River Basin flow and transport modelling system. J Hydrol Eng 5(3):250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V (1998) Evaluating overland flow sediment transport capacity. Hydrol Process 12(12):1895–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Porto P (2000) Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) model. J Hydrol Eng 5(4):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (1995) USDA-Water Environment Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. 10, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette

  • Garcia MH (2008) Sediment transport and morphodynamics, Sedimentation engineering processes, measurements, modelling and practice. In: MH Garcia (eds) ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice. ASCE, New York

  • Govers G (1990) Emprirical relationships on the transporting capacity of overland flow. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 189:45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimann B, Lai Y, Huang J (2008) Two-dimensional total sediment load model equations. J Hydraul Eng 134(8):1142–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, Bhuiyan RR (1999) Evaluation of an interrill soil erosion model using laboratory catchment data. Hydrol Process 13(1):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir A (2011) Process-based distributed modelling of basin scale sediment dynamics. PhD Thesis, Monash University, Australia, 181 pages

  • Kabir MA, Dutta D, Hironaka S (2011a) Process-based distributed modelling approach for analysis of sediment dynamics in a river basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(4):1307–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir MA, Dutta D, Hironaka S (2011b). Evaluation of sediment transport capacity equations using basin-scale process-based modelling approach. Proceedings of the 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Engineers Australia, 1403–1410

  • Kabir MA, Dutta D, Hironaka S, Peng A (2012) Analysis of bed load equations and river bed level variations using basin-scale process-based modelling approach. Water Resour Manag 26:1143–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinouchi T, Musiake K (2008) Simulating hydrological impact of environmental change in the Abukuma watershed. The Proceedings of the 4th APHW Conference (APHW2008), Beijing, China during, 3–5

  • Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems. Conservation Research Report No. 26, USDA, Washington, D.C

  • Low HS (1989) Effect of sediment density on bed-load transport. J Hydraul Eng 115(1):124–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Peter E, Müller R (1948) Formulas for bed-load transport. Paper presented at the 2nd Meeting of the International Association of Hydraulic Structures Research, Madrid

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Rickson RJ (1993) EUROSEM user guide version 3.1. Silsoe College, Cranfield University, Silsoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen WA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME (1998) The European Soil Erosion Model (EU-ROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Proc Landf 23:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process based soil erosion model for USDA water erosion prediction project technology. Trans ASAE 32(5):1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2002) Soil and water assessment tool user’s manual version 2000. GSWRL Report 02–02; BRC Report 02–06; TR-192, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas

  • Nord G, Esteves M, Lapetite J, Hauet A (2009) Effect of particle density and inflow concentration of suspended sediment on bedload transport in rill flow. Earth Surf Proc Landf 34:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi T (1997) Late Quaternary sediment budget in alluvial-fan–source-basin systems in Japan. J Quat Sci 12:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmori H (1991) Change in the mathematical function type describing the longitudinal profile of a river through an evolutionary process. J Geol 99:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oka T, Miura S, Masaki T, Suzuki W, Osumi K, Saitoh S (2004) Relationship between Changes in Beechnut Production and Asiatic Black Bears in Northern Japan. J Wildl Manag 68(4):979–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens P (2005) Conceptual models and budgets for sediment management at the river basin scale. J Soils Sediments 5(4):201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (1990) Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers. J Hydraul Res 28(4):417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser IP, Rustomji P, Young B, Moran C, Hughes A (2001a) Constructing river basin sediment budgets for the National Land and Water Resources Audit. Technical Report 15/01. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra

  • Prosser I, Young W, Rustomji P, Hughes A, Moran C (2001b) A model of river sediment budgets as an element of river health assessment. MODSIM 2001—International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2001, Canberra, Australia

  • Raven EK, Lane SN, Bracken LJ (2010) Understanding sediment transfer and morphological change for managing upland gravel-bed rivers. Prog Phys Geogr 34(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spasojevic M, Holly JFM (1990) 2-D bed evolution in natural watercourses-new simulation approach. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 116(4):425–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott T, Mount N (2004) Plantation forestry impacts on sediment yields and downstream channel dynamics in the UK: a review. Prog Phys Geogr 28(2):197–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda T, Hishinuma T, Oguma C, Takiguchi R (2001) Fukushima—today & tomorrow. Rekishi Shunju Publishing Co., Aizu-Wakamatsu City. ISBN 4-89757-432-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Sfalaga M, Del Sette M (1987) Splash detachment: runoff depth and soil cohesion. Catena 14:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turowski JM, Rickenmann D, Dadson SJ (2010) The partitioning of the total sediment load of a river into suspended load and bedload: a review of empirical data. Sedimentology 57(4):1126–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanoni VA (1975) Sedimentation Engineering, Manual and Report No. 54. ASCE, New York

  • Walling DE, Collins AL (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Pol 11(2):136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock PR, Crowe JC (2003) Surface-based Transport Model for Mixed-Size Sediment. J Hydraul Eng 129(2):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock PR, Pitlick J, Cui Y (2009) Sediment transport primer: estimating bed-material transport in gravel-bed rivers. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-226. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 64.

  • Wu W (2004) Depth-averaged two-dimensional numerical modelling of unsteady flow and nonuniform sediment transport in open channels. J Hydraul Eng 130(1):1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Rodi W, Wenka T (2000) 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in open channels. J Hydraul Eng 126(1):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS (1963) An expression for bedload transportation. J Hydraul Div ASCE 89:221–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeganeh-Bakhtiary A, Shabani B, Gotoh H, Wang SSY (2009) A three-dimensional distinct element model for bed-load transport. J Hydraul Res 47:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorozuya A, Shintaku S, Ejima K, Fukami K, Kanazawa H (2009) Development of a sediment discharge measurement system with ADCP. FLUCOME 2009, 10th International Conference on Fluid Control, Measurements, and Visualization, Moscow, Russia

  • Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1987) AGNPS, Agricultural nonpoint-source pollution model: a watershed analytical tool. Conservation Research Report No. 35. Washington, D.C.: USDA

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is funded by NEWJEC Inc., Japan and the small grant scheme of Monash University Gippsland Campus. The data for modelling in the Abukuma Basin was provided by NEWJEC Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dushmanta Dutta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabir, M.A., Dutta, D. & Hironaka, S. Estimating Sediment Budget at a River Basin Scale Using a Process-Based Distributed Modelling Approach. Water Resour Manage 28, 4143–4160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0734-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0734-8

Keywords

Navigation