Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Water Policies for Sustainable Irrigation Management: The Case of India and Australia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analysis of irrigation related issues and effectiveness of water policies in India and Australia is conducted to help share the learning from each other’s experience in sustainable irrigation management. Keeping in pace with the global trend of implementing a sustainable water management program, India has adopted the concept of participatory irrigation management (PIM) while Australia has adopted irrigation management transfer (IMT) program. PIM in India is regarded as experimentation in diverse socio-economic settings with mixed results while IMT in Australia has achieved a high level of water use efficiency. Australian irrigation industry is currently driven by market mechanisms where water trading is expected to lead to greater efficiency. However, there are concerns that sole reliance on water use (or economic) efficiency objective may conflict with the objectives of social equity and ecological sustainability. Similar to Australia, there is an opportunity for water markets in India. However, conflict in the objectives of efficiency, equity and sustainability constrain the debate of establishing water markets in India. The comparative analysis indicates that despite both countries have a common goal of sustainable water management, their strategies differ. Nevertheless, India can emulate many of the Australian experiences in water policy reforms, entitlements, institutional arrangements, and corporate style of management while Australia can adopt the best Indian traditions of decentralized participatory and community management for sustainable irrigation water management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2005) Experimental estimates of regional water use, Australia, 2004–2005, catalogue 4610.0.55.002. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2007) Ground water management and ownership- report of the expert group. Government of India, Planning Commission, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2010). Pricing of water in public system in India, Information Systems Organization, Water Planning and Projects Wing Central Water Commission. Government of India, New Delhi

  • Anonymous (2011a) IWRM challenges in developing countries: lessons from India and elsewhere, Water Policy Briefing, International Water Management Institute. Issue 24. www.iwmi.cgiar.org/publications/Water_Policy_Briefs/PDF/WPB24.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2011

  • Anonymous (2011b) Farm-dam-management-case-study. http://npsi.gov.au. Accessed 22 December 2013

  • Anonymous (2012a) Surface water and groundwater interaction. http://www.water.gov.au. Accessed 12 September 2013

  • Anonymous (2012b) Land & water Australia. 2008. Farm dam management. [Online](Updated March 9th, 2010). Available at: http://lwa.gov.au/node/2640 [Accessed 24 September 2012]

  • Anonymous (2013a) Union Budget and economic survey 2013–14, Government of India

  • Anonymous (2013b) Report of the committee for drafting of national water framework law. Ministry of water resources, Government of India, New Delhi

  • Anonymous (2013c) Economic value of groundwater in Australia national centre for groundwater research and training. Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd

  • Bauer CJ (1997) Bringing water markets down to earth: the political economy of water rights in Chile, 1976–95. World Dev 25(5):639–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy JA, Johnson A (2000) Integrated resource management: moving from rhetoric to practice in Australian agriculture. Environ Manag 25(3):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy J, Ross H, Ewing S, Meppem T (2002) Integrated catchment management: learning from the Australian experience for the Murray-Darling Basin. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia B (1992) Lush fields and parched throats: political economy of groundwater in Gujarat. Econ Polit Wkly 27:51–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjornlund H (2003) Efficient water market mechanisms to cope with water scarcity. Int J Water Resour Dev 19(4):553–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrawal P (2010) Business opportunities in micro irrigation systems in India. Financ Agric 35(3):31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Challen R (2001) Economic analysis of alternative institutional structures for governance of water use. water policy reform: lessons from Asia and Australia: proceedings of International Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand 8–9 June 2001, (Editor: Donna Brennan)

  • CoAG. (2004) National water initiative: intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative between the Commonwealth of Australia and the Governments of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. Canberra: Council of Australian Government

  • Crase L, O’Reilly L, Dollery B (2000) Water markets as a vehicle for water reform: the case of New South Wales. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 44(2):299–321

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2008) Water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. Summary of a report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO, Australia, 12pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen P (2006) Flying blind—the disconnect between groundwater and policy, Paper presented to the 10th Murray-Darling Basin Groundwater Workshop. Canberra. 19 Sept 2006

  • Dhawan BD (1995) Groundwater depletion, land degradation, and irrigated agriculture in India. Commonwealth Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmahdi A, Shi T (2010) Efficient water allocation for sustainable irrigation development—a system dynamics modelling approach. In: Briggs AC (ed) Water shortage: social. Economic and Environmental Impacts. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy KD, Poddar RS, Hugar LB, Biradar DP (2008) A probe into status and progress of participatory irrigation management in upper Krishna project area—an economic perspectve. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad

  • Gandhi VP, Namboodir NV (2009) Groundwater irrigation in India: gains, costs and risks. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, No. 2009-03-08 pp38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi VP, Vaibhav B (2011) Groundwater irrigation in India Growth, challenges, and risks. http://www.idfc.com/pdf/report/2011/Chp-7-Groundwater-Irrigation-in-India-Growth-Challe.pdf.Accessed 22 July2013

  • Gang L, Felmingham B (2002) The technical efficiency of Australian irrigation schemes. http://www.utas.edu.au/ecofin/Library/discussion_papers/papers_02/2002-08.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2008

  • Goesch T, Heaney A (2003) government purchase of water for environmental outcomes, ABARE eReport 03.22 Prepared for the natural resource management business unit of the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

  • Government of India (GOI) (1999) Ninth five year plan 1997–2002 Vol. I and II. Planning Commission, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI) (2002) National Water Policy. Ministry of Water Resources, New Delhi

  • Government of India (GOI) (2006a) Some aspects of operational land holdings in India, 2002–03, report No. 492. National sample survey organization, ministry of statistics and programme implementation. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI) (2006b) Report of the working group on water resources For the XI the Five Year Plan (2007–2012). Ministry of Water Resources, New Delhi

  • Government of India (GOI) (2013) Status of participatory irrigation management (PIM) in India- policy initiatives taken and emerging issues. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Ruth M-D, Raju KV (1999) From Top down to bottoms Up: institutional reforms in Indian canal irrigation. Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris E (2011) The impact of institutional path dependence on water market efficiency in Victoria, Australia. Water Resour Manag 25(15):4069–4080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenifer MA, Arul C (2012) Groundwater management–a policy perspective. International Science Index 62. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 62:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Jairath J (2000) Participatory irrigation management in Andhra Pradesh—contradictions of a supply side approach. Paper presented in South Asia Regional Poverty Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop, New Delhi, June 8–10, 2000

  • Kumar DM, Singh OP (2001) Market instruments for demand management in the face of scarcity and overuse of water in Gujarat, western India. Water Policy 3(5):387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar AN, Poddar RS (2013) Economic evaluation of micro irrigation programme in Bijapur District. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India

  • Mapson J, Poulton D (2001) IMT country profiles: Australia: INPIM-International Email Conference on Irrigation Management Transfer

  • Mariño M, Simonavic S (2001) Integrated water resource management. IAHSPublication, Oxford, 272

    Google Scholar 

  • Moench M (1992) Drawing down the buffer. Econ Polit Wkly 27(13):A7–A14

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty N, Gupta S (2002) Breaking the Gridlock in water reforms through water markets: international experience and implementation Issues for India. Working Paper Series, Julian L. Simon Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi

  • Nathan R, Lowe L, Merz SK (2012) Discussion paper: the hydrologic impacts of farm Dams. http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au. Accessed 24 September 2012

  • National Water Commission (2012b). http://www.nwc.gov.au/groundwater Accessed 19 September 2012

  • Navaneeth BS, Poddar RS, Kunnal LB, Hugar LB, Biradar DP (2008) Performance of minor irrigation in Krishna basin of Karnataka—an economic analysis. Karnataka J Agric Sci 21:532–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddar RS, Hiremath GK, Basavaraja H (2000) Participatory approach for small scale irrigation development –a case study of chikkapadasalagi barrage in Karnataka. Indian. Indian J Soc Dev 1(1):93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddar R, Qureshi ME, Syme G (2009) Comparing irrigation management reforms in Australia and India—a special reference to participatory irrigation management. Int J Irrig Drain 58:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Shi T, Qureshi SE, Proctor W (2009) Removing the barriers to facilitate efficient water markets in the Murray Darling Basin of Australia. Agric Water Manag 96(11):1641–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Schwabe K, Connor J, Kirby M (2010) Environmental water incentive policy and return flow. Water Resour Res 46, W04517. doi:10.1029/2008WR007445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Reeson A, Reinelt P, Brozović N, Whitten S (2012) Factors determining the economic value of groundwater. Special Issue: Economics of groundwater management. Hydrogeol J 20:821–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Hanjra M, Ward J (2013) Impact of water scarcity in Australia on global food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 38:136–145. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi ME, Whitten, S, Franklin B (2014) Impacts of climate variability on the irrigation sector in the southern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Water Resources and Economics, doi:10.1016/j.wre.2013.12.001

  • Ray I (2002) Farm level incentives for irrigation efficiency: some lessons from an Indian canal. Water Resour Updat 121:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Samad M (2005) Institutions for agricultural water management in Water Scarce River Basins in Asia: lessons from five case studies, training Workshop in River Basin Management and Organizations for Mid Career Water Professionals from South Asia, 25–29 April, 2005, Sri Lanka

  • Sampath A, Kedarnath B, Ramanujam C, Haidery H, Rao R, Arunachalam R, Govindaraju S, Thirumalavan V, Jeet V (2008) Water privatization and implications in India. Association for India’s Development, Austin, http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/aidaustin/water/water_privatization.pdf. Accessed 25 July2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T (2012) India’s Ground water irrigation economy: the challenge of balancing livelihoods and environment. International Water Management Institute, India, http://cgwb.gov.in/documents/papers/incidpapers/Paper%203-%20Tushaar%20Shah.pdf. Accessed 25 July2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T, Giordano M, Mukherji, A (2012) political economy of energy-groundwater Nexus in India: Exploring Issues and Assessing Policy Options, Hydrogeol J (Forthcoming).

  • Shi T (2006) Simplifying complexity: rationalising water entitlements in the southern connected river Murray system, Australia. Agric Water Manag 38(3):229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi T (2010) Commentary: sequence of policy objectives matters in sustainable water management. In: Briggs AC (ed) Water shortage: social. Economic and Environmental Impacts. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 235–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi T, Meyer W (2009) Moving towards a policy proactive irrigation sector: some Australian experiences. Water Policy 11(6):763–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Sikka AK, Upadhyaya A, Bhatnagar PR, Dhanphule S, Singh MK, Singh SR (2008) Scientific perceptions and community responses in a participatory water management endeavor. Water Resour Manag 22(9):1173–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakkar H (1999) Assessment of Irrigation in India, South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People, India, Prepared for Thematic Review IV.2: Assessment of Irrigation Options. http://www.dams.orgAccessed 27 July2008

  • The Council of Australian Governments’ Water Reform Framework (1994) http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6caa5879-8ebc-46ab-8f97-4219b8ffdd98/files/policyframework.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  • Thomas J, Adams P, Dixon P, Hall N (1999) Water and the Australian economy, a joint study project of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering and the Institution of Engineers, Australia. http://www.atse.org.au. Accessed 10 April 2008

  • Tisdell JG, Ward JR (2003) Attitudes toward water markets: an Australian case study. Soc Nat Resour 16:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell J, Ward J, Grudzinski T (2002) The development of water reform in Australia. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Turral H, Fullagar I (2007) Institutional directions in groundwater management in Australia. In: Giordano M, Villholth KG (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CAB International, London, Accessed on 19.09.2012 from http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk A, Evans R, Hairsine P, Khan S, Nathan R, Paydar Z, Viney N, Zhang L (2006) Risks to the shared water resources of the Murray-darling basin, CSIRO technical report. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermillion DL (1997) Management devolution and the sustainability of irrigation: results of comprehensive versus partial strategies. http://www.wca-infonet.org Accessed 10 July2008

  • Vermillion, DL (2006) Irrigation sector reform in Asia: from patronage under participation to empowerment with partnership. In: Shivakoti G, Vermillion D, Ostrom E, Yoder R, Lam WF, Pradhan U (eds) Asian irrigation in transition. Sage Publications, New Delhi

  • Vuren GV, Mastenbroek A (2000) Management types in irrigation a world-wide inventory per Country, World Bank Report

  • William EK, Liu Y (2005) Cost recovery and water pricing for irrigation and drainage projects, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper No. 26, World Bank

Download references

Acknowledgement

The first author wishes to acknowledge the support provided by the Australian Endeavour Fellowship Program 2008 and CSIRO Water for Healthy Country Regional Water Theme. Comments and suggestions provided by Drs. John Ward and Mac Kirby are acknowledged. Any errors and omissions remain authors’ responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, India

    Rajendra Poddar

  2. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Black Mountain & Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, Canberra, Australia

    M. Ejaz Qureshi

  3. ACIAR, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    M. Ejaz Qureshi

  4. PIRSA Agribusiness and Regions, GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia

    Tian Shi

Authors
  1. Rajendra Poddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Ejaz Qureshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tian Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ejaz Qureshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poddar, R., Qureshi, M.E. & Shi, T. A Comparison of Water Policies for Sustainable Irrigation Management: The Case of India and Australia. Water Resour Manage 28, 1079–1094 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0535-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0535-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation