Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Monte Carlo Simulation Technique to Design Flood Estimation: A Case Study for North Johnstone River in Queensland, Australia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional rainfall-runoff modelling based on the Design Event Approach has some serious limitations as this ignores the probabilistic nature of the key flood producing variables in the modelling except for rainfall depth. A more holistic approach of design flood estimation such as the Joint Probability Approach/Monte Carlo simulation can overcome some of the limitations associated with the Design Event Approach. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is based on the principle that flood producing variables are random variables instead of fixed values. This allows accounting for the inherent variability in the flood producing variables in the rainfall-runoff modelling. This paper applies the Monte Carlo simulation technique and hydrologic model URBS to a large catchment with multiple pluviograph and stream gauging stations. It has been found that it is quite feasible to apply the Monte Carlo simulation technique to large catchments. The Monte Carlo simulation technique has much greater flexibility than the Design Event approach and can provide more realistic design flood estimates with multiple scenarios, which is likely to replace the Design Event Approach. The method developed here can be applied to other catchments in Australia and other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolverdi J, Khalili D (2010) Development of regional rainfall annual maxima for Southwestern Iran by L-Moments. Water Resources Management 24(11):2501–2526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronica GT, Candela A (2007) Derivation of flood frequency curves in poorly gauged Mediterranean catchments using a simple stochastic hydrological rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 347(1–2):132–142. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.011

  • Bureau of Meteorology (2012) State of the climate 2012 report. Prepared jointly by the CSIRO and BOM, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero WL, Taylor M, Rahman A, Shrestha S (2011) Regionalisation of intensity-frequency-duration data: A case study for New South Wales. The 19th international congress on modelling and simulation, 12–16 Dec 2011, Perth, pp 3775–3781

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero W, Rahman A (2013) Development of regionalized joint probability approach to flood estimation: A case study for New South Wales, Australia, Hydrological Processes (In press).

  • Cecilia S, Kjeldsen TR, Jones DA (2011) Flood frequency estimation using a joint probability method. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 13, EGU2011-7442, EGU General Assembly.

  • Chen J, Guo S, Li Y, Liu P, Zhou Y (2013) Joint operation and dynamic control of flood limiting water levels for cascade reservoirs. Water Resources Management 27(3):749–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Granados MA, Valdes JB, Bras RL (1984) A physically based flood frequency distribution. Water Resour Res 20(7):995–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson PS (1972) Dynamics of flood frequency. Water Resour Res 8(4):878–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia A, Iacobellis V, Manfreda S, Fiorentino M (2008) Runoff thresholds in derived flood frequency distributions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12:1295–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giola A, Iacobellis V, Manfreda S, Fiorentina M (2011) Influence of soil parameters on the skewness coefficient of the annual maximum flood peaks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. doi:10.5194/hessd-8-1-2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberlandt, Ebner U, von Eschenbach AD, Buchwald I (2008) A space-time hybrid hourly rainfall model for derived flood frequency analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12:1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad K, Rahman A (2012) Regional flood frequency analysis in eastern Australia: Bayesian GLS regression-based methods within fixed region and ROI framework—Quantile Regression vs. Parameter Regression Technique. J Hydrol 430–431(2012):142–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad K, Rahman A, Stedinger JR (2012) Regional flood frequency analysis using bayesian generalized least squares: A comparison between Quantile and parameter regression techniques. Hydrol Process 25:1–14. doi:10.1002/hyp.8189

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad K, Rahman A (2011) Regionalization of storm duration for determining derived flood frequency curve: A case study for Victoria in Australia. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 8(3):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneker TM, Lamert MF, Kuczera G (2002) Overcoming the joint probability associated with initial loss estimation in design flood estimation. Hydrology and water resources symposium. Engineers Australia, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill PI, Mein RG (1996) Incompatibilities between storm temporal patterns and losses for design flood estimation, 2nd edn. Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium 1996, Hobart, pp 445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang T, Rahman A, Weinmann PE, Laurenson EM, Nathan RJ (1999) Joint probability descriptions of design rainfalls, study presented at the international hydrology and water resources symposium of the I.E. Aust. 2nd International Conference on Water Resources and Environmental Research, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Hromadka TV (1996) Rainfall—Runoff probabilistic simulation program: 1 synthetic data generation. Environ Softw 11(4):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobellis V, Gioia A, Manfreda S, Fiorentino M (2011) Flood quantiles estimation based on theoretically derived distributions: Regional analysis in Southern Italy. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 11:673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IE Aust (1987) Australian rainfall and runoff—A guide to flood estimation. Engineers Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen TR, Svensson C, Jones DA (2010) A joint probability to flood frequency estimation using Monte Carlo simulation. Proceedings of the BHS Third International Symposium, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera G, Lambert MF, Heneker TM, Jennings S, Frost A, Coombes P (2006) Joint probability and design storms at the Crossroads. Australian Journal of Water Resources 10(1):63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohkas A, Quick MC, Russell SO (1996) A physically based stochastic-deterministic procedure for the estimation of flood frequency. Water Resources Management 10(6):415–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveridge M, Rahman A (2012) Probabilistic losses for design flood estimation: a case study in New South Wales, Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium. Engineers Australia, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirfenderesk H, Carroll D, Chong E, Rahman M, Kabir M, Van Doorn R, Vis S (2013) Comparison between design event and joint probability hydrological modelling. Flood Management Association National Conference, Tweed Heads

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzik I (2002) A first-order analysis of the climate change effect on flood frequencies in a subalpine watershed by means of a hydrological rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 267:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Weinmann PE, Hill P (2003) Use of Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the expected probability of large to extreme floods, 28th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium. Wollongong 1:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, Weinmann PE (2013) Australian rainfall and runoff discussion paper: Monte Carlo simulation techniques, Australian Rainfall and Runoff Discussion Paper, May 2013. Engineers Australia

  • NCWE (2013) Australian rainfall and runoff revision projects, National Committee on Water Engineering, Engineers Australia, http://www.ncwe.org.au/arr/index.html.

  • PWC (2011). Economic impact of Queensland’s natural disasters. Price Waterhouse Cooper, http://www.pwc.com.au/about-us/flood-support/assets/Economic-Impact-Qld-Natural-Disasters.pdf

  • Rahman A, Hoang TMT, Weinmann PE, Laurenson EM (1998) Joint probability approaches to design flood estimation: A review. CRC for Catchment Hydrology Report 98/8, Monash University, p. 77.

  • Rahman A, Weinmann PE, Hoang TMT, Laurenson EM (2002a) Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall. J Hydrol 256(3–4):196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A, Weinmann PE, Mein RG (2002b) The use of probability-distributed initial losses in design flood estimation. Australian Journal of Water Resources 6(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A, Carroll D, Wienmann PE (2002c) Integration of Monte Carlo simulation technique with URBS model for design flood estimation. Twenty-seventh (27th) National Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, I.E. Aust, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A, Carroll D (2004) Appropriate spatial variability of flood producing variables in the joint probability approach to design flood estimation. In Proc. British Hydrological Society Intl. Conference. Imperial College London 1:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MJ, Ganguli P (2012) Bivariate flood frequency analysis of upper Godavari River Flows using Archimedean copulas. Water Resources Management 26(14):3995–4018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell SO, Kenning BFI, Sunnell GJ (1979) Estimating design flows for urban drainage. J Hydraul Div 105:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson C, Kjeldsen TR, Jones DA (2013) Flood frequency estimation using a joint probability approach within a Monte Carlo framework. Hydrol Sci J 58(1):8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Beven KJ, Wood EF (1990) On hydrologic similarity, 3, A dimensionless flood frequency model using a Generalised geomorphic unit hydrograph and partial area runoff generation. Water Resour Res 26(1):43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih K, Hill P, Nathan R (2012) Joint probability model for the Nerang River catchment stage II. Report prepared for the Gold Coast City Council by SKM, Melbourne

  • Siriwardena L, Weinmann PE (1996) Derivation of areal reduction factors for design rainfalls in Victoria. Report 96/4, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, p. 60.

  • URBS (2013). URBS hydrologic model. http://members.optusnet.com.au/~doncarroll/contact.htm.

  • Viglione A, Bloschl G (2009) On the role of storm duration in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinmann PE, Rahman A, Hoang T, Laurenson EM, Nathan RJ (1998) A new modelling framework for design flood estimation. Proc. Intl. Symp. On Stormwater Management, 27–30 Sep, Adelaide, 1, 393–398

  • Weinmann PE, Rahman A, Hoang T, Laurenson EM, Nathan RJ (2002) Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall—the way ahead. Australian Journal of Water Resources 6(1):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria ZA, Shabri A, Ahmad UN (2012) Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfalls in the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia using partial L-Moments. Water Resources Management 26(15):4417–4433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman M, Rahman A, Haddad K (2012) Regional flood frequency analysis in arid regions: A case study for Australia. J Hydrol 475:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ataur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charalambous, J., Rahman, A. & Carroll, D. Application of Monte Carlo Simulation Technique to Design Flood Estimation: A Case Study for North Johnstone River in Queensland, Australia. Water Resour Manage 27, 4099–4111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0398-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0398-9

Keywords

Navigation