Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical Distribution of Streambed Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity along the Platte River, Nebraska

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity (K v ) plays an important role in understanding and quantifying the stream–aquifer interactions. While several researchers have discussed the spatial variability of streambed horizontal hydraulic conductivity or K v at one or several close-located sites in a river, they did not develop any statistical distribution analysis of streambed K v at distant sites along a large river. In this paper, the statistical distribution and spatial variation of streambed K v at 18 test sites in a 300-km reach of the Platte River in Nebraska are presented. In-situ permeameter tests using the falling-head method were carried out to calculate the streambed K v values. Fine-grained sediments transported by two tributaries, the Loup River and the Elkhorn River, to the Platte River appear to result in lower streambed K v values downstream of the confluences between the Platte River and the tributaries. The streambed K v values were found to be normally distributed at nearly each test site. When the correlated K v values were eliminated from the grid sampling plots, the remaining independent sub-datasets of streambed K v values were still in normal distribution at each test site. Furthermore, the combined streambed K v values upstream of the first confluence between the Platte River and the Loup River was normally distributed, which may be due to the lack of tributaries in-between and thus streambed sediments were well distributed in this reach and belonged to a single population of hydraulic conductivity values. In contrast, the combined dataset of all measurements conducted downstream of this confluence was no longer in normal distribution, presumably as a result of the mixing of different sediment sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjerg PL, Hinsby K, Christense TH, Gravesen P (1992) Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined aquifer determined by a mini slug test. J Hydrol 136:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas MB, Zlotnik VA (2003) Three-dimensional model of modern channel bend deposits. Water Resour Res 39:1441. doi:10.1029/2002WR001383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH (2000) Measurement of streambed hydraulic conductivity and its anisotropy. Environ Geol 39(12):1317–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH (2004) Streambed hydraulic conductivity for rivers in south-central Nebraska. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(3):561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH (2005) Statistical and geostatistical features of streambed hydraulic conductivities in the Platte River, Nebraska. Environ Geol 48(6):693–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH (2007) Hydrologic connections of a stream-aquifer-vegetation zone in south-central Platte River valley, Nebraska. J Hydrol 333:554–568. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Shu L (2002) Stream-aquifer interactions: evaluation of depletion volume and residual effects from ground water pumping. Ground Water 40(3):284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Burbach M, Cheng C (2008) Electrical and hydraulic vertical variability in channel sediments and its effects on streamflow depletion due to groundwater extraction. J Hydrol 352(3–4):250–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Song J, Cheng C, Wang D, Lackey SO (2009) A new method for mapping variability in vertical seepage flux in streambeds. Hydrogeol J 17(3):519–525. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0384-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Chen XH (2007) Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer-aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river. Hydrogeol J 15:669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA (1975) A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in a nonuniform homogeneous media. Water Resour Res 11(5):725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frings RM (2008) Downstream fining in large sand-bed rivers. Earth-Sci Rev 87:39–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genereux DP, Leahy S, Mitasova H, Kennedy CD, Corbett DR (2008) Spatial and temporal variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity in West Bear creek, North Carolina, USA. J Hydrol 358:332–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami D, Kalita PK, Mehnert E (2010) Modeling and simulation of baseflow to drainage ditches during low-flow periods. Water Resour Manag 24:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess KM, Wolf SH, Celia MA (1992) Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersitivities. Water Resour Res 28(8):2011–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey TB, Bluck BJ (1999) Identifying the controls over downstream fining of river gravels. J Sediment Res 69(1):40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntzinger TL, Ellis MJ (1993) Central Nebraska river basins, Nebraska. J Am Water Resour Assoc 29(4):533–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin 36:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2006) Measuring methods for groundwater, surface water and their interactions: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:873–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbus E, Schmidt C, Molson JW, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2009) Influence of aquifer and streambed heterogeneity on the distribution of groundwater discharge. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly SE, Murdoch LC (2003) Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of shallow submerged sediments. Ground Water 41(4):431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy CD, Genereux DP, Corbett DR, Mitasova H (2009) Spatial and temporal dynamics of coupled groundwater and nitrogen fluxes through a streambed in an agricultural watershed. Water Resour Res 45:W09401 doi:10.1029/2008WR007397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon MK, Rus DL, Harvey FE (2001) Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds. Ground Water 39(6):870–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leek R, Wu JQ, Wang L, Hanrahan TP, Barber ME, Qiu H (2009) Heterogeneous characteristics of streambed saturated hydraulic conductivity of the Touchet River, south eastern Washington, USA. Hydrol Process 23:1236–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason JA (2001) Transport direction of Peoria loess in Nebraska and implications for loess sources on the central Great Plains. Quat Res 56:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhs DR (2004) Mineralogical maturity in dunefields of North America, Africa and Australia. Geomorphology 59:247–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt KR, Boggs JM, Gelhar LW (1992) Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer 3. Geostatistical analysis of hydraulic conductivity. Water Resour Res 28(12):3309–3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice S (1998) Which tributaries disrupt downstream fining along gravel-bed rivers? Geomorphology 22:39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice S, Church M (1998) Grain size along two gravel-bed rivers: statistical variation, spatial pattern and sedimentary links. Earth Surf Processes Landf 23:345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RJ, Boufadel MC (2007) Evaluation of streambed hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity in an urban watershed. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehin M, Packman AI, Paradis M (2004) Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneoys streambeds: laboratory experiments and modeling. Water Resour Res 40:W11504. doi:10.1029/2003WR002567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MB (2008) Downstream patterns of bed material grain size in a large, lowland alluvial river subject to low sediment supply. Water Resour Res 44:W12202. doi:10.1029/2008WR007183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Chen XH, Cheng C, Summerside S, Wen F (2007) Effects of hyporheic processes on streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity in three rivers of Nebraska. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07409. doi:1029/2007GL029254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Chen XH, Cheng C, Wang D, Lackey S, Xu Z (2009) Feasibility of grain-size analysis methods for determination of vertical hydraulic conductivity of streambeds. J Hydrol 375(3–4):428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous MA, Koussis AD, Martin JL, Perkins SP (1995) Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Ground Water 33(4):579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprent P (2001) Applied nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer AE, Petroutson WD, Semmens BA (1999) Spatial and temporal variability of hydraulic conductivity in active reattachment bars of the Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Ground Water 37(3):338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudicky EA (1986) A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process. Water Resour Res 22(13):2069–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Zhan H (2007) Pumping induced depletion from two streams. Adv Water Resour 30:1016–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surian N (2002) Downstream variation in grain size along an Alpine river: analysis of controls and processes. Geomorphology 34:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury AD, Sudicky EA (1991) The geostatistical characteristics of the Borden aquifer. Water Resour Res 27(4):533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Shao M, Wang T (2010) Spatial distributions of soil surface-layer saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors on dam farmlands. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9550-y

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583-0996, USA

    Cheng Cheng, Jinxi Song, Xunhong Chen & Deming Wang

  2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710127, China

    Jinxi Song

Authors
  1. Cheng Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinxi Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xunhong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deming Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xunhong Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, C., Song, J., Chen, X. et al. Statistical Distribution of Streambed Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity along the Platte River, Nebraska. Water Resour Manage 25, 265–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9698-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9698-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation